Space Stocks (@SpaceEquities) profile picture

Exploring the Cosmos, One Stock at a Time!| Your go-to source for all things space-related investments and news. #SpaceStocks Not Financial Advice

Earth
Joined October 2023
Photo by Space Stocks (@SpaceEquities)Photo by Space Stocks (@SpaceEquities)Photo by Space Stocks (@SpaceEquities)Photo by Space Stocks (@SpaceEquities)Photo by Space Stocks (@SpaceEquities)Photo by Space Stocks (@SpaceEquities)Photo by Space Stocks (@SpaceEquities)Photo by Space Stocks (@SpaceEquities)Photo by Space Stocks (@SpaceEquities)Photo by Space Stocks (@SpaceEquities)
Space Stocks retweeted
$RKLB $SATS 🧵🔍 May have cracked the case on the two new mystery Electron launches - take a look below and tell me it doesn't line up perfectly
30
35
9
353
67,006
Space Stocks retweeted
Agree that it could be a flexible permission envelope for both inclination & altitude 👍 I believe Bermuda is in reference to a NASA tracking station which has been used in multiple F9 launches (youtube.com/results?search_q…), with the DB listing several other ground/tracking stations
2
15
1,108
I believe you are right, these are not beams for the satellites but rather the Neutron vehicle iself. No constellation for now. Regarding the 200 km and 2500 km, I don't think it's a maneuver intended to do, but rather the range of alttitudes they could launch to, the same way the inclination range is there. They've basically defined the possible Neutron trajectory edges. To top it off, the Bermuda primary zone of operations, its right below an eastward trajectory from Wallops, so that also makes total sense for it being Neutron. Thanks for you input!
1
3
1
16
2,271
Space Stocks retweeted
• The satellite in question (NEUTRON-1) might just be S2, which has a range of poss. incl. (37-60°) but appears to end up in a circular 2500km MEO TBD what payload (if any) ends up being deployed there f_constell = N seems to indicate this is a one-off and not a constellation
2
1
13
1,018
Space Stocks retweeted
TL;DR (armchair speculation, open to corrections or alternative interpretations) • The S-band frequencies appear to be for Neutron Stage 1 and 2 TT&C (Telemetry, Tracking and Command) purposes
1
1
13
867
Space Stocks retweeted
Numbers line up with the advertised achievable orbital inclinations out of Wallops For now my theory is that they're filing for a general range of inclinations that S2 (NEUTRON-1) may hit nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/…
1
1
13
833
Space Stocks retweeted
ITU cost recovery letter for Victus Haze with the same "Satellite Network" phrasing and message body: apps.fcc.gov/els/GetAtt.html… Seems like it's just a template for filing with the ITU and not something unique to read into
1
1
5
975
Space Stocks retweeted
What's still unclear to me are the orbital parameters and the 'Neutron Satellite Network' terminology. It's possible that part is for 2 different trajectory options (37° or 60°), with S2 placed at an initial 200km parking orbit before raising to 2500km MEO. Just speculation tho
3
1
14
934
Space Stocks retweeted
As for the beam name acronyms, I could be way off base but here are my *guesses* - S1/S2UL = Stage 1/2 Uplink - S1 A-D TM = Stage 1 Antenna, Beacon, Command, Downlink Telemetry - S2 E/F TM O/B = Stage 2 Engineering/Flight Telemetry Omni/Backup
1
1
18
952
Space Stocks retweeted
I believe the beams you listed are from S-band transmitters/antennas for Neutron TT&C This system was previously tested against an Archimedes hotfire to characterize engine plume attenuation on RF signals during flight, re-entry, and landing teapawt.net/trypto_tran/status/189…
Replying to @SpaceEquities
I assume you're referring to File Num. 1600-EX-ST-2024 Experimental STA was filed 8/26/24 and granted 9/17/24 (valid 10/1/24 - 4/1/25), not tracking any prior denials It's for characterizing plume attenuation on S-band up/downlinks for telemetry & command during flight/re-entry
1
1
15
1,490
Space Stocks retweeted
Replying to @SpaceEquities
One of the database rows appears to indicate that this mission/satellite name is NEUTRON-1 As @JacobKeeton20 explains, the station heights listed seem to correspond with initial heights of Neutron S1 & S2 while on the pad (likely confirmed in filing)
2
3
30
1,855
Space Stocks retweeted
An updated look at the 'known' Rocket Lab launches for 2025 🚀 Not shown here are: 4 more HASTE, 3 more BlackSky, 1 more Hawkeye 360, & 4 more iQPS... [dramatic pause] ...all of which are expected to launch within 2025 🤯 $RKLB $BKSY TYO: 5595
