Vaibhav Addala

Rahul Gand aaja karle Debate

24 घंटे हो गए मोदी जी। मैंने आपको चैलेंज दिया है। आप कहते हो कि opposition देशद्रोही है। किसी भी स्टेज पे आप जगह चुनिए, डिबेट कीजिए मेरे साथ। देशद्रोही कौन है? विदेशी फोर्सेस का कनेक्शन किसका है? और किस प्रकार का कनेक्शन है? जल्दी से जल्दी कीजिए, डरिए मत। दोनों मिलेंगे, मीडिया होगी, देश के युवा होंगे, टेबल होगी, एक साइड आप बैठोगे, एक साइड मैं बैठूंगा। जिसको आप जज बनाना चाहते हो, बना दो। मोहन भागवत जी को बिठा दो, चलो। और फिर डिबेट करते हैं। सवाल उठेंगे फाइनेंशियल सिस्टम पर, फाइनेंशियल स्ट्रक्चर पर, US डील कैसे हुई, क्यों हुई, इतनी जल्दी क्यों हुई, सिर्फ आपने क्यों की, कैबिनेट को क्यों नहीं बताया, अडानी का केस बंद क्यों हुआ, Epstein - ऐसी बहुत सारी चीजें हैं जिसपे खुलकर डिस्कशन होगा। आ जाइए, डरिए मत। दूध का दूध, पानी का पानी कीजिए। आप एलिगेशन लगाते हैं ना मेरे ऊपर, आ जाइए, सब साफ हो जाएगा। बाकी चीजों पे आपने defamation केस लगा रखा है, शायद 45 defamation केस मेरे ऊपर हैं। मगर इस डिबेट मामले पे, foreign कनेक्शन पे आप defamation नहीं लगा रहे हो। लगाइए ना, वहाँ भी डिस्कस करेंगे, खुल के। ये सब डिस्कस करते हैं, आइए। हैप्पी दिवाली, मोदी जी। It’s been 24 hours since I challenged you, Modi ji. You say the Opposition is anti-national. Choose any stage, any venue, and debate me on this - Who is anti-national? Who has connections with foreign forces? And what is the nature of those connections? Let’s do this as soon as possible. Daro mat! We’ll both be there. The media will be there. The youth of this country will be there. There will be a table. You’ll sit on one side, I’ll sit on the other. You can appoint whoever you want as the judge. You can even make Mohan Bhagwat ji the judge. There will be questions about the financial system, the financial structure, how the US deal happened, why it happened and why so quickly, why you made the deal alone and didn’t inform the Cabinet, why the Adani case was closed, Epstein - and many other issues. We’ll discuss all of them openly. Let the truth come out. Let everything be crystal clear. You make allegations against me, don’t you? Come forward. Everything will become clear. You’ve filed defamation cases against me over other matters. I think there are around 45 defamation cases against me. But on this issue of the debate, on the question of foreign connections, you haven’t filed a defamation case. Go ahead, file one. We’ll discuss that openly too. Happy Diwali, Modi ji.

CM of State or Security Guard of Sonia Gandhi?

God forbid South Asian Americans build power for our communities rather than fall for right wing divide-and-conquer agendas

Social media is increasingly being misused to spread rumours and tarnish India's image. It is the collective responsibility of every citizen to counter this. While we have eliminated Naxalism from remote areas, the threat of 'Dimagi Naxalism' still persists. The nation must remain vigilant against these Dimagi Naxals. - PM @narendramodi

BREAKING: Madras High Court issues notice on plea seeking investigation into the identity and background of journalist Saurav Das, including his parents, and cancellation of his passport and Aadhaar card if allegations are established. @SauravDassss @Cockroachisback

Imagine if Manmohan Singh had cracked down on Facebook and WhatsApp the way Modi is doing with Instagram today. Would Modi have made it this far?

Tata is being criminally destroyed, and no business leader dares say a word. How long will you stay silent? Until they own you? Indian business is not Modi and Shah's plaything. You lack courage. We don't. We will ensure justice for these crimes.

First, the frame. The petition rests on an investigation by @IndianExpress revealing 14 objections by Election Commissioners Vivek Joshi and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu, recorded over 10 months, objecting to decisions taken in the Commission’s name without their knowledge. The affidavit doesn’t dispute a single note. It only says that the Commission “has neither released nor authorised the release” of them. (2/10)

IS ECOSYSTEM ANTI-CEC CAMPAIGN RIDING ON BACK OF INDIAN EXPRESS REPORT DONE, BRO? Here's what the EC'S affidavit in SC means: 1. SIR ‘RIFT’ THEORY COLLAPSES? ECI says all three SIR orders were unanimously approved by the CEC and both Election Commissioners. 2. FILE NOTINGS ARE NOT COMMISSION DECISIONS: ECI says internal queries and suggestions are routine, not evidence of a split. The July 28 work-allocation order was never implemented after a joint direction by both ECs. 3. FORM 6 ‘TAMPERING’ CLAIM REBUTTED: ECI says Form 6 has not been amended. It acknowledges the online display could cause confusion and says the digital process will separate Form 6 from the SIR declaration, as in the physical process. 4. SIR DOES NOT MEAN MASS HEARINGS: Unmapped voters need not routinely appear for hearings. BLOs will collect documents at home, with hearings reserved for exceptional cases, preferably online. 5. ECINet ‘VOTE DELETION’ CLAIM CHALLENGED: ECI says no voter can be added or deleted without an ERO’s order. It cites an IIT-IISc expert committee and clarifies the Goa figures behind claims of excluded voters. 6. PLEA AGAINST CEC’S FUNCTIONING ‘NOT MAINTAINABLE’: ECI says the petition rests on a single news report, denies authorising media leaks and argues that the CEC can be removed only through the constitutional process applicable to a Supreme Court judge. It seeks time to file a detailed reply.