Former D1 wrestlebrah, natural insemination coach, aristocrat of the hole, my kink is respecting women. USATT rating: 1226
Santa Monica, CA
Joined January 2022
- Tweets28.4K
- Following2.7K
- Followers30.8K
- Likes13K
Pinned Tweet
Periodic reminder that Perseus, the first heterosexual man to challenge Medusa, could not keep his eyes off of her enormous yams and therefore was not turned to stone. There’s a lesson in that.
If we can gloss over the race bait part of the video I just have to point out that women are just not scared of men in any way that they report to be. This broad just keeps sticking herself between fighting men multiple times with zero concern for the consequences.
I totally agree with this as to how assortive mating is typically an extremely efficient sorting mechanism.
But what happens when assortative mating becomes deranged by contraceptives, abortion, and the sexual revolution, effectively removing the downsides for women who continue putting all their chips on the 8-10 spot well into their 30s?
Even though the odds are low, they keep betting on those men despite getting pumped and dumped or slow-faded by 8–10s because they themselves are 6s, because they have an infinite amount of spins on the roulette wheel. The only thing they’re paying with is time.
Meanwhile, those 8–10s, thanks to dating apps, are receiving the kind of female attention historically reserved for rock stars. They’re quite literally drowning in novel trim, to the point that women are starting Facebook groups in an attempt to shut down the sheer amount of casual sex these men are having. This obviously has little to no effect as women are biologically designed to pursue that exact type of male.
The result is that men in the 4–7 range are basically iced out of the dating market unless they’re willing to settle for ugly 1–3 mutants which only other male 1-3 mutants are. So now you have women in the 4-10 range fighting for a very limited number of seats in the 8-10 range, making the men in the 8-10 range even less likely to be in a hurry to settle down, which leaves the possibility of hitting a jackpot on women’s dating app algorithm, which causes them to ignore their own looksmatch, who by this point has just relegated himself to playing video games and watching porn. What happens then??
There is a famous social psychology study that was performed based on a classroom game, called The Pairing Game, and is widely used to demonstrate assortative mating in relationships. I’ve always found it interesting and apply it to what people are saying about current dating dynamics. Participants are randomly assigned a number 1-10 which is fixed to their foreheads so they can see each other’s yet not their own. They’re given the goal to silently pair up with the highest number possible.
What happens during the game follows a predictable pattern. Everyone crowds the 9s and 10s. They may not know what their number is but they know everyone else sought them out so they end up choosing each other and select another 9 or 10, both are happy to match up and lock in a high number. If a 9/10 wants you, obviously you dont question it. Youre maxing out.
The mids are first rejected by the higher numbers after initially crowding them since 10s have better options. Eventually the mids lower their target, and pair up with other mids.
The lowest numbers are actively pushed out of the way or ignored by everyone else and before the time runs out, they reluctantly pair up with the other lowbies who are still left.
Without ever being told their own worth, the market is efficient. 10s end up together, as do 5s and 1s. This same market plays out in the dating world. People’s value isnt just attractiveness but can be status, wealth, etc and their social value has a feedback loop that indicates where they land based on what options they have. They get direct feedback through who is rejecting them and who is overly excited. I think a large problem today is people dont know their number because they ignore this feedback and refuse to accept it. They think they are too good for what is left. This system also helps understand playing it cool in the beginning because being too eager may signal to the other person that they could do better and it isnt an equal match. How you act towards others yourself is also signaling to them where they stand. That’s why some guys try to neg girls out of their league to knock them off their pedestal a bit. He wouldnt do that if he thought she was already his equal. That works on some insecure girls but for others, it’s off putting because they shouldnt feel the need to do that. It doesnt come from a place of confidence.
The amusing part is knowing guys who have security clearance are told by supervisors to “know their number” literally as a matter of national security bc state spies will camp at local bars and theyll start hooking up with girls way out of their league. If she’s not your match, there’s a reason she’s interested! It’s not sheer luck but the guys often dont have a clue and think since she’s interested then he adjusts his internal perceived number instead of clocking the danger.
Part of the dating pool problem is that men cant get high status or decent well paying jobs as easily or as early in their life as previous generations and women can match their income and status more easily. The average person is obese so that also cuts into the pool, so what people think of as average is actually above what they think. However, the market is always efficient. You can feel however you want about it, but unless you’re a mark holding state secrets, girls just wont be interested if they have better prospects. You can blame the women, you can blame the market, but you can really only change yourself and luckily that number can move up (or down) depending on your own ability and drive.
Telling young girls that they dont need to stay fit and fat is beautiful is just removing competition to make yourself more valuable, yet so is convincing young men to remove themselves voluntarily or to wait until theyre older. Being young and fit is the easiest way to max out your number but there’s a clock on that. Its silly to limit your options based on your own choices then blame the market for being too efficient.