Rocket Lab $RKLB has applied for 2 FCC licenses for launches from Wallops (good find by our friend @scotto2050 !). Both licenses cover testing and launch with requested dates ranging from July 7th until December 31st 2025. Both licenses could also refer to the same flight, since the details of the missions are confidential. > One license (apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/repor……) mentions it is for an Electron launch scheduled for NET Spetember 2025. > The other doesn't specify the vehicle nor the launch date (apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/repor……). It could be Electron as well, HASTE or more unlikely, Neutron. RKLB has also updated its upcoming missions page (rocketlabusa.com/missions/up……). A noteworthy detail is the confirmation that the 2 HASTE launches in 2024 were for Leidos under the MACH-TB program. This means that the company still has in backlog at least: >1 HASTE for Leidos under MACH-TB >1 HASTE for Hypersonix/DIU >1 HATE for a confindential customer
8
13
1
112
11,902
I suspect that September launch will be STP-S30. It matches this slide from September last year which said that STP-S30 will be Rocket Lab's next National Security launch, so before VICTUS HAZE (which is NET October) teapawt.net/GewoonLukas_/status/18…
A US Space Force presentation shows the next NSSL missions for: - Falcon 9: SDA Tranche 1 Transport Layer-B (NET Q2 2025) - This means NROL-69 is now NET 2025 - Falcon Heavy: USSF-75 (NET 2025 or 2026) - Electron: STP-S30 (NLT April 2026) - Minotaur IV: NROL-174 (NET 2024)
2
1
21
3,402
Space Stocks retweeted
I'm on the hunt for @RocketLab "Return On Investment". So far I think the barge is located somewhere in the Gulf Island Fabrication yards near New-Orleans. If anyone has any info, lmk!
5
3
2
50
19,084
Replying to @scotto2050
We believe the FY 2024 11% revenue "government customer" is simply the SDA. Per fpds, $RKLB has already received the following payments for the SDA contract, which are milestone-based: >$39,616,703 on December 2023 >$49,520,879 on April 2024 >$24,296,291.29 + $25,224,587.71 on September 2024 >$14,856,264 on October 2024 It shall be clear that payment doesn't mean that thre revenue has been recognzied, but those December 2023 and April 2024 have likely had a significant part recognized. It's likely that the first payment was for the Systems Requirements Review (SRR) and the second one for the Preliminary Design Reivew (PDR). The PDR was closed in early 2025 (or late 2024, rocketlabusa.com/updates/roc…), it makes sense that SRR was fully recognized in 2024. Anyway, there is also no government customer requiring that many reaction wheels. It could be as you said that Amazon is acquiring the reaction wheels for lesser price, or simply that the Kuiper production is (no secret) delayed, and therefore subsystem deliveries are as well. For the curious, the SDA allows the offerors certain flexibility to the contractors to decide the milestone-based payment system, but here are some of the guidelines released under the Tranche 2 Transport Layer Beta solicitation:
1
3
16
1,769
Space Stocks retweeted
Testing is underway at @NASA_Marshall for Haven-1’s trace contaminant control system. Over the next month, we will continue validating the system’s ability to remove toxic pollutants introduced by the crew and equipment, ensuring clean air for all missions.
11
67
6
608
33,914
Space Stocks retweeted
Replying to @SpaceEquities
Replying to @trypto_tran
The MSR review team’s recommendation is to be presented to senior NASA leaders, including Nelson, before year-end. “Hopefully, the administrator will approve the recommended architecture,” Gramling said. “That would be followed by an agency acquisition strategy in the spring.”
1
1
3
1,796
Replying to @stan100x
There appears to be a widespread assumption that NASA is going to announce definitive contracts for the revised Mars Sample Return architecture on the 7th. However, the studies conducted were to propose ways to improve the previous architecutre or present new ones (like leveraging the Artemis program). There's been no public bidding for new contracts (which couldn't have happened in so little time anyway). Bill Nelson's comment (teapawt.net/SciGuySpace/status/187…) "MSR announcement Tuesday will not put next administration 'in a box.'". pretty much reaffirms this, as awarding full mission contracts is putting NASA 'in a box'. What's expected on the 7th is setting a direction in terms of architecutre and, probably, a schedule for upcoming contracts and/or further higher-level study contracts.
Some notes from a call with NASA Administrator Bill Nelson today: Mars Sample Return announcement Tuesday will not put next administration 'in a box.' Expects New Glenn launch no earlier than Tuesday night, and plans to be there. Highly confident in April 2026 Artemis II date.
2
6
1
27
4,486
The document we posted as well as some NGA notices posted on this thread (forum.nasaspaceflight.com/in…) lead us to believe the fairing separated on three pieces, which didn't stay attached to the rocket.
2
2
12
1,099