SimpleJack

👀🔥 Another piece of our GME.WS investigation just fell into place. $IonQ's warrant agreement contains protections similar to GameStop's Reference Property provisions. Different terminology, comparable mechanics. Both address what warrant holders could receive following a qualifying merger, reorganization, or exchange. Now look at our precedents. $EQV completed a documented warrant conversion. $IonQ approached a scheduled expiration. Both received Form 25 filings selecting Rule 12d2-2(a)(3). Both IonQ and GameStop also had contractual provisions protecting warrant holders during qualifying corporate events. The checkbox isn't the trigger. The protection clause isn't the trigger. The qualifying corporate event is. We're narrowing the investigation to executed agreements, effective dates, corporate action notices, and actual successor consideration. Less guessing, more paperwork. That's how we connect the dots. 👀🔥🍻