Conservative 🇺🇸 Rock and Roll 🎸 Biz/Finance Exec 📊 “Courage is fear holding on a minute longer” Gen Patton. @uhtred1973 is my other half

#BostonStrong #TeamColorado
Joined March 2015
Thank you, Daddy, for your service and sacrifice to our great country. #GreenBeretColonel #DeathFromAbove #ArmySurgeon #BestDaddyEvah #HumbleBrag
186
440
40
1,397
– at Cresson, PA
32
230
5
1,753
13,842
L – at Cresson, PA
14
199
8
1,280
10,301
4
67
1
710
13,994
Well said, Father Chris. Thank you.
Prominent Roman Catholic influencers and some leading figures in the anti-abortion movement are behaving disgracefully over the Lindsay Clancy trial. They are mocking compassion for a severely mentally ill woman, dismissing illnesses they do not understand, and turning a family’s destruction into content. It is shameful. I am a priest, not a lawyer. I am not deciding Massachusetts law or the verdict. I am speaking about the moral reality before us. Cora, Dawson, and Callan are dead. Their mother killed them. Lindsay then tried to kill herself and is now paralyzed. Mental illness does not make the children’s deaths less real, and compassion must not turn Lindsay into a celebrity. This is a tragedy from every direction. But more than one thing can be true. Lindsay was trying to get help. She went from provider to provider, reporting severe anxiety, depression, insomnia, intrusive thoughts, and thoughts of suicide. She contacted crisis services and entered a psychiatric hospital. Nineteen days after her discharge, her children were dead. Prosecution witnesses described her as a loving and devoted mother. That does not erase what she did, but it destroys the caricature of a cold mother who simply wanted her children gone. The testimony has exposed fragmented care. Providers did not always know what others knew, and records were not always available or requested. I am not saying every provider was uncaring or incompetent. But when a woman moves through this many offices, medications, and levels of psychiatric care, someone must see the whole picture. Taken together, the warning signs were everywhere. Postpartum psychosis, postpartum depression, and bipolar disorder are real. Lindsay’s precise illness and mental condition when she killed her children are contested in court. The existence of these illnesses is not. A religious following does not make someone a psychiatrist. Suffering people do not tell everyone the same things. Lindsay may have told her mother one part, her husband another, a clinician something else, and a chaplain what she could not say elsewhere. Anyone who has cared for suffering people should understand that. We do not have to choose between grieving Cora, Dawson, and Callan and recognizing that their mother was severely ill. A movement claiming to defend vulnerable life should recognize that a mentally ill woman is also vulnerable. Compassion for Lindsay takes nothing from her children. Cruelty does nothing to honor them. People on the margins have been central to my priestly service since 2008. Women in psychiatric crisis are among them. I will not turn Lindsay into a hero or pretend three children were not killed by their mother. But neither will I join a public stoning led by influencers who mistake cruelty for moral clarity. Three children should still be alive. We must ask what must change so another family does not reach the same horrifying end.
2
120
đź’… #LindsayClancy
🤖 Made with AI
62
56
14
1,046
22,778
Prominent Roman Catholic influencers and some leading figures in the anti-abortion movement are behaving disgracefully over the Lindsay Clancy trial. They are mocking compassion for a severely mentally ill woman, dismissing illnesses they do not understand, and turning a family’s destruction into content. It is shameful. I am a priest, not a lawyer. I am not deciding Massachusetts law or the verdict. I am speaking about the moral reality before us. Cora, Dawson, and Callan are dead. Their mother killed them. Lindsay then tried to kill herself and is now paralyzed. Mental illness does not make the children’s deaths less real, and compassion must not turn Lindsay into a celebrity. This is a tragedy from every direction. But more than one thing can be true. Lindsay was trying to get help. She went from provider to provider, reporting severe anxiety, depression, insomnia, intrusive thoughts, and thoughts of suicide. She contacted crisis services and entered a psychiatric hospital. Nineteen days after her discharge, her children were dead. Prosecution witnesses described her as a loving and devoted mother. That does not erase what she did, but it destroys the caricature of a cold mother who simply wanted her children gone. The testimony has exposed fragmented care. Providers did not always know what others knew, and records were not always available or requested. I am not saying every provider was uncaring or incompetent. But when a woman moves through this many offices, medications, and levels of psychiatric care, someone must see the whole picture. Taken together, the warning signs were everywhere. Postpartum psychosis, postpartum depression, and bipolar disorder are real. Lindsay’s precise illness and mental condition when she killed her children are contested in court. The existence of these illnesses is not. A religious following does not make someone a psychiatrist. Suffering people do not tell everyone the same things. Lindsay may have told her mother one part, her husband another, a clinician something else, and a chaplain what she could not say elsewhere. Anyone who has cared for suffering people should understand that. We do not have to choose between grieving Cora, Dawson, and Callan and recognizing that their mother was severely ill. A movement claiming to defend vulnerable life should recognize that a mentally ill woman is also vulnerable. Compassion for Lindsay takes nothing from her children. Cruelty does nothing to honor them. People on the margins have been central to my priestly service since 2008. Women in psychiatric crisis are among them. I will not turn Lindsay into a hero or pretend three children were not killed by their mother. But neither will I join a public stoning led by influencers who mistake cruelty for moral clarity. Three children should still be alive. We must ask what must change so another family does not reach the same horrifying end.
