Pinned Tweet
$MRNA 30%+ in 12 days.
$IOVA 50%+ in 17 days.
And yes, I own both.
I shared both positions publicly before these moves, along with the rest of my portfolio.
I’m going to keep doing this:
Every stock I buy, I share.
Every stock I sell, I share.
No hindsight. No cherry-picking winners after they run.
The setups get posted when I actually take the position.
I don’t buy AI themes. I buy supply choke points.
Two rules:
1. Structural choke points = what to own
2. Volume contraction patterns = when to own
Here’s how my current book is layered:
1. AI INFRASTRUCTURE
$NVDA - Accelerated compute
$MU - High-bandwidth memory
$SNDK - Enterprise flash & storage
$ARM - Architecture & power efficiency
$AMAT - Tooling monopolies
$GNRC - Data center power resiliency
2. AI COMMERCIALIZATION
$PLTR - Enterprise ontology & workflows
$RBRK - Cyber resilience & data recovery
$TEM - Clinical AI + proprietary genomics
3. BIOTECH PLATFORMS
$MRNA - Programmable synthetic biology
$OABI - Antibody discovery engine (HTF breakout entry)
$IOVA - Commercialized TIL cell therapy
4. FRONTIER INFRASTRUCTURE
$SPCX - Orbital launch & satellite infrastructure
Most of these were not bought because I wanted exposure to a theme.
Fundamentals put them on the watchlist. Proper price and volume structure gave me the entry. I’ve posted many of those setups publicly here as they developed.
The playbook:
Own the bottlenecks first. Then own the platforms that turn them into cash flow.
Fundamentals give you the watchlist.
The tape gives you the trigger.
Claude Opus 5.5 now reads your chart.
Price action.
Trigger.
Invalidation.
Then it backtests the setup on years of history.
Chart in.
Testable trade out.
Your eyes say breakout.
The data decides.
A friend of mine lost over $1,000.
To a free trading repo from GitHub.
Imagine trusting a few hundred lines of code with your hard-earned money.
One bug.
One flawed strategy.
One position gone wrong.
Your money is gone.
The scary part?
You won’t know what broke until it’s too late.
Now ask yourself.
Hedge funds spend millions on code.
Hundreds of engineers.
Years of testing.
If a free repo made money,
why isn’t Citadel running it?
Never trust your capital to code you haven’t verified.
Your savings are NOT someone else’s testing ground.
The question works because it hands them two numbers (“millions” vs “free”) and makes them do the math. The obvious answer is that it doesn’t work, or that it works for whoever wrote it. That second answer is the scary one, and it’s the one they’ll land on.
S&P 500: 5 distribution days in 25 sessions.
Big money is heading for the exit.
You don’t buy what they’re dumping.
Zero new buys.
Watchlist? Yes.
Buy button? NO.
$IOVA broke out again.
Already up 65% from our entry.
VCP Scanner flagged the breakout.
Now we're watching what comes next.
$IOVA just triggered a fresh breakout from a tight VCP.
Price cleared the ~$9.4 pivot and is holding above it.
RS: 98
21 EMA: rising
Breakout volume: still only 0.7x average
The interesting part is the structure before the move.
Tighter contractions. Higher lows. Supply drying up
Now the question is whether $9.4 becomes support.
$HTFL breaking out
credit goes to
@Ghostalpha for spotting it accurately
Market is down?
Good. Pay attention to the stocks showing relative strength.
The ones holding up while everything else sells off could be the next market leaders when conditions improve.
I’ve added frontier AI backtesting
to VCP Scanner.
It’s FREE for a limited time.
Describe your trading idea in plain English.
Let AI build a strategy.
Backtest it against decades of market history.
📊 $AAPL | 46 years | 141 trades
Opus 5.5 backtesting is coming soon.
Got a trading idea?
Test it before risking real capital. 👇
Backtest results only. Past performance ≠ future results.
Market isn’t looking convincing right now.
Under a lot of pressure. But I’m trusting individual setups over my own biases.
My system says play conservatively. That’s exactly what I’m doing.
$XP gapped +31% in one morning.
3 weeks earlier it was on the VCP Scanner list.
Tightening.
Pressing the line.
Nobody talking about it.
Up days on volume.
Down days on nothing.
Every dip held the 21 EMA.
Pros were loading quietly.
Retail found it on the gap.
Market health: Defensive.
Cracker Barrel $CBRL didn’t care.
Broke its $60 Livermore line Oct 13.
Scanner caught it live.
4 days. +13%.
Anish | VCP Scanner retweeted
I gave an AI one sentence.
It built a Netflix $NFLX strategy: +1,300% in a 24-year backtest.
Wait till you see the last 2 years it never saw 👇
I gave an AI one sentence.
It built a Netflix $NFLX strategy: +1,300% in a 24-year backtest.
Wait till you see the last 2 years it never saw 👇
An AI built a Netflix $NFLX strategy in 1 minute.
24-year backtest: +1,300%.
Last 2 years, data it never saw: +46%.
Buy and hold: -0.1%.
👇
$TSLA drove a car up a wall.
Hung it upside down.
Flipped it mid-air on air thrusters.
0–60 in 0.81s.
They promised us flying cars.
Tesla made one do a kickflip.
Still bearish on Tesla?
















