Panican Skywalker retweeted
Wow! What a weird coincidence that there *just* happens to be a reason why this person wants a Democrat to lose. I'm sure this is something unique to Turek and totally a one-off sort of deal. Definitely not something they do with other Democrats
Panican Skywalker retweeted
It's based on him adding trans people to various civil rights protections. You weren't paying attention.
Panican Skywalker retweeted
Every election the left is presented with the world's easiest trolley problem, and every time they smirk and go "the trolley shouldn't exist" and then walk away.
Panican Skywalker retweeted
You spread disinformation on the eve of an election. You know it was wrong. You made no attempt to explain what happened or even slightly apology for it.
You've decided to believe like MAGA and just be completely shameless about it. You are a true piece of shit and everyone in the Influencer/Podcast Class needs to be dunked in a vat of steaming hot piss.
It's pretty funny/sad that Umichvoter has just gone back to tweeting election results. It is genuinely a cancer on our society that no one has the capacity for shame anymore.
So while we're on the topic of 'fraud'....remember when that Umichvoter guy and Keith Edwards (among others) posted a 'rumor' the night before the primary election that said Haley Stevens pollsters told her the campaign had 'no path to victory?'
Did any of the people involved ever explain how/why that happened?
Because it sure seemed like a transparent attempt to suppress voters, the night before the primary...
Panican Skywalker retweeted
Maybe an actual journalist would want to get to the bottom of how he was duped by a fraudulent pollster and wantonly shared a fake narrative on electability. That you have no such interest is just the latest indication that political leftism matters to you more than journalism.
You just cited another bullshit poll you absolute idiot
Panican Skywalker retweeted
McMorrow got absolutely done dirty. A real shame. And frankly, the people involved need to face consequences.
As one of the candidates featured in these polls - the infamous one in late June that showed me plummeting into single digits (which was at odds with our internals) - here's the impact of this "experiment"
- Donations dried up
- Volunteers were devastated and pleading for guidance on what to do
- Reporters hounded me with calls to drop out
Sure, a point was proven. Polling is broken. But tens of thousands of people poured their hearts, time, energy, hard-earned money into something they believed in - for a year-and-a-half, and it was treated like a game. Our volunteers gave their all. And then some. I felt like I had let so many of them down.
To be extremely clear, Michigan Democrats are locked in to beat Mike Rogers. We WILL send @AbdulElSayed to the US Senate.
But between crap like this, endless fundraising texts that drive supporters away with spammy fake deadlines and trash "match" claims, scam PACs run rampant for firms to grift without actually supporting candidates, undisclosed content creators pushing content out either misrepresenting themselves as residents of states they don't live in or hiding whether they were paid and by who so they could make a buck, and the tidal wave of dark money ads -- I hope Democrats are ready to blow up the system with campaign finance and transparency reforms.
Trust is already at an all-time low. We don't get out of this mess without rebuilding trust.
And media - who loves to ride the drama of a pollercoaster - needs to take a hard look at what's legitimate and what's not.
If this teaches us anything - DON'T GET COMPLACENT AND DON'T TRUST THE POLLS.
LOCK IN. SIGN UP FOR A CANVASSING SHIFT. LEAVE NOTHING TO CHANCE OVER THE NEXT TWO WEEKS.
It is so embarrassing to be online enough to claim to know what Neera is tweeting all day and then be like “uhhh I’m not on twitter” when asked about Hasan tweeting about her 56 times every day.
Panican Skywalker retweeted
Why lie (about your own party) like this?
I just don't get it...
Rep. Ayanna Pressley in MI just praised AOC for the $1 million — and ripped DSCC.
“The DSCC should take note because it is shameful that we are not seeing an equitable investment in progressive and diverse candidates like Abdul El-Sayed, like Angie Nixon, like Scott Colom.”
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
DSCC has invested $16 million to date electing Abdul El-Sayed, according to its own statement. Senate Majority PAC has spent or committed tens of millions more in support.
x.com/ShaneGoldmache…
axios.com/2026/09/16/abd…
Panican Skywalker retweeted
Neither of these people are Democrats, and I really wish more people would acknowledge that. We should treat them like a reboot of Hannity and Colmes, that's basically the role they're both playing
Jennifer Welch asks Hasan why Neera Tanden, Shannon Watts, and Jonathan Chait are so obsessed with him
"She's like so obsessed..those two, why are they so obsessed with you?..but donate to those girls that are obsessed with you? Do they not realize that they end up looking like nuts? Every time I get on Twitter, it's those two..just don't f'in watch the stream..I don't watch Tucker Carlson"
"I want to get into the psychology of what's going on with Jonathan Chait, why is he so obsessed with you?"
Panican Skywalker retweeted
Reporters do this bizarre deaf, dumb and blind routine where they behave as if arguments about emphasis, duration, and narrative do not exist. “We reported that (once),” or “They’re both bad,” are deployed as if that refutes complaints about emphasis or obsession. 1/
Panican Skywalker retweeted
"David Axelrod talking to the Pod Save boys about how Jon Ossoff should smile more" is somehow the absolute perfect illustration of how utterly irrelevant all of them are in the modern democratic party





































