
Husband | Father | GI Radiation Oncologist at @BIDMChealth | @Harvardmed | Gastrointestinal Oncology Program | #MedEd | #RadOnc | Tweets my own
Boston, MA
Joined February 2020
- Tweets184
- Following97
- Followers181
- Likes359
Pinned Tweet
Rad onc + radiology like peas and carrots 🟢 🥕
special guest at our abdominal imaging & intervention fellowship morning conference today...@abrams_md!!!
#radiology + #radiationoncology go together like peanut butter + jelly! one of my favorite parts of my job is working with our rad onc colleagues.
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
Replying to @radioactivered
Well, the most interesting thing about the Radium Girls is actually how few of them got cancer.
"Only" 56 out of 1,468. I would argue that was, you know, 56 too many because it was entirely preventable, but still.
It's actually a great example of...wait for it...a threshold...
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
Controversial statement by @SJFrankMD, informed by the ProtecT study results, for those who still think prostatectomy is the better treatment. #ASTRO26
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
Really interesting randomized data from #ASTRO26.
Wang et al. randomized 93 patients with solitary HCC ≤2 cm, all suitable for either treatment, to RFA vs SBRT 50 Gy/5 fx.
2-year LPFS:
• RFA: 87.0%
• SBRT: 91.5%
• Difference +4.5%, meeting noninferiority
2-year OS was ~98% in both arms, with similar acute toxicity.
Small, single-center interim trial with a wide CI, so I would not overinterpret it. But this is another prospective randomized data point supporting SBRT as a legitimate definitive ablative option for small HCC, not simply a fallback when RFA (or other invasive interventions) cannot be performed.
#OncTwitter @NiuSanford @KrishanJethwa @nbn426
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
GI003 HCC proton vs photon: no dif OS, PFS, Gr 3+ AEs.
Protons = 1 option in expanding RT toolbox (MRgRT, adaptive, etc) to optimize therapeutic ratio, & each case should be individualized by tumor & liver fxn.
But w neg RCT & $/access dif, photon RT should remain SOC. #ASTRO26
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
Microwave ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic colorectal liver metastases (LAVA-CRLM): a prospective, randomised, phase II trial
thelancet.com/journals/lanep…
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
A randomized trial confirms that visceral reactions matter when the word "radiation" is used as an adjective to describe a cancer therapy. Following this publication, I have adopted the preferred European terminology by using the term "Radiotherapy" in all of my sentences with my patients.
Try it out. You might like it too!
redjournal.org/article/S0360…
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
I love the hidden gems in CMS datasets.
Which one of you ABSOLUTE ANIMALS tried to bill SBRT for LDRT in 2024??
Normally I'd assume it was a coding error, but given this is in the appeals claims...it means someone actually tried to do it.
Intentionally.
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
Replying to @jryckman3
Credentialism / focus on someone's SCOPUS profile is textbook definition of ad hominem. Only here for the meta-debate, carry on with the science debate 😀
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
Presented Phase 1 denikitug at #AACR26. Anti-CCR8 mAb is pharmacologically active at ≥10 mg: CCR8+ intratumoral Treg depletion and Teff activation on paired biopsies. Antitumor responses in heavily pretreated pts, including anti-PD-(L)1 refractory. Manageable safety. Supports mono and combo development. @BIDMC_CancerCtr @DanaFarber
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
"Began ~2.5 months ago"
"Recently completed"
79.2Gy in 44 fractions: BASED.
His RadOnc clearly understands how to choose wisely.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
🚨SPRING-01🚨
🔍Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
RCT:
25 Gy x 5 ➡️ CAPOX +- Sintilimab
🔥+ Sintilimab demonstrated:
✅⬆️pCR 59% vs 33%
✅No significant adverse surgical or safety signals
Time to explore with organ preserving approaches⁉️
#ASCO25
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
X-torial: Cleaning up the misinformation about @JoeBiden and #ProstateCancer that I am reading everywhere.
The purpose of this is to provide education from someone who treats and studies PCa for a living, lead the USA @NCCN PCa guidelines, hold leadership in @NRGonc @theNCI @US_FDA and dedicated my career to help men and their families suffering from PCa
@nytimes @WSJ @FoxNews @CNN @NBCNews @Reuters @ASCO @PCFnews @DeptofDefense
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
✨ Practice-changing for gallbladder cancer?
A randomized phase 3 trial from 🇮🇳 evaluated NACTRT vs NACT in locally advanced GBC (T3/T4, N1, liver infiltration).
Results:
✂️ R0 resection: 51.6% (NACTRT) vs 29.7% (NACT) p=0.01
⏳ Median OS: 21.8 vs 10.1 mo
HR: 0.56 (95% CI 0.37–0.84), p=0.006
⏱ EFS: 10.6 vs 4.9 mo
HR: 0.58 (95% CI 0.39–0.85), p=0.006
5-year OS: 27% vs 18%
Grade 3+ post-op morbidity: similar (~18–28%)
Conclusion: NACTRT significantly improves resectability & long-term survival in unresectable LAGBC.