Hug your grandma, and if your kid is being difficult about it, tell them that they have to suck it up and be nice and polite to grandma and accept her hug.
And while you’re at it, also make them address adults properly, and respond when spoken to, and behave appropriately at family functions, even when they’re bored to tears.
You not only can but should override their consent in these situations.
People of the opposite sex who spend long periods of time together tend to have sex with each other, news at 11
I mean just like off the top of the dome, if my kid walked up and licked someone’s hand, it would be an issue. If they pissed on the sidewalk, it would be an issue.
Obviously we hold them to a higher standard of behavior because they’re human beings, but we allow special exceptions for dogs for no particular reason.
Dogs in public don’t do anything positive. The best case scenario is that they urinate and defecate on the sidewalk and don’t harm anyone.
It’s not so much that parents are pining for the love dogs get, it’s that we spend an enormous amount of time and effort on making sure our children don’t impose themselves on anyone, yet there’s people who bring their furbaby around everywhere that impose themselves on everyone, and it’s permissible “because they’re a dog, that’s what dogs do.”
I’ll add as another caveat, because no one reads the second tweet, that parents don’t even want to let their kid act like a dog in public, we just think it’s silly that we have these expectations to control our kids as parents but dog owners have almost zero similar expectations put on them.
I’m convinced I live in another timeline. I get treated like the mayor when I’m out. People are tripping over themselves to help me. I’m not humble-bragging. I really mean that I live in a parallel universe where kids are treated better than dogs and that the Internet allows for inter-dimensional contact.
I remember reading some Reddit post years ago, a woman talked about having a sister who was much more beautiful than her. And it was hard, but she had mostly made her peace with it. But then she described her fiancé meeting the sister one day and like visibly having his eyeballs shoot out of his head in awe. I can’t deny I would have a terrible time with this, maybe a small upside to not having a sister :/
I have to call foul on this, there are several mechanisms by which society polices anti-social vehicle use, but very few functional mechanisms by which we police anti-social dog ownership. Try and stop the flow of traffic and see what happens. Park illegally and see what happens.
The primary problem with widespread dog ownership and car culture is growing entitlement and anti-social behavior of owners
People who just break rules and then feel as though YOU are a problem for caring because they “aren’t hurting anyone” and to “mind your own business”
So they park in bike lines, refuse to pick up shit, let dogs off leash in places where it’s specifically prohibited.
Every western man on earth has a father, grandfather or great grandfather who married a virgin woman who he had absolute legal dominion over, responsibility AND authority, & every generation the deal got a little worse until today where the deal is so bad men are reneging on it.
Its kind of funny to me how men all want to be the prize now. Women used to be pursued, now men want to be the ones pursued. They want to be chased. They want the girls they find beautiful to think he’s out of their league. The old man trope of “I’m lucky she puts up with me” and he had to fight for his life to win her over just isnt worth the effort to these guys. You can blame their opinion that they think women arent worth it but it seems more like learned helplessness. Men were dying in war while getting Dear John letters. It cant possibly be worse now. I think its some hormone issue. Theyre literally willing to just roll over and die than put any effort in.
Im trying to picture it.. the loser in a village of 5 women his generation who are all spoken for already. He has no prospects. No phone to harass women on twitter, no girls to groom on discord. Its bleak. Your village has a few other single guys and they’re going to pillage another village. You go fight with your tribe but you wont take home a war bride. The one you could get was already a mother. “Gross. Sloppy seconds and who knows what else? Id rather die alone.”
Now you dont even have to risk dying to abduct women from somewhere else. You have millions of them on your phone. You just have to figure out the right string of words to get them out. “No” he says.. “they should be begging me for a chance. I refuse”
You really are kind of blind to how much more public spaces favor dogs over children until you have children and then it becomes appalling. It’s like getting a pair of those sunglasses in “They Live” and then becoming actually aware of the world you’ve always lived in.
Slumdog_Chillionaire retweeted
There is a famous social psychology study that was performed based on a classroom game, called The Pairing Game, and is widely used to demonstrate assortative mating in relationships. I’ve always found it interesting and apply it to what people are saying about current dating dynamics. Participants are randomly assigned a number 1-10 which is fixed to their foreheads so they can see each other’s yet not their own. They’re given the goal to silently pair up with the highest number possible.
What happens during the game follows a predictable pattern. Everyone crowds the 9s and 10s. They may not know what their number is but they know everyone else sought them out so they end up choosing each other and select another 9 or 10, both are happy to match up and lock in a high number. If a 9/10 wants you, obviously you dont question it. Youre maxing out.
The mids are first rejected by the higher numbers after initially crowding them since 10s have better options. Eventually the mids lower their target, and pair up with other mids.
