The ☢️ Missile Strike at the Pentagon on 9/11 /🧵 What really struck the WTC on 9/11? We've already eliminated airplanes as an option, which is a shock to anyone who lived through that day. We now have video evidence of not inserted planes in all footage of 9/11, but also the removal of another object. What the hell was that that "ball" like object? Could it also be a composite? A deeper fake, so to speak? Is there any clue that could possible eliminate all other options? It's a ridiculous thought but, given what we experienced, we shouldn't make any assumptions and only work with what is real, provable and observable. The real challenge of answering such a question is that the two world trade centres turned to dust, destroying the scene of the crime and most of the evidence with it. But we aren't out of luck, as another building was struck on 9/11: The Pentagon. Though there was obviously no wreckage of an aircraft on the scene, there is enough evidence in the Pentagon for us to determine not only what couldn't have struck it, but the only object in the world that could have struck it and left the damage that it did. Unlike the strikes on the WTC, there was no televised composite film of a plane striking the pentagon, simply because the scenario required was physically impossible. The plane supposedly banked to achieve cruise speed at ground level and struck the Pentagon parallel to the ground. There is a very slow and low quality surveillance video that depicts this strike (which we will examine shortly). Yet, just from the satellite photos of the Pentagon, we can determine the actual damage. So, let's examine three pieces of evidence based on things that are already established and known! With these pieces of evidence we will determine what struck the Pentagon and how it's related to whatever struck the WTCs and the larger plot around 9/11! A. Penetration Depth ================ Let's do some math based on established observations. This is going to be necessary to other objects out, though it will be overkill for a plane. The object that struck the Pentagon struck three of its five rings: The E-Ring, the D-Ring and finally C-Ring when it stopped. The exterior wall of the pentagon consisted of ~13 centimetres of limestone and ~20 cm of bricks. Inside the Pentagon, each wall consisted of 25 cm of brick. The distance travelled to the end of ring C is 64 meters total. Given the 6 walls penetrated, at the perpendicular, that is a total of: * 64 meters travelled after impact. * 130mm of limestone * 1580mm of bricks * Six impact impulses Even though the individual walls are not very thick or strong, that's a huge amount of material to eat through and that's at 90 degrees. And a very long distance from the first site of impact. If you measure the two visible impact zones, you will see that the object struck the Pentagon at an angle of 70 degrees to the plane. That means we have to divide the above by sin 70deg: - 68 meters travelled - 138mm of limestone - 1680mm of bricks The object was clearly on its way to the courtyard centre of the Pentagon and whoever planned this trajectory was attempting to penetrate the building as deeply as possible without targeting anything specific within it. Incidentally, the courtyard centre of the Pentagon was (and still is) called ground zero, a name it earnt during the Cold War under the assumption that the USSR would strike exactly that location during mutually assured destruction. There is even a hotdog stand in the middle of the Pentagon affectionately called cafe ground zero for this reason. B. Pattern of Destruction ================ Despite being struck with this object, the Pentagon outer wall did not immediately collapse. In fact, close ups show very localised destructions, albeit very strong fires. 20 minutes later, the outer wall of the Pentagon collapsed. Another important observation was impact shape it left: it was that of a single hole that destroyed a brick pattern around ~2 meters wide. This was evidence even in the C-ring. Keep this important observation in mind. C. The Timeline ================ Let's place the attack on the Pentagon with all the events surrounding it: 8:46:30 AM - WTC North Tower is struck. 9:03:00 AM - WTC South Tower is struck. 9:37:46 AM - Pentagon is struck. 9:55:?? AM - First responders told to evacuate Pentagon perimeter. 9:57:?? AM - Pentagon outer wall "collapses". 9:58:59 AM - South Tower pulverised. 10:03:11 AM - Object destroyed over Pennsylvania. 10:28:22 AM - North Tower pulverised. ================ This is actually all the evidence we need from the Pentagon itself so let's dive deeper into the implications that every detail left behind. /1

Studying scale-free phenomena is a requirement for true enlightenment. Goodnight oomfies!

Do not deport this one. That's far too merciful.

Never play Touhou on Lunatic without having the right kind of hardware!

