Virality Engine (@ViralityEngine) header
Virality Engine (@ViralityEngine) profile picture

Mastering the art of influence | Insights, strategies, and trends that actually work

Joined June 2020
Photo by Virality Engine (@ViralityEngine)Photo by Virality Engine (@ViralityEngine)Photo by Virality Engine (@ViralityEngine)Photo by Virality Engine (@ViralityEngine)Photo by Virality Engine (@ViralityEngine)Photo by Virality Engine (@ViralityEngine)Photo by Virality Engine (@ViralityEngine)Photo by Virality Engine (@ViralityEngine)
Virality Engine retweeted
Soldier on, you are a man.
4
24
764
Virality Engine retweeted
God is with you.
2
8
68
2,308
Virality Engine retweeted
Get Ready.
1
5
27
804
Virality Engine retweeted
I GAVE MY PRODUCT A DRAMATIC BILLBOARD ENTRANCE. Then I buried it under effects. I may need supervision. Try a little more restraint with your reveal in CapCut PC. tinyurl.com/2v23rn22 #capcutpc #capcutblackfriday
🤝 Paid partnership
17
26
28
1,526
Virality Engine retweeted
this is the most boring-sounding AI news of the week and maybe the most IMPORTANT AI-generated code at scale is supposed to mean slop Axiom just dropped a pretty good counterexample they took the Stacks Project, a massive math reference started by Columbia’s Johan de Jong, and had AI agents rebuild it in Lean, a language where proofs are written as code you don’t have to trust the AI. a computer checks every step but the size isn’t the interesting part. the structure is Stacks isn’t a pile of separate proofs. everything is connected to everything else think of the glass pyramid at the Louvre: one pane is just glass, but together they make the whole thing so they ran it like a software company: > humans led the project > some agents owned the architecture > others wrote the core definitions > others handled the single proofs the result keeps the math’s structure, but now it’s code a machine can check which makes it a foundation AI agents can actually build on to do math sounds boring, is kinda wild
🤝 Paid partnership
Most think vibecoding at scale is slop. Here’s a counterexample. Today we release a 16M-line formalization of the entire Stacks Project, critical infra underlying modern math, with optimized code quality and its highly interconnected structure preserved. A mathematical city 🌆
5
9
18
989
Virality Engine retweeted
Most think vibecoding at scale is slop. Here’s a counterexample. Today we release a 16M-line formalization of the entire Stacks Project, critical infra underlying modern math, with optimized code quality and its highly interconnected structure preserved. A mathematical city 🌆
272
562
132
1,902
1,178,715
Virality Engine retweeted
How can I not be grateful??? Life is hard but God still makes a way.
3
12
90
7,275
7 Subject Line Formulas That Get Opens:
1
20
41
1,984
Virality Engine retweeted
Tell me your website and I'll send you every Reddit thread ranking on page 1 of Google for it. Free. No call. No pitch. Why this matters: Google keeps putting Reddit threads in front of buyers. Those threads are page-1 real estate you don't have to rank. You just have to show up in the comments. I’m giving away a free Reddit Opportunity Report. Your report shows: → The Reddit threads ranking for your top keywords → How much monthly traffic each keyword gets → Ready-to-post comments that mention your brand naturally → A posting plan: where to comment, what to say, how to track it Comment "Report" and I’ll send it over to you. (Follow me first so I can DM you)
2
8
11
319
Virality Engine retweeted
This guy just showed something absolutely WILD.
Woww.. Viggle AI just shipped Remake, and it changes anything inside a video while the acting, camera and sound stay. • a new character, object, background or style, just by describing it • recast the whole cast and keep every face consistent across cuts • fix one shot by chatting with the agent, the rest stays untouched • up to 2 minutes in one go, from $0.96 per 10 seconds change one frame. remake the whole scene
7
8
1,461
IF YOU'RE A MAN WHO IS: • 22 years old • 25 years old • 27 years old • 29 years old • 33 years old • 37 years old No one is coming to save you. You're on your own. Do this to save yourself...
