❗
Replying to @wfreemantle
Obviously uyatshisa West cause he’s been backed up even when he wasn’t supposed to be.
Hooker v Arendse for the other wing spot when Kolbe comes back is blockbuster trials that I'm here for! In the wise words of Ta Bev... "WOW, UMCULO!!"
2
400
⛈️⛈️??
#NEWS: Bok star Pieter-Steph du Toit is returning to South Africa 👇#SouthAfrica #Springboks rugby365.com/countries/south…
70
Lovely first phase variation to open up the dance floor!! Scotland v All Blacks will be a humdinger! Strap in!
1
157
Yazi 😂😂😂
Replying to @lelzandco
This mindset and thought process is probably exactly why they aren’t answering your calls 😭😭🤣🤣🤣.
136
"Is good under the high ball though, that’s undeniable but uses the tactic too often"
"Uses the tactic too often"
Argh 😂😂
Replying to @SpringbokRWC
With a few quizzical responses here is the rationale:
- Lazy on D (doesn’t track across, jogs)
- Never in the right position at the back (50:22 target with acres of space when he plays)
- Prone to (highly unnecessary) forward passes
- Attitude seems (unnecessarily again) aggressive and arrogant, escalating nothing moments
- On attack, runs at 45 degrees, shutting down space, skips, then goes into contact, never offloading (only flinging long ball when it’s not on)
- Not physical enough in contact
- Never a turnover threat
- Only covers one other position (maybe)
- Way better options already performing, notably Siyaya, Willie, Quan, Luan
Is good under the high ball though, that’s undeniable but uses the tactic too often.
127
Are you happy with this Willie description?
Replying to @SpringbokRWC
With a few quizzical responses here is the rationale:
- Lazy on D (doesn’t track across, jogs)
- Never in the right position at the back (50:22 target with acres of space when he plays)
- Prone to (highly unnecessary) forward passes
- Attitude seems (unnecessarily again) aggressive and arrogant, escalating nothing moments
- On attack, runs at 45 degrees, shutting down space, skips, then goes into contact, never offloading (only flinging long ball when it’s not on)
- Not physical enough in contact
- Never a turnover threat
- Only covers one other position (maybe)
- Way better options already performing, notably Siyaya, Willie, Quan, Luan
Is good under the high ball though, that’s undeniable but uses the tactic too often.
223
"Is good under the high ball though, that’s undeniable but uses the tactic too often"
"Uses the tactic too often"
Argh 😂😂
Replying to @SpringbokRWC
With a few quizzical responses here is the rationale:
- Lazy on D (doesn’t track across, jogs)
- Never in the right position at the back (50:22 target with acres of space when he plays)
- Prone to (highly unnecessary) forward passes
- Attitude seems (unnecessarily again) aggressive and arrogant, escalating nothing moments
- On attack, runs at 45 degrees, shutting down space, skips, then goes into contact, never offloading (only flinging long ball when it’s not on)
- Not physical enough in contact
- Never a turnover threat
- Only covers one other position (maybe)
- Way better options already performing, notably Siyaya, Willie, Quan, Luan
Is good under the high ball though, that’s undeniable but uses the tactic too often.
101
"Is good under the high ball though, that’s undeniable but uses the tactic too often"
"Uses the tactic too often"
Argh 😂😂
Replying to @SpringbokRWC
With a few quizzical responses here is the rationale:
- Lazy on D (doesn’t track across, jogs)
- Never in the right position at the back (50:22 target with acres of space when he plays)
- Prone to (highly unnecessary) forward passes
- Attitude seems (unnecessarily again) aggressive and arrogant, escalating nothing moments
- On attack, runs at 45 degrees, shutting down space, skips, then goes into contact, never offloading (only flinging long ball when it’s not on)
- Not physical enough in contact
- Never a turnover threat
- Only covers one other position (maybe)
- Way better options already performing, notably Siyaya, Willie, Quan, Luan
Is good under the high ball though, that’s undeniable but uses the tactic too often.
57
Now let's use the same rational for let's say . Willie? He ticks ALL THE BOXES you have just mentioned. Heck, is this a Willie description?
Replying to @SpringbokRWC
With a few quizzical responses here is the rationale:
- Lazy on D (doesn’t track across, jogs)
- Never in the right position at the back (50:22 target with acres of space when he plays)
- Prone to (highly unnecessary) forward passes
- Attitude seems (unnecessarily again) aggressive and arrogant, escalating nothing moments
- On attack, runs at 45 degrees, shutting down space, skips, then goes into contact, never offloading (only flinging long ball when it’s not on)
- Not physical enough in contact
- Never a turnover threat
- Only covers one other position (maybe)
- Way better options already performing, notably Siyaya, Willie, Quan, Luan
Is good under the high ball though, that’s undeniable but uses the tactic too often.
48
Which Elton are you talking about? Which country are you talking about? Heck this could read as a compliment if you weren't a faceless account on twitter who can't even back up his own tardy opinion with the bare minimum of showing his/her face.
It's annoying.
Stupid too.
Fassi is this era’s Elton: the whole country knows he’s not good enough to play yet he keeps getting selected.
78
It's not "race rage baiting" if its true. The question was "Would Rassie have treated Handre or Willie the same way he has treated Am and Mapimpi? I'm talking getting to your milestone. Nothing more, nothing less."
It's a simple q. What is so difficult to understand?? Yes or no
Lukhanyo was the best player on the planet in his pomp.
Think Rassie would keep him around if was still hit that or close to that standard. But unfortunately he isn't.
On Makazole, he hasn't played for the Sharks recently and just look at the depth at wing for answers.
Let's look beyond our noses before race rage baiting.
1
2
172








