Patrick Dugan (@doog) profile picture

designer, engineer, generalist. previously @messenger @chanzuckerberg, @quora, @nextdoor, @designerfund, @google. @uw husky. @mariners fan.

Seattle, WA
Joined November 2007
Photo by Patrick Dugan (@doog)Photo by Patrick Dugan (@doog)Photo by Patrick Dugan (@doog)Photo by Patrick Dugan (@doog)Photo by Patrick Dugan (@doog)Photo by Patrick Dugan (@doog)Photo by Patrick Dugan (@doog)Photo by Patrick Dugan (@doog)Photo by Patrick Dugan (@doog)Photo by Patrick Dugan (@doog)
“hall of frame” was right there man
Aaron Ashby's glasses have been inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame His 18 scoreless innings pitched are the most ever by a reliever in a single postseason (via @baseballhall)
13
Patrick Dugan retweeted
My friend made a really impressive app. It's live and has users. He has no idea where it's hosted.
126
95
56
6,811
245,113
the setup for this is incredibly slick
By popular request, you can now text your dot. Give it a task to take off your plate or something to keep an eye on, using text, photos, or even voice notes. It will text you proactively with relevant updates. Safe, secure texting via iMessage or RCS. You’re the only one who can text your dot, and your dot can only text you. Rolling out now as a preview for Pro users in the US.
64
our industry has always struggled with this in part because taste is such a visible thing that others seek to emulate without understanding the hard invisible parts of the job. pdugan.com/writing/taste-wil…
The story of tech and design: In 1976, Apple figured out that design, taste, and quality make better products. Ever since, everyone in tech has wanted to be like Apple and “do design,” while remaining completely oblivious to what design, quality and taste actually means
118
Patrick Dugan retweeted
every launch vid now is like *cavemen making fire* *model t* *wright bros* *moon landing* *nuclear bomb detonation* “every great innovation was once called crazy… that’s why today we’re launching AI-powered automated accounts receivable for operationally complex services businesses”
54
157
24
2,742
101,333
Patrick Dugan retweeted
matt predictably sharp on ANT S1 but goddamn is he always funny too bloomberg.com/opinion/newsle…
5
26
4
473
43,477
Patrick Dugan retweeted
I actually think Netflix is suffering right now for the opposite reason. From the newsletter yesterday:
People are losing the attention span to even watch 30 minute TV shows as short form video eats the world.
107
489
43
10,596
472,519
Patrick Dugan retweeted
This describes every data led software company and why software factories will not produce taste
A24 vs. Netflix shows the taste trap tech companies fall into: they want the results of good taste without investing in it. Being a tastemaker means taking risks before the data comes in. Waiting for data means you're not setting trends, you're following them.
24
15
1
519
24,105
Its very easy to look at someone’s CV and see what appears to be a perfect visible upward trajectory and miss the many invisible small stumbles along the way that made those leaps forward possible. Just as true for me as it is for many of us.
Back in 2021 I interviewed at Vercel and I failed badly. I couldn’t implement a debounce function and was stuck for like 30 minutes. It was pretty embarrassing. 10 months later (2022) I interviewed again and got the job. Don’t give up!
3
119
im actually going to cry
Steve Jobs emails Paul Rand March 2, 1996
90
Patrick Dugan retweeted
I was considering offering a million dollar bet against 17% GDP growth but I figure it's time to let other people get in on the action
any Anthropic employees wanna bet on this? perhaps with some of those juicy stock options? i'll take the under
10
9
2
841
23,917
hilarious that every time one of these gets posted you can count on kenan showing up
just remembered that we used to have this insane cast lineup during S31 of SNL
92
still one of my favorite tweets of all time
Three Days of the Condor is about a man who dresses so fly the CIA wants him dead
3
125
codex autocomplete is frying me. more often than not it just says the exact thing I would have typed and even in my own voice.
2
1
102
first thing in a while that's made me feel much more insignificant in some of the workflows i've been enjoying using the past few months.
24
infinitely more interested in the slate with its cheap modular parts and easy maintenance vs a flying tesla
44
oh my god
Probably the most fucked up thing I've done with Muse is have it watch all the Instagram Stories from anyone in my Close Friends list. It sends me a summary of their Stories each morning so I don't have to watch them myself. Finally, I'm freed from the shackles of friendship
83
Patrick Dugan retweeted
Replying to @hassanrahim
they're trying to cut open the bird to find the song
102
2,083
250
16,213
939,159
real ones have always used eyebrow and mustache (sparingly). but agents slam these elements in everywhere in a duplicative manner without them adding any value
once you learn about the “eyebrow” design element, you start seeing it everyone and apparently it’s a bit claudeslopism
3
4
582
Patrick Dugan retweeted
Distribution is not a moat. Execution is not a moat. Brand is not a moat.
Moats! Does anyone have one anymore? Yes. Yes, they do. But only a small subset of what people call moats create real long-term value and defensibility. Not actually a moat: 1. Distribution: This does matter more than ever. Building products has gotten easier, but getting them to customers has not. Distribution, however, does not create durable defensibility. It helps create the raw ingredients for one, but it is not itself a moat. 2. Execution: Yes, speed is critical for startups. But a company that has to sprint forever is not a good business. Ultimately, it will misstep, slow down, and competition will catch up. Speed gives a company more shots on goal as it tries to build a great product and a great business, but it must eventually find something more durable. 3. Brand: The idea is that when everyone is building the same thing, the most resonant brand will win. But for startups, brand works more like customer acquisition spend: Put money in, get growth out. It’s not something that will effectively keep others from competing long-term. Brand can become a true moat over time (as with Coke or Nike or Apple), but it just takes too long to really matter for most startups. What you're looking for is compounding advantages: a self-reinforcing flywheel that gets stronger and stronger over time, ultimately making a company very hard to compete with long-term. There are only four compounding advantages that really matter. Every major tech company has at least one: 1. Switching costs: The more deeply embedded a product is in the way a customer works, the harder it is for that customer to switch. This increases retention and revenue per customer, which can be reinvested into the product. 2. Network effects: The more users a product has, the better it gets for everyone. This increases engagement and attracts more users. 3. Scale economies: The more volume a company has, the larger and more efficient its operations can be. This lowers unit costs, funding lower prices or a better product at the same price, further driving up volume. 4. Data effects: The more usage a product has, the more data it generates. This data can be used to improve the product and increase usage. If you can’t see the potential for any in the startup you’re considering joining, that’s a red flag. In today’s incredible post, @danhockenmaier shares a simple framework you can run in about an hour after getting an offer: 1. Identify a startup’s compounding advantage 2. Gauge how strong it could get 3. Measure whether it’s working Inside: dozens of real company examples, the specific metrics to track, and benchmarks for what good and great look like. Read it here: lennysnewsletter.com/p/how-t…
68
19
31
282
137,019