The lowest numbers are actively pushed out of the way or ignored by everyone else and before the time runs out, they reluctantly pair up with the other lowbies who are still left.
Without ever being told their own worth, the market is efficient. 10s end up together, as do 5s and 1s. This same market plays out in the dating world. People’s value isnt just attractiveness but can be status, wealth, etc and their social value has a feedback loop that indicates where they land based on what options they have. They get direct feedback through who is rejecting them and who is overly excited. I think a large problem today is people dont know their number because they ignore this feedback and refuse to accept it. They think they are too good for what is left. This system also helps understand playing it cool in the beginning because being too eager may signal to the other person that they could do better and it isnt an equal match. How you act towards others yourself is also signaling to them where they stand. That’s why some guys try to neg girls out of their league to knock them off their pedestal a bit. He wouldnt do that if he thought she was already his equal. That works on some insecure girls but for others, it’s off putting because they shouldnt feel the need to do that. It doesnt come from a place of confidence.
The amusing part is knowing guys who have security clearance are told by supervisors to “know their number” literally as a matter of national security bc state spies will camp at local bars and theyll start hooking up with girls way out of their league. If she’s not your match, there’s a reason she’s interested! It’s not sheer luck but the guys often dont have a clue and think since she’s interested then he adjusts his internal perceived number instead of clocking the danger.
Part of the dating pool problem is that men cant get high status or decent well paying jobs as easily or as early in their life as previous generations and women can match their income and status more easily. The average person is obese so that also cuts into the pool, so what people think of as average is actually above what they think. However, the market is always efficient. You can feel however you want about it, but unless you’re a mark holding state secrets, girls just wont be interested if they have better prospects. You can blame the women, you can blame the market, but you can really only change yourself and luckily that number can move up (or down) depending on your own ability and drive.
Telling young girls that they dont need to stay fit and fat is beautiful is just removing competition to make yourself more valuable, yet so is convincing young men to remove themselves voluntarily or to wait until theyre older. Being young and fit is the easiest way to max out your number but there’s a clock on that. Its silly to limit your options based on your own choices then blame the market for being too efficient.
Dozens of replies saying “ahh but have you considered that cheating on your wife is immoral?” Lmao WE IT IS KNOW NIGGA! I’m trying to explain how a man ends up with a less attractive side piece! Imagine a wife who “doesn’t like giving blowjobs anymore” vs a girl who’s like “I need your penis to breathe.”
I’ve been straining not to wade in and have just been waiting for someone else to say it, but no one has yet, so: he did it because she enthusiastically wanted his little Hebrew national an order of magnitude more than his wife did. Men can resist a 2x, but not a 10x desire diff.
Dozens of replies saying “ahh but have you considered that cheating on your wife is immoral?” Lmao WE IT IS KNOW NIGGA! I’m trying to explain how a man ends up with a less attractive side piece! Imagine a wife who “doesn’t like giving blowjobs anymore” vs a girl who’s like “I need your penis to breathe.”
Slumdog_Chillionaire retweeted
Since people are asking, this is why the Democrats will lose the midterms massively:
1. Funding
a. You may recall once USAID was shutdown, DNC funding plummeted to basically nothing after having 100's of millions of dollars to spend. This is because, via money laundering networks, the entire DNC platform was paid for by yours and my taxpayer dollars. If this is hard to believe for you, or you think that "no way they would do that, that's illegal", then I want to burst your bubble. They were absolutely doing it. You may recall networks like the BBC in the UK shutting down because USAID was no longer funding it.
They were paying people to campaign. They were paying for ads. They were paying people to vote. They were paying people to chase ballots. They were paying to transport mail in ballots. They were paying for printing mail in ballots.
You will never have proof of this, I'm afraid. You can say I'm making it up all you want. And you are correct. I'm intuiting this 100% on vibes. This is all I need. If it looks, quacks, and walks like a duck, then it is.
b. The shrinking of the federal work force, especially the department of education, drastically reduced the people on government payroll able to work elections for the democrats. You may recall the article about Trump "wiping out the black middle class." You think those people were being paid to do valuable work? You think HR harpies and women working from home were being paid to do anything of value? No. The federal government had been turned into a DEI jobs program and these workers were more than happy to get people out and voting for the people who employed them. That's how government works in every communist third world shithole and that's what was happening here.