8
31
1
131
10,879
Virality Engine retweeted
Woww.. Viggle AI just shipped Remake, and it changes anything inside a video while the acting, camera and sound stay. • a new character, object, background or style, just by describing it • recast the whole cast and keep every face consistent across cuts • fix one shot by chatting with the agent, the rest stays untouched • up to 2 minutes in one go, from $0.96 per 10 seconds change one frame. remake the whole scene
🤝 Paid partnership
Introducing Viggle Remake. The most powerful video transformation agent. And we’re releasing the weights today. → recast every character in a scene, and they stay consistent across cuts → swap objects, change the background, restyle or add VFX → up to 2 minutes → keep chatting to fix any shot until it’s right From $0.96 per 10 seconds at 720p, less than half of what Higgsfield Genjutsu charges. Try it now: viggle.ai/meme/app/home?ui=v… Open weights: huggingface.co/Viggle/Viggle…
18
11
9
32
3,140
Virality Engine retweeted
Reddit sued Perplexity and a group of major scraping providers, including SerpApi. In the process, they revealed how Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude and Google actually work. Including how businesses can get traffic from AI search to their websites. Now that the secret is out, let’s talk about it. By the way, if you want to see whether your business is appearing across Google AI, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Grok, check here (it's free): seo-stuff.com/free-audit Reddit’s lawsuit claims that Perplexity and its partners have been scraping Google’s search results to capture Reddit content indirectly, bypassing robots.txt restrictions. One part of the complaint really stuck out. Reddit reportedly created a test post that only Google could crawl. Within hours, Perplexity showed the content of that post. According to Reddit, the only way Perplexity could have retrieved that content was by scraping Google’s SERPs or by getting the data from a partner that scraped it. This essentially confirms that Perplexity and similar AI search engines are not crawling the full internet on their own. Instead, they are relying heavily on obviously training data, but also Google's top results, often times Bing's top results, authority domains, recency signals and optimized data. This has been a guiding principle by which SEO Stuff (seo-stuff.com/ai-seo) has been operating. This also lines up cleanly with what Perplexity’s head of comms recently explained publicly. Many AI search systems still rely on page-level discovery signals before passing those results into an LLM, which then synthesizes answers using sub-document or snippet-level context. (If you want to see where your site stands across Google, ChatGPT, Claude and broader AI search, start here: seo-stuff.com/free-audit) AI engines don’t start from “the web" so much as they start from a filtered, ranked, authority-weighted version of the web. When you break it down, here is what appears to be happening under the hood: Perplexity monitors and ingests Google’s top results as a discovery feed. And this is why visibility in Google translates directly into visibility in AI search. This also explains why brands that “rank fine” but lack authority or structure often never show up in AI answers. They’re visible to humans, but not that useful to machines. Perplexity has actually offered an interesting window into AI search dating back to last August when their “ranking factors” leaked courtesy of Metehan Yesilyurt. Retrieved content is broken into chunks and converted into vector embeddings. Then at search time, the system compares your content’s vectors against the user’s query to find semantically relevant matches. Clean structure, clear subheadings, short answer blocks and semantic clarity win out. This is exactly what snippet-first systems optimize for: reusable fragments. Authority domains also receive a ranking boost, and legitimate, strong backlinks still matter. Recent studies on AI Overviews and Common Crawl back this up, showing authority builds on itself inside AI systems because high-authority domains are crawled more often, retrieved more often and cited more often. Also, a strict recency filter is applied. Perplexity uses a time decay system. New content and recently updated content are weighted more heavily. Everything we have learned lines up perfectly with the system SEO Stuff (seo-stuff.com) has been building around long before this lawsuit surfaced. Not because anyone was exploiting a one-off loophole, but because SEO Stuff was building for how AI systems actually retrieve, chunk and cite information. The done-for-you package: seo-stuff.com/gold-plan-pack… You get 10 AI search optimized articles plus three DR50+ backlinks per cycle. The content is formatted with: High semantic density Clear HTML markup TLDR summaries Question-based H2s Short answer blocks for extraction Backlinks come from domains already appearing in AI results and already receiving real search traffic. This builds both discovery authority (Google) and citation defensibility (AI). The content package: seo-stuff.com/premium-conten… You get 60 targeted, high-similarity articles created and refreshed on rolling cycles to stay inside the visibility window that Perplexity, Gemini and AI Overviews rely on. This content is designed to show up in both Google’s index and Perplexity’s derivative index. Scale matters because AI confidence is built through repetition, not one perfect page. The authority package: seo-stuff.com/premium-backli… You get three DR50+ contextual backlinks from domains that are already being cited by AI answer engines. This reinforces authority and entity alignment so your site is more likely to be selected by ChatGPT and Perplexity. And if you want to see whether your business is appearing across Google AI, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Grok, check here (it's free): seo-stuff.com/free-audit
