Part Fox : Part Public Servant : All 🇨🇦 |❤️Married to @RhapsodyBarks ❤️
Canada
Joined November 2011
- Tweets57.9K
- Following428
- Followers15.2K
- Likes45K
Pinned Tweet
Yote and fox snuggle time! ❤️❤️ Featuring myself and my beautiful wife @SyberWuff
(Beautiful art drawn by @Spunkywulf)
You can dislike someone's kink, art style, or fursona without inventing a criminal accusation to justify disliking them. Jesus Christ it’s been 30 years of the same arguments with no consensus but people like to pretend there is.
Respectfully?
The line *opinions may be subjective and state OP’s likes/dislikes.
This assigns horrific designations to the rest, adding an element of fear if you disagree, lest you be labelled those bad things.
Can we go at people causing the harm, vs art some think is icky?
Imagine advocating evidence-based public safety then dismissing the concerns of professionals responsible for implementing the policy. Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police raised valid questions about workload, priorities and implementation. But those concerns don’t matter?
[EDITORIAL @globeandmail re #TumblerRidge investigation]: "This is a problem that goes beyond the police. Too often in Canada, the default assumption among officials is that the public has no right to know. .. Because of the importance of law enforcement and the justice system – which are crucial both to public safety and to the public’s perception of safety – secrecy from them has a particularly corrosive effect. .. The person charged in the US reported that Rootselaar claimed to have stolen firearms from the family gun safe, convinced someone to buy ammunition for them and possessed a device that US police believed would convert a rifle into a machine gun. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿? 𝗔𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗰, 𝗶𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗴𝗮𝗽𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗮’𝘀 𝗴𝘂𝗻-𝘀𝗮𝗳𝗲𝘁𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗺𝗲. .. The principle of 'need to know' is common in security and intelligence jobs. This limits information to those who require it. But officials must remember that the public is not party to any such policy. The public has a default right to know – that’s fundamental to a free and open society."
theglobeandmail.com/opinion/…
Step 1: tell Canadians public safety is the priority
Step 2: spend hundreds of millions on a firearms compensation program
Step 3: have police leadership question the operational priority
Step 4: insist questioning the program means opposing public safety
Did I miss a step?
[EDITORIAL @globeandmail re #TumblerRidge investigation]: "This is a problem that goes beyond the police. Too often in Canada, the default assumption among officials is that the public has no right to know. .. Because of the importance of law enforcement and the justice system – which are crucial both to public safety and to the public’s perception of safety – secrecy from them has a particularly corrosive effect. .. The person charged in the US reported that Rootselaar claimed to have stolen firearms from the family gun safe, convinced someone to buy ammunition for them and possessed a device that US police believed would convert a rifle into a machine gun. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿? 𝗔𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗰, 𝗶𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗴𝗮𝗽𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗮’𝘀 𝗴𝘂𝗻-𝘀𝗮𝗳𝗲𝘁𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗺𝗲. .. The principle of 'need to know' is common in security and intelligence jobs. This limits information to those who require it. But officials must remember that the public is not party to any such policy. The public has a default right to know – that’s fundamental to a free and open society."
theglobeandmail.com/opinion/…
Yet you guys don’t seem to care about police chiefs across Canada telling you the gun grab will not reduce gun related crime. Don’t like to repost their stats because they don’t support your narrative.
But suddenly you’re interested in the info they have here?
Give me a break.
[EDITORIAL @globeandmail re #TumblerRidge investigation]: "This is a problem that goes beyond the police. Too often in Canada, the default assumption among officials is that the public has no right to know. .. Because of the importance of law enforcement and the justice system – which are crucial both to public safety and to the public’s perception of safety – secrecy from them has a particularly corrosive effect. .. The person charged in the US reported that Rootselaar claimed to have stolen firearms from the family gun safe, convinced someone to buy ammunition for them and possessed a device that US police believed would convert a rifle into a machine gun. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿? 𝗔𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗰, 𝗶𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗴𝗮𝗽𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗮’𝘀 𝗴𝘂𝗻-𝘀𝗮𝗳𝗲𝘁𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗺𝗲. .. The principle of 'need to know' is common in security and intelligence jobs. This limits information to those who require it. But officials must remember that the public is not party to any such policy. The public has a default right to know – that’s fundamental to a free and open society."
theglobeandmail.com/opinion/…
Gotta love the adult fans that reach out with “I’m your biggest fan” but in reality they know nothing about you, only care about the character, aren’t interested in learning about anything else and get upset that you’re actually a person who does real life things.
Grow up.
People need to be kinder to each other. No one really knows what the other has been through. Always remember that.
Live your life without these things imprinted on your mind. Some of us suffer so you don’t have to. Don’t willingly subject yourself to this.
I’m guessing a lot of people will watch this live streamed execution.
You’re risking more than you think. This isn’t a movie.
I’ve seen too many people die, and I can promise you, justice or rule of law will not make it any more palatable.
On bsky as well;
Given positions have held in the fandom, I see quite concerns and assumptions but no one asks me directly.
I am an open book and you may or may not like my answers, but i urge you to ask and go verify.
My opinions rarely vary from my friends here :)
🐾 SpazzFox 🐾 retweeted
Poly’s misleading narrative explained:
The 80% domestic figure is real but only for a small, biased slice of traceable long guns mostly in RCMP-policed areas (outside major ON/QC cities). It does not prove domestic guns are the “bigger” driver of the gun crime that matters most to public safety — smuggled handguns in urban centres.
Local data from the highest-crime areas shows the total reverse. Presenting the narrow RCMP subset as disproving the smuggling narrative (or as evidence that “domestic is bigger”) is classic cherry-picking and selection bias. It supports calls for more restrictions on legal domestic owners while downplaying enforcement against smuggling and illegal markets.
For years, the same voices pushed the same script: The vast majority of crime guns are smuggled across the border, so the only fix is tighter border controls. That narrative was always flawed. New @rcmpgrcpolice data show smuggled guns are a problem. But domestic guns are a bigger one. Both require action. #GunLobbyMyth by @DanforthFSC & #PolySeSouvient via @TheSpec therecord.com/opinion/contri…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The cited RCMP data excludes traces from Ontario and Quebec—provinces with their own agencies—and is not representative nationally; in Ontario, police report 80-90% of crime guns as smuggled from the US. theglobeandmail.com/canada/article… cbc.ca/news/canada/to…
🐾 SpazzFox 🐾 retweeted
Gorillaz concert today! I forgot to say while back @SpazzFox surprised me with Mountain Experience Tickets! I am so hyped! Aahhh!