Decoding the truth in study design, science, technology, markets, politics and culture. Retired CEO. Combat veteran. Father of five.

Pittsburgh, PA
Joined December 2023
Federal regulation of police surveillance systems like Flock is overdue as a matter of public accountability. These interconnected databases can track citizens across jurisdictions, while access controls remain largely dependent on individual agencies. Congress should establish mandatory federal security standards requiring immediate account suspension when officers lose authorization, automatic credential revocation, multifactor authentication, role-based access restrictions, case-specific search authorization, tamper-resistant audit logs, and independent security inspections. Every unauthorized search must trigger investigation. Agencies and vendors should face meaningful civil penalties for systemic violations. Deliberate misuse and concealment should carry criminal consequences where applicable. The central issue is federal accountability for a surveillance network whose reach exceeds local jurisdiction. A nationwide surveillance capability demands enforceable nationwide safeguards.
A Flock account stays active months after a cop is suspended for killing a girl. A resident found the problem in the logs and notified the city. The city “overlooked” the email from the “activist.” The guardrails at work. signalakron.org/akron-flock-…
1
95
Could Allegheny County’s Paid Leave Mandate Trigger an Economic Exodus? Allegheny County risks eroding its economic base if the proposed 12-week paid parental leave mandate accelerates business departures. Of 392 surveyed employers, 83% expected higher costs, one-third considered relocating, and 18% contemplated closing a local location. Relocation will drain payroll, supplier contracts and consumer spending across county lines. Tax-base erosion will squeeze municipal services, leaving remaining buisnesses facing growing fiscal pressure and heavier compliance expences. More than half of surveyed employers said they would raise prices to cover the mandate. That will create a second round of costs for families through dining, healthcare, childcare and other services. Businesses with thin margins face difficult choices: raise prices, reduce hiring, cut hours or delay expansion. Those responses will reinforce local inflation and reduce purchasing power. For employers already managing labor shortages, arranging temporary coverge adds further strain to operating bugets. The exemption for employers with fewer than 15 workers creates an economic threshold. A firm hiring its fifteenth worker will face new obligations, making expansion less appealing. Owners might postpone recruitment, outsource tasks or place new positions outside the county. This will constrain entry-level opportunities and weaken the pipeline from small firms to mid-sized employers. Such a threshold will quietly distort hiring decisions and capital allocation across countless seperate buisness plans. Capital flows toward jurisdictions offering stronger expected returns after operating costs. When neighboring counties impose different requirements, regional companies will direct their next investments elsewhere. One-third of respondents reported reluctance to open new offices in Allegheny County. Lost future investment never appears on a closure notice. Over time, fewer new locations will mean lower commerical property demand, slower wage growth, weaker economic diversification and fewer oppurtunities for residents. The deepest risk is a feedback loop. A shrinking tax base will strain public finances, creating pressure for higher taxes or reduced services, further discouraging investment. Hospitals, nonprofits and other labor-intensive employers will face particularly difficult staffing decisions. Businesses that remain might reduce equipment purchases and wage increases. These effects will undermine the county’s long-term finacial health and economic competitveness.
Any other local media members going to talk about this? Or just me again? Am I still on my own here? Media people staying silent are, at this point, accomplices. Too afraid of losing your press availability, invitations to swanky events and access to people. So weak.
99
Americans have seen this movie. Years of Russia probes, two impeachments, and endless hearings produced headlines and division while families paid for the gridlock. Today voters face record fuel prices and rising borrowing costs. They need Congress working on energy, affordability, and security. A House consumed by subpoena wars would freeze that work and deliver two years of political theater.
Scott Bessent SWATS DOWN partisan Democrat grilling in absolute masterclass of composure!
1
1
1
70
Your argument makes AI’s originality impossible to demonstrate because every successful discovery can be retroactively dismissed as recombination. Every human mathematician builds upon existing knowledge. Novelty emerges when familiar principles produce previously unknown results, proofs, or methods. If those 50 solutions required no original insight, identify the existing methods that would have solved them. Otherwise, you’re substituting personal conviction for mathematical evidence.
Replying to @HowToPrompt__
I am still convinced that AI fundamentally cannot discover anything fundamentally novel. Those 50 problems required no novel insight or approach and could be solved by reshuffling already known stuff. Grunt intellectual work
1
60
Calling it "output that mimics intelligence" assumes intelligence is a hidden essence sitting behind the output. Look inside any brain and you find only organized physical processes. Intelligence is the name we give to processes that model the world, solve problems, and adapt. A system that writes working code, proves theorems, and catches its own errors is performing those processes. Calling this impossible requires a special ingredient that only meat can host, and nobody has ever located one. Fair criticisms remain: hype outruns capability, valuations may be a bubble, and current models lack bodies and continuous lives. Those are disputes about degree and price. Fraud means selling what you cannot deliver, and these systems deliver measurable work every day.
