rarely here! building the "letterboxd for concerts" at https://xitter.cf/t.co/PHQCGqn5Zf // https://xitter.cf/t.co/b7xvVXa9wg & https://xitter.cf/t.co/ekCe4Sbo3P

Joined April 2009
i've been hard at work building a "letterboxd/goodreads/beli for concerts" called HearHear sign up for early access to join + follow tastemakers like @ryanschreiberfm @jzux @abbyfjones_ @grace_roso @mrsslrss @ohheybrittany + many more! see ya there 👏 hearhear.fm
1
8
1
26
2,502
adam offitzer retweeted
So it was you ? Just answer the subpoena truthfully and we can figure out the truth.
Correct. Using Starlink, a civilian commercial service, for offensive drone strikes to kill people has never been allowed, nor should it be. Starshield, a different system, is controlled by the US government. What they decide to do is up to them. Ukraine military violated Starlink terms of service and used it for offensive drone strikes to kill people. That loophole was closed last week. Starlink remains critical to the defense of Ukraine, as it is the only system that cannot be jammed or blown up, at least for now. Were Starlink to be turned off, the Ukrainian front line would collapse immediately. This is NOT a threat, it is simply a statement of fact. Starlink was also crucial to preventing Russia from overrunning Ukraine in the early days of the war, as all other means of communication were destroyed or jammed by Russia. SpaceX has done more to defend Ukraine than any private company on Earth BY FAR. That said, I have nothing but UTTER CONTEMPT for the virtue-signaling evil warmongers who push for endless slaughter and offer no realistic solution to the conflict. May you burn in hell. End of story.
793
541
39
4,997
211,685
adam offitzer retweeted
So let met get that straight: paying a wealth tax is impossible (“billionaires have no liquidity”, “it would be taxing unrealized gains”, “their wealth is virtual”) but paying half a billion to influence elections is possible. Did I understand well?
Elon Musk has cemented his record as the largest individual political donor in modern American history. Musk poured $446 million of his own money into this year’s midterm elections, mostly aimed at preserving the Republican Party’s control of Congress. wapo.st/4igb5Kq
537
7,245
130
35,047
688,223
adam offitzer retweeted
Must read story from @JonathanBlitzer on ICE’s unprecedented role in the midterms. This isn’t normal immigration enforcement and Congress needs to investigate this mission. newyorker.com/news/the-polit…
1
23
1
39
4,051
The Department of Homeland Security is openly engaging in an unprecedented, partisan campaign to intervene in the midterm elections. My latest piece @NewYorker surveys the effort and looks at what it means at the local level: newyorker.com/news/the-polit…
15
364
19
704
71,573
adam offitzer retweeted
Share this post as widely as possible. No matter where you live, this referendum affects you. Thank you all so much. To my friends in California: the whole world is watching. YES on Prop 40. NO on Props 41 and 42. The forces of democracy will prevail over the forces of oligarchy.
37
99
3
270
21,135
adam offitzer retweeted
Since 1982, the wealth of California's billionaire class—the richest 0.0002% — has increased thirtyfold. Between 2023 and 2025 alone, it surged by 144%. California's billionaires now hold a combined $2.4 trillion in wealth—equivalent to all the income reported by ALL Californian families on their individual income tax returns.
9
87
7
306
44,576
adam offitzer retweeted
There is something deeply wrong with a political system that allows one trillionaire to buy his own personal U.S. Senator.
There is something deeply wrong with Talarico
10,068
26,045
983
222,507
5,785,868
adam offitzer retweeted
WSJ is reporting this afternoon that Elon Musk took a break from pouring in hundreds of millions of dollars to help Ken Paxton's campaign to order a the slowdown of Starlink that tripped up Ukraine. wsj.com/world/ukraine-starli…
6
83
6
283
14,600
adam offitzer retweeted
Incredible scoop by my @WSJ colleagues: Elon Musk ordered the slowdown of a military-grade version of Starlink relied on by Ukraine, a decision that sparked panic in Kyiv and confusion inside the Trump administration. wsj.com/world/ukraine-starli…
1,517
3,657
513
10,245
1,061,193
adam offitzer retweeted
For the second straight election, Trump is lying that schools in multiple states send kids off for gender surgery without their parents' knowledge. For the second straight election, his team can't find a single example of that having ever happened in any state. cnn.com/2026/10/20/politics/…
87
1,277
71
3,429
75,837
Emphasizing again that we cannot treat this as just business as usual. This is the President of the United States openly attacking an entire ethnic group.
Trump: "You go up to Minnesota -- number one place in the entire country for the sale of Mercedes-Benz. And Somalians are buying them. They come here with low IQs and no money and they get rich. Do we feel stupid? Our fraud division is getting them all."
44
764
16
4,572
103,907
adam offitzer retweeted
Hi @elonmusk , we’ve conducted the most comprehensive study to date on tax unfairness in the United States. We found that you, like your fellow billionaires, pay a lower effective tax rate than the average American. So if you really want to help the American people, I have a better suggestion than charity: pay more taxes. 🧵
Next year, I will give one of my SpaceX shares to every kid in America. This will be the first of many.
3,110
1,089
285
4,608
599,406
adam offitzer retweeted
Is there a letterboxd for concerts
2
8
1,488
Is there a letterboxd for concerts
2
8
1,488
adam offitzer retweeted
I encourage people to watch the video and hear for themselves that El-Sayed says he “absolutely” denounces the Muslim Brotherhood, and goes on to explain that he supports the Constitution. What’s more newsworthy is a CBS reporter trafficking in bigoted disinformation.
This quoted post is unavailable.
347
1,423
50
8,482
138,937
adam offitzer retweeted
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota. To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically. Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country. Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case. Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve. In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota. The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.
60,657
27,898
4,567
140,136
12,847,105
don't forget that he owns this website too!
So the guy who birthed the idea of slowing down Starlink to aid Russia—a decision that resulted in death and risk to US personnel in Ukraine—is also the biggest donor to the Republican party and is single-handedly trying to tilt the Texas Senate race to the GOP. I have that right?
1
136
adam offitzer retweeted
The new disclosures show that Musk, the world’s richest person, is behind much of the money that has been pumped into the Texas Senate race to help keep Paxton financially competitive. wsj.com/politics/elections/e… via @sabrod123 @anthonydb
5
9
17
796
adam offitzer retweeted
All those Elon defenders on here yesterday, and for what
EXCLUSIVE: Elon Musk came to Donald Trump with the plan to throttle Ukraine’s use of SpaceX’s Starshield satellite internet network, sources have told the Telegraph. The tech billionaire made the proposal during the US President’s row with Volodymyr Zelensky over strikes on Russian oil refineries. ‘The reality is that they were both in it,’ a senior source said of Musk’s and Trump’s involvement. But after a night of carnage in Kyiv caused by the slowdown, Musk was alarmed about the possibility of adverse consumer reaction in Europe. The SpaceX boss then proceeded to tweet, blaming the US administration, and ultimately, President Trump for authorising the slowdown. ‘He tweeted out that he was innocent and that it was the US administration that did it,’ the source said.
10
20
176
9,922