TSLA SHAREHOLDERS ARE # 14!!!
We did it!!! Great work everyone!!
The Tesla Retail letter in support of a $TSLA/$SPCX merger now represents over $10.2 BILLION dollars in Tesla shares - to put it into context, that is more shares than Baron Capital, Citigroup and ARK Invest COMBINED.
Kalshi betters may want to revisit the merger odds.
The Numbers - in just 2+ Days:
♦️ 25,710,618 shares
♦️ $10.2 billion in Tesla stock
♦️ 9,697 signers
Tesla and SpaceX don't just share a CEO; they share shareholders. 76% of signers (7,406) own both TSLA and SPCX, holding 19,774,447 shares.
The closest thing to this historic mobilization was ALSO Tesla retail: our 2024 letter (representing $4B of TSLA) supporting Elon Musk's incentive package & move out of Delaware. Neither would have been possible without the stellar skills of @TeslaBoomerMama.
Thousands of shareholders think Tesla and SpaceX are stronger together, and they back Tesla, the Special Committee, and Elon Musk.
@Tesla @elonmusk @robyndenholm @KathleeWT @IraEhrenpreis @jgebbia @kimbal
@SpaceX @Gwynne_Shotwell @AntonioGracias @d0nharrison @FutureJurvetson @rglein @roelofbotha
Amy retweeted
There you have it, best retail shareholders in the World!
Bravo and thank you.
And a special thanks to @amy787
@Tesla , now it's your turn.
TSLA SHAREHOLDERS ARE # 14!!!
We did it!!! Great work everyone!!
The Tesla Retail letter in support of a $TSLA/$SPCX merger now represents over $10.2 BILLION dollars in Tesla shares - to put it into context, that is more shares than Baron Capital, Citigroup and ARK Invest COMBINED.
Kalshi betters may want to revisit the merger odds.
The Numbers - in just 2+ Days:
♦️ 25,710,618 shares
♦️ $10.2 billion in Tesla stock
♦️ 9,697 signers
Tesla and SpaceX don't just share a CEO; they share shareholders. 76% of signers (7,406) own both TSLA and SPCX, holding 19,774,447 shares.
The closest thing to this historic mobilization was ALSO Tesla retail: our 2024 letter (representing $4B of TSLA) supporting Elon Musk's incentive package & move out of Delaware. Neither would have been possible without the stellar skills of @TeslaBoomerMama.
Thousands of shareholders think Tesla and SpaceX are stronger together, and they back Tesla, the Special Committee, and Elon Musk.
@Tesla @elonmusk @robyndenholm @KathleeWT @IraEhrenpreis @jgebbia @kimbal
@SpaceX @Gwynne_Shotwell @AntonioGracias @d0nharrison @FutureJurvetson @rglein @roelofbotha
刚刚,SpaceX 交了 8-K:Apollo 拿出约 400 亿美元,帮它买英伟达 GPU,再租给它用。年底前交割,明年上半年卡到了就开始起租。
400 亿能买多少?Vera Rubin 一柜 72 块卡,市场报价一柜 500 万到 900 万美元,算下来大概 30 万到 58 万块卡,光插电就得接近 1 吉瓦。
英伟达自己说,Vera Rubin 一柜的推理性能是现在 GB300 的 3.3 倍。等于 SpaceX 一下子拿到了好几十万张最新的卡!
昨天有人说老马会去买那些破产的neocloud的旧卡,我回复,买新的不香吗?
这钱划不划算?Anthropic 招股书里写着,向 SpaceX 买算力最多 1,205 亿美元,全部到位后每月约 31 亿,一年差不多 370 亿。Apollo 这边一年要还大约 80 亿本金,再加上利息,利率还没定,按 7% 算,一年一百亿出头。
一年付一百亿出头的租金,对着一年 370 亿的算力合同,这笔账老马算得明白。$SPCX
Replying to @chamath
Pretty much.
As of the past few weeks, debt markets have almost entirely shut off access to money for any company that doesn’t have substantial revenue independent of AI data centers.
SpaceX closed $40B of debt for GPUs, but we’re investment grade and have Starlink & launch revenue.
That means the 200+ neoclouds are going to see guppy-level death and consolidation. Some will make it through, but not many.
TESLA/SPACEXSI
The Special Committees have already been formed. But some don’t understand the ramifications.
♦️Some say the Special Committee has been formed, so do nothing.
BUT The Special Committee represents us shareholders. They can guess what we think, OR we could just tell them. Thousands of shareholders chose the latter and signed the Letter to ask for expeditious action. Inaction was costly to Tesla in losing out on xAI, we don’t want that to happen again.
♦️Some assume a deal is a given.
Elon Musk specifically said it is not a given on the SpaceX earnings call.
♦️Some debate timing.