290
278
67
1,464
201,245
“We do not have to choose between grieving Cora, Dawson, and Callan and recognizing that their mother was severely ill. … Compassion for Lindsay takes nothing from her children. Cruelty does nothing to honor them.”
Prominent Roman Catholic influencers and some leading figures in the anti-abortion movement are behaving disgracefully over the Lindsay Clancy trial. They are mocking compassion for a severely mentally ill woman, dismissing illnesses they do not understand, and turning a family’s destruction into content. It is shameful. I am a priest, not a lawyer. I am not deciding Massachusetts law or the verdict. I am speaking about the moral reality before us. Cora, Dawson, and Callan are dead. Their mother killed them. Lindsay then tried to kill herself and is now paralyzed. Mental illness does not make the children’s deaths less real, and compassion must not turn Lindsay into a celebrity. This is a tragedy from every direction. But more than one thing can be true. Lindsay was trying to get help. She went from provider to provider, reporting severe anxiety, depression, insomnia, intrusive thoughts, and thoughts of suicide. She contacted crisis services and entered a psychiatric hospital. Nineteen days after her discharge, her children were dead. Prosecution witnesses described her as a loving and devoted mother. That does not erase what she did, but it destroys the caricature of a cold mother who simply wanted her children gone. The testimony has exposed fragmented care. Providers did not always know what others knew, and records were not always available or requested. I am not saying every provider was uncaring or incompetent. But when a woman moves through this many offices, medications, and levels of psychiatric care, someone must see the whole picture. Taken together, the warning signs were everywhere. Postpartum psychosis, postpartum depression, and bipolar disorder are real. Lindsay’s precise illness and mental condition when she killed her children are contested in court. The existence of these illnesses is not. A religious following does not make someone a psychiatrist. Suffering people do not tell everyone the same things. Lindsay may have told her mother one part, her husband another, a clinician something else, and a chaplain what she could not say elsewhere. Anyone who has cared for suffering people should understand that. We do not have to choose between grieving Cora, Dawson, and Callan and recognizing that their mother was severely ill. A movement claiming to defend vulnerable life should recognize that a mentally ill woman is also vulnerable. Compassion for Lindsay takes nothing from her children. Cruelty does nothing to honor them. People on the margins have been central to my priestly service since 2008. Women in psychiatric crisis are among them. I will not turn Lindsay into a hero or pretend three children were not killed by their mother. But neither will I join a public stoning led by influencers who mistake cruelty for moral clarity. Three children should still be alive. We must ask what must change so another family does not reach the same horrifying end.
65
148
9
1,528
56,378
I think the Right needs to take a long, hard look at the messages being pushed on social media right now. We are months away from the midterms, and women are watching. You cannot claim to value mothers while mocking, minimizing, or completely dismissing the very real mental health crises women can experience after giving birth. You cannot talk about protecting families while showing so little compassion, understanding, or concern for postpartum depression, postpartum psychosis, and maternal mental healthcare. As mothers, we know pregnancy and childbirth do not end when the baby is born. Our bodies change. Our hormones change. Our brains and emotional experiences can change. And sometimes women become desperately, frighteningly unwell. Acknowledging that does not mean abandoning accountability. It means having enough emotional intelligence to understand that compassion and accountability can exist in the same sentence. I have always voted conservative. But some of the vile things I have watched conservative voices say about women and mental illness have pushed me straight into political homelessness. I refuse to surrender my compassion just to belong to a political tribe. If your politics require you to stop seeing the humanity in people who are suffering, I want no part of them. Maybe it’s time we stopped asking whether someone is Right or Left and started asking whether what they’re saying is compassionate, reasonable, and true.
1,027
119
89
767
75,643
Back home. Please note that Saved by the Blood had her old account hacked, and is now @vonzion2. First Class Follows: @SumErgoMonstro @TheyCallMeDoc1 @TheBeaSmith @MeganSmiles @TheGart @lmontanad @TrumpGirlLove @thebuuck @nygrlahart
2
3
1
3
100
WOW! AAG @HarmeetKDhillon of the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ just DOUBLED DOWN: “I sent out a notice to top election officials in 50 states reminding them that knowingly allowing non-citizens to vote in federal elections in their states is a crime.” Thank you!
