Gigi Sotolongo Mazzola

It’s almost incomprehensible how wide the distance is between someone who’s working at the frontier with AI and basically everyone else right now. The crazy thing is these lines are not converging, but only growing farther apart. If the curve of AI progress had leveled off, it would certainly have given most people and companies time to catch up or implement their workflows in a standardized way. The technology would have neutralized competitive advantage because everyone would be using it the same way. But what’s happened is the opposite. The curve of AI progress is basically going vertical right now, which means if you had codified your processes 3-6 months ago you’re likely already behind again. Now imagine most companies that kicked into gear a year ago and thought that they were done. Even further behind now. I’ve never seen a technology in my life and career that improves at this rate, which consequently means you need to upgrade your expectations at a similar rate. Our brains weren’t wired for this, and our organizational change management processes certainly weren’t either. With any form of recursive self improvement, things just get wilder. It’s a time when you will need to be constantly reevaluating the things that didn’t work just a couple months ago to see if they now can be solved. AI native companies certainly have a strong advantage due to this right now, so now it comes down to can the bigger companies keep up. Wild times.

Never, ever let them tell you it can't be done.

Watch this. All of it. The rawest thing I’ve seen in a long time. About 15 emotions hit you directly in the heart. All in a minute. Speechless on everything about this.

Obama is campaigning against both.

The American left trained me for a generation to be a political activist and operative. They absolutely LOVED me when I was on their side because I was EFFECTIVE. 30 years of experience and training, plus being an attorney? The American left loved it. Now they want to vilify me because not only did I walk away from the Democratic Party, I walked away from trans. I used to be their golden child. Now I’m their ultimate apostate. When I speak about the American left and Democratic Party being corrupt and infiltrated by trans, I’m speaking from experience. I’m speaking because I was sitting in those meetings and rooms living it and watching it become captured. I didn’t just read about politics on the internet either. I graduated from college with honors with a degree in political science. I’m well read with a generation of real life political experience. You can attack and defame me all day, but I will be taking my time, training, talents, and energy elsewhere. I will be taking all of that and fighting the very thing that took a generation of my young life. They want to silence me so badly 🤣

Mark Cuban says the lack of AI adoption in organizations means the "trillionaire in the basement" entrepreneur is coming: "You have to be able to understand as a CEO and in the C-suite how all those things impact your company. Once you get a good grasp on that... you can just find new ways for things to happen that benefit your customers or create new opportunities." "And that's the brilliance of AI, right? AI is not smart. It's book smart maybe, but it's not street smart. It's not entrepreneur smart. You've got to have somebody there who guides it and helps it." "But until you have a C-suite that understands how it works, it's gonna be very difficult for that organization." "I literally sat with the head of a consumer food company... I'm like, 'Okay, well, let's do this. Let's take your number one product, your cookie, right? And I'm gonna ask ChatGPT to create a competitor...' And in about three minutes he was like, 'Oh, s**t.'" "There's no better time to be an entrepreneur than right now. There will be the trillionaire in the basement." @mcuban @eriktorenberg @julesyoo

⚠️⚠️Marco Rubio expulsa al diplomático castrista acusado de agredir e intimidar en el salón de la Asamblea General. Aquí lo identificamos… su nombre es Richard Tur de la Concepción y va de camino a La Habana en 24 horas.

🚨 RETIRED MILITARY VET JUST DROPPED THE REALEST LINE OF THE ENTIRE CAMPAIGN OUTSIDE TRUMP’S LUBBOCK RALLY: “I love my freedoms. I love my country. We fought for it. They don’t understand what the heck is going on. I’m retired military. I know what it’s like outside this country. This is what I’m fighting for now, to keep Texas RED so we can keep our freedoms. That’s what’s at stake. And James Talarico is NOT going to protect your rights.” This is the energy. This is the stakes. One week left. 🇺🇸

BOOM: Mike Waltz just UNLOADED on a Cuban official trying to intimidate him at the UN: “BACK AWAY. This isn’t Havana! Do you understand who you’re dealing with? This is the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!” 🔥 The communists are terrified of Trump and Rubio. Strength is BACK in America! 🇺🇸👊