AI is literally a scam, the most sophisticated scam ever. They created a machine that mimics the output of intelligence. Then told everyone it was really intelligent — an impossibility, but the illusion was convincing. Based on that deception, they fleeced investors of trillions.
1
40
The most significant unanswered question is how the brain selects one of the two rapidly alternating population states for conscious awareness and binds successive conscious epochs into a stable, continuous percept.
2
84
An ordinary carpenter father of two daughters at the school, legally armed and passing by on lunch, ended the attack in the room where the most vulnerable kids were gathered. His personal stake, readiness, and proximity did what delayed official response could not, revealing how thin the margin is between contained horror and total slaughter when the vulnerable are targeted by someone who knew their room.
JUST IN: The man who stopped the school shooting in Bend, Oregon, has been identified as 36-year-old Kalub Giamanco. Giamanco, a carpenter, was reportedly driving home for lunch when he heard gunshots. After hearing the gunshots, Giamanco, who has a concealed carry permit, followed the suspect into the school. He then shot and killed 16-year-old John J Griffin moments after the teen opened fire into a special education classroom. Giamanco, who has two children of his own who attend the school, is family friends with one of the victims, a 7-year-old who uses a wheelchair and was shot in the face. The 7-year-old survived and is in the hospital. Three children at Silver Rail Elementary School were killed. Their ages are 5, 8, and 11. According to Giamanco's brother, Giamanco doesn't feel like a hero because he feels guilty for not being able to save more children. You are a hero, Kalub.
2
67
JUST IN: The man who stopped the school shooting in Bend, Oregon, has been identified as 36-year-old Kalub Giamanco. Giamanco, a carpenter, was reportedly driving home for lunch when he heard gunshots. After hearing the gunshots, Giamanco, who has a concealed carry permit, followed the suspect into the school. He then shot and killed 16-year-old John J Griffin moments after the teen opened fire into a special education classroom. Giamanco, who has two children of his own who attend the school, is family friends with one of the victims, a 7-year-old who uses a wheelchair and was shot in the face. The 7-year-old survived and is in the hospital. Three children at Silver Rail Elementary School were killed. Their ages are 5, 8, and 11. According to Giamanco's brother, Giamanco doesn't feel like a hero because he feels guilty for not being able to save more children. You are a hero, Kalub.
2,411
15,932
1,168
148,575
5,766,550
NBC just talked to five people who got pulled over, held at gunpoint, or detained after Flock cameras spit out false alerts. One electrician stopped at a Chick-fil-A in Lafayette, Indiana, and officers surrounded his work truck with guns drawn because a plate misread flagged it as stolen. Another person sat in jail for nearly two weeks over the same kind of error. These aren’t rare glitches. Flock’s system scans every car, matches against hot lists, and treats a probabilistic hit like certainty. Innocent drivers become high-risk stops with no probable cause. This is mass surveillance doing exactly what critics warned it would.
🤖 Made with AI
107
940
57
2,164
40,870
People keep saying, “It’s still the judge.” They’re not judges. They’re magistrates. In Pennsylvania, they only need a high school diploma. No college degree. No law degree. They are elected. In Allegheny County, my former director (now Deputy Court Administrator) and former supervisor (now Deputy Director) openly bragged about 'threatening' magistrates with removal from the bench if they refused to follow our assessments. Some pushed back. Those who did were removed from handling arraignments and preliminary hearings. Others lost reelection to more moderate and left-leaning candidates. If a magistrate dared to go against our recommendation, the Arnold Unit in our main office (named after one of the grants) prepared the case. Our court representatives took it to motions court, where a Court of Common Pleas judge almost always changed the bond to match what our office wanted. Most magistrates had no idea their decisions were being undone behind their backs. The people who built and ran this system in Allegheny County Pretrial Services: Tom McCaffrey, Janice Dean (now Deputy Court Administrator in a position that previously required bar membership—she is not a member of the bar), Chris Shanley, Colleen Murtha Sypolt, and Garrett Larkin. Another police officer lost his life today in Philadelphia—Shane Seiber, a father of two. Every time this happens, ask the same questions: Did the shooter have a history? Was he out on pretrial release? Could this have been prevented? That’s why I’m speaking out. People need to understand who is actually driving these decisions. I will keep saying it as much as I need to if it saves even one life and spares one family from having to prepare a funeral. Please share this. @colin_dunlap @ZitoSalena @realDonaldTrump
18
144
7
318
4,615
Fate retweeted
America depends on people who still believe duty means something, especially when speaking up carries a personal cost. When someone spends years inside a system, sees repeated failures, ignored warnings, and preventable harm, silence becomes its own decision. Kelly Rae is describing a lesson millions of Americans learned from parents like her father: when you know something is wrong, you stand up and you see it through. That instinct built this country, protected its communities, and gave ordinary citizens the courage to challenge institutions that forgot whom they serve.
