
ALT Gray background with crimson text: Roe v Wade Research Spotlight. White boxes with crimson text: Article: Examining the relationship between Roe v. Wade knowledge and sentiment across political party and abortion identity; Authored by: Drs. Brandon L. Crawford, Kristen N. Jozkowski, Ronna C. Turner & Wen-Juo Lo; Findings: Research assessing people’s knowledge and sentiment toward Roe v. Wade is limited. As such, we assessed the relationship between knowledge and sentiment regarding Roe v. Wade and whether the relationship is moderated by political affiliation and abortion identity (e.g., “pro-life,” “pro-choice”). Roe v. Wade knowledge is associated with sentiment; this relationship is moderated by political affiliation and abortion identity. People in subgroups without a clear stance on abortion (e.g., Independents; people who identify as neither or both “pro-life” and “pro-choice”) seem to hold sentiments similar to those more supportive of abortion (e.g., Democrats, “pro-choice”)

ALT Screenshot from an article that says: "In 2018, following government policy changes to Australia’s national electronic health record system, ‘My Health Record’, consumer advocates—including organisations representing people living with HIV, people who use drugs and sex workers—raised concerns about privacy and data security. Responding to these controversies, this study explores the practical, ethical and political complexities of engaging stigmatised communities with digital health systems."




























