Anyone else just want to punch the smug bastard?

They have no concept of cost or money, as its our money, not theirs

A politician stood up in the European Parliament and said what most of them never will. “All the banks are broke.”

🚨 BBC BUSTED AGAIN! Accused of pushing left wing ideology on schoolchildren through its education website! BBC Bitesize, used by 1.7 MILLION pupils every week, has removed controversial teaching materials following an investigation by The Mail on Sunday. Here’s what was uncovered: ‼️ An online game reportedly rewarded children for choosing open borders and granting amnesty to illegal migrants. ‼️ Teaching material suggested concerns about migrants taking local jobs were “prejudiced”. ‼️ Children were encouraged to join Amnesty International. ‼️ Pages promoted progressive political figures, including Greta Thunberg. ‼️ Following the investigation, the BBC removed or suspended disputed material and placed it under review. 💥 Former BBC television controller Danny Cohen called the material a blatant breach of impartiality and demanded answers. And rightly so! 💯 The BBC is funded by licence fee payers. Its job is to EDUCATE children, not tell them which political opinions are acceptable. How did this material get approved in the first place, and who was responsible for ensuring political impartiality? 😤 Defund the BBC!!

The Wetherspoons poppy controversy has taken another turn. According to the manager at Wetherspoons in Gosport, refusing entry to customers wearing a Remembrance poppy is supposedly company policy. If true, that is absolutely disgraceful. The poppy has been a symbol of remembrance for generations, honouring the brave men and women who sacrificed their lives for our country. It isn't divisive. It isn't political. It's something that should unite us as a nation. Wetherspoons needs to urgently clarify whether this really is company policy. I've been a loyal Wetherspoons customer for years, regularly visiting for breakfast. I won't spend my money somewhere that treats the poppy as something to be ashamed of.

The major question in Brazil… At exactly 5pm, a code is supposed to be entered that closes and locks the voting machines. Once a machine is locked, it can’t accept any more votes. It’s irreversible. The Supreme Court extension was relayed a few minutes after polls were supposed to be closed and machines locked. So… which machines were kept open? In what districts were those machines? And why weren’t they locked at 5pm?

They said they wanted to control banter (in pubs) . They are already without laws because now you don’t even know who your friends are or who is eavesdropping so the cretins can report you . They want to totally silence us

ÚLTIMA HORA | El presidente del Tribunal Superior Electoral de Brasil, el juez Kassio Nunes Marques, acaba de lanzar una advertencia demoledora: No existía absolutamente ninguna regla que permitiera extender la votación dos horas. Fue una orden sin precedentes de un magistrado del Supremo aliado de Lula, que terminó beneficiando a sus regiones. La decisión preliminar, dictada después del cierre de las urnas, generó graves dificultades en el proceso electoral. “No había regulaciones que autorizaran ninguna extensión”, afirmó Nunes Marques. Y lo dijo con claridad histórica: “Nunca, en toda la historia del TSE, ha habido una extensión.” También advirtió que era materialmente imposible, en pocas horas, garantizar que una decisión judicial de ese calibre no provocara efectos secundarios —especialmente tecnológicos— capaces de alterar de forma significativa el conteo de votos. Y remató con un recordatorio contundente al Supremo: la Constitución atribuye competencia exclusiva a la Justicia Electoral para dirigir el proceso electoral. No al STF.