Hertfordshire, England
Joined October 2014
Sundowner in Letna Park at the end of another great day with my @WeAreTripsmiths tour group in Prague. We've been covering the history of Czechoslovakia from 1939 to 1989, and it's proved to be emotional at times. It's a tour I'd very much like to do again, so watch this space.
4
8
73
2,635
My latest cartoon for tomorrow's Telegraph Buy a print of my cartoons at telegraph.co.uk/mattprints Original artwork from chrisbeetles.com
2
150
7
672
11,749
Love that @WeAreTripsmiths have launched the 'Guy Walters Collection', which makes me sound like a fashion brand. Do join me on either – or both! – of these trips: Prague 1939-1989, 19-23 Oct 26 Colditz & Great Escape, 12-17 Apr 27 tripsmiths.com/guy
14
9
67
14,321
You have no idea about Defence.
My Week in Westminster - a tale of two speeches. @Keir_Starmer launched our Defence Investment Plan - which will prepare Britain for modern warfare. And @andyburnham set out his plans for No.10 - more power for communities (naming Port Talbot) and more support for industry.
46
69
3
397
6,508
What would you do if were bimbling along in Poland in 1944 and found an entire V2 in a marsh? Leave it alone? Hide it before the Germans arrived? Or spirit it away to Britain? Found out what really happened in my new @HoZ_Books book coming out Thursday, Stealing Hitler's Rocket!
7
24
1
108
4,815
My Saturday @Telegraph #cartoon
11
1
21
630
If the problem is you're borrowing too much, that arises because you're spending too much. If you're spending too much, you must reduce your spending...It's a very silly person that says, "I'm going bankrupt the way I am but I can't afford to cut so don't ask me." [...] You know 30% of the people in council houses have higher household incomes than 45% of the people in owner-occupied homes. And yet, the people in the owner-occupied homes are having to subsidise some of that 30%. You don't cut subsidies to those people who need them. The trouble now is they're right across the board. And where do subsidies come from? Not from the government, but out of the taxpayers' pocket.
38
357
29
1,865
159,997
As someone with a worm’s eye view of the legislative process, it really irritates me that Starmer’s spin for the poor local election results is that his Govt hasn’t been moving fast enough. There were 40 bills in the first parliamentary session and there are 37 in the second, as set out in yesterday’s King’s Speech. Starmer has created 96 peers – a higher rate per year than any previous Prime Minister. He could not be going any faster. The fact that the legislation the Govt has rammed through has not delivered growth or reduced the tax burden on working people or lowered the cost of living – delivered the ‘change’ that Labour promised – is because they’re not designed to do that. They’re designed to placate the Party’s ‘stakeholders’ – backbench Labour MPs, trade unions, NGOs, think tanks, lobby groups, allies in the legal profession, cheerleaders in the media, etc. It’s been bleedin’ obvious to everyone on the opposition benches – and probably some on the Govt benches too – that the legislation was introduced in the last parliamentary session – particularly the Employment Rights Act – will impede growth, not accelerate it. We’ve told the Govt’s ministers this in the chamber again and again and everything we’ve predicted would happen has happened – rising unemployment, rising inflation, accelerating borrowing costs, an unmanageable welfare bill, exodus of high income-earners, thereby increasing the tax burden on the rest of us, etc. The idea that if the Govt had been going *even faster* – which is just straightforwardly impossible – the country would be better off, is for the birds. Even as a piece of spin, it’s pathetic. The reason we’re in an economic doom spiral is because this Govt is only interested in pandering to its ‘stakeholders’ and their only motive is to line their own pockets and advance their own narrow sectional interests. Changing the leader will make no difference. We need a Prime Minister and a Govt who are going to prioritise the national interest. I don’t see anyone in the pack of hyenas stalking Starmer who’s going to do that.
87
1,327
67
4,169
89,041
Absolutely perfect - I must rewatch the whole thing xitter.cf/HoodedClaw1974/status/…
32
181
27
1,099
84,022
Well look at that…. There’s always a tweet! 😁
Boris Johnson will happily hang the last civil servant out to dry before he takes responsibility or does the right thing. Fresh from throwing junior staff under the bus, he’s plotting to sacrifice his henchman to save his own skin. Rotten to the core. theguardian.com/politics/202…
124
2,804
39
15,695
326,375
So apart from trying to give away the Chagos islands. Recognising Palestine. 13 ministerial resignations. Showing full confidence in Morgan McSweeney, Peter Mandelson, Sue Gray and Lord Ali. Blaming the far right for an island of strangers. 16 Policy U turns and rising. Having no operable warships. Not smashing the gangs. Approving a huge Chinese embassy in London. Spending 23 seconds laying a wreath in Southport only to rush back to a drinks party. Appointing an anti Muslim hostility tsar. Raising income tax. Raising inheritance tax. Raising national insurance. Raising capital gains tax, Raising council tax. Raising value added tax. Raising mansion tax. Increasing welfare spending and the minimum wage whilst freezing tax allowances. Scrapping jury trials. The only boat he has stopped is HMS dragon from crossing the channel. What has Starmer really achieved apart from breakfast clubs and the decay of our country?
883
6,265
361
18,373
268,893
We're in the news! (Thanks to @stusatirical for mentioning this.) There are a few minor inaccuracies in the article — eg the Manor House is listed Grade II* — but hopefully it will help spread the word that the Manor House is in safe hands. spaldingvoice.co.uk/bid-to-s…
2
9
76
1,239
Thrilled that #TheLastHuntforNaziGold is a critic's choice in the Times, the Sunday Times, and the Mail! Please tune into @HISTORYUK at 2100 tonight, or watch on demand with @NOWTV.
1
7
27
1,132