Pinned Tweet
Reform UK - The Economic Reset & Pillar 1: Energy Sovereignty.
In my view, this is exactly the unapologetic economic reset Britain has been crying out for. Reform UK’s newly unveiled 64-point Economic Rescue Plan isn’t just modest political tinkering—it is the most serious, common-sense supply-side deregulation agenda proposed in modern British political history.
Framed around the blunt reality that "Britain is broke", this document lays out a comprehensive strategy to dismantle the "vetocracy"—the dense thicket of statutory obligations, planning inquiries, endless judicial reviews, and environmental remits that have throttled British capital investment, industrial capacity, and infrastructure delivery for decades.
By packaging 64 specific statutory rollbacks into a single Chancellor's manifesto, the objective is clear: shock the British economy out of its low-growth, high-tax equilibrium by cutting development approval times, slashing legal friction, and directly re-industrialising our energy and manufacturing sectors. It is an overdue declaration of war on the Whitehall consensus that has managed our national decline for thirty years.
This fundamentally redraws the battle lines of UK economic debate. Here is the full breakdown of the five structural pillars underpinning Reform’s rescue plan: 🧵👇
It was a Westminster press briefing called at 72 hours' notice ahead of the Budget, not an arena rally booked six months in advance.
The room was packed out with political journalists, broadcast cameras, and economic correspondents. Instead of interrogating a detailed 64-point plan to slash £40bn of Whitehall waste and restore British growth, Sky’s top takeaway is schoolyard seating-plan gossip.
This is why trust in legacy broadcast media is in freefall. Britain is facing £3 trillion in national debt, public services are buckling, and the lobby pack behaves like a clutch of lifestyle bloggers.
Labour’s official press office is reduced to clipping five seconds of someone checking their notes backstage because you don't have a single counter-argument to a £40bn plan to cut your bloated state.
Nigel Farage stood on stage with Robert Jenrick at the podium taking questions from the lobby for over an hour. The country is facing 70-year high taxes, ballooning deficits, and economic stagnation under your watch, and the best Labour HQ can produce is schoolboy sniggering from a BBC cutaway camera.
When you have zero solutions for Britain’s bankruptcy, petty visual spin is all you have left. Pathetic.
Whitehall reviews aren’t launched to find answers; they exist to bury public anger. In five months' time, Shabana Mahmood will quietly kick the can into another consultation phase or bury the report on a Friday afternoon when the media has moved on. The establishment knows two-tier policing and institutional cowardice are indefensible under scrutiny, so their entire strategy is delay, dilute, and pray the British public forgets. It won't work this time. deferring it.
Nice James - slashing bureaucratic red tape, drilling our own energy, and stripping back the deadweight in Whitehall is the only way to get Britain dynamic again. The state was built to serve the nation, not suffocate it. Time to get the boot off our necks and back wealth creators.
It is important to recognise that most of these measure are literally just telling the state to get its boot of our nation’s neck.
The Garden of England is still glorious but the Yookay Jungle is growing fast.
Less state bureaucracy
More rugged individualism
Let’s get the economy cooking on (our own) gas.
Let’s deport the dead wood
And let’s start enjoying being alive again.
I agree Esther - it's genuinely surreal watching a government instruct ordinary families to stockpile baked beans and bottled water because they’ve completely neglected national defense.
Telling the public to prepare for conflict in 1,000 days while kicking the actual strategic spending review down the road is pure evasion. You don't deter hostile adversaries by outsourcing civil resilience while our frontline armed forces are starved of munitions and the Royal Navy is down to single-digit operational escorts.
The first duty of government is the defense of the realm, yet Number 10 treats military procurement like an administrative afterthought while prioritizing ballooning welfare budgets. We need hard naval power, domestic manufacturing resilience, and real defense investment right now—not theatrical panic campaigns to paper over political delay.
What was the point of Wes Streeting telling us that we must be ready for war in 1000 days?
Was this some kind of media stunt to reassure us that nothing would happen for three years because he knows he’s not getting any meaningful money for defence in the near future, and Burnham has kicked the defence spending review down the road for another year? Or was it because that will take him conveniently beyond the next general election?
But let's not worry, instead of building up our nation's military capacity the government has issued a national 'Be Ready' campaign to get us all stockpiling tinned goods and water. I am sure the Russian Military will be quaking in their boots knowing we are all armed with extra tins of baked beans in the cupboard!
