Making 7 figure ecomm brand owners more money through email marketing | $8.5 million generated for clients in new email revenue

Book Your Free Audit ⬇️
Joined April 2022
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
Replying to @teortaxesTex
25
78
54
826
1,114,912
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
DeepSeek
@deepseek_aiMay 22
We are making our discount permanent! 🎉 Enjoy building with DeepSeek-V4-Pro and bring your innovative ideas to life! 🚀
DeepSeek
@deepseek_aiApr 29
The DeepSeek-V4-Pro discount has been extended until May 31, 2026, 15:59 UTC!
1,476
2,725
1,536
24,193
7,105,731
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
Hi, I'm Audrey. I'm making 1,000 AI caretakers for seniors. Here's my story:
368
150
94
2,234
562,503
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
So many people on this website are so confidently retarded
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
9
3
51
4,936
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
Sci-Fi Author: In my book I invented the Torment Nexus as a cautionary tale Tech Company: At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from classic sci-fi novel Don't Create The Torment Nexus
303
30,562
2,823
115,310
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
The developers of PEAK explain pricing
656
4,259
1,601
108,137
9,821,977
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
Replying to @pspfrench
Who are copywriting accounts you think should get more recognition? Tag ‘em below.
1
1
2
543
to further prove my point: this is exactly what happens when you apply masculine-coded marketing frameworks to a female audience. you can’t build a “nervous-system-safe” business using adrenaline-fueled strategies. what most agencies don’t understand is women don’t buy intensity. they buy stability. their purchase decisions are tied to nervous system regulation, not dopamine spikes. and when your funnel, messaging, and delivery system disregards that, it doesn’t just tank sales, it erodes trust, safety, and loyalty.
1
2
8
890
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
I’m sick of how serious this game’s gotten. Everything’s about optimization, tracking, frameworks, conversion paths, funnel logic… Every marketer I talk to sounds like an accountant trying to sell joy by the spreadsheet. What happened to fun?
 What happened to trying something just to see if it works?
 What happened to breaking the rules because the rules were boring? There was a time… not that long ago… when this industry was wild. You’d throw something together, write a cheeky post, send an email with a dumb subject line like “Oi” or “Wanna see something ridiculous?” 
And people would respond.
 Not because it was polished. But because it was alive. Now we’re out here polishing everything until it’s lifeless. Everyone’s walking around terrified of “brand inconsistency,” of “messaging frameworks,” of “market sophistication levels.” 
You can’t even post a half-formed idea anymore without someone trying to turn it into a carousel. Remember when marketing used to attract artists and misfits? 
People who loved to experiment?
 People who’d rather play with an idea than present a 9-slide deck explaining it? Now it’s analysts and operators and consultants with corporate PTSD, trying to make creativity safe.
 Trying to build processes around play.
 And the irony? 
The best campaigns in history… the ones that actually moved people… didn’t come from A/B tests.
 They came from gut. 
They came from someone saying, “This might be stupid, but it might also work.” When did it stop being okay to have fun? Marketing is supposed to be about connection, emotion, and curiosity.
 Not dashboards and deliverables.
 Some of you have forgotten that the word creative literally means “to bring into existence.” 
Not “to run ads and optimise the CPM.” I don’t want another “framework.”
I don’t need another “system.” 
I want energy.
I want people who still get excited by the thrill of the unknown. 
People who can make something up, test it, and laugh if it bombs. Because this game was never about being perfect… it was about being interesting. And I get it… the money’s bigger now. The stakes are higher. The clients expect reports. 
But if it costs you your spark, it’s not growth. It’s self-domestication. I see creators who used to make magic now scheduling “content pillars.” 
I see founders who used to play now managing “brand assets.” 
I see marketers who used to write art now crafting “copy frameworks.” We turned play into performance.
We turned experimentation into execution.
We turned freedom into a fucking job. And I’m done with it. I want to bring FUN back. The kind of fun where you have no idea if it’ll work, but you’re buzzing to try it anyway. 
Where you launch something just because it makes you smile. 
Where the idea is so ridiculous it might actually work. 
Where your inbox feels alive again.
 Where people reply because they felt something, not because your “funnel logic” told them to. I don’t care if it breaks every rule. 
I don’t care if it doesn’t fit the latest “7-step content strategy.” 
I don’t even care if it doesn’t scale. If it’s fun, if it’s real, if it reminds you why you started… that’s the point. We don’t need another guru teaching “authentic storytelling.” 
We need people who still remember what authenticity feels like… raw, messy, unpredictable, human. Marketing was meant to be a playground. 
Now it’s escape from Shawshank. So if you’ve been bored out of your mind trying to “play the game”, if you’ve forgotten what it feels like to enjoy this again, and if you secretly miss the chaos that made it exciting in the first place… you’re my people. Let’s start breaking things again.
Let’s experiment. Let’s make stupid ideas work.
Let’s make marketing fun again. Because if it’s not fun what’s the fucking point any more?
16
3
2
26
1,539
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
At one point business will get more and more boring. It's not a sign to lean away from business but more so a sign to lean more towards your artistry and mastery
15
4
1
27
2,280
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
Mason
@CardinalMason24 Oct 2025
We lost one of the greats tonight. Genuinely the most magnetic, talented, charming guy I’ve ever met in my life. Changed thousands of lives in person and online. Nobody in this circle would be who they are without him. One of one. Long Live Ben Bader. Love you brother.
