Pinned Tweet
A thread of publically available information and suppositions in regard to Rt Hon Sir Keir Starmer QC without any specific allegation attached:
There is a difference between a political coalition build around what can achieve majority consensus and the individuals involved consistently lying about their beliefs. Which is what is being advocated for on purely careerist grounds here.
Okay so but is the grandparent not getting a hug inherently traumatic or violating?
"Healey, who as ever travelled with a bottle of HP sauce in his luggage"
Our weekend read with four days to go before the Budget
- The curry summits in No10
- Wobbles over the cost of living package
- New gratitude for Rachel Reeves’ “Labour Treasury”
theguardian.com/uk-news/2026…
That is the outcome but if William had lived a little longer and had a direct male heir? Who knows.
bread and poses retweeted
This would be a HUGE deal. Climate scientists and senior campaigners were privately ‘okay’ about Jackdaw: it’s gas, and small. Rosebank is oil, and far larger. A real red line.
No way this happens when Greens were polling 20%.
🚨 NEW: Andy Burnham and John Healey are set to force the approval of Rosebank despite the Energy Secretary's reluctance
Minister: "Both Andy and John have decided Rosebank needs to go ahead. The economic and energy security case is so strong"
[@DPJHodges]
How long would a new one take to build if you paid $210m for it?
Reminder: There are only about 900 supertankers in the world, each one able to carry up to 2 million barrels of crude.
✦ Every one Iran takes out of service tightens a fleet that's already stretched by the war.
✦ Ships are now so scarce that a 5-year-old supertanker sells for about $210 million, far more than the roughly $130 million a new one costs, because new ones take three years to build.
This is true but they should just take over the offices behind downing Street so they can get the iconography while like having office space
Just in production USA has spent $150bn in oil and gas production ever year for decades. An investment it could protect because it is the military imperial power of the world. This is not replicable in the North sea for obvious reasons.
One of the understated advantages to the USA of the Ukraine war- on top of the profits from direct exports to europe- is generating the gap that makes their industries artificially competitive
Badgers were invented in 1970 by the deep state to oppress the hedgehogs
The decline of the hedgehog is mainly caused by the huge recent expansion of the badger population. In both time and place there is a strong negative correlation between badger numbers and hedgehog numbers.
The scientific evidence that an increase in Mr Brock may well be the chief cause of Mrs Tiggywinkle’s demise is overwhelming.
There’s the direct evidence – the hollowed-out prickle-bearing skins left behind after a badger eats a hedgehog. Only badgers can open a hedgehog after it rolls up in defence with prickles on the outside. Foxes and dogs cannot. Badger predation is often found to be the main cause of hedgehog death in studies in this country.
There’s the timing evidence. The decline in hedgehogs coincided with the rise in badgers since the latter’s protection began in the 1970s and was strengthened in the 1990s. Anecdotally, there are clear-cut cases to show this is likely to be cause and effect, not coincidence. Kew Gardens had a thriving hedgehog population until the mid 1980s when badgers first arrived there. Today, says the Royal Botanic Gardens’ website, “Kew is teeming with badgers”. There are now more than 20 badger setts and hedgehogs are hardly ever seen, and if they are don’t last long. Habitat change and development cannot be the cause in Kew, because there has not been any.
There’s the spatial evidence. Throughout England hedgehogs (great worm eaters) have vanished from worm-rich pastureland, where badgers thrive, and cling on only in suburban gardens and amenity grassland, where badgers so far have not penetrated much. Even here, as one study put it: “the probability of hedgehog occurrence in suburban habitats declined towards zero in areas of high badger density.” As a general rule, wherever badgers are present at a density higher than about one main sett every four square kilometres, hedgehogs are absent. In most of rural England, sett density is two or three times higher.
There’s the behavioural evidence. Back in the 1990s, ecologists discovered that the smell of badgers alone is enough to deter hedgehogs from entering an area. And hedgehogs released into areas of excellent habitat high-tailed it out of there if they smelt badger. They do not wait to be eaten.
There’s the international evidence. Sweden has also blamed its decline in hedgehogs on rising badger numbers. In the Netherlands, scientists reported this yearthat hedgehogs are now confined mostly to urban areas, despite roads and development, because of the spread of badgers in rural areas.
There’s the experimental evidence, which is the clincher. The randomized badger control trials, carried out between 1998 and 2006 in 30 different parts of the country, provided an opportunity to see what happened to hedgehog numbers if badger numbers were reduced.
In pasture land, where hedgehogs are mostly extinct, there was of course little effect. But in “amenity grassland” – parks, lawns, gardens, playing fields etc – there was a dramatic explosion in hedgehog numbers in those areas where badgers were culled: hedgehog density almost trebledfrom an average of 0.9 per hectare to 2.4 per hectare in just five years. By contrast in the control areas where no badgers were culled, the hedgehog density remained unchanged at 0.3 per hectare over the same period.
So we know one way to increase hedgehog numbers: reduce badger numbers. No other approach has been demonstrated to have such an effect. Given that badgers are highly effective predators of bumble bees (those who try to study bumble bees complain that most of the nests they find get dug out and eaten by badgers) as well as of ground nesting birds, and that they carry bovine tuberculosis, there is little doubt that lower badger densities would be good for the ecology of the British countryside as well as for farming.
There is nothing natural about the density at which badgers and foxes live in Britain today.
bread and poses retweeted
Notice the awkward phrasing here, it's because he voted to keep the cap in 2024.
Luckily the family farm tax will drive down the value of the farm you want to hand onto your children without in anyway impacting the business itself
bread and poses retweeted
Remember when Labour shitehoused that vote to keep the words “collective punishment” out of the parliamentary record, then lied about it and said it was about protecting MPs’ safety? Do you think they did that because they *didn’t* believe this stuff is collective punishment.
Israeli forces demolished homes and damaged roads in Hebron in the occupied West Bank, forcing around 1,200 Palestinians to leave their homes a day after a Palestinian attack killed two Israeli soldiers reut.rs/3ULnOwX
Israel demolishes Hebron homes after soldiers killed - News
Outside of the sort of densely populated areas that would necessitate tunneling anyway one of the largest (and cross subsidising) sectors of Welsh economy is tourism. Welsh population and industry heavily concentrated near coast on north and south where developing offshore links
85 acres of ethnic cleansing but remember- do not call this racist.
Israeli forces demolished homes and damaged roads in Hebron in the occupied West Bank, forcing around 1,200 Palestinians to leave their homes a day after a Palestinian attack killed two Israeli soldiers reut.rs/3ULnOwX
Israel demolishes Hebron homes after soldiers killed - News
The way forward for Wales (population heavily clustered north and south and on the coast) to unlock access to the wind farm energy is clearly sea cables rather than pylons.
Britain's growth problem is a grid problem.
We paid almost £2bn last year to switch wind farms off because the grid couldn't carry the power. Households are struggling under weight of rising bills and British industry pays more than double what US firms pay for electricity. Investors make decisions worth billions based on that.
So much gets unlocked once there's a national consensus to throw everything at the grid. Planning. Capital. Just go at it. Winning that argument, while taking the decisions now to speed up the rollout, should be the political priority.
Which is why it's crazy for Wales to even contemplate making it slower and more expensive.





