People have asked why I’m doing this. Why I’m exposing what happened inside Pretrial Services. This is why. I learned right from wrong from my dad, WWII Army Sgt. Ray Robertson. He died when I was 14 years old. I kissed his cold cheek and said goodbye, and more than 30 years later, I can still remember exactly what that felt like. I know he would expect me to stand up when I know something is wrong. And what happened at Pretrial was wrong. I watched warnings get ignored. I watched the same people come through that system over and over again. I watched decisions get made that put victims, police officers, and entire communities at risk. And now there are people who are dead who did not have to be. So when people ask why I won’t just let this go, that’s part of the answer. My dad has been gone most of my life, but I still carry everything he taught me. I believe he’s with me through this. I believe all of my angels in Heaven are. And with their help, I’m going to see this through. I’m his daughter. Always.
2
1
19
503
Fate retweeted
How Did Six Failures to Appear Produce a Favorable Risk Score? Six failures to appear, multiple felony convictions, and pending criminal cases produced an assessment that ignored critical risk factors and recommended release. The May 2022 reports subsequently recommended against release, despite favorable numerical scores. That discrepancy demands a forensic audit. Subpoena the original assessments, scoring algorithms, data-entry histories, supervisory overrides, judicial orders, and funding records. Determine whether negligence, defective software, or deliberate falsification corrupted these assessments. Any official who knowingly manipulated public safety records should face criminal investigation. @AlleghenyCoDA
Jeremy Christopher Stover. OTN G 899038-0. Arrested November 9, 2021. Flight to avoid apprehension. He already had a conviction for flight to avoid. 2015. County prison. 27 prior adult arrests. 8 felony convictions. Robbery. Drug manufacture. Terroristic threats. 4 cases pending. One of them a felony retail theft, already out on ROR, $0. 6 failures to appear in two years. On pretrial release. On probation. The file says homeless. On the run. Pretrial recommendation: non-monetary. Medium supervision. Report in person. Here's why: 96 out of 100. No new violent arrest. 82 out of 100. No new arrest. 80 out of 100. Make every court date. The factor page marks pending charges and prior FTAs as No. He had 4 pending cases and 6 FTAs. That is the product. Flight from court, scored as likely to come back, recommended out for free. I will not stop posting these until this office, every pretrial office running this model, and the politicians on the Jail Board are audited. Where did the money go? @ZitoSalena @colin_dunlap
1
2
96
Fate retweeted
Allegheny County Manipulates Pretrial Risk Assessments to Deceive Auditors @AlleghenyCoDA Kelly Rae Robertson’s allegations demand an investigation into deliberate risk-score manipulation, misleading audit reports, and civil rights violations. Officials systematically classified nonviolent defendants as dangerous to conceal lenient recommendations for violent defendants, they corrupted a process affecting fundamental constitutional rights. The most disturbing behavior is statistical deception. An audit counting bond recommendations would report apparent compliance while concealing which defendants received those recommendations. Investigators should subpoena assessment algorithms, scoring histories, internal communications, judicial dispositions, and grant compliance reports. They should examine whether high-risk classifications disproportionately affected minor offenders following funding milestones. Allegheny County received $5.504 million from the MacArthur Foundation, a private funder. That establishes a financial relationship worth examining, although criminal intent requires independent evidence. Robertson has identified a testable pattern. The records will reveal whether it reflects deliberate manipulation, flawed risk assessments, or legitimate scoring factors. Anyone who knowingly falsified official recommendations or funding reports should face appropriate prosecution.
