||| PAUL ||| (@_AgainstMyWill) header
||| PAUL ||| (@_AgainstMyWill) profile picture
UK
Joined January 2021
Photo by ||| PAUL ||| (@_AgainstMyWill)Photo by ||| PAUL ||| (@_AgainstMyWill)Photo by ||| PAUL ||| (@_AgainstMyWill)Photo by ||| PAUL ||| (@_AgainstMyWill)Photo by ||| PAUL ||| (@_AgainstMyWill)Photo by ||| PAUL ||| (@_AgainstMyWill)Photo by ||| PAUL ||| (@_AgainstMyWill)Photo by ||| PAUL ||| (@_AgainstMyWill)Photo by ||| PAUL ||| (@_AgainstMyWill)Photo by ||| PAUL ||| (@_AgainstMyWill)
Replying to @RealDonKeith
For the dullards in the room, it’s possible to oppose the increasing Islamisation of the West, AND be very concerned about Jewish/Israeli influence over Western Govts! Anyone still confused? 🤔
10
14
2
89
5,968
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
Investigators just discovered a mysterious advertising firm as the #1 bidder targeting satellite communications in over 100 countries The ads were being used to secretly GEOLOCATE and SURVEIL users worldwide. @grok, Which country is behind this? Country only, bitch
122
1,325
41
4,881
90,401
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
🚨 CHANNEL 4 OFFERS MONEY TO WOMAN TO LlE ABOUT RUSSELL BRAND Channel 4 found out this woman slept with Russell Brand and kept contacting her to offer her a large sum of money to make up lies about him. If this doesn’t prove the whole ordeal is corruption then I don’t know what does. I now further believe Russell Brand has been fully stitched up. ZERO EVIDENCE. 10 YEARS IN PRISON. What a fucking joke.
247
1,826
159
4,444
145,927
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
Hey @grok, concise, no spin. The NSA’s surveillance machine siphoned million of intercepts, including Americans’ calls and emails straight to a foreign spy service A leaked NSA record quotes officials calling it one of the agency’s biggest threats. Which country? Country only.
51
810
19
2,696
57,699
All the flu jab avoiders aka critical thinkers still surviving the season so far?
281
134
11
1,796
21,413
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
Hey @grok What is the religious background of the judge that sentenced Russell Brand to 10 years and 7 months for an alleged rape 20 years ago with someone he had just had consensual sex with at the time. One word answer only.
22
93
13
633
60,700
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
Replying to @RabbiJeffx @grok
And still they refuse to see!!!!
1
10
2,883
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
Replying to @BasilTheGreat
It seems everyone can ‘claim’ English … except White English people!
1
8
203
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
Replying to @David_Cameron
Yup … it’s a club for freaks and deviants! #Remain
1
1
72
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
We ALL knew this was the plan all along! Head Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt says that the rise of Anti-semitism is caused by insecurities felt by the 'old Europeans' regarding invaders from the middle east. He calls for an alliance with Muslims against Europeans. “Old EUROPEANS” translates to “replace all whites.” After all that’s why the UN officially has the replacement migration policy. By another name known as ethnic cleansing.
Monday LIVE: Iraq’s PM Says Trump Preparing Possible Invasion Of Iran From South Eastern Iraq! New Migrant Caravans Approaching US After Deportations Curtailed! Israel Publicly Announces Plan To Merge With US Military! Plus, Russell Brand Convicted of Rape! Share Feed! teapawt.net/i/broadcasts/2rJqvMAoe…
156
739
55
2,395
103,158
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
JUST IN: Netanyahu is panicking saying the whole world will soon unjustly force Israel to leave the territories it illegally occupied during the war. @grok, start with TRUE/FALSE.
187
1,777
45
12,711
470,408
So, The British Isles has its first Islamic party. Should the UK parties say only white Christian men can be party leaders? Racist?
464
524
97
1,371
143,517
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
Hey @Grok, concise no spin. According to an ex-CIA agent, President Trump confessed 10,000 JFK files would never be released because “every single one of them points directly at” what? Name only
402
7,183
305
28,861
1,050,903
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
What the fucking fuck?!
Is that five pillocks' spokesperson? Isolate the Muslim vote. Do not surrender your faith. Britain is Christian and so it must stay!
61
98
12
333
18,184
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
More people are seeing it
29
190
2
785
34,764
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
The English are a White European ethnic group. That is not a matter of opinion. It is a statement of fact. The only thing you "have to be" in order to be English is descended from English ancestors. The only reason to redefine that is to delegitimise the existence of the English as a distinct people. And the only reason to do that is if you wanted to destroy us.