382
171
110
2,506
1,071,904
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
"Email marketing delivers $42 for every $1 invested into the channel" - when are we going to stop parroting this nonsense? When are we going to calculate the cost to acquire an email address from paid sources? After all, that's how lists are built! This is why I don't like siloed channel-specific contributions. It's better to look at the overall health of the business as a whole.
1
132
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
growing up is realizing you don't need Figma slop email campaigns and flows you can literally just write text only emails that convert 10x better
2
1
2
27
3,311
The email marketing bro's will get you a 15% signup rate. But they won't check Shopify to see how that damages conversions. I've seen stores lose an entire 1% of their CRV all because of an aggressive popup. Your #1 goal should be to SELL, not get emails.
2
1
6
592
Replying to @TheJacobMars
Precisely this brother You don't have to be a zen monk to achieve it though I've personally lost the ability to ruminate/space out and live in the present 99% of the time I don't say this lightly - And it doesn't mean negative emotions don't arise EVER - but they last for seconds before dissipating Makes life infinitely sweeter
1
1
54
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
I gotta say @MitchellKeller_’s LeadGrow agency is the absolute best I’ve ever worked with. Results. Communication, Everything is on point. We’re gonna take one of our businesses to 1m/mo thanks to them. (And a killer offer)
6
2
19
4,498
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
Copywriting will not be entirely replaced by AI. Because ‘writing’ was never the point. Understanding why humans make decisions is what creates results. And this process is often messy, emotional, and contradictory. AI can write... ...But it will never understand why those words matter.
14
6
1
74
2,465
Social media feels public. Email feels private. That’s why your email content should make your subscribers feel like they’re in an exclusive club. Share behind-the-scenes insights, team culture, product creation, etc. Give them a reason to connect to your brand and say “I love what they stand for” This will also set you apart and will impact impacts sales positively almost instantly. The lower down the funnel, the more exclusive your content should feel.
5
4
23
2,247
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
This should be a wakeup call for any copywriter not leveraging AI: A few weeks back I shared an opening for a copywriting position with one of my companies. Applicants had to fill out a Google Form, and I intentionally added the following questions: Q1: If We Ask You to Write a 7 Email Campaign That Goes to Our Customers and Cross-Promotes Various Supplements, How Long Would it Take You To Complete the Assignment (At An A+ Level)? Q2: How Do You Use AI When Writing Copy (if you do)?  Share as much detail as you can. Which LLMs do you use? What does the process look like? We had 160 Applicants, and the responses were extremely revealing: For Q1, answers ranged from "a few hours" to "probably 14 Days but it could be longer." Meanwhile, for Q2... Answers ranged from: "I use AI throughout the whole process" to "I don't use AI because I find that it's faster for me to just write the emails myself." And here's where it gets really interesting... Pretty much everyone who said they don't use AI regularly to write copy also quoted WAY longer turnaround times than those who do use AI. On the one hand, it's obvious why this would be the case... But what's mind-blowing is that so many of these applicants seem unaware of how SLOW their turnaround times are in a world of AI. This can be evidenced by the fact that, like I said, a lot of the people who don't use AI said the reason why is because they don't think it helps them work faster. So look, I don't know how else to say this but: Those people are in for a world of pain if they don't embrace LLMs immediately. The world has changed since 2022. A huge part of that change is an acceleration of timelines. Right now, there are still a lot of people out there trying to operate on what I call "Legacy Timelines." These are timelines that favor slow, methodical, plodders. Those plodders were always at a disadvantage compared to those who could do high quality work fast (hell, I made millions of dollars as a freelance copywriter because I was both fast and good)... But until recently, these slow-pokes were able to somehow get away with it. Not anymore though. If it takes you 7 days to write 7 emails, and another candidate can produce the same (or better) output in 70 minutes, who the hell is ever going to pick you? And this applies to business owners to. Your entire business should be moving EXPONENTIALLY faster than it did 3 years ago...and even 3 months ago. Hell, just look at the image generation that OpenAI just dropped. Boom, you should be able to test ad creatives WAY faster now. Or look at AI UGC Creators. You should be able to create and test dozens of video ads in a fraction of the time it used to take you to test 4. You might not like it, but this is reality. Choosing to continue operating on Legacy Timelines is like voluntarily raising your hand for extinction. I mean heck, you can Vibe Code video games, SaaS Platforms, and retention-heavy apps just by voice chatting with an LLM. Reality has shifted. Adapt or perish.
14
9
7
170
16,641
Jacob Mars 🟣 retweeted
Calling ALL email/SMS marketers to participate in a MASSIVE agency survey that will shake up the industry! We're producing the most comprehensive analysis on the market of agency life in the email space and we need YOU to share your insights ANONYMOUSLY. All findings will be presented in public in 2 weeks with the aggregated data. If I've helped you at all through my content, this is the best way to say thank you and pay me back. I promise this report will be the most interesting piece of content in the email space in 2025, so make your voice heard here now: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F…
3
2
1
10
1,443