It is NOW - or NEVER. The special committee was already formed. That ship SAILED. There won’t be special committees again. Failed merger attempts are just that, failed.
♦️Some ask us to dictate terms.
Even Elon Musk had to let the normal process work - and can’t dictate terms or timing or share exchange ratios. And he founded both companies. We can’t either. But we can, and did, ask that the ATH, and internal growth & revenue targets for Optimus & CyberCab be considered.
♦️Some say operate separately.
BUT The Joint Ventures aren’t meant to be permanent. They are pure bureaucracy, friction and liability. They were a framework that achieved a headstart on what talented engineers from both companies can do together. They are now the unnecessary part to be deleted. Elon Musk doesn’t need to work at all. His time should not be spent in conflict committees.
♦️Some say do nothing.
See again: You could let the Board guess, or you could just tell them shareholders are in favor.
50% + 1 of outstanding shareholders is an almost IMPOSSIBLY high bar. Broker non-votes count as NO. Many foreign investors can’t vote. The deal terms HAVE to be extremely compelling to turn undecided investors and institutions into YES VOTES. The Special Committee, and M&A Bankers/Lawyers have a fiduciary duty to gain the best terms they can.
A letter doesn’t change a share exchange ratio. A letter says that shareholders will mobilize - in the face of an compelling deal -to get over 50% outstanding shares voting in favor and get the deal over the line.
Who’s going to tell them that Tesla shareholders already mobilized to support the deal?
Elon Musk must persuade Tesla shareholders that a merger with SpaceX is in their interests. bloomberg.com/news/newslette…
SpaceXSI’s ambitious SI super-compute buildout:
Elon Musk moves to the Next Biggest Pain Point. Note three of the key constraints being Solved:
♦️ POWER - SpaceX will be casting gas turbine blades
♦️COOLING - Stealth Innovations made to power & heat dissipation, but NOT disclosed specifically so competitors can’t copy.
♦️CAPITAL - Elon Musk noted debt funding is closing shut - to businesses WITHOUT other substantial revenue (SpaceXSI DOES have other revenue sources like Launch; and Starlink). SpaceXSI is profitably monetizing the compute as fast as they build it - and secured 40 Billion callable debt.
兩個月前我們才出報告說馬斯克打算自製渦輪葉片來解決天然氣發電缺渦輪發電機的問題,上週SpaceXSI 就把 2027年底GW算力從5-10G,一口氣加到13GW,甚至不排除有20GW的電力儲備,並且強調已解決電力及散熱問題但不能跟大家說怎麼做的,因為其他公司會偷學,雖然我們目前仍無法確定SpaceXSI這10G的算力增量的4000-5000億美元資本開支從何而來(我們估計營運現金流入僅有不到2000億美元,缺了3000億美元以上,最近400億美元現金增資明顯不足),但至少看得出馬斯克靠著其美國火箭製造的卓越工程能力,讓其AI數據算力中心的擴充速度明顯優於大多數的新興外溢雲 Neocloud,甚至一些雲巨頭。這週商業週刊也專題討論馬斯克自製渦輪葉片及受惠台灣產業鏈。
andrewhclu.substack.com/p/sp…
Elon Musk has the equivalent of several PhDs from founding and building multiple companies. Elon Musk doesn’t have just text book knowledge, but wisdom forged in the trenches from pure necessity.
Consolidation is coming
Replying to @chamath
Pretty much.
As of the past few weeks, debt markets have almost entirely shut off access to money for any company that doesn’t have substantial revenue independent of AI data centers.
SpaceX closed $40B of debt for GPUs, but we’re investment grade and have Starlink & launch revenue.
That means the 200+ neoclouds are going to see guppy-level death and consolidation. Some will make it through, but not many.
Amy retweeted
Just heard a brilliant idea from a young Elon fan (initials NFS, goes by “The Captain”) with regards to our chats:
Stop calling them DMs.
Start calling them XMs.
Makes perfect sense. @X
🤖 Made with AI
FINAL CALL! One hour to GO. Join in now - or forever miss out.
THE STATS: In just TWO DAYS -
The Tesla Shareholder Letter in support of a $TSLA/ $SPCX merger represents:
♦️25.7 Million Shares
♦️9.6 Billion Dollars (almost 10x Ark)
♦️Over 9500 Signers
WHICH IS BETTER - Telling the Tesla Board and Special Committee what we WANT - or let them guess? Many shareholders chose the former. You can too.
LAST CHANCE: Letter is closing in 60 minutes. It will be express mailed first thing tomorrow. Then, all shareholder data will be deleted for security. @TeslaBoomerMama
SIGN NOW:
surveymonkey.com/r/mergealre…





































