Tsynod retweeted
Now to the assertion.
Svigel is correct. All visible manifestations of YHWH are YHWH. This is demonstrated by entire constellations of data, including the fact that He is directly called the unique, holiest, covenant Name "YHWH," something no mere agent can uphold.
Tsynod retweeted
If you think Yahweh is Satan, you've been duped by clowns who are incompetent in Biblical Linguistics.
“The Hebrew term raquia consistently refers to a physical surface that has been stretched out, like fabric stretched over a frame or like “hammered out gold leaf” (Ex 39:3; cf. Num 16:38). The Genesis text says God “made” or “fashioned” (asah) the raquia in the heavens, indicating that something material was “stretched out” by him (Ps 104:2). Paul Seely explains,
Standard Hebrew lexica… have defined the raquia (firmament) of Gen 1:6-8 as a solid dome over the earth… Only by taking Genesis 1 out of its historical context could one say that raquia means merely ‘an atmospheric expanse’ or, as more sophisticated conservatives say, “just phenomenal language.” In the ancient world the sky was not just phenomenal. The ancients did not just refer to the appearance of the sky as being solid. They concluded from the appearance that the sky really was solid… the raquia was for them literal physical part of the universe, just as solid as the earth itself.
Some scholars have tried to show that raquia, at least as used in the creation account, does not refer to a physical dome. However, within the Bible itself there is confirmation the day two raquia should be read as a physical vault. Psalm 104:2 reflects on creation day two with the words, “stretch[ed] out the heavens like a tent.” And the author of Job, reflecting on creation day two, wrote, “Can you, like him, spread out [raquia] the skies, hard as a cast metal mirror?” (Job 37:18). This perception is pervasive in the Bible. Exodus describes an encounter with God on Mount Sinai as a climb high enough to reach the dome of heaven and see through it to the feet of God: “There was under [God’s] feet as it were a pavement of sapphire stone, like the very heaven for clearness” (Ex 24:10). In that instance, God revealed “his feet” within the cultural expectations that his throne rested on the dome one the earth. Ezekiel saw a similar vision of God’s throne on top of a crystalline dome:
Over the heads of the living creatures there was the likeness of an expanse [raquia], shining like awe-inspiring crystal, spread out above their heads. And under the expanse [raquia] their wings were stretched out… And there came a voice from above the expanse [raqia] over their heads… And above the expanse [raquia] over their heads there was the likeness of a throne, in appearance like sapphire; and seated above the likeness of a throne was… the likeness of the glory of the LORD. (Ezek 1:22-28; cf. Ezek 10:1; Ps 104:1-3, 13)
The day two narrative envisions a physical vault fashioned by God, inserted into the midst of the waters, and then elevated to heft half of hotel waters into a suspended position over the earth. The description is like a knife slicing into a dinner roll, and then lifting the upper half of the roll from over the lower half. The firmament installed on day two is the backdrop for events on other creation days also. The heavenly lights were thought to be suspended from the heavenly dome, traveling their courses across its surface. Thus on day four God states, “Let there be lights in the firmament [raquia] of the heavens” (Gen 1:14), and on day five the birds were said to fly “across the face of the firmament of the heavens” (Gen 1:20).
Modern scientific tools have enabled humans to examine the skies — and even to visit them! We now know that there is no physical vault in the heavens. If, therefore, we were to judge the accuracy of the Bible by the degree to which the Spirit gave the prophets advanced scientific insight, then Gen 1:6-8 needs to be added to a long list of problem texts. But here, as throughout the Bible, the Scripture reveals heaven’s truths within the language and conventions of the original audience.”
Michael Lefebvre, The Liturgy of Creation (2019), pp. 154-155.
H/T Tim Martin
Tsynod retweeted
Jesus on Jerusalem: there will not be one stone upon another that will not be torn down (Matt 24).
Jeremiah on Babylon: "No stone shall be taken from you for a corner and no stone for a foundation, but you shall be a perpetual waste" (Jer 51).
Jesus describes the fall of Jerusalem as the fall of another Babylon, just like Revelation 17-18.
Tsynod retweeted
Replying to @RaymondessW @jasonstaples
Basic dynamic: Scattered among Gentiles, Israel becomes gentilized. When God gathers all Israel back to Himself, the Gentiles are included among the gentilized nations. Thus Gentiles become Israelized.
Tsynod retweeted
Ps 33:6
בִדְבַר יהוה שָׁמַיִם נַעֲשׂוּ וּבְרוּחַ פִיו כָל־צְבָאָם
"By The Word of Yahweh the heavens were made; by The Breath/Spirit (רוּחַ) of His mouth all their host."
Father, Debar, Ruah.
1, 2, 3.
But the 3 are 1.
And He is The Creator!
q.e.d.
Tsynod retweeted
Replying to @PatrologyVotary
[ἡ ἐκκλησία] τοῦ θεοῦ [...] ἡγιασμένοις ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ [...] σὺν *πᾶσιν τοῖς ἐπικαλουμένοις τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ κυρίου ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ ἐν παντὶ τόπῳ*
Tsynod retweeted
"If you don't assent to the infallible teachings of the Syriac Peshitta then you aren't in spiritual communion with the Assyrian Peshittic Halakhic Hellenic Church, the only institution on earth in whom dwells the fullness of truth; thus you're in schism with Jesus's only Body."
Tsynod retweeted
Replying to @isuch_lenoob @ChristandGuitar
It does. The Council of Jerusalem *did not go beyond what was written.* They added no new command nor word to affirm upon pain of excom. And indeed even their guidance there was not followed universally even at that time.
So re: your last, that *would* be true *if* they had.
Tsynod retweeted
This is arguably where the Classical Theology / Dogmatics crowd necessarily lands. A warning if you're enamored with that movement.
Tsynod retweeted
To read literally is, in other words, to try to understand what Scripture is saying to us in just the ways in which we seek to understand what other people are saying to us--taking into account, as we do so, their age, culture, customs, and language, -->
Tsynod retweeted
The common words for "divorce" in the Hebrew Bible don't specifically mean "divorce."
*shalach = send away (Mal 2:16)
*karat = cut off (Dt 24:1-4)
*garash = drive away (Gen 21:10; Lev 21:7)
The same terms are used for Yahweh's covenant sanctions against Israel, specifically for exile: Yahweh threatens to cut off, send away, and drive out - that is to say, divorce - His unfaithful Bride.
Tsynod retweeted
The imagery of the sixth seal—earthquakes, a darkened sun, a blood-red moon, stars falling, and the sky vanishing—is deeply symbolic, drawing on Old Testament prophetic motifs (e.g., Joel 2:10, Isaiah 13:10, Ezekiel 32:7) to signal divine judgment,...
Tsynod retweeted
On Isaiah 53 specifically, Dan is broadly right on two important points, but too absolute on the rest. In mainstream critical scholarship, Isaiah 52:13–53:12 is first read in its exilic or early post-exilic setting within Deutero-Isaiah.🧵
docs.google.com/document/d/1…
Cross references don’t make the Bible divine
#maklelan3195
youtu.be/ATgBoOG1w2E
Tsynod retweeted
I don’t see why antiquity should be seen as a merit of the church fathers beyond the 2nd century. Augustine was about as far removed as we are from the American Revolution with history and the adjacent sciences being at a much lower level of development.
Tsynod retweeted
Replying to @Exodus15_11 @staleyexpress
OT Israel is called “church” all the time.






















