Shell Shock !🔞! (@ShellShock_Mk1) header
Shell Shock !🔞! (@ShellShock_Mk1) profile picture

Certified silly thicc floofer / 21 / does renders and thicc model edits sometimes I do a model and blender doesn’t like me :P Bi & taken LGBTQIA+ welcome

Somewhere in the UK
Joined September 2021
Photo by Shell Shock !🔞! (@ShellShock_Mk1)Photo by Shell Shock !🔞! (@ShellShock_Mk1)Photo by Shell Shock !🔞! (@ShellShock_Mk1)Photo by Shell Shock !🔞! (@ShellShock_Mk1)Photo by Shell Shock !🔞! (@ShellShock_Mk1)Photo by Shell Shock !🔞! (@ShellShock_Mk1)Photo by Shell Shock !🔞! (@ShellShock_Mk1)Photo by Shell Shock !🔞! (@ShellShock_Mk1)Photo by Shell Shock !🔞! (@ShellShock_Mk1)Photo by Shell Shock !🔞! (@ShellShock_Mk1)
Shell Shock !🔞! retweeted
The fact that the Epstein class was revealed to have killed, raped, and eaten children and babies and it DIDN’T stop the world dead in it’s tracks and create a sense of urgency to remove the current administration is beyond me.
327
13,940
110
93,079
781,599
I’ve been working on this video for a while. It’s been an important project to me. It’s longer but has a very important message I’ve been meaning to say for this fandom but have been struggling on how to say it.
36
101
7
724
22,749
What consenting adults do in their own bedrooms is of no concern of yours, nor is it the concern of the state. The fact that this law was allowed to pass with little to no scrutiny, and the fact that you are still employed as an MP, boggles the mind. Resign.
Replying to @CobaltCherry
Hi there, as the person who introduced the amendments which led to this ban, I can tell you that the law already bans non-fatal strangulation and attempted suffocation. Consent can be a defence in situations where there is not serious harm but is for the defendant to prove.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
In the UK, defendants in a case are innocent till proven guilty. Therefore, is it not for the defendant to prove their innocence but rather the prosecution to prove the defendants guilt. google.com/url?opi=899784…
2
36
371
3,014
Shell Shock !🔞! retweeted
“Hi, the shit wording in your law means technically even kissing is illegal and can get you put on the registry” ‘A court can deal with that when you get arrested lol’ These people are running the country btw
Replying to @CobaltCherry
That is exactly what should be left to courts and experts to prove. All legislation requires interpretation alongside the facts of the case and the intention of the law. This is designed to ensure that harmful practices are discouraged.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
It is the responsibility of elected MPs to make clear, precise laws, not pass vague legislation and leave judges to fill in the gaps while people's lives, liberty and futures hang in the balance. parliament.uk/about/how/role/ supremecourt.uk/cases/judgment…
22
782
1
9,316
70,117
Shell Shock !🔞! retweeted
I would like to make mention that the act of CPR requires pinching the recipient's nose and placing your mouth against theirs We know logically that this is to give your breath to them, but any photographs and videos will only depict restricted airflow your law bans CPR
Replying to @CobaltCherry
That is exactly what should be left to courts and experts to prove. All legislation requires interpretation alongside the facts of the case and the intention of the law. This is designed to ensure that harmful practices are discouraged.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
It is the responsibility of elected MPs to make clear, precise laws, not pass vague legislation and leave judges to fill in the gaps while people's lives, liberty and futures hang in the balance. parliament.uk/about/how/role/ supremecourt.uk/cases/judgment…
1
165
7
1,690
16,826
I know a great many young English men that, if told to go and fight, will simply say no. This is not the same world as 1939 or 1914. These boys play video games online, have friends in the countries that their elites want to fight, and are generally loving people. You would ask them to die for a country that has broken all bonds of brotherhood. You berated them for the last thirty years for being as they are. You sold out their country from beneath their feet. And now you wish to spill blood you come to them and demand they sell their souls to line the pockets of the political and financial elite. On this point there is no being apolitical. My little brothers will not spend their blood for the profits of the rich and powerful. My son will not be sent to die in a foreign field on behalf of foreign interests. No.
‘Unbelievable attitude! We’re screwed then!’ Gen Z caller Josh tells @TomSwarbrick1 not only would he ‘take prison’ over being conscripted into the army, he wouldn’t even cook for the troops.