An analysis of 129,000 websites, 216,524 pages and 100,000 prompts determined the #1 secret to getting traffic from ChatGPT. It busts a lot of myths and lines up closely with what we’ve learned about how AI search systems retrieve, evaluate and reuse information. It also aligns with what SEO Stuff has been building over the past year: seo-stuff.com/ai-seo Let’s break it down. Headline first: backlinks mattered more than anything else. The SE Ranking study found that sites with 32,000+ referring domains were 3.5x more likely to be cited by ChatGPT. Sites with very high domain trust also earned nearly 4x more citations than low-trust domains. If you want to see where your site stands across ChatGPT, Claude, Google and broader AI search, start here. It’s free: seo-stuff.com/free-audit ChatGPT may ignore some old-school SEO tricks, but authority clearly matters. High-authority domains are more likely to rank, get discovered, enter AI retrieval and ultimately get cited. That is why SEO Stuff's flagship package includes three contextually relevant DR50+ backlinks: seo-stuff.com/gold-plan-pack… Homepage traffic was another major signal. Sites with 7,900+ homepage visitors had twice the citation likelihood, while domains with 190,000+ monthly visitors earned nearly twice as many citations as smaller sites. That reinforces something important. AI search does not exist in isolation from traditional search visibility. If your domain has almost no presence across the wider search ecosystem, it has fewer opportunities to enter AI retrieval in the first place. This is why SEO Stuff content is built for Google and LLMs at the same time. Presence on Quora and Reddit mattered too. Domains with a lot of Quora and Reddit mentions had four times higher citation likelihood. Even smaller brands saw measurable lifts from participating in relevant discussions and being referenced organically. Those mentions can reinforce what the company does, which category it belongs to and whether real people are talking about it. Content depth also mattered. Articles under 800 words averaged 3.2 citations, while articles over 2,900 words averaged 5.1, but simply adding words is not enough. The stronger content included multiple angles, examples, expert quotes, verifiable data and broader topic coverage. That is the thinking behind the Premium Content Bundle: seo-stuff.com/premium-conten… It includes 60 long-form articles designed to build deeper coverage around the questions customers and AI systems are researching. Structure made a major difference too. Well-structured pages earned 70% more citations. The strongest pages used clean headings, relatively concise sections, logical progression, question-based H2s and clear answers. Walls of text and vague brand storytelling give LLMs much less they can reliably extract. Freshness mattered as well. Pages updated within the previous three months nearly doubled their citations, with older pages averaging 3.6 citations compared with 6.0 for recently updated content. Newer does not automatically mean better, but keeping important pages current clearly matters. Question-based titles and FAQs also helped, particularly for smaller sites, when combined with depth, authority and good structure. LLMs.txt, on the other hand, did almost nothing. Its impact was negligible. Authority, structure and useful content mattered far more. Review platforms were another strong signal. Brands appearing on Trustpilot, Capterra, G2, Sitejabber and Yelp earned three to six times more citations than brands with no presence. That is another reminder that AI systems do not evaluate your company only through your own website. Third-party reputation matters. Core Web Vitals mattered too. Fast pages were cited three times more often than slow pages. You do not need perfect scores, but you do need to avoid a site that is painfully slow or difficult to use. So what actually drives ChatGPT visibility? The study points to backlinks, domain trust, homepage authority, Reddit and Quora presence, deep content, clear structure, recent updates, review platform visibility and fast performance. In other words, many of the fundamentals that help you in Google also help you in AI search, with additional social, structural and entity signals layered on top. This is exactly what SEO Stuff was built around: seo-stuff.com The Done-For-You Gold Plan combines 10 long-form, AI-search-optimized articles with three DR50+ contextual backlinks: seo-stuff.com/gold-plan-pack… The Premium Content Bundle adds 60 deep-dive articles designed to expand topical coverage and give search and AI systems more useful information to retrieve: seo-stuff.com/premium-conten… And the Premium Backlink Bundle adds three DR50+ authority placements designed to strengthen domain trust and broader brand authority: seo-stuff.com/premium-backli… Backlinks were the strongest factor in the entire study. But the broader takeaway is that AI search visibility comes down to authority, clarity, depth, structure, trust and freshness. And SEO Stuff was built to deliver exactly that. And if you want to see where your site stands across ChatGPT, Claude, Google and broader AI search, start here. It’s free: seo-stuff.com/free-audit
5
36
43
5,627
Virality Engine retweeted
Sam Altman says the lessons you learn from failure are mostly useless: "The lessons I learned from success were very good, and I should have applied those more." "And the lessons I learned from failure were either fairly generic, and I kind of already knew them, or got in the way of something else." Most things don't work, and for so many reasons that the real cause is hard to pin down. When something does work, you can see exactly what to copy. That's how he treats what worked at Y Combinator and at OpenAI. Interested in AI? Follow @AiEvolutio58513 and never fall behind. I track ChatGPT, Claude, and every tool quietly changing how we work and create, then hand you the tested signals.
1
21
27
1,878
Virality Engine retweeted
This pricing is wild. Viggle just dropped Remake. You can transform entire videos for just $0.96 per 10 seconds. And they open-sourced the weights too.