HARSH TRUTH CHECK-IN: THE RUSE. Pretrial still recommended bond. Occasionally. That was the cover. If the feds had audited Allegheny County Pretrial Services, the files would have shown bond recommendations. No release. High risk. An auditor would have thought Pretrial was still holding the dangerous ones. Pretrial was not. The bond was parked on nonviolent people. One night, a young Black man came in. Small amount of marijuana. Rolling a stop sign. A few driving violations. One prior arrest, same charge. On probation for it. Employed. Respectful. In compliance. Nothing else. The assessment said no release. No ROR. No non-monetary. Scored high risk. Those cases were almost never brought to the jail. Cops summonsed them at the scene. Police only brought them to the ACJ if the defendant couldn’t find a ride or was uncooperative with police. That is why the tool was rigged to peg them high risk. A rare nonviolent file, scored as a bond, so an audit could say Pretrial still recommended bond. It just did not show who the bond was recommended for, and more importantly, for what charges. The cost was his. A nonviolent man, in compliance, treated as high risk so the paperwork looked clean. The violent defendant the grant money was written to release was not the one carrying that bond. It was a ruse. Nonviolent people paid for it. I wrote those recommendations for 14.5 years. I will say this on the record.
1
2
62
Fate retweeted
Did AI Just Give Academia a Nervous Breakdown? NYU professor Tristan Buckmaster claims OpenAI’s release of 722 mathematical papers destroyed the careers of young mathematicians. Imagine dedicating your life to advancing human knowledge and then having a psychological meltdown because knowledge advanced too quickly. If your career depends on humanity remaining ignorant of the answer, congratulations, you’ve accidentally turned intellectual stagnation into a retirement plan. The machines started proving theorems, and the professors started calculating unemployment benefits.
🚨 #BREAKING: NYU's Math Professor Buckmaster attacks AI's advancements in mathematics: “this recent dump of papers on Tuesday destroyed the careers of early career mathematicians.”
1
1
2
149
Fate retweeted
Replying to @KellyRaeReports
This is a critical matter of public safety and official corruption. The People must have attention on this matter urgently @AlleghenyCoDA
Who Altered the Records, and Who Ordered It? There are enough documented facts to justify immediate evidence preservation and an independent investigation. Allegheny County accepted $5.504 million from MacArthur while formally pursuing jail population reduction, and its own report states that Pretrial Services never recommended money bail. Once a former insider alleges that override records were altered, preservation of the original digital evidence becomes our first priority. Investigators should secure grant agreements, recommendation files, audit logs, database histories, emails, backups, retention policies, administrator accounts, and metadata through lawful process. They should preserve evidence before interviewing custodians whose testimony could affect the investigation. Any unexplained deletion, alteration, backdating, or destruction occurring after officials anticipated scrutiny would require immediate forensic examination. Investigators should reconstruct every material decision chronologically. Who designed the recommendation policy? Who authorized overrides? Who measured jail reduction? Who reported performance to funders? Who controlled the databases? Who knew records were inaccurate? They would then compare original backups against production copies. A discrepancy becomes significant when evidence shows knowledge, intent, coordinated concealment, or materially false reporting. The Evans case makes the institutional questions urgent. Hemingway had previously been released without monetary bail on a burglary charge before authorities accused him of murdering Dr. Idris Evans and committing another serious violent offense. Investigators would examine whether decision makers received complete criminal history and risk information, whether recommendations accurately reflected that information, and whether policy incentives affected the process. Investigators should follow evidence rather than institutional assurances. If forensic records corroborate deliberate alteration or destruction, we would identify every participant, every instruction, every affected case, and every representation made to courts, auditors, funders, or investigators. Search warrants, subpoenas, preservation orders, and compelled production would follow whenever the legal predicates are satisfied. Public safety demands an auditable record.
2
2
108
Fate retweeted
Who Altered the Records, and Who Ordered It? There are enough documented facts to justify immediate evidence preservation and an independent investigation. Allegheny County accepted $5.504 million from MacArthur while formally pursuing jail population reduction, and its own report states that Pretrial Services never recommended money bail. Once a former insider alleges that override records were altered, preservation of the original digital evidence becomes our first priority. Investigators should secure grant agreements, recommendation files, audit logs, database histories, emails, backups, retention policies, administrator accounts, and metadata through lawful process. They should preserve evidence before interviewing custodians whose testimony could affect the investigation. Any unexplained deletion, alteration, backdating, or destruction occurring after officials anticipated scrutiny would require immediate forensic examination. Investigators should reconstruct every material decision chronologically. Who designed the recommendation policy? Who authorized overrides? Who measured jail reduction? Who reported performance to funders? Who controlled the databases? Who knew records were inaccurate? They would then compare original backups against production copies. A discrepancy becomes significant when evidence shows knowledge, intent, coordinated concealment, or materially false reporting. The Evans case makes the institutional questions urgent. Hemingway had previously been released without monetary bail on a burglary charge before authorities accused him of murdering Dr. Idris Evans and committing another serious violent offense. Investigators would examine whether decision makers received complete criminal history and risk information, whether recommendations accurately reflected that information, and whether policy incentives affected the process. Investigators should follow evidence rather than institutional assurances. If forensic records corroborate deliberate alteration or destruction, we would identify every participant, every instruction, every affected case, and every representation made to courts, auditors, funders, or investigators. Search warrants, subpoenas, preservation orders, and compelled production would follow whenever the legal predicates are satisfied. Public safety demands an auditable record.
