Ikepo retweeted
I just broke the glass bowl my wife recently bought and spilt the Alfredo pasta it contained.
If to say I be 10 years, some parents fit don rush me blow by now.
Was it my fault? 150%
Is it worth a beating? Never.
🤣🤣😭😭
Replying to @____abiodun____
Lmao! I’m no one’s intellectual—that’s effectively a slur, I’m an anti-intellectual. Read my bio again.
Perhaps, you need to be on cognitive enhancing drug to be able to understand what lies before your gaze?
So this is the savage imbecility you wanted to do with my voice? 🤣
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Replying to @____abiodun____
🤣I don’t take orders or gambits—if you’d like, from a halfwit, still damp from the ichor of the 12th dimensions, who thinks he has the prerogative to arrogate my voice.
Go on; when you attain puberty, in 10yrs perhaps, we’ll be able to partake in the same universe of discourse.
Ikepo retweeted
Once again imprecise language is how most of the world communicates. Let’s please give people some grace.
so cnc
Freeuse is a form of sexual play that is done by two people(or more).
One person gives full sexual consent at any time of any day(at least until they call it off) for their partner(s) to engage with them sexually without asking, or letting them know. It’s not CNC but it can tie into somnophilia, a sleep sex fetish.
So example.
Cooking in the kitchen. Partner comes right behind you and bends you over without a word. You can’t complain. That’s freeuse.
Ikepo retweeted
If I say my class is a zoo and you respond by saying the students are not animals.
You’re clearly an idiot. And there’s nothing else to say.
Esq, distinguishing figurative intent from literal, is simple. And please, drop your abstract examples of metaphor; the case at hand involves two real, verifiable conditions.
If a teacher says 'my class is a zoo,' and a staff says 'no, students are not animals,' the teacher won’t produce animal charts to prove her point, she just laughs and says 'it’s just a figure of speech.'
But when Mum Zee said 'pregnancy is not a death sentence' and people kept giving cases of maternal mortality to prove her wrong. You didn’t take that as a sign that the exchange wasn’t about a metaphor but a literal assertion of fact??.
When a dispute is fought using factual evidence, it is a literal debate over actual outcomes, not a literary exercise. You don’t use factual evidence to argue “the class is a zoo”, nor “life is a journey” nau😂.
It was AFTER sufficient medical opinion saturated the air on the subject that they tried taking the “literary” license to evade the critic of the travesty.



















