
Professional question asker @gradientmetrics | Political Science PhD | Dad Joke MA | Democracy enthusiast | 🍩 expert
Joined July 2013
- Tweets896
- Following404
- Followers184
- Likes7.6K
Cory Manento retweeted
Congratulations to the team: @gradientmetrics & @survey160. Cory Manento, @tvladeck, Kyle Block, @kwcollins, @natelubin, Brendon Ellis, & @JordanBoeder plan to poll 1,600 respondents nationally and in each 3 states via probability-based sampling. We're thrilled to collaborate!
Cory Manento retweeted
The new issue of State Politics and Policy Quarterly is now available!
Our first article comes from @corymanento
@Cap_Americanist who examine the effect of women in prominent political positions on representation in state legislatures.
doi.org/10.1017/spq.2020.3
Cory Manento retweeted
New pub: "The Effects of Increased Women’s Presence on Political Ambition, Efficacy, and Vote Choice." Isabel Wallace, a @dartmouth '21 student (!!), and I show how men, women, Republicans, & Democrats react when told a lot of women are running for office: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.…
Cory Manento retweeted
Grad school got you down? May I recommend some coauthors like @corymanento and @Kristen_Essel to get you out of your funk. Cannot wait for our panel "Experiments on Gender and American Political Attitudes and Behavior" at #mpsa2021. tinyurl.com/yjfbrdfg
Cory Manento retweeted
In latest issue, @Edana_Beauvais provides evidence that people are more willing to revise their opinions after hearing a man’s counterargument than after hearing a woman’s identical counterargument. #polisciresearch doi.org/10.1177/106591291987…
This looks cool
My new working paper lead by @SamTrachtman and @SarahAnzia: the strength of young people's age identity predicts their voting rates and likelihood of participating in climate change protests! Paper here: youngamericans.berkeley.edu/….
3
Cory Manento retweeted
Feels like I was a different person entirely when we started this, but now it's out in the world! Thanks @corymanento for keeping me around for the whole process.
Out now in @SPPQJournal! #polisciresearch #WomenInPolitics
cambridge.org/core/journals/…
New article with Marie Schenk (@Cap_Americanist) is up at @SPPQJournal!
We find that electing women to office statewide has diverging partisan effects on women's representation in state legislatures.
#polisciresearch cambridge.org/core/journals/…
Cory Manento retweeted
The war between former President Trump and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is likely to turn into a battle over money as Republican donors will be forced to choose between Trump-backed and GOP-establishment candidates.
thehill.com/business-a-lobby…
Cory Manento retweeted
NEW: Trump's 2020 campaign kept paying organizers behind DC protests before the Capitol riots post-Election Day—totaling $3.5M+ in 2020 with its jfc—revealing even more connections as Trump's role in the rally is scrutinized at his Senate impeachment trial crp.org/tqj6
Cory Manento retweeted
There’s simply no way to explain this tweet other than recognizing POTUS is justifying an insurrection against the legislature as a remedy to a conspiracy theory he made up whole cloth to deny an election defeat, and celebrating the insurrectionists.
🚨 Starting now: Do we need #FilibusterReform? Tune into a webinar debate on the future of this Senate staple with @algaraca & @richarenberg, moderated by @mollyereynolds.
📺 Watch live: brook.gs/3qBnjkA
My paper with @ProfPaulTesta is now online at @PolBehavior! [link.springer.com/article/10…]
What does this scary graph mean for parties' control over their nominations? In short, it's not great. [1/7]
For Democrats, we matched a Sanders-endorsed candidate w/no experience against a candidate randomly assigned to have a Pelosi endorsement (or none) and experience as a state senator (or not).
Low-trust Dems are again less likely to prefer "insider" candidates. [6/7]
1
1
In the face of plummeting trust, it's in parties' interest to actively work to restore it (no, D/R do not share equal responsibility for that), and of course to prevent more unwanted candidates from reaching the primary ballot in the first place. [7/7]
link.springer.com/article/10…
1


