We all know Andy Burnham would sooner spend taxpayers' money on benefits than defence of the nation, so if Wes Streeting needs to tell anyone we must be prepared for war, it is the Prime Minister not the rest of us.
The hard numbers Westminster never wants published: 754,000 EU Settlement Scheme claimants already drawing £4.6bn a year in Universal Credit, with £2.2bn handed to people out of work. According to the OBR's own figures, every single additional resident requires £20,000 in capital infrastructure spending just to keep public services standing.
Bringing back Freedom of Movement under Labour’s pathetic youth mobility fig leaf isn't diplomacy—it is an economic suicide pact. When European countries like Germany and Spain are handing out fast-track citizenship and amnesties to millions from the third world, an open border to the EU is an open border to the globe.
Our NHS is collapsing, housing is unaffordable for young Brits, and councils are bankrupt. We cannot afford to be the welfare safety valve for the entire European continent.
Spare working households the lectures on picking up the tab, Kemi.
Your party was the architect of both disasters: you created the inflation with reckless lockdown spending and zero-interest-rate addiction, and you supercharged the benefits bill by abandoning welfare conditionality for over a decade.
Now, reduced to opposition, you suddenly discover fiscal discipline and tweet about "getting Britain working again" as if you were an innocent bystander. When in power, you penalised work, rewarded economic inactivity, and covered the shortfall with record-high taxes. Nobody believes the party that broke the welfare system has any clue how to fix it.
Christopher Hope’s performance is textbook lobby cartel behavior. Farage and Jenrick stood up to deliver a serious, structural 64-point economic rescue blueprint to salvage a bankrupt country, and the very first question from "the people's channel" wasn't about productivity, £40bn in Whitehall cuts, or tax relief. It was a sneering, gossip-column attack about room capacity and a cherry-picked Ipsos poll. GB News built its entire brand promising to be the insurgent antidote to the BBC, yet the moment Reform puts forward real alternative governance, @christopherhope sounds indistinguishable from a Guardian lobby intern doing a hatchet job for the Tory rump. @GBNEWS
Case in point.
Less than an hour after @christopherhope chose to ignore a £40bn economic plan to tweet about empty chairs, look who immediately weaponises it: official @CCHQPress.
This is the exact media-political nexus in action. @GBNEWS provides the faux-"alternative" setup, and the Conservative Party machine swoops in to amplify the smear. They don’t want to debate deregulation, Whitehall waste, or tax cuts because they broke the country for 14 years.
When you challenge the Uniparty consensus, the entire cartel coordinates in plain sight.
Your party gutted the British Army to its smallest headcount since the Napoleonic era, shrank the Royal Navy to barely a dozen operational surface combatants, and left our frontline troops with depleted stockpiles and recruitment contracts outsourced to corporate failure. You spent over a decade kicking the 2.5% target down the road, and now you want the country to take your fictional 3% promise seriously?
Labour is utterly paralyzed and clueless on defense, but the only reason Britain is caught defenseless today is because the Tories spent fourteen years treating our armed forces like an administrative cost-cutting exercise. The Uniparty broke our military together; pretending you’re the solution is insulting the public's intelligence.
The government are all over the place on defence spending. I don't think Andy Burnham realises he commits to spending 3% of GDP on defence by 2030 in this interview...his Defence Secretary won’t even make that commitment!
When the government are saying Britain needs to be ready for war in 1000 days, hitting a defence spending target in 2035 is too late. Getting to 3% by 2030 means spending the money to be ready NOW, not in 9 years time.
Burnham spent eight years as Mayor of Greater Manchester promising to wipe out rough sleeping, watched it skyrocket, and now runs PR campaigns pretending he holds the solution. Lecturing the British public that homelessness is a choice while his government actively empties prisons onto the street with sleeping bags shows just how detached Labour has become. Empty photo-ops, zero delivery, and not an ounce of accountability in sight.
Even as Foreign Secretary, the job description is advancing British national security and British economic interests, not running an unelected international charity on the taxpayer's dime. British diplomacy used to be about securing critical supply chains, striking strategic bilateral trade deals, and defending our borders. Under Labour, the Foreign Office behaves like a virtue-signalling NGO that uses working-class tax revenue to spray aid and lecture foreign conflicts that don't care what Whitehall thinks. If British foreign policy doesn't deliver a single tangible benefit to the British citizens funding it, it isn't statecraft—it's pure vanity.