🤝 Paid partnership
Introducing Viggle Remake. The most powerful video transformation agent. And we’re releasing the weights today. → recast every character in a scene, and they stay consistent across cuts → swap objects, change the background, restyle or add VFX → up to 2 minutes → keep chatting to fix any shot until it’s right From $0.96 per 10 seconds at 720p, less than half of what Higgsfield Genjutsu charges. Try it now: viggle.ai/meme/app/home?ui=v… Open weights: huggingface.co/Viggle/Viggle…
3
8
15
1,209
Virality Engine retweeted
AI videos are getting crazy. @ViggleAI Remake transforms viral videos in minutes while matching the original motion, camera angles, and timing. step by step tutorial with prompts: 👇
🤝 Paid partnership
1
10
12
1,256
Virality Engine retweeted
The most famous phone in the Musk universe does not exist, has never been announced, and he publicly dismissed the entire category six years ago. Meanwhile he spent $17 billion on something almost nobody noticed. Not a handset. The frequencies every handset is legally required to use. A phone rumoured since 2021 with zero announcements. A satellite network that already works on the phone you own. 15,000 satellites licensed last month. Here’s what a telecoms analyst would tell you if they could speak freely: “Everyone quotes the 2022 tweet and nobody reads it. It says: ‘I certainly hope it does not come to that, but, yes, if there is no other choice, I will make an alternative phone.’ That is a conditional, posted in reply to someone else, about Apple and Google possibly removing Twitter from their app stores. The condition never happened. Two years earlier he had posted something much clearer: ‘Smartwatches & phones are yesterday’s technology, Neuralinks are the future.’ So look at what the money did instead. In September 2025 SpaceX agreed to buy about $17 billion of EchoStar spectrum — $8.5bn cash and $8.5bn in stock — for 50 MHz of AWS-4 and H-block licences. He didn’t want to sell you a phone. He wanted to own the band your phone transmits on.” A phone is a product you buy once. Spectrum is a toll every phone pays forever. “Build the device and you compete with Apple. Buy the frequency and Apple competes with you.” Here are the 7 signals in the actual record:🧵 Signal 6 is the interference objection filed by the company that sells the service.
7
8
10
654
Virality Engine retweeted
A guy walked into a BMW dealership in 2026 ready to replace his 7-year-old X5. He'd driven BMWs for 20 years. He knew what he wanted: another X5, gas engine, same as always. Then the salesperson started talking about "Neue Klasse," a new iX3, a different kind of iDrive, an electric X5, an electric M3, and 40 new or updated models coming by the end of 2027. He walked out confused. Was BMW going all-electric? Should he buy now or wait? Was the BMW he loved about to disappear? He called his brother-in-law an automotive engineer who spent 14 years working on drivetrain and vehicle software programs for German luxury carmakers and now consults on EV technology. His brother-in-law laughed. "BMW isn't killing the cars you love. It's rebuilding the entire company underneath them. The biggest investment project in BMW's history Neue Klasse is rolling out right now. The new iX3 is just the beginning. The way BMWs are built, the way they're powered, the computers that run them, the screen in front of you, the batteries, even the CEO all of it is changing at the same time. In 3 years, most of the BMW lineup will be new. Whether you want electric, gas, or plug-in hybrid, the BMW you buy in 2028 will feel very different from the one you're driving now." He walked him through 10 things in about an hour. The guy left knowing exactly what was coming and when it made sense to buy. He said: "I thought BMW's future was just 'more electric cars.' It's actually the biggest reinvention of the brand since the 1960s and almost no one outside the car world understands what's happening." Here are the 10 things his brother-in-law told him and why BMW's next few years could define the company for decades: 🧵
2
11
11
1,135
Virality Engine retweeted
A couple had shopped at Costco almost every weekend for 8 years. They spent about $9,000 a year there. Groceries, paper goods, a TV, holiday gifts, tires. They had the basic $65 Gold Star membership and figured the Executive membership was just Costco upselling them. They bought gas at a station down the street with a regular credit card. They booked their family vacations on a travel website. They shopped Saturdays at noon and waited in long lines. At a birthday party, they mentioned Costco to her cousin a former Costco front-end and membership supervisor who spent 12 years at the warehouse, handling memberships, renewals, returns, and member questions. She did the math on a napkin. "You spent $9,000 last year on the basic membership. With Executive, you would have earned about $180 back in a 2% reward for an extra $65 a year. You're paying more for gas at that station than you would at Costco. You booked a rental car and vacation package without checking Costco Travel. You've been paying full price for restaurant gift cards Costco sells at a discount. And you're shopping at the busiest time of the week when Executive members can now shop an hour earlier. Costco gave you a membership card. You've been using it like a library card." She walked them through 10 things in about 30 minutes. They upgraded to Executive, switched their gas to Costco, started using the right credit card, checked Costco Travel for their next trip, and moved their shopping to early weekday mornings. She said: "I thought Costco was just cheap groceries in bulk. It turns out the membership is a whole system and we were only using the cheapest part of it." Here are the 10 things her cousin told them and why most Costco members are leaving hundreds of dollars a year on the table:🧵
1
16
25
1,774