Not interested in "debating" FKRs. I'm interested in their surrender. The only correspondence I accept from FKRs is their 567-question MMPI.
Joined April 2012
- Tweets2.8K
- Following225
- Followers287
- Likes592
SnooCompliments6210 retweeted
A huge thank you to @TuesdayGazette and @TeamFUKR for accomplishing more in the past few weeks than we've managed in the past four years.
They've done two things exceptionally well.
First, they've exposed just how little the most prominent FKR content creators really know and understand about the actual evidence in the John O'Keefe murder case. If you strip away the bogus conspiracy theories, selective omissions, and misinformation, their narratives collapse under the slightest bit of scrutiny.
Second, and more importantly, they've finally put the digital evidence front and center. The GPS, steps, movement, vehicle Techstream data, and phone battery temperature data tell a consistent story: John remained outside 34 Fairview seconds after Karen drunkenly and recklessly reversed her vehicle at 24 mph and 74% throttle. The evidence shows that John NEVER entered 34 Fairview Street.
And let's address one of the biggest straw-man arguments in this case: that John's injuries were inconsistent with a pedestrian strike.
Nobody is arguing that John was struck head-on by Karen.
The data and John's injuries show Karen Read's SUV clipped him from behind, off his center of mass, causing him to spin counterclockwise, lose his balance, and fall backwards. His catastrophic head injury resulted from secondary blunt-force trauma when his head struck the frozen ground, with hypothermia due to prolonged exposure to freezing temperatures contributing to his death.
An off-center, glancing impact can produce an entirely different injury pattern from a conventional frontal pedestrian collision. Comparing the two as though they're identical is intellectually dishonest.
Tuesday and Truth finally brought the conversation back to what matters most: the evidence, the data, the science, and justice for John O'Keefe.
The data doesn't lie. People do.
SnooCompliments6210 retweeted
Pandora’s box is open.
Massachusetts is being clowned nationally over its inability or unwillingness to enforce guardrails in high-profile criminal trials.
Hank Brennan, a career defense attorney who has spent decades taking the government to task in open court, warned us in the clip below.
To be clear, a defendant has every right to fight for their freedom in the media. The government has already branded that person a defendant which can be devastating before a jury ever hears a word of evidence. But there is a line.
Court-protected material cannot become ammunition for a public campaign to spread falsehoods, attack witnesses, or poison the jury pool. Once courts allow that line to disappear in one case, they shouldn’t be surprised when everyone else follows suit.
Brennan’s argument extends to every defendant in every courtroom. The suggestion that Morrissey somehow transformed a career defense attorney into an enemy of defendants is absurd.
We saw the circus in Read. We saw the consequences of trial-by-social-media surrounding Clancy.
And unless Massachusetts starts enforcing the rules, we’ll see it again.
You don’t get to open Pandora’s box for one defendant and expect it to close for the next.
#KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #Massachusetts #TrialBySocialMedia
@ProsecutorsPod
@megynkelly
@BostonGlobe
@NoteMyObjection
@MACourts
SnooCompliments6210 retweeted
I have been following the euthanasia debate in Canada that the recent Daily Mail news story about the killing of a grandmother who may not have understood what was happening sparked. It is chilling how many doctors embrace killing in Canada. Doctor resistance to assisting the suicides of patients in USA is one of the impediments to following that same dark path. MDs. Don't kill. Heal. Palliate. Care. Make Hippocrates proud.
SnooCompliments6210 retweeted
"Antipsychiatry" causes:
1)The few incompetent psychiatrists
2)Excessive expectations- eg people dont blame cancer MDs when treatment fails
3)Generalization: If treatment didnt work for me wont work for anyone
4)Common enemy=within group support
5)Never meet people who benefitted
SnooCompliments6210 retweeted
Four things I now believe after the Lindsay Clancy jury disaster:
1. Jurors should be barred from doing media interviews after the trial for at least 6 months (maybe 12).
2. As much as I hate to say it, no trial should be televised.
3. The jury selection process needs some serious updating.
4. We need to stop with this fantasy that jurors are avoiding all media coverage and social media discussions during jury service, especially in high profile cases. I don't know what can be done about this but it's definitely an issue. Even if someone is doing their best to avoid everything, Al-G Rythm will find you.
SnooCompliments6210 retweeted
A lot of big accounts, mostly non true-crime accounts, that are speaking out about the Lindsay Clancy case have not heard about (or don’t know much about) the Karen Read case. If you are disgusted by what has happened in the Clancy case, I urge you to look into the Read case. This is where all this craziness started.
There were similar themes.
The original pink mob of advocates. In the Read case they were trying to free a drunk driver who killed her boyfriend under the advocacy against corruption and her being framed.
These nut jobs raised millions for Read.
They attacked witnesses. They intimidated and harassed them in person and online. So much so that the witnesses are suing Karen and her cohort, Turtleboy for defamation and conspiracy among other things.
Yes, the same Turtleboy that doxxed a juror in the Read case. Karen hired him to spread conspiracy theories and misinformation by funneling non-public information to him so he could send to his large audience and to taint the jury pool.
Turtleboy is also facing trial in December for Witness Intimidation.
Karen is being sued in a wrongful death lawsuit by John O’Keefe’s family. Think of it like OJ. The pink mob and jury tainting got her acquitted, but she now faces a wrongful death case she is surely to lose. Unfortunately, there was no hero hold-out in her criminal trial (second trial). It almost worked in the Clancy case.
