Pinned Tweet
Check this out
Truth is Scarier retweeted
Sproat Lake in Canada is home to a rather peculiar lake monster. Travelers on Vancouver Island reportedly saw a two humped creature swimming there. This freaky drawing of a "sea wolf" is present nearby and has been connected to the monster which is called naitaka in the area.
Truth is Scarier retweeted
My Bigfoot Encounter — Wood Knocks, Chest Gumps, and the Ridge Roar at Elk Meadow
June 21–22, 2014. First annual Bigfoot Community Campout at Elk Meadow, 67 miles north of Willow Creek. Deb, Dee, and I spent about 24 hours there.
I walked north alone past an empty campsite, continued 300–400 yards, and stood still on a large fallen tree. I heard a clear wood knock to my right. I waited motionless for about 35 minutes. When I took a few steps down the log, another knock rang out — substantial and singular, not a woodpecker. I waited another 10 minutes, heard nothing more, and headed back.
When I returned, Thom said Jackie, Dee, and Deb had walked south along the road and heard strange noises near a burned section. Deb had felt uneasy about the spot and said so. They heard what we called a “gump” — a deep gulp crossed with a very low-frequency thump felt in the chest. Jackie said it reminded her of gorilla sounds. She howled and knocked trees, but only more gumps came back.
That night around the campfire I whooped and we wood-knocked. Later we heard one very large tree break from the southwest. We also heard a delicate “coo” and a “whoop” that seemed to come from just the other side of the creek. Deb and Dee, sitting side by side, thought the coo was right over their shoulders. Dee got up unsettled. Deb went to the tent. To us it sounded like a young female because of the sweetness and gentleness of the tone. I missed the coo (I was getting firewood) but I clearly heard the whoop. I looked at the others. It was “WHOOOP.” Not an owl, not a bear. We had just been saying the same thing into the brush minutes earlier, and we heard it answered back.
The next morning Deb, Dee, and I walked south along the road. About half a mile in, Deb said she felt ill and that they didn’t want us going further. Moments later we began hearing and feeling the gumps. It was the first time I heard them. Deb turned back. Dee and I continued to a bend in the road and got gumped more — 5 or 6 per burst, bursts 1 to 3 minutes apart, coming from down the slope west of the road and resonating in the chest. Dee tried to record it on her phone. The frequency was too low to register.
We started back, cracking some logs hard against trees and stopping to listen. Nothing answered. We picked up the pace. Then a protracted roar howled from the upper ridge above and east of the road. It lasted 15–20 seconds. As it ended, Dee looked up to her right and said, “OMG something is coming down the mountain at us!” We both froze. Immediately the gumps started again, this time from behind me to the west. Whatever had been gumping earlier had followed, or there was more than one. That was the point where the coincidences stopped working as an explanation.
We waited, then returned to camp. We described what happened. Three very loud tree knocks answered — the third so hard it sounded more like a crash.
Deb later told us that on her way back alone she had been followed by chest-thumping from both the west and the ridge to the east. She finally said out loud for them to leave her alone and go pester Dee and me instead. The thumping shifted to us.
I asked Thom if any animal up there made that gumping sound. He said there was a bird that made something similar, but it started slow and increased in frequency. What I heard was fixed frequency, and birds don’t produce infrasound that feels like a bass drum in the chest.
There were a few other things I can add in replies, but this is the bulk of what I found most significant. I already believed these beings were real. What I wanted was my own experience to bring it more fully into my scope of reality. This did that. It was a life-changing event for me.
The greatest character in Game of Thrones is this random exiled prince from the Summer Islands who just sits in Westeros and asks people for money and soldiers to reclaim his island. Hes also really chill so everyone let's him hang around.
Truth is Scarier retweeted
In 1967, a mysterious film of bigfoot took the world by storm. In 2026, newly uncovered evidence has shown the truth behind this footage. This is the shocking story of how bigfoot's most famous footage was fake the entire time- and the hints that it wasn't real.
Link below
Truth is Scarier retweeted
One of the stranger bird cryptids is known as the siyiniao from China. Its said to be a smaller yellow bird with a round head, but it strangely has two sets of wings, one larger and one smaller. This led to people theorizing that the siyiniao is a living microraptor.
Truth is Scarier retweeted
Although I am certain that the Patterson Gimlin film is a hoax, to me the scene here with Bob Gimlin was Bob not hearing Clint very well. Anyone have thoughts?