The fundamental trap of the Uniparty is believing the state has a divine right to taxpayers' money before families even see their wages. Burnham can't cut taxes because Labour's entire model relies on feeding bloated Whitehall quangos, DEI bureaucracies, and public sector wage hikes without demanding an ounce of productivity in return. Slashing £40 billion of deadweight waste and putting £1,300 directly back into household pockets is how you inject life back into the real economy. Let the people who actually earn the money decide how to spend it, not civil service desk-drivers.
Absolutely majestic. She’s stood there in a crisp, cream power suit looking like she’s about to put a homeless bloke in a festive crate by the radiator until Boxing Day, before remembering she promised to keep him through February. Truly heartwarming stuff from the People’s Republic.
"This moral mission of ours isn't just for Christmas, we're in it for the long haul."
Housing secretary Angela Rayner announces the government's plans to end rough sleeping at a summit in Downing Street.
trib.al/97QIFQh
📺 Sky 501
Steve Scrase retweeted
Watch LIVE as we lay out our Economic Rescue Plan. xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1pKkOXBvk…
Andy Burnham’s assertion that the UK only "lost immigration control" due to Brexit is a staggering display of political deflection 🤦. To reduce a generation-long border breakdown to a lost EU returns agreement is an insult to public intelligence. The uncomfortable reality—one the Westminster bubble willfully ignores—is that there is scarcely a community up and down this country untouched by the sheer pressure of mass migration, both legal and illegal.
Politicians want to pretend this crisis exists in a post-Brexit vacuum, but the numbers expose the lie. In 2022, small boat arrivals hit roughly 45,700, and around 29,400 in 2023. Yet, in 2022 alone, overall legal net migration hit a record-shattering 745,000. By framing the current crisis strictly around Channel crossings and Brexit, the political class is trying to insulate itself from its own historical failures and the structural collapse of local public services staring them in the face. 🧵👇
Before the Boats: The dismantling of UK border control did not start in the English Channel; it began in Whitehall. For context, in 1993 under John Major's government, UK net migration was effectively zero. However, the transition into the New Labour years marked a deliberate, ideological decision to open the floodgates. By the mid-2000s, net migration had surged to hundreds of thousands annually as the establishment engineered an economy addicted to cheap imported labour rather than investing in domestic capital, training, and productivity.
What politicians like Burnham nostalgically defend as a "revolving door" of temporary mobility was, in reality, the beginning of a permanent demographic transformation. Working-class towns were left to absorb the immense strain on local surgeries, schools, and housing stocks. Instead of acknowledging the suppressed wages and infrastructure deficits, the political class dismissed legitimate public concerns entirely. 🧵👇
After the Boats: The current era is merely the visible, chaotic symptom of a much deeper institutional surrender. The daily arrival of small boats exposes a state that has lost both the legislative will and the operational capacity to enforce its own sovereignty. The civil service and legal frameworks are now visibly paralyzed, unable to efficiently process or deport those with no legal right to be here.
Yet, the boats also serve as a convenient distraction for the political establishment. While public and media attention is rightfully drawn to illegal crossings and billions spent on hotel bills, legal migration continues at unsustainable levels that dwarf historical norms. Blaming Brexit for this systemic collapse is merely an excuse for politicians who lack the courage to admit that both legal and illegal influxes have vastly exceeded the nation's physical and economic carrying capacity.
I know Restore voters want our country back, but we have to look at the bigger picture and call this out for what it is: a social media gimmick with zero policy substance.
The crisis facing Britain isn't driven by who gets married; it is driven by a macro-economic model that uses cheap imported labor to prop up corporate profits while a million young Brits are abandoned on out-of-work benefits. The bigger picture connects mass migration directly to council bankruptcies, impossible housing costs, depleted military barracks being turned into migrant hubs, and human rights courts overruling Parliament.
Tweeting about marriage rules is the political equivalent of repainting the front door while the entire house is collapsing underneath it. Real governance demands a comprehensive, cross-departmental strategy that dismantles the economic incentives, fixes the borders, and restores legal supremacy all at once. Anything less is pure theater.
The Tories broke the economy, Labour is taxing what’s left of it, and only Reform is putting forward actual pro-growth solutions.
Farage and Jenrick laying out a real blueprint to dismantle EU red tape and reward British workers is what leadership actually looks like. The Uniparty's time is fast coming to an end.






















