Replying to @_treacherous_13 @seetheJackals
and no one is like "we've got to protect haaland from this"
this protecting players rhetoric is always just used in woso and has the tone of misogyny *because* this is a contact sport
i was right #COYI
she jumped the shark when she married a white florida girl i fear
as a former club and ODP player and current coach:
no, club training should absolutely remain postponed during the season (and being intentionally obtuse by calling it "playing in free time" is undermining your argument; call it what it is)
especially now w/pro pathways
unavailable
at community first with my fiance for something stupid (he's fine) and i am at my most sympathetic: "don't worry, something embarrassing will eventually happen to me i'm sure" (this is twice in five years for him lmao)
✨dea✨ is forever blowing bubbles 🇵🇸 retweeted
Je mélange politique et foot : Neymar, Rivaldo et Lucas Moura me dégoûtent en soutenant Bolsonaro, sans parler de ce violeur de Dani Alves.
Tandis que Raphina, Richarlison, Juninho et Raí ont gagné mon respect et ma sympathie (ils l’avaient déjà) en soutenant Lula.
lol y'all just pick and choose who makes the errors arbitrarily, it's genuinely hilarious
professional goalkeeping technique keeps them to one goal
Replying to @whu_cheeks
it was before his career ending injury 👍🏻
Replying to @CJJBurzio @KathrynBatte
thanks for not being One of Those who ruin the women's game by demanding gentle refereeing 🫶🏻
Replying to @mcwfcxjaderose2 @GirlsontheBall
she's a professional football player, not your little sister. chill.
Replying to @OliverEstev4o
you're right, we should be giving much more credit to whomever defender saved the one (1) SoT off the goal line that day. that's like the least significant hair to split here.
Replying to @OliverEstev4o
this is the wrexham game btw -- a punch really isn't a save
Replying to @OliverEstev4o
oh anyone who says bellamy is disqualified from serious discussion lmao
Replying to @OliverEstev4o
it's not, i think, that folks can't name someone, it's that they can't name someone *currently unemployed* since that's our only job pool