Bob Gimlin — Confession or Confusion?
I missed this on the first viewing. I had known since April that Bob was confronted at the Yakima event, but I had not seen the footage itself until this last Tuesday. When I did, the exact wording didn’t click in my head.
Here is the exchange as it appears:
Clint: “From one cowboy to the other, I gotta tell you what’s going on. Me and my mom, my whole family, we’re all coming…we’re all coming clean and telling everybody that, you know, it was fake, that Roger did it, and that he did a damn good job of doing it.”
Gimlin: laughs
Clint: “You know he did.”
Gimlin: “Yes, he did.”
Clint: “He did a hell of a job. Are you ready to come clean on it?”
Gimlin: nodding “Yes.”
Clint: “OK, let’s do it! Let’s tell everybody what an amazing person Roger was.”
Gimlin: “Yeah, I will.”
I stated earlier that Bob did not directly say the PGF was a hoax. That was accurate as far as it went — he never utters those words himself. What I missed was his affirmative response to Clint’s framing. When Clint asks if he is ready to come clean after stating that the family is telling everyone it was fake and that Roger did it, Bob nods and says “Yes.” I was unaware of that specific agreement until a closer review. The distinction matters for the record, but it does not reduce the weight of the affirmation itself.
I can appreciate both readings from their respective starting points. One takes the exchange at face value: Bob heard the claim that the film was fake, agreed that Roger had done it, and signaled he was ready to come clean until interrupted. The other recognizes the same lines in the scene — an elderly man, hard of hearing, among familiar people offering warmth and praise. The word “fake” sits inside a longer sentence that also compliments Roger; the nod and “yes” can attach to the compliment and the social moment as readily as to the full claim.
Because my position remains anchored to an authentic Patty, I prefer the second reading. I also conclude it is the stronger one on the evidence available. I have met Bob. The agreeable response matches what I have seen of his personality and what I watched in my own father during the middle stages of dementia. He was affable and would often answer positively to someone standing in front of him more for the warmth of the interaction than for the content of what was said. Anyone who has been through that recognizes the same pattern here.
Bob is hard of hearing — something I have observed directly and that others, including John Perez, have noted. A later written denial reported in Bigfoot Times is consistent with continued rejection of the claim rather than a completed confession; both Perez (a supporter) and Eric Palacios (a critic who devoted a full video to calling Gimlin a liar for the letter) agree that the written statement was submitted.
The interruption by Bob’s wife is compatible with either reading. Consider how you would react if someone with a long adversarial history — the kind of relationship Bob has had with figures like Bob Heironimus — approached your impaired husband or father in that setting and pressed for an admission. Would you step in, especially if you believed his long-standing account of the film, or at least stood by him regardless of private doubts? The scene does not require us to decide her motives to recognize that protective intervention is a reasonable response under the conditions present.
Under the Lucky Capture Hypothesis I laid out again this morning, the exchange remains one human-side claim to be weighed against the morphology and dynamics in the 1967 film itself. The record shows what was said. What it establishes is left to the viewer. 👣🪶
Truth is Scarier retweeted
para ti, que confirma que a nova filmagem de ensaio confirmou que o Patterson-Gimlin Film é uma farsa, ele também comprova que o Pé-Grande não existe???
50%Sim, pé-grande não existe
50%Não, o pé-grande existe
2 votes • 3 days Truth is Scarier retweeted
I mean I get the joke but LeBron James still being an elite player in his 24th NBA season may be the most impressive thing in the history of sports.
Truth is Scarier retweeted
Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan 1970
On the city road in the Aburaki area of the same town leading to this mountain, the former Saijo Town employee, Mr. Eki (74), started talking. "This is the place where the Hibagon riot that once attracted attention throughout Japan began. It is said
Truth is Scarier retweeted
The pgf had one of the stupidest theories that not only patterson killed bigfoots and filmed it, he never shared that story to anyone else , never released the video of the massacre and never collected evidence from the alleged dead bigfoots for whatever reason
The shocking true story behind one of the most infamous pieces of footage in history, told by the people who’ve lived with its ramifications. CAPTURING BIGFOOT is now available to rent or buy on Amazon Prime Video. More info: capturingbigfoot.com













