I spent 14.5 years inside Allegheny County Pretrial. I wrote the recommendations. After the grant money arrived, release became the product. MacArthur paid this county about $5.5 million to shrink the jail. The county’s own report said the goal was a 20% cut. They beat it and got renewed. Pretrial’s director told the Post-Gazette the office decided it would not recommend money. Judge Howsie told the Jail Oversight Board a pretrial recommendation never includes a monetary condition. You are in or you are out. The override logs were tampered with. Do not trust what is left in the file. A Pittsburgh pediatrician is dead. The man charged was out on a no-cash bond. That is the design. @POTUS @realDonaldTrump @FBI @FBIPittsburgh @TheJusticeDept lock the offices down and seize everything. Grant agreements, emails, recommendation files, servers, backups, the lot. Do not let another record walk out of that building. @macfound paid for empty beds. @ZitoSalena already put the paperwork on the record. @AlleghenyCoDA the standing rule is still in place. I am not dropping this.
2
1
169
Fate retweeted
Why Is the Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis Such a Huge Leap? The mind-blowing part is the qualitative jump: a fixed zero-free half-plane Re(s) > 7/8 replaces regions whose width shrinks toward zero as height increases. For more than a century, every unconditional frontier still crept arbitrarily close to Re(s) = 1. A fixed 7/8 boundary means the zeros are now uniformly confined away from 1, globally and forever, which is the first genuine structural movement toward Re(s) = 1/2.
We’re releasing a broad range of new mathematical results produced by an internal frontier model. We’ve been consulting with the independent Advisory Group on Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence at the Institute for Advanced Study, and we have drawn on their advice and public recommendations to inform how we release these results. github.com/openai/math
1
2
300
Fate retweeted
THAT sounds like a crime! @AlleghenyCoDA @PAAttorneyGen
HARSH TRUTH CHECK-IN: THE RUSE. Pretrial still recommended bond. Occasionally. That was the cover. If the feds had audited Allegheny County Pretrial Services, the files would have shown bond recommendations. No release. High risk. An auditor would have thought Pretrial was still holding the dangerous ones. Pretrial was not. The bond was parked on nonviolent people. One night, a young Black man came in. Small amount of marijuana. Rolling a stop sign. A few driving violations. One prior arrest, same charge. On probation for it. Employed. Respectful. In compliance. Nothing else. The assessment said no release. No ROR. No non-monetary. Scored high risk. Those cases were almost never brought to the jail. Cops summonsed them at the scene. Police only brought them to the ACJ if the defendant couldn’t find a ride or was uncooperative with police. That is why the tool was rigged to peg them high risk. A rare nonviolent file, scored as a bond, so an audit could say Pretrial still recommended bond. It just did not show who the bond was recommended for, and more importantly, for what charges. The cost was his. A nonviolent man, in compliance, treated as high risk so the paperwork looked clean. The violent defendant the grant money was written to release was not the one carrying that bond. It was a ruse. Nonviolent people paid for it. I wrote those recommendations for 14.5 years. I will say this on the record.
1
1
22
Replying to @alltheputs
Keep in mind a huge number of academic papers are similar in many ways to slop, its some puzzle students use to generate a Ph.D. , or they are to gin up a publication count for their major professor. They talk in terms of low hanging fruit, meaning publications that are easy, not caring if it is very fruitful or worth pursuing, STEM fields publish small experiments that no one else wants to do, Pyschology and less scientific fields , a lot of publications aren’t generally reproducible, much less ever referenced by anyone else. If your publication is rarely referenced, only in introductions by your buds, you have to wonder if it was worth doing in the first place. In other words, academics want you to leave their slop alone.
1
1
1
29
A frequency-based probability of human extinction requires a reference class of extinct humanities, and that class has a sample size of zero.
I’m offering $1000, easy money, right now! to anyone who can provide real scientific evidence proving that AI has a 10–20% chance of causing human extinction. I want empirical evidence, actual data, statistics, and validated scientific research supporting those percentages. Not expert opinions, predictions, surveys, or personal assumptions. If you can scientifically demonstrate that the 10–20% figures are based on real evidence, the $1000 is yours. Please spread the word so everyone can have a chance to win.
1
2
82