How are women actually losing the war of the sexes (launched by ✡️), when they've seemingly won every single battle? /📄 --- The War Between the Sexs The idea that men, collectively, can see women as their enemy was an absolute joke to me as a young boy. I couldn't imagine it. I loved my female siblings and cousins, my mother and aunt dearly. And of course my beloved and wise grandmothers. I couldn't imagine the situation being different among other families. To a degree that was correct back then. Feminism was for freaks and lesbians. Not normal women. Decades later, the situation is inverted. Non-feminist women are so rare that if you find one, you better enjoy her company before the rot eventually gets to her as well. It's like a zombie apocalypse out there, and the root of feminism isn't about equality. It's about hating and wanting to destroy men. And yet for decades, the majority men went along with it, thinking it was a joke and that the women out there felt the same way about them as they felt about women. The first thing feminists demanded was equality, and so all segregated spaces were destroyed in favour of mixed spaces. So women had an advantage, and early on, many women used the newly mixed society to access good men... And then they destroyed those men, by leading them on, instigating chaos in their lives, or breaking up with them and cheating on them. These women understood that a first love is impossible to forget and wanted to occupy that position without loving these men back so that they could psychological r*pe them. Meanwhile, a minority of men, bitten by feminism, but able to attract women, went around destroying all the women they could find, sexually, psychologically and spiritually. The so-called "Chad" would drive to a town, have sex with every single woman inside, and drive away leaving it a barren wasteland for the future. For "Chad", it isn't about sex addiction. It's about destroying women. Hating women to the point where abandoning them after taking everything from them gives you great pleasure. These two demonic mindsets, promoted by the Judeosatanic media and the culture at large, have completely destroyed the pairbonding ability of both men and women alike. For almost every woman you find, some "Chad" has already been inside her and broke her heart. She will never be a normal woman again and is essentially demonically possessed for the rest of her life. For almost every man you find, some wh*re has already been inside his heart and brain, and ruined them both. He will never be able to truly love again and trust the feeling he has inside of him. He will try but every single relationship he will try and build will feel fake to him, even as he learns to hate the succubus that broke his heart. There is no sociological study of this phenomenon despite it being so wide spread, and this is mainly due to feminine/homosexual/Judeosatanic control of the establishment. So let me give it a go, as a physicist. A crude but important analogy: The depletion region Ironically the best analogy I can think of is a diode, or a P-N junction. This junction is the core of every piece of technology you use and semiconductors in general. The idea is simple, there are two types of materials that can be made out of the same substrate: N-types which provide extra electrons. You can think of this as the male. P-types which provide extra "holes". You get the idea. Normally, when you place these two material junctions together, you get a flow, from the region rich in electrons, to fill the region rich in holes. And eventually, you will get a region in the middle, where every hole is filled. This is called the "depletion" region and is where the action happens. The junction is special because it only permits one type of charged flow: the electron flowing into the hole. The hole is simply a void in the material which an electron could fit in, and though that void can move, it's oppositely charged to the electron and thus the charge can only flow in one direction. Why doesn't this region grow to cover both sides entirely? This is the key to semiconductor technology and what makes it different to metals, and is a complex bulk quantum mechanical effect, yet it's simple to understand: The energies at which the hole and electrons can be mobile are separated by a band gap. Eventually this depletion region will create a barrier of energy equal to this band gap and nothing will flow. To establish the flow you must overcome this band gap by putting a forward-biased voltage across the junction. The analogy should become clear: the "mixing" of the N and P type regions is temporary and eventually creates a depletion layer, and no more electrons will fill holes until an external electromotive force is provided. An incentive, so to speak. The exact situation happened with men and women. Feminism created a male-female function in every single field, which has destroyed both men and women. It created a depletion layer in which pair bonding is now impossible as the band gap is not merely energy but something transcendental and irrecoverable. The great segregation It's easy to lose hope in situations like this, but you must realise it is not about territory or resources when it comes to these battles, but organisation. Feminists are deeply organised and have total ideological uniformity in their mission to destroy the other sex of their species, thereby committing autospecicide for the sake of the Neanderthals. The situation for men was not even comparable. It was impossible to organise against women for the longest time. They infiltrated every single man out there through marriage or relationship. Getting men to realise that there was a war being waged on them by almost all women in society was literally impossible. Even GamerGate didn't do it, with women rapidly infiltrating even the counter-motion. But the good faith reasoning by men eventually dried out as quickly as hook up culture irreversibly destroyed pair bonding between men and women forever within our society. The majority of men were left dealing with women they didn't like. They gave it a go, but rapidly realised it was a losing prospect and too high risk, so they checked out. The women assume that's the end of that, and they can quickly swallow up the entire world as they have done in Melbourne and soon Sydney. But it doesn't work that way. They have left men no incentive to play along. There is literally no incentive possible in this situation, unlike with the P-N junction! The "electron" doesn't want to fill the "hole" anymore, ever. And there is no regular depletion layer either... Because of all the battles women have won, there are now major and silent communities on the internet that ban even the presence of women. You might think this is harsh -- and to the few good women out there it really is -- but this came about through a process that is mirrored by society at large. The moment you mix the two sexes in one setting, without proper barriers and controls, the moment that setting is destroyed. This is scale free, up until the basic unit of a holy virgin marriage. These online communities are survivors cut out from larger shards destroyed by women, not merely as a collective but also through individual actions. That means the survivorship bias is tilted heavily in favour of secret male-only spaces. It's hence literally inevitable that all male spaces will thus become exclusive male spaces This is the nightmare scenario for femnazis and this is why they deliberately enter male spaces to ruin them. Even if it means manipulating individual men within them. These days, such men are immediately banned from these types of spaces as compromised. Organisation is the first step of warfare. Men haven't even begun, but victory is inevitable, because men are the strength of a society, its brains and ultimately if men decided together to stop serving a society, that society will inevitably and rapidly die. The next few decades are going to be very ugly, dear friends. Yet there is no other way but through. Protect yourself and your dear ones. /End

If you go the conventional route people will either ignore you or just speak over you. That's why you need to write out segments of your thesis, wait for the dumbass/Dunning-Kruger types to attack them and their entertain yourself as you clobber them with the iceberg beneath over the course of many years. You have to make it entertaining as possible, by finding the most ridiculous sounding (to a ret*rd) segment and posting that first. That's your bait on the fishing line. The best thing is it's extremely educational for the smart people out there who will be intrigued each time by how you would support such a radical position.

Man uses Astra to find a C.IA backdoor into Samsung televisions. Gets banned by OpenAI within 24 hours.

Based tr00ns. Start replacing all the womens in jobs please do it as rapidly as you can and file for discrimination the moment you encounter a woman at work.