64
117
1
1,451
65,121
Shell Shock !🔞! retweeted
The UK is my home, it’s where my roots are. But I genuinely cannot see myself living here in the next 5 years if there isn’t drastic cultural changes. Truly an island full of nasty, bitter, hateful old folks who want nothing more than to see the world burn.
469
1,350
82
14,965
285,130
Shell Shock !🔞! retweeted
No lo olvides nunca: no están creando un Estado de vigilancia porque NOSOTROS seamos los delincuentes. Lo están creando porque ELLOS son los delincuentes. Y lo utilizarán como arma contra CUALQUIER PERSONA que se atreva a cuestionar su poder, sus privilegios y su impunidad
36
1,264
34
3,420
28,418
Shell Shock !🔞! retweeted
Mothers, they are using your love for your children as the excuse. Online child safety laws do NOT protect children. They do not stop predators. They do not give you more control as a parent. They do not hold platforms accountable. They collect data. On your kids. On you. On everyone. That is not protection. That is surveillance with a child's face on it. Go to ChildSafetyLies.com. Read it. Then stand up. Preserve Liberty by Preserving Privacy.
3
47
1
105
1,206
Shell Shock !🔞! retweeted
Good Morning UK. Welcome to the beginning of a time where youre taxed through your eyeballs and can no longer sit on someones face even with their consent. They're slowly taking away our rights, bit by bit, and noones wants to fight against it. This is a WILD time to be living in. God knows what bills theyre passing while everyone is chasing the porn law or whats happening to Russell Brand.
8
30
286
13,005
Yeah cool story bro *hypnotizes you with my fat fucking ass* (Another thingy 4 @ShellShock_Mk1)
9
220
1
2,036
14,468
Shell Shock !🔞! retweeted
Imagine your daughter is 14. She wants to look up something private. A health question. A question about faith. Something she is not ready to ask you yet. Now imagine every site demands her face scan or government ID first. The company stores it. The database gets breached, sold, or handed over. And a record of her private questions now follows her for life. That is what online child safety laws build. Not safety. A permanent file on your child. Mothers, you are the last line of defense. Please step up. ChildSafetyLies.com
12
128
9
290
3,139
Congratulations to the UK government for making the sex offender registry a completely worthless record since now alongside actual rapists and nonces can be people who watched a video of consensual sex between adults
🇬🇧 UK porn ban starts tomorrow (6 Nov 2026) From Friday, possessing or publishing certain types of pornography becomes a criminal offence in England and Wales under the Crime and Policing Act 2026. Banned content includes: • Strangulation or suffocation • Penetrative sex between people who appear related (or are pretending to be related, including some step/foster scenarios) • Adults role-playing as children under 16 Penalties: • Up to 2 years for possession of strangulation or “relative” content • Up to 3 years for the under-16 role-play material • Up to 5 years for publishing any of it
16
320
4
2,900
33,697
Shell Shock !🔞! retweeted
>refusing to ban actual incest
New laws to tackle harmful pornography are now in force. What happens online can have real-life consequences. These changes aim to prevent the normalisation of sexual violence and abuse, as part of our wider work to tackle violence against women and girls.
13
14
1
178
2,184
Shell Shock !🔞! retweeted
Free speech means defending the right to expression that is transgressive, taboo and unpopular - not just content approved by the state. The government's rush to criminalise broadly defined categories of explicit content between consenting adults sets a dangerous precedent. Such vague bans don't make the web safer; platforms over-censor out of legal fear, and ordinary users risk being flagged for ambiguous content. History shows that state censorship mechanisms never stop at their initial target. Once the state grants itself unchecked powers to police "harmful" or "objectionable" content, reactionary forces will inevitably weaponise those exact mechanisms to censor LGBT+ resources, sex education, and dissenting speech.
7
85
1
311
7,049
Shell Shock !🔞! retweeted
The UK government watching as thousands of people dissappear to Canada at 3AM and then magically return after 20 minutes
148
2,991
89
76,989
1,205,442
Shell Shock !🔞! retweeted
Teen chat spaces online Trans people in public spaces Peaceful protest of genocide Consensual, legal sex on film Do @UKLabour and @andyburnham think they can just ban things they don't like out of existence? What a nasty, useless government... again.
2
58
448
6,980
Shell Shock !🔞! retweeted
living in the uk
10
1,646
26
6,187
66,172
Jeez girl thats a lot of democracy you're wafting around Animation work 4 @ShellShock_Mk
16
347
2
3,198
21,343