#GIonc #GallbladderCancer #ASCO25 #OncoTwitter @NiuSanford @5_utr @ASCO
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
Wow, this trial showed no OS benefit to FOLFIRINOX vs. single agent gemcitabine in locally advanced pancreas cancer (different than adjuvant & metastatic trials - both w OS improvement!)
PFS increased by 2 mo, but this came at cost of increased toxicity, $, treatment burden.
🚨 NEOPAN - Pancreatic Cancer Update 🚨
In LAPC (locally advanced pancreatic cancer) 🧬:
📊 Trial compared FOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine
👥 171 patients, PS ≤1, unresectable cases
📌 Primary endpoint: PFS
📌 Secondary endpoints: OS, QoL, safety
🧪 Results:
🕒 Median PFS:
➡️ FOLFIRINOX: 9.7 months
➡️ Gemcitabine: 7.7 months
📉 HR = 0.7, P = .04 ✅
🕒 Median OS:
➡️ FOLFIRINOX: 15.7 months
➡️ Gemcitabine: 15.4 months
⚖️ HR = 1.02, P = .95 ❌
✅ Better PFS with FOLFIRINOX
🤷♂️ No OS benefit
💊 Well tolerated
doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02210
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
PLATO ACT 4: Ph II RCT of 50.4 vs. 41.4 Gy for T1-2 (<4 cm) N0 anal SCC.
No difference in 3-year local recurrence (primary endpoint) or OS, & better toxicity/QOL with dose-reduction.
Should 41.4 Gy be a SOC option (ahead of Ph III DECREASE trial reporting)?
#ESTRO25
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
⚡️⚡️NEW STUDY - presented today at #ARS2025 in an oral talk by MS2 Yarelis Roque-Reyes from UCC School of Medicine, PR
🧠💥 Does whole brain RT (WBRT) help patients hospitalized with symptomatic leptomeningeal disease (LMD)?
Our @MountSinaiRO study suggests: rarely — and in reality, it may be more harmful to patients’ quality of life and end-of-life care.
🧵👇 #radonc #neuroonc #endoflifecare #ARS2025
LMD is a devastating CNS complication with 3–6 mo survival. WBRT is often used for palliation — but for patients sick enough to need hospital admission, we asked:
👉 Does it actually help?
We reviewed 58 such patients (2014–2023). Here’s what we found ⬇️
📊 Symptom response after WBRT:
❌ 74% worsened
➖ 21% no change
✅ Only 5% improved
💀 Short-term mortality:
40% at 30 days
60% at 60 days
76% at 90 days
📉 ECOG declined in 79%
⏳ 30% spent >⅓ of their remaining lifespan on treatment — often in the hospital
🎯 Our takeaways
➡️ In hospitalized patients with symptomatic LMD, WBRT provides little to no clinical benefit
➡️ with few exceptions, best supportive care — not burdensome WBRT — should be the priority
➡️time to rethink WBRT in hospitalized pts with LMD?
👏 Congrats to Yarelis Roque-Reyes on her #ARS2025 oral talk!
@sindhu_kunal @MountSinaiRO @QuadShotNews
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
Replying to @RabbiWolpe
When I was a resident, Harvard took money from Krupp I naïvely thought this has to be a different company/family than the one that funded the third Reich. This was in the early 70s. I was wrong should’ve known.
Matthew Abrams, MD retweeted
All due respect, but it is relatively common knowledge that radiotherapy works for many months after it has been delivered. One must not conflate pCR, especially short term pCR, after radiotherapy as a surrogate for LC or residual tumor. This has been well demonstrated across many disease sites.
For reference, MISSILE cut at 10 weeks s/p RT while SABR-BRIDGE cut at 4.5 mo post-SBRT (range 2-17.5 mo).
Take anal cancer, for example. When biopsied at 3 months, if positive, 3/4 of patients with positive biopsy converted to negative biopsy by 6 months. Of course, the whole specimen was not removed, so there is a potential there could be "residual," but robust data supports very high cure rates in the long term (~85%, generally speaking) with CCRT alone for anal SqCC.
Receipt here:
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article…
Take prostate cancer, for example. Post treatment biopsies are essentially not recommended until two years after radiotherapy.
Receipt here:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3355…
Take RCC, for example, where routine post-treatment biopsy is not recommended as it is not predictive of patient outcome.
Receipt here:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3818…
So, why should lung cancer be any different? Similarly to RCC, if post-treatment biopsies after lung RT do not predict outcomes, is this meaningful to patients or multidisciplinary discussion? Radiotherapy can also induce cellular senescence, where the cell will no longer divide but can still make proteins at low levels. We must not perpetuate misinformation suggesting short-term pCR is predictive of patient outcomes after RT, as it harms existing biases against radiotherapy.
I have seen this fallacy posted repeatedly on X, so I felt it was time to address this head-on.
















