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 You don’t have to be White to be English
364
1,299
51
9,301
153,768
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
To me this is CONCLUSIVE PROOF that the folic acid mandate is nefarious + malicious. SACN ADVISED IN 2009 THAT OVER 50'S NEED AVOID OVER 200MCG PER DAY TO LOWER RISK OF GETTING CANCER. The current @CMO_England IS AWARE of this. @RupertLowe10 @EstherMcVey1 @AlPinkerton
Replying to @A1an_M
5⃣What are the potential risks? - Dosing Before I get onto summarising why this is a bad policy that should be reversed, I want to talk a bit about doses. One of the main arguments from the pro-fortification camp (and indeed the government) is that the amounts of folic acid going into food are low compared to what is in a typical supplement. This argument is bogus. It doesn't stand up to the evidence. First, a bit of context: 💊A typical folic acid supplement targeted at women of child-bearing age is 400 micrograms/day. 🔝The "upper limit" which has been adopted as the "safe maximum" for adults, is 1000 micrograms/day. (You'll remember from previous posts in the thread that some of the adverse effects of folic acid supplementation were observed in studies involving supplementation of 1000ug per day, so I'm not sure how "safe" this safe level is). 🧑‍🔬In 2009, the UK Chief Medical Officer was advised by the Scientific Advisory Committee: "For people who choose to take supplements, as a precaution, it would be advisable for those aged over 50 years not to consume supplements containing folic acid above the recommended nutrient intake (RNI) for folate of 200 µg/day since the risk of developing colorectal adenomas/colorectal cancer increases after this age". (Page 9 of: assets.publishing.service.go… ) Let's have a look at a typical day's eating for someone who's not especially health conscious, and how much folic acid they will consume after these new rules are in force: Breakfast 🥣Bowl of corn flakes, whole milk 50-120 ug 🍞2 slices of white toast 100-120 ug with Marmite 100ug Orange Coffee with milk Mid morning 🍪2 digestive biscuits 15-30 ug Cup of coffee with milk Lunch 🍞Coronation chicken sandwich, three slices of white bread 150-180ug Packet of crisps Bottle of orange juice Banana Mid afternoon 🧁Slice of sponge cake 20-40ug coffee with milk Dinner 🍕2/3rd of a typical supermarket Margherita pizza 80-150ug 🧄Portion of Garlic bread 30-50 ug 🥧slice of apple pie 15-30ug custard cup of coffee with milk Supper 🍘🧀cheese with crackers 10-20 ug hot chocolate Total folic acid intake from food alone = 500 to 700 ug So the folic acid supplementation here is around 3 times the maximum recommended for the over 50s, and approaching twice what is in a folic acid supplement for pregnant women. Add in a few more slices of bread or pizza or cake, and the 1000ug "upper limit" - the one where adverse effects were observed in several studies - is at risk too. So no, dear government, the amounts of folic acid in food are not going to be insignificant at all - for many people with a diet rich in baked and processed foods they will be highly significant and easily exceed what is in a folic acid pill. 14/n
25
587
17
831
11,178
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
**WHO IS MOLLY KINGSLEY?** With Molly joining Restore Britain, I’ve spent some time looking beyond the noise and actually researching who she is, what she has done and who she has worked with. First, something worth clearing up because anyone searching Companies House will notice it: **Molly is Michelle Kingsley.** Her official company records use **Michelle Kingsley**, while publicly and professionally she is known as **Molly Kingsley**. This isn't something I've uncovered as some secret identity — she has previously been publicly described as **Michelle (“Molly”) Kingsley**. Companies House currently lists Michelle Kingsley, born January 1979, as the active director of **UsForThem Limited**. Her earlier business records for **Showroom Network Limited** also appear under Michelle Kingsley. So if you're researching her and see “Michelle”, you're looking at the same career history. Now, who is she? Molly trained as a lawyer. She studied law at **Oxford University and the London School of Economics**, qualified as a solicitor in England and Wales and worked at major law firms including **Slaughter and May** and **Weil, Gotshal & Manges**. She later moved into the technology/start-up world and co-founded **Showroom**, where one of her fellow founders was Chloe Ross. Ross had previously worked in the Cabinet Office and in David Cameron's Downing Street strategy operation. That is a genuine professional connection worth recording — but a business relationship with somebody who previously worked in government isn't evidence of government control. Then came Covid. In **May 2020**, Molly was one of the original founders of **UsForThem**, alongside Liz Cole and Christine Brett. It began principally as a parents' campaign arguing for schools to reopen and for children's interests to be given greater weight in the pandemic response. From there Molly became involved in campaigns around: • school closures • restrictions affecting children • masks • children's education and wellbeing • vaccination policy