Daan retweeted
A congresswoman just told Elon Musk "See you soon."
So let's compare résumés. Because that's really what this is about.
Elon Musk moved to North America at 17. He built Zip2, then PayPal, then put almost everything he had into two companies every expert said would die: a rocket company and an electric car company. In 2008 both nearly did. He went all in anyway.
Today SpaceX lands orbital boosters and flies them again like airliners, something NASA, Russia, Europe and China considered impossible or uneconomical for 60 years. It launches most of the mass sent to orbit by all of humanity combined. It's the reason America stopped renting seats on Russian rockets to reach its own space station. Starlink brings internet to Ukrainian trenches, Amazon villages and disaster zones. Tesla forced every carmaker on Earth to go electric. Neuralink is letting paralyzed people control computers with their minds.
And to the "billionaires don't pay their fair share" crowd: in 2021 he paid over $11 billion in taxes. Widely reported as the largest individual tax bill in American history. One man. One year.
His stated goal is to make life multiplanetary so that consciousness doesn't die on a single rock. You can think that's crazy. He has delivered on enough "crazy" that betting against him has become a bad habit.
Now Yassamin Ansari.
Stanford, international relations. Intern for Nancy Pelosi. Climate advisor at the UN. Phoenix City Council. Won her congressional primary by 39 votes. A whole career spent inside institutions that run on other people's money. Never built a product. Never had a customer. Never faced a market.
The day after her party won Congress, what's her top priority for day one? Cheaper housing? Energy? Competing with China?
No. Pause advanced AI. Ban "superintelligence."
The bill she backs freezes any model trained above 10^25 operations until a brand-new cabinet-level Department of AI gets staffed and writes its rules. Violators face up to 20 years in prison.
Let that sink in. The industry that, by one Oxford Economics estimate, drives about a third of recent US growth, frozen by people who have never trained a model, while waiting for a federal agency that doesn't exist yet. Beijing couldn't have written it better.
And yes, Elon has warned about AI risk for a decade. That's exactly the point. His answer to risk was to build, compete and put better systems in the arena. Hers is a committee, a freeze and prison terms. One looks at a hard problem and builds. The other looks at a hard problem and asks for a permit to stop everyone else.
Then the cherry on top: her reply to the man who built the rockets is "See you soon." Coming from someone whose only real power is the ability to stop others from building.
This is the real fault line of our time. Not left vs right. Builders vs administrators of envy. A system that selects people who have never created anything and gives them authority over the people who create everything. A political class that turns resentment into legislation and calls it "safety."
I'm French. I've watched this movie. Europe wrote the world's most ambitious AI rulebook. Now count how many of the world's top AI models are European.
I genuinely hope humanity grows out of this model. A civilization where its most mediocre managers summon its most extraordinary builders with a "see you soon" is a civilization working against itself.
"Brave New World" is right. Except the dystopia isn't the machine. It's the committee.
Daan retweeted
I actually feel bad for Elon, even though I deeply disagree with him on some things.
Imagine trying to build a car company in California in the mid-2000s, when American manufacturing is being completely offshored and almost all of Wall Street thinks you’re a joke and is rooting for your failure, while the entire oil and gas industry is using all their power and leverage to make you fail.
But against all odds, you actually pull it off. You build cars that make electric vehicles desirable to millions of people, create an enormous number of quality American jobs, and force the global car industry to play catch up and move away from oil and gas.
You would think California would be proud of you and the team. Instead you find yourself having to fight a completely corrupt and incompetent left government impeding all your efforts while you sleep at the factory night after night to avoid collapse. At some point, you would go to the right too.
And because of your politics, it becomes a justification for people to celebrate your companies failing in their personal ideological fight with you. Even threats against you become something people explain away and use mental gymnastics to justify.
Meanwhile, people like Scott Galloway and Bernie Sanders who have made absolutely nobody better off other than themselves get to lecture you about your value to society and even call for your murder without grounds from their vacation home while you're on 20 hour benders in your factories trying to get things built for all of society. If this were me I would lose my mind.
Criticize his opinions. I do sometimes, especially on Ukraine. But the pleasure people take in wanting to destroy everything he’s built is hideous and frankly suicidal for the masses, especially coming from people who insist they care about workers, the climate, and civilization as a whole.
As you try to make good things for society you are confronted with a world that worships people who care only about the perception of being good people, while they actually fight against your tangible efforts of making improvements for humanity.
I don't think almost anyone would have made it out of that and if they did, they would probably not come away feeling so warm towards the left either. So I am rooting for Elon to succeed, and for humanity.
Daan retweeted
When this kind of violence is allowed by the police, it marks the end of a decent society
We are all tired of seeing @YoungBobRB be assaulted for his often fair political opinion.
@metpoliceuk can you start locking people up please, political violence should not be tolerated!
Daan retweeted
This tweet has gotten 2 million views and is wrong.
