Replying to @ThePrimeagen
Look out, Theo might scold you for such claims ;)
Replying to @housecor
And no vacations for the meet-proxies, the future never looked bleaker.
Replying to @Retromania4ever
AI slop. It would be impressive if true though.
Replying to @djonesuk @lauriewired
You learn every day. Thanks for this piece of information, like Turing complete Minecraft wasn't enough of a nightmare ;)
Replying to @Lorem_Ipsum_Est @nickchapsas
There's none, considering the cost. Ackchyually, Microsoft is rewriting parts of "the runtime" to C# itself. I'd assume Nick is trolling or just had a worse moment ;)
Replying to @iamsethmedina @theo
It’s not like it hasn’t happened in the past - the nerfing I mean. It’s easy for people to jump to conclusions now.
Replying to @vikktorrrre
I'll take any sliver of hope I can get to remain relevant - thanks @ylecun
Replying to @PalmBeachCST @forgebitz
There are people in my current organization who want to introduce it. My faith in humanity is weaker every day.
Replying to @unclebobmartin
The only problem in all this is that I enjoyed writing code, and I don't enjoy directing agents to write code :(
Replying to @ThePrimeagen
People have varied life experiences and different levels of dependence on „drugs”, including porn. You seem to project a lot in this particular case. In result your advice, although well meant, is just not good/healthy for most people.
Replying to @droidbuilds
I kinda like talking to Gemini and find it more useful than other models for most things outside of coding.
Replying to @snewmanpv @pmarca
I dislike this take. Bad at maths, bad at Olympic climbing? We invented both. We set the premise, it’s our game. Is human brain optimal for doing maths? Sure it isn’t, it hasn’t evolved for this purpose. That’s why we have calculators and why we experiment with AI.
Replying to @anne_engineer
Living in Poland I would largely disagree, but having clients in other countries it does ring a bell 🙃
Replying to @housecor
Maybe that’s most efficient, but it doesn’t sit right with me. Probably too old or too fond of craftsmanship.