2. Election Fraud
a. Dominion machines were proven to be hacked by DOGE. Everyone knew the vote counts were being changed (ya bro I promise, every election in key states is like 50/50 except for these last minute ballots at 2am that are totally legit and bump it up to 50.1/49.9 in favor of the dems, I don't make the rules) via dominion machines. DOGE verified the hacking from China thru Venezuela. That's one of the main reasons we went and captured Maduro. The dominion machines have since been purchased by Scott Leiendecker, who is a right wing affiliate. In other words, we own the main method of cheating now.
b. Despite the SAVE Act being blocked by congress, the admin has still sent polls watchers to make sure the elections are secure at the polls. Additionally, and this method was proven extremely effective at combatting fraud in 2024, the Trump team has networks of lawyers set up to catch and prosecute election fraud. They threw a ton of people in jail for cheating during the 2024 election. Additionally, despite the lies, slander, hate, and betrayal by people like Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson (and additionally, literal bots networks from turd world countries running controlled opposition) against Erika Kirk and TPUSA following the assassination of Charlie Kirk, TPUSA saw a massive influx of young Americans getting involved in politics. They are poll watching, chasing ballots, and educating the public on real issues. They were extremely effective in 2024, and will be more effective now.
c. Deportations. If you are a controlled opposition bot, this isn't for you. And I realize many of you panicans don't believe this at all, so kindly just save both of us time and fuck off. But mass deportations are happening, both for legal and illegal immigrants. All the data supports it. The democrats main voter base is immigrants. They know they can't vote. And despite the claim that they aren't and never were, pressure from the Trump admin has gotten people like Mamdani and Newsome to openly run campaigns and lawfare against the federal government in defense of migrants illegally voting. We went from "no they never vote" to "we need to protect their right to vote!" The optics are terrible, and with the Democrat news networks panicking and spreading rumors about ICE watching polls, everyone now knows immigrants are voting illegally.
The immigrants themselves are terrified to. They are scared to go outside. They are living in fear. Their entire social media feeds are videos of people being chased down and thrown into vans by ICE. Their algo is a constant flow of propaganda telling them the Gestapo is walking the streets hunting them. They are scared to go to the polls. Between this and actual deportations, there is going to be a massive shortfall in democrat turnout for the elections. And with legal and illegal immigration being cracked down on, only the windows to get into the country rapidly evaporating, the left will continue to have fewer and fewer voters.
3. Culture and the Overton Window
a. The right is totally dominant culturally. Two years ago you would be publicly ruined for even saying anything mildly racist like "I don't want to be replaced in my own country." This viewpoint is now the mainstream. The overton window has shifted to far right that we are in an unrecognizable world. Real, on-the-ground results will take time, but things are changing. And it's changing in such a way that democrats know they can't appeal to their usual voter base, immigrants, with things like "we'll give you free healthcare if you vote for us." They actually campaigned on it and have admitted to it, and even democrats are thinking "wait, why am I paying so much for healthcare but this guy gets it for free?" The democrats have switched to trying to appeal to the moderate AMERICAN voter. They're not running the "free HRT for every boy and girl" playbook anymore. They know that "woke 1 was crazy" and they were perceived as lunatics by the average American voter.
What does this tell us? That right wing populism is the future. That people want more of what they're getting. That the average voter has been fed up with how it is and wants more change and for a healthy country. Our ideas, specifically poasted by us (my treasured mutuals) are popular with the public, and the admin has run with them. We are dominant culturally. And THAT is who the democrats are now trying to appeal to. People who are still a little uncomfortable with how things are now. People who want a future for their kids but aren't quite fine mass deportations. They aren't worried about the radicals, they are worried about getting the medium voter to abandon Trump.
b. People want strong leaders and they want a strong country. Trump is giving us that. For the first time in decades we are bombing this hell out of our enemies. We are getting warkino unlike anything before, and 4k videos of retards smuggling fentanyl into our country being hit by hellfire missiles. Our border is secure. Our military is powerful throughout the globe. People love this. They want more of this. This is why you see so many attacks on Hegseth from the left and Euros, because he is the quintessential American general. He is strong. He is making our military great again. We aren't losing fights, and we aren't apologizing for winning. And people will vote for more of that. They remember the Afghanistan pull out. They remember Benghazi.
Additionally, between the tariffs and USAID, Trump reoriented the global social contract to go from USA -> subsidizing the existence of the world, to everyone in the world -> living at the behest of the US. We aren't destroying our economy and infrastructure and cities to benefit literally anyone but Americans anymore. It's the other way around. This is good, and people like it. While it's effects will take some time to be fully felt, and it is painful, long term it will pave the way for our Children to have a home again.
That's just a few things. I'm short on time so I will cut off here.
Say what you want about Catholics, but St. Anthony is batting a thousand when it comes to me finding lost shit whenever I pray to him.
Slumdog_Chillionaire retweeted
I knew it was over when she stopped looking at him with puppy dog eyes the whole time during their show and it turned into him looking to her for what he was allowed to say on camera. This is a story of the 2010s and society foreclosing the ability to practice heterosexuality