Musk doesn't think space cooling is easier because space is cold. He thinks its easier because it's a strait forward engineering problem that scales well.
Cooling in space is indeed difficult, because vacuum is an insulator.
But it's also straightforward, you just need a radiator.
Since 99% of the heat you are radiating comes from power consumption produced by solar panels, the amount of radiator panels equals a percentage of solar panels. It's around 25%.
The International Space Station has ~2,500 m² of photovoltaic panels generating power, and ~645 m² dissipating the heat.
There is no scale problem like there is on earth -- you can just keep building bigger and bigger and bigger.
Scaling is what makes cooling harder on earth. The bigger the data center, the more difficult the cooling. This comes not just from the engineering challenges but also the political challenges from communities rejecting huge data centers, taxes, etc.
However, we haven't built anything larger than the ISS for radiators. We have a lot still to discover, such as micrometeorites puncturing fluid lines. I wouldn't bet on space data center, but Musk isn't making simple errors by thinking that space is "cold" instead of "insulated".
My respect for Elon Musk has mostly vanished, but I still thought that at least he is a good engineer (Teslas are great cars). But that last bit also got a blow after hearing him say that it is easier to "cool things down" in space. The opposite is true. A vacuum is the best possible isolator. In space you can only dissipate heat through radiation. It is extremely unlikely these data centers in space will ever happen (and certainly not in our lifetimes).
Daan retweeted
The year is 180. You are a gladiator in Ephesus, and the films will give you a body like a bronze statue. You are fed barley porridge and beans, and the crowd calls you a barley man to your face. The porridge puts a layer of fat over your muscle so the cuts bleed instead of killing, which is good for the show. The man who owns you dines on dormice rolled in honey and poppy seed. When your bones are dug up eighteen centuries later they are full of barley and almost nothing else, and a man at a university will call your diet plant-forward.
The year is 1300. You are a villein on a Hampshire manor, living, as the brochure will one day put it, in harmony with the land. The land gives you pottage: peas, beans and oats in the one pot, every day, until you die of it at forty. The hall above you smells of venison from the lord's own park, roast pork, eel, swan, butter from cows you milked before dawn. Take one deer from his wood and you lose a hand. The court that decides it sits in his hall, after dinner.
The year is 1755. You are a Highland tenant eating oatmeal three times a day, and in London Dr Johnson has just printed his dictionary. Oats: a grain which in England is generally given to horses, but in Scotland supports the people. The laird at the head of your glen finds this very funny over his beef. The beef was driven to market past your door.
The year is 1795. You are a Berkshire farm labourer and a clergyman is at your table with a notebook, writing down what your children eat. Bread. Tea. A little cheese. Bacon on Sunday if the pig did well. He prints it as a national disgrace. The squire you work for has a joint every day of the year and is told from the pulpit that your trouble is thrift.
The year is 1847. You are in County Clare and the potatoes have gone black in the ground for the second year running. Your family lived on them, ten pounds a day for a working man, and you are sitting in a cabin with nothing. At the harbour the ships are loading cattle, pigs, butter and bacon for England, under armed guard. The agent on the quay looks well. So does the bullock walking up the gangplank past the people who raised it.
The year is 1933. You are in a village outside Kharkiv. The grain quota has been collected, then collected again, then the brigades have come with iron rods to probe the floors for anything buried. Your children are eating boiled bark, and the dog next door has stopped barking. In the district town there is a shop for Party members with a curtain over the window. Behind the curtain there is sausage.
The year is 1997. You are in North Pyongan and the rations stopped months ago. You are stripping the inner bark from pines and boiling grass, and the famine will take hundreds of thousands before it ends. The Dear Leader's personal chef is flying to Japan for tuna, to Denmark for pork and to Iran for caviar, and will write a book about it.
The year is 2026. You are in a supermarket in England. The posters say eat less meat for the planet. The spread is plant-based, the cereal has a heart on the box, and the beef carries a warning about its footprint. You take the lentils, because you are a responsible person, and you pay more for them than the villein's pottage ever cost anyone.
The people who put the posters up flew to the climate conference, and the menu had beef on it. They eat what the lord ate, what the laird ate, what the agent on the quay ate, what the man behind the curtain ate.
Two thousand years, and the diet of grain and beans was always what the powerful handed down to the people beneath them. Everyone at both ends of the table knew what it meant.
Now it has a name, a logo and a moral, and for the first time in history the peasant is paying extra for it.
Daan retweeted
Cats are cold blooded psychos. This lunatic just stared down 4 wild racoons like it was nothing.
Daan retweeted
100% support from Cleese
Islamophobia, a word much bandied about by Sadiq Khan, is used by Islamists to stifle legitimate criticism
of their culture
It should be replaced by the more neutral word 'Islamoscepticism'
🚨BREAKING: Jeremy Clarkson is facing fresh calls from the left to be CANCELED after he weighed in on the Muslim grooming gangs scandal and said it is not racist to investigate a rapist.