A defense team/attorney that pushed for the pink mob. In the Read case, a team that a judge announced in open court about their “lack of candor”. A team that worked with the blogger Turtleboy to create a false narrative. A defense team that is named throughout the defamation/conspiracy lawsuit. A dirty defense team that also worked with a federal prosecutor and his office to push their false narrative. Both of Read’s attorneys and a federal prosecutor are now subpoenaed. Reddington’s behavior is questionable at best.
Kellie Farina. A major player in the Karen Read pink mob that advocated for her freedom and was a deliberating juror in the Clancy.
Mistrials. Karen Read’s first trial ended in a mistrial, albeit the majority were guilty.
Virtually the same content creators and lawtubers covering the case for clicks and views. Zero concern for the truth.
A jury impoundment order that had to be extended indefinitely because of the safety of jurors.
There are more. I again urge anyone that wants to know where this absolute nonsense started, please look into this case. You will be shocked. I pray everyday that Karen Read is held accountable one day just as I hope Lindsay Clancy is as well.
SnooCompliments6210 retweeted
When the diagnosis becomes the defense
A patient’s report is not a diagnosis. Medicine exists to decide what rises to clinical significance and what does not. I am libertarian about private life. Call yourself depressed, an amputee, psychotic. Adults can self-define without my permission.
The problem begins when the claim becomes an obligation for everyone else. Insurance must pay. Institutions must reorganize. Skepticism is bigotry. That is no longer your liberty. It is the opposite: forcing others to agree.
Apotemnophilia is an example. If you want a healthy limb off and you pay for it, I do not care much. The moment physicians must call it medicine, and doubt must be called hate, you are asking for something else. Physicians are agreeing anyway, in the name of patient-centered validation.
The same concept is now being applied with postpartum psychosis.
Postpartum psychosis exists. It is rare. It starts days to a few weeks after birth. It is a break with reality that makes a woman unable to care safely for herself or the infant. It is a psychiatric emergency.
What I am now being asked to accept is something else:
– onset up to a year after delivery, not the first weeks
– “psychosis” that can last an hour, not days or weeks
– “psychosis” that still permits driving, conversing, and making medical decisions
We kept the word and discarded what it meant.
Skepticism of that expansion is treated as misogyny, or as a failure to honor how hard motherhood is. Call yourself whatever you like. I do not care about private speech. The problem begins when the label stops being a description and becomes a legal instrument, when an unrecognizable category is used to erase responsibility.
SnooCompliments6210 retweeted
The Clancy-O.J. comparisons are looking more justified.
The Clancy jury was 9/12 women. The O.J. Simpson jury was 9/12 black. In both cases, jurors appear to have treated the verdict as a form of activism tied to the group identity they shared with the defendant.
In 2016, O.J. juror Carrie Bess admitted she viewed the acquittal as “payback” for Rodney King and estimated 90% of the jury felt the same way.
SnooCompliments6210 retweeted
This is a completely oblivious admission to an ulterior juror motive, and obviates further need to speculate over the holdout juror’s motive.
A mistrial was ironically the right call, but not because of the holdout, because it’s clear that there was significant activist-confounded groupthink involved, seen clearly from this statement and other statements indicating other jurors apparently drew bias from their presumable nursing expertise.
When the jury is entitled, which self-proclaimed experts tend to be, they project using terms like “arrogant” as they did to describe the holdout juror.
SnooCompliments6210 retweeted
Wait what? Is this real? Because I also think it was altruistic filicide but that's *precisely* why I would have said guilty. Just because you very wrongly believe your children would be better off dead than without you doesn't mean you aren't aware it's a crime. Wtf.
SnooCompliments6210 retweeted
By all accounts, the BTK Killer (that's "Bind, Torture, Kill") was a loving father. He also murdered people for his own enjoyment, including children.
It took years for his daughter to reconcile this and recall moments the mask slipped. Clancy's children will never be able to.
SnooCompliments6210 retweeted
Do you think, for even a second, she had an open mind about this case? Forget deliberations. I'm talking the moment she was sworn in. This is not our jury system. It's not how it's supposed to work. And most jurors aren't like this. But the CW had no chance.
SnooCompliments6210 retweeted
Amongst many things said in this review of the Lindsay Clancy case and trial stuck with me - but one quite in particular by this YouTube is one I want to share - (it’s long so I broke it up in the comments):
youtu.be/BBBkL2eeHVI?is=Gs6H…
SnooCompliments6210 retweeted
Psychosis itself does not meet the legal standard for insanity. This is an over generalization. The psychosis must have destroyed the persons functional ability to tell right from wrong or conform their actions to follow the law when the crime was committed. Simply being in a state of psychosis does not qualify.
SnooCompliments6210 retweeted
It seems the only person following the instructions on the Lindsay Clancy jury was the holdout. We learned today from another juror that after watching a video of Clancy with one of the doctors, he expressed doubt...as to Murder 1. As the judge instructed, the proper thing to do at that point was to consider Murder 2 and manslaughter, which expressly allowed the jury to consider Clancy's mental illness as mitigating her culpability. But the other 11 didn't want to do that. They wanted to go straight to NGRI. The holdout should be praised for staying strong and following the instructions given to him.