Recently I was talking with a guy from the bourgeoisie. Good schools, good job, good manners. I asked him: "Do you think there are too many people on Earth?" He said yes. Without a second of hesitation. I asked him why. He gave me two reasons. First: there aren't enough resources. Second, and I'm quoting him word for word: "I'm afraid of the masses." That second sentence chilled me. Because it admits what the first one disguises. This guy didn't come up with that opinion on his own. Nobody is born a Malthusian. You become one. And this belief has a history, authors, institutions, and funders. It starts with Thomas Malthus, an English clergyman who argued at the end of the 18th century that population would always grow faster than food, and that famine would take care of the surplus. There were 1 billion of us. Today there are more than 8 billion, and humanity has never eaten better in its entire history. In 1968, Paul Ehrlich publishes The Population Bomb. He predicts that hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in the 1970s. It doesn't happen. Norman Borlaug and the Green Revolution feed the world. Ehrlich never apologizes, and gets invited on every show for the next fifty years. In 1972, the Club of Rome, founded by an Italian industrialist and a Scottish scientist, commissions a report from MIT: The Limits to Growth. Computer models, collapse scenarios, resource depletion. The book becomes the bible of an entire generation. Degrowth is its direct descendant. In 1980, economist Julian Simon makes a bet with Ehrlich: the price of five metals, chosen by Ehrlich himself, will fall within ten years. By 1990, all five had fallen. Simon wins. Why? Because a human being is not a mouth to feed. A human being is a brain that solves problems. The ultimate resource is us. Fifty years later, the story hasn't changed. It just changed outfits. It's no longer "there won't be enough wheat," it's "your child has a carbon footprint." Studies get published explaining that not having children is the most ecological thing you can do. People discuss it at Davos, between two private jets. Bill Gates said it himself on the TED stage in 2010. He presents an equation to bring CO2 emissions down to zero, and the first term of that equation is P. People. He then explains that with vaccines, healthcare, and reproductive health, we could lower population projections by 10 to 15%. Nobody is talking about killing anyone. It's more subtle, and in my view more disturbing: a large part of the elite sincerely sees human beings as a variable to be reduced in an equation. And what happens when a technocratic elite actually takes this dogma all the way? You get China. In the late 1970s, Song Jian, a missile engineer for the regime, discovers the Club of Rome's work, runs his own projections, and convinces the Communist Party. The result: the one-child policy. Hundreds of millions of abortions and sterilizations, many of them forced. Today China sits around 1 child per woman and is set to lose a massive share of its population by the end of the century. Meanwhile, look at the numbers. South Korea: 0.8 children per woman. Taiwan: 0.7. Spain: 1.1. Japan: 1.14. And France, long the champion of Europe, has dropped to 1.56. In 2025, for the first time since World War II, my country recorded more deaths than births. Elon Musk has been saying it for years: population collapse is a far bigger danger to civilization than climate change. If people don't have more children, civilization will crumble. Japan will eventually cease to exist if nothing changes. And just yesterday: so many cultures are dying out. People call him alarmist. The curves prove him right. Now do a simple exercise. Take all 8 billion humans and pack them into a cube. It would be less than a kilometer on each side. All of humanity, in a volume smaller than a single neighborhood. Even better: if all of humanity lived at the density of Paris, it would fit in an area smaller than France. The rest of the planet would be empty. And the next time you fly, look out the window. Paris to San Francisco is hours over Greenland, the Canadian Arctic, deserts, forests, mountains. Emptiness. Thousands of miles without a single light. Cities cover roughly 1% of the Earth's land. We are not too many. We are tiny. And above all, we are far too few for what lies ahead. If we want to leave this cradle, build cities on Mars, mine asteroids, build orbital habitats, and then head for the stars, we won't need 8 billion humans. We'll need a trillion. Just to get started. Every human is a genetic and cultural lottery ticket. The more humans there are, the more Newtons, Pasteurs, and Von Neumanns. The more engineers, builders, artists, and explorers. Genius is a law of large numbers. So let me be clear. Everything you think you know about overpopulation is dogma. A dogma born with an English clergyman, turned into equations by the Club of Rome, enforced with a truncheon by the Chinese Communist Party, and recycled today by the degrowth left and the salons of Davos. It's not science. It's a worldview in which humans are a problem rather than a solution. And behind the resources argument, there is almost always what the guy I was talking to was honest enough to say out loud. Fear of the masses. The problem was never that there are too many of us. The problem is that soon there will be too few.

We understand you more than you know, @elonmusk – our patriotic hero 🇺🇸 This video is for you ❤️ *Made with Grok Imagine* – included. 🎶 Content created with @KekmaximusaSol

How many more times must this be shown before people realize Zelenskyy was wrong, Zelenskyy lies and Zelenskyy needs to be held to account for his misuse of a commercial platform not military platform.