His exact words: “It’s not racist to investigate a rapist! We need to remove the shackles of political correctness from the police.”
In his column, Clarkson argued that police must be freed from the fear of being labeled racist if they pursue these cases. He wrote that a young girl could report being raped by a gang of Pakistani men only to be dismissed because officers know they risk cancellation for reporting it.
Clarkson said another public inquiry is unnecessary because the problem is already clear, and the real obstacle has been the refusal to confront the ethnicity of the perpetrators without being accused of bigotry. The comments have drawn sharp criticism online from activists who claim he is stoking racism, with some calling for advertisers and platforms to drop him.
This is the same pattern that has followed Clarkson for years whenever he says something "politically incorrect".
Daan retweeted
Sweet. It's a 1 megawatt nuclear microreactor that fits in a shipping container.
Gas-cooled, first by helium, then air.
Runs for five years, then you ship it back to the factory, where they take care of the spent fuel and refuel it.
Daan retweeted
Name one? How about a few?
Rockefeller lowered the cost of kerosene through efficient refining and distribution.
Ford made automobiles affordable through mass production.
Carnegie reduced steel production costs through industrial innovation.
Walton lowered retail prices through bulk purchasing and efficient logistics.
Dell made computers cheaper by eliminating retail intermediaries.
Kamprad made furniture affordable through flat-pack manufacturing and distribution.
Bezos intensified retail competition through Amazon.
Koum made international messaging practically free through WhatsApp.
Page and Brin made search, navigation, email, and translation available without direct charges.
And that's barely scratching the surface.
In fact, it would be considerably more challenging to find a billionaire who earned their fortune through voluntary trade without lowering costs, improving quality, increasing productivity, or making something more accessible.
That's how fortunes are generally made in competitive markets. You create value for others, and the more people you serve, the greater your potential reward.
You don't even have to buy from these businesses to benefit. Their competitors must improve their offerings or risk losing customers.
These clout chasers destroy their credibility daily without so much as flinching.
They enjoy the accumulated benefits of capitalist innovation while confidently demanding evidence that any of it ever happened.
The economic illiteracy would be impressive if it weren't so commonplace.
Daan retweeted
Because before you got the firmware update that told you to hate billionaires building rockets. You hated the Waltons for selling Americans "cheap crap" instead investing in science, & advancing humanity
Daan retweeted
Elon Musk's wealth:
January 2021: $170B
January 2025: $730B
He got $560B richer during Biden's term.
Maybe the increase in wealth isn't related to the person in power...
Daan retweeted
1. Dit zou hét nieuws van de dag moeten zijn: de mogelijk nieuwe burgemeester van Berlijn, Elif Eralp van Die Linke, wordt bedreigd door clanleiders uit het islamistische, antisemitische pro-Hamas milieu, waarmee haar extreemlinkse partij in zee is gegaan en zij probeert publicatie hierover in Der Spiegel te voorkomen: "Mijn man en ik zijn bang voor deze mensen." Dit is enorm brisant: Hamasaanhangers die een vooraanstaande Duitse politica intimideren en mogelijk corrumperen. Wat sommige analisten al vaker hebben gemeld (en wat ook in mijn podcast en tv-optredens regelmatig aan de orde komt): het 'islamo-gauchisme' is een groeiende, antiwesterse, antikapitalistische, antijoodse, antiblanke, in essentie antidemocratische politieke beweging, die zich zowel binnen de parlementaire politiek - zie Die Linke in Berlijn, zie LFI in Frankrijk, zie ook tendensen in sommige Nederlandse partijen - manifesteert, als buitenparlementair: zie de plunderingen in Frankrijk en de rellen in andere Europese steden. De opkomst van deze alliantie zou bij iedere democraat de haren ten berge moeten doen rijzen. Maar in Nederland wordt zelfs het bestaan hiervan domweg ontkend of niet begrepen. Hoezeer deskundigen als @FBBlackler Of @DoornaertMia er ook voor waarschuwen. Hier het stuk in @derspiegel archive.ph/AsynR
Daan retweeted
Item over de hoge gasprijzen bij @NOS #achtuurjournaal
“De overheid kan een deel van de winst van Shell afpakken”
Dit kan echt niet langer. Wederom NIETS over onze enorm hoge belastingen op gas.
Ga je schamen NOS
Daan retweeted
Rake column van @RHoogland 🎯
20 miljard voor stikstofbeleid, 30 miljard voor defensie, 40 miljard voor klimaat. Terwijl een kwart van Nederland overweegt om straks in de kou te gaan zitten omdat ze de hoge energierekening niet meer kunnen opbrengen. Complete waanzin 👇














