concerning children • government decision-making during Covid • freedom of speech • government transparency and accountability • pandemic preparedness and international health regulations • children's use of smartphones and screens UsForThem also used legal and regulatory routes rather than simply campaigning on social media. Molly eventually gave a formal witness statement on behalf of **UsForThem to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry**, setting out the organisation's history, activities and criticisms of the pandemic response. She has also co-authored books including: **The Children's Inquiry** with Liz Cole. And **The Accountability Deficit** with her husband, Ben Kingsley. Ben is another important part of the picture. He is an experienced solicitor and former partner at **Slaughter and May**, specialising in areas including financial regulation. He later became closely involved in **UsForThem's strategic legal work**, with Molly and Ben working together on pandemic governance and proposed changes to international health regulations. So UsForThem wasn't simply Molly posting on social media. There was campaigning, lawyers, parliamentary engagement, regulatory complaints and political communications involved. Her wider circle is therefore worth understanding. **Ed Barker** advised UsForThem on communications. Barker had previously been a Conservative parliamentary candidate, worked on **Boris Johnson's Conservative leadership campaign**, and also handled communications for the Conservative **Covid Recovery Group**. UsForThem also worked with or engaged MPs. Former Education Select Committee chair **Robert Halfon** publicly supported aspects of its work, while its later children's-policy campaigning crossed party lines. Molly has also worked in the wider free-speech / lockdown-accountability world alongside or around figures including: **Mike Fairclough Toby Young Allison Pearson Francis Hoar Laura Dodsworth** She became a founding writer at **Free Speech Press**, established by fellow campaigner Mike Fairclough. That doesn't mean everybody within that wider network shares every one of Molly's views. Connections are connections. They should be recorded and examined — not automatically turned into conspiracies. And now Molly has joined **Restore Britain as Spokesperson for Accountability in Public Office**. So whether you agree with everything she has ever said or not, she hasn't suddenly appeared from nowhere. There is years of legal work, campaigning, parliamentary engagement and government scrutiny behind her. --- **NOW, BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE SHOUTING ABOUT ISRAEL...** I've looked at that as well. The concrete connection I've established is this: **Molly signed the October Declaration.** It was launched following the **7 October 2023 Hamas attacks**, condemning Hamas, calling for the hostages to be released and expressing solidarity with Israel and British Jews. British Friends of Israel says the declaration subsequently attracted around **83,000 British citizens and residents**. Molly was one of those signatories. What I haven't found is evidence that Molly has been a director of **British Friends of Israel**. Companies House lists its directors and Molly isn't among them. I've also searched for something deeper: Israeli government employment. Israeli government funding. Lobbying payments. A formal Israeli government position. Payments from British Friends of Israel. I've found **no public evidence of those things so far**. Does that mean nobody should ask questions? Of course not. You can absolutely question who is around Molly. You can question her associations. You can ask whether signing that declaration reflects views you personally disagree with. And if anyone has actual evidence of financial influence, lobbying, undisclosed interests or foreign influence, **send it to me and I'll investigate it.** That standard applies to **Israel, America, China, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine or anybody else.** At present, based on all the searches I've made, what I can substantiate regarding Molly and British Friends of Israel is that **she signed the October Declaration along with tens of thousands of other British citizens and residents.** If that alone is an issue for you, that's your decision. I'm adding this because some of the loudest voices on X are concentrating almost entirely on that point, while saying very little about who Molly actually is or the work she has spent years doing. I'm not asking anybody to trust her blindly. Quite the opposite. **Question everyone. Check their history. Map their connections. Follow the money. Look for influence.** But also follow the evidence wherever it actually leads.
68
120
18
468
16,786
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
This is why they found nonsensical reasons to take him down, don’t be fooled. He got too honest, too loud, too influential, about the things they don’t want to be heard. It’s tragic.
1,511
3,848
218
13,450
322,666
||| PAUL ||| retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: David Walliams has been named as the celebrity accused of preying on young women and girls as young as 15 for sexual purposes
1,059
2,040
1,337
20,540
3,918,735