879
6,749
143
25,735
257,027
Jesus, I trust in You
27
182
3
2,303
14,223
The Lindsay Clancy trial has reminded me how quickly social media turns a complicated case into two teams screaming at each other. I’ve watched the testimony, listened to the witnesses, followed the medical evidence and tried to look at the entire picture — not just the pieces that fit a preferred narrative. You can believe Cora, Dawson and Callan deserved justice while also believing postpartum mental illness deserves to be understood. You can have compassion for Lindsay without minimizing what happened. You can have compassion for Patrick without inventing conspiracy theories about a father who lost all three of his children. And you can disagree with someone without calling them stupid, unstable or a disgrace because they see the evidence differently. Cases like this should create conversations about mental healthcare, postpartum psychosis, treatment failures, warning signs and how families get help before a crisis becomes a tragedy. That conversation is far more important than “winning” an argument on the internet. Cora. Dawson. Callan. Their lives should remain at the center of it all. 🧡
31
26
4
243
9,860
Ben Shapiro rebukes his Daily Wire colleague Matt Walsh, who spent Monday arguing that postpartum depression was due to women’s selfishness. “Please, please, please, stop being a moron.”
221
280
223
6,400
2,383,332
What is hard to comprehend is that this is not a frivolous prosecution. There are proper arguments to be made to support the contention that these were intentional killings without a valid mental health defense. I don't see it beyond a reasonable doubt given their burden to disprove the asserted defense, but it is surreal that the prosecution in this case is so unlikable and seemingly has such a credibility deficit with the jury vis a vis the defense. Idea for the prosecution: try the case fairly, professionally and credibility, let the jury decide Clancy's fate and then go home.
This absolutely was "intentional" and a proper basis of a mistrial that would terminate a case. The ADA's questions were planned and purposeful. They were deliberate. She knew (or should have known) this was beyond improper. That is textbook, open and shut, "intentional misconduct." Her outrageous conduct put the defense in an impossible position: let the stricken answers hang in the ether (you cannot put that toothpaste back in the tube) or be forced to seek a mistrial to erase the improper statements entirely, while giving the DA a "do over" to try to correct what thus far has been a rocky prosecution. Any such mistrial 100% would have been caused by the prosecution and should result in a complete end to the matter.
28
42
2
698
43,333
Weeks of trial and here’s what the prosecutors have told us about Lindsay Clancy: LC was a drug seeker but also didn’t take her meds. She didn’t ask for help but she asked for help and had perfect care. Her suicide attempt wasn’t real or maybe it was but she sucks at suicide. She was a controlling mom who had to do everything but also so mad that a nanny wouldn’t do the work for her that she killed her kids. You can only have a Mental Health disease if you see unicorns in the corner for a long period of time. Being able to drive to the doctor or do a Google search is solid evidence of strong mental health. This is a modern day witch trial!
62
167
15
2,048
80,241
Every federal prosecutor. Every federal agent. Every US attorney. They all report up the chain to the attorney general, who reports to the President of the United States. That is Article Two of the Constitution. Democrats are suddenly crying about Justice Department independence. They had no problem with Biden-era lawfare. No problem waiving Trump's executive privilege to greenlight the Mar-a-Lago raid. They only care now because a Republican is in charge. Too bad. Now Todd Blanche is AG. Now there's accountability. And the left is terrified.
81
769
20
2,379
53,240
Bea retweeted
Seth Aitken and Talos Farris were out hitting doors together in Fall River, getting the word out about both of their campaigns! Both candidates are working hard, meeting voters face to face, and earning every single vote. From the Bristol County District Attorney’s race to the 7th Bristol District, Seth and Talos are putting in the work to earn the support of voters across the region. Want to get involved or support their campaigns? Check out their websites: 🔴 Talos Farris for State Representative: farrisforrep.com 🔴 Seth Aitken for Bristol County District Attorney: aitken4da.com Let’s keep the momentum going! 🇺🇸 #mapoli
6
13
503
It's not surprising, although frightening, that the crisis hotline clinician told Lindsay Clancy she did not meet the criteria for hospitalization because she had no "suicide plan." We have heard this over and over and over again in this trial. Here is what not one clinician has testified to: There is no legal requirement that there must be a plan to be hospitalized. It's especially true when the patient tells clinicians over and over again there are "dark thoughts" and suicidal ideation. Tell me anywhere in MGL c. 123 that it says that there must be a plan. xitter.cf/TheCarolErskine/status…
A lot is being made of the testimony that Lindsay Clancy did not have a specific suicide “plan.” That is NOT the Massachusetts legal standard. It’s not in the statute or the DMH regulations. G.L. c. 123, §1 does not require a formulated suicide plan. Neither the statute nor the SJC requires a patient to articulate a specific suicide plan. The legal question is risk—not whether the patient has disclosed the mechanics of how she would take her life. Lindsay Clancy had repeatedly reported suicidal thoughts, called a suicide hotline/crisis service, and ultimately admitted herself to McLean BECAUSE of depression and suicidality. Under Massachusetts law severe, recurring suicidal ideation and actions—like her documented calls to a crisis hotline and seeking emergency psychiatric help—can legally constitute a "likelihood of serious harm" to satisfy an involuntary hold, with or without a formulated plan.
68
114
12
940
65,005