SimpleJack

👀🔥 Another piece of our GME.WS investigation just fell into place. $IonQ's warrant agreement contains protections similar to GameStop's Reference Property provisions. Different terminology, comparable mechanics. Both address what warrant holders could receive following a qualifying merger, reorganization, or exchange. Now look at our precedents. $EQV completed a documented warrant conversion. $IonQ approached a scheduled expiration. Both received Form 25 filings selecting Rule 12d2-2(a)(3). Both IonQ and GameStop also had contractual provisions protecting warrant holders during qualifying corporate events. The checkbox isn't the trigger. The protection clause isn't the trigger. The qualifying corporate event is. We're narrowing the investigation to executed agreements, effective dates, corporate action notices, and actual successor consideration. Less guessing, more paperwork. That's how we connect the dots. 👀🔥🍻

💥💥💥October 28th, 2026. DTCC announces its Tokenization Service is LIVE. Eligible securities can now move between traditional and tokenized form, with supported token transfers operating 24/7. Wall Street's plumbing is getting an upgrade. 🍻 Now look at the GME.WS warrant agreement. 👀 It's Share Exchange Event provision says warrants can become exercisable for replacement shares, securities, cash, or other property shareholders receive in a qualifying transaction. The contract even calls it “Reference Property.” Two days before the October 30th warrant expiration, we've got new DTCC infrastructure and an existing contractual mechanism for alternative consideration. Neither proves a $GME transaction is coming, and tokenization alone doesn't trigger the clause. But the timing? October 28 and October 30. I've got both documents on the table. 👀🔥

👀🔥 THE OCTOBER 30th CONVERGENCE $GME. $eBay. Collectors/PSA. GME.WS warrants. Options positioning. Securities lending. Different developments are approaching the same October 28th–30th window. What happens if a corporate catalyst changes the economics of positions built around a fixed deadline? Follow the evidence. 🧵

🚨🚨🚨 906.25% to borrow GME.WS on Robinhood. 750% on Public. Same warrants, two brokers, both charging rates high enough to make a loan shark ask for financial counseling. 😂 Robinhood shows just 25,000 available, with expiration only seven days away. Borrowing $GME common shares is relatively cheap, but borrowing the warrants is a whole different circus. At $0.70 per warrant, a 10,000-warrant short could cost roughly $174 per day at Robinhood's quoted annualized rate. Expensive exposure for an instrument approaching its expiration date. @SimpleJack has been tracking common-share lending conditions. Now we've got a second market showing extreme borrowing costs. High fees don't prove shorts are trapped, but the contrast deserves attention. 👀 Seven days until October 30th. Why is borrowing a $0.70 warrant priced like a luxury penthouse when the lease is almost up? 🤔💭