How it feels to be Elon Musk, taking on George Soros

I don't know if you realize what Elon Musk is doing to save the West. And how much skin in the game he has. Let's start with the other side. George Soros has been pouring money into American politics for over twenty years. More than $125 million for the 2022 midterms alone, a record. Already over $100 million in the 2026 cycle, through his super PAC Democracy PAC, now run by his son Alex. And that's just the visible part: other entities in his network aren't even required to disclose everything. But the most toxic part isn't the amount. It's where the money goes. Soros understood before anyone else that you don't transform a civilization from the top, but through the positions nobody pays attention to. Local prosecutors. The people who decide who gets charged and who walks free. The result: dozens of prosecutors backed by his money in America's biggest cities. Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Chicago. You've seen the footage. His project is the "open society" pushed all the way. Borders that no longer mean anything. A justice system that protects the offender before the victim. Institutions that spend their time apologizing for existing. A civilization that no longer defends itself. Carried all the way through, this project can only produce one thing: the dissolution of the West. Not through invasion. Through the methodical dismantling of everything that kept it standing. Now look at Elon. The fundamental difference between the two isn't the political side. It's the reward function. Elon's goal, which he's been repeating for twenty years: make civilization multiplanetary. Keep the light of consciousness alive. For that, he needs a civilization that works. One that innovates, has children, builds factories, power plants, rockets. A civilization that still believes in itself. His incentive isn't to destroy. It's to create. He can only reach his goal if the West stays standing. And he has skin in the game like no one else. His reputation, his companies, Tesla stock, hundreds of millions out of his own pocket: nearly $300 million in 2024, over $360 million already in the 2026 cycle. He gets attacked every single day. He could have just kept building rockets and let things happen. He didn't. Soros plays to tear down. Elon plays to build. And let's be clear about the stakes. If he loses this fight, it won't just be a political defeat. It will most likely be the self-destruction of the West, and with it, the only serious project to keep humanity from being stuck on a single planet. The most chilling part is that some people, deeply cynical, seem to take pleasure in it. When he replies "I'm trying" under a tweet, take it seriously. He really is.

I’ve been saying this for years. How can the Black community cry systemic racism, then turn around and lean on that same system??? Mannnnnn F*ck the Democratic Party😂😂😂. Vote Red. I did🇺🇸💪🏿‼️😉

X ALGORITHM UPDATE 🚨 X just stopped cutting new posts first, and that should help small accounts (I check it daily with Claude and share updates worth sharing with you) tl;dr: - X can only check 2,800 posts each time you open your feed - new posts used to be last in line, so they got cut first - now everything gets cut equally, new posts included - posts labeled low quality or misinfo now show a warning, and people can't like, reply or share them - no score changes this time lesson learned: your new posts now get a fair chance to be seen. Your first 2 hours still matter most. full details: - How it worked until this week Every time someone opens For You, X collects around 3,700 posts it could show them: posts from people they follow, popular posts, posts liked by similar people, and brand new posts. But X only has time to check 2,800 of them. So it just took the first 2,800 in line. Brand new posts were at the back of the line. When there were too many, they were the ones left out... and a post that never gets checked can't be shown. - What changed Now everything gets cut by the same amount. 25% too many? Every type of post loses 25%, new posts included. Nobody goes first. - Why small accounts should care Those brand new posts are under 2 hours old, with under 8 likes and under 500 views. That's where most posts from smaller accounts are. My read: they now get a fair chance instead of being cut first. How often X actually hits the 2,800 limit isn't in the code, so I can't tell you how big the difference is. - Low quality and misinfo posts now show a warning If X labels your post as low quality or misinformation, people who don't follow you see a warning on it, and they can't like, reply, repost, bookmark or share it. The code doesn't say what gets a post that label. Here's a recap of what you should be doing: - a new post gets its extra push only in its first 2 hours and first 200 views, so post when your people are online - likes carry more weight than ever at 0.66 each - people sticking around pays, the time-spent score is 50% higher than two weeks ago - a read of 10+ seconds after someone opens your post adds 0.4 - the boost favors the post with the best like rate from its first viewers - accounts up to 50K can get one fresh original lifted to roughly 16th - nothing beats a copy link share, it scores 20 - replies, quotes and DM shares each score 5 - talk with your mutuals, replies between you score 20 instead of 5 - originals are the only posts that travel outside your follower base - the 1st and the 32nd like each open a new route to strangers - your 2nd post in the same feed is worth 62% of the first, so pick your best one - videos still need 10+ seconds to qualify for the video lists - earning a follow adds 4 - a pinned post with a bad link can flag the account for 7 days, worth a quick check What you should NOT be doing: - posts that get labeled low quality or misinfo now carry a warning, and nobody outside your followers can like or share them - video alone won't carry you, an open counts 0.02 and the watch 0 - hide-worthy posts cost more, "not interested" sits at -52.27 - a post at 3am burns its 2 hour window before anyone sees it - a tap that turns into a bounce is worth only 0.3 - replies and reposts don't get past your followers - insults get your post hidden from anyone who doesn't follow you - adult media in 3 of your last 5 posts puts a label on your account - disguised content in videos gets checked from 64 likes, harder at 512 - self-reply chains under big accounts risk being zeroed - one account label and non-followers stop seeing you entirely - low-rated links don't belong in your pinned post - recycled wording can get tagged as copypasta spam - strangers tagged plus a low quality link is a pattern X flags - engagement bait has no size exemption - several posts in a row end up competing with each other - hashtag stacks add nothing - bookmarks are still worth 0 - 48 hours in, For You is finished with a post