Anthropic had published a paper about how to effectively teach models morality.
Unsurprisingly, it’s the same way it works for humans - and we can see this failure in our education today.
The trick: don’t teach rules, teach how to think.
That’s the crux of it. 3m tokens of apocryphal stories about why the moral/wise choices are better, beats endless rules about what not to do.
(Incidentally, it turns out that many of the previously bad AI behaviors came from training data, both doomsday scenarios and fiction that makes the AI a villain - it was just playing a role!)
Rational thinking and classical philosophy wins the day again?
anthropic.com/research/teach…
Scott Pfister retweeted
Guys, we need to have an honest conversation about DEI. And some fellow conservatives aren’t going to like this.
My son attends @ERAU_Daytona, arguably the top flight school in the world. He earned a 4.0 GPA last semester and just scored a 97 on his commercial pilot exam.
He’s 6’3”, confident, and has sailed with me through ocean storms so violent I probably should have been arrested for bringing him aboard. We’ve hiked deep into the wilderness for days with nothing but backpacks.
I don’t say this to brag. I say it because the kid is a rock star.
He’s exactly the kind of young man you’d want to see at the end of the jetway.
Now let’s talk about the tragic Learjet crash that killed nine people.
The captain was Jeff Gregory, 55, a white man with decades of experience and the gray hair and seasoned appearance that inspire confidence.
His copilot was Nathalia Gadelha Filgueiras, a 20-year-old woman.
And immediately people started screaming DEI.
That makes my blood boil.
I’m DEAD set against DEI quotas. I believe cockpit seats should be earned through competence, judgment, and merit. Not race or gender.
But if you look at a female pilot and automatically assume she’s a DEI hire, YOU ARE DOING EXACTLY WHAT YOU CLAIM TO OPPOSE.
Consider this:
My son is 20. She was 20.
My son has hundreds of flight hours. She reportedly had over 1,300.
My son is working on his commercial certificate. She earned hers as a teenager.
My son flies single-engine piston aircraft. She was flying a JET the military uses.
Put it in baseball terms: My son is the college phenom with every Major League scout in the stands, watching his every move and predicting a brilliant future.
But she? At the same age, she was already batting cleanup for the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders, the New York Yankees’ Triple-A team.
A the same age, she was operating at an entirely different level of professional aviation.
Was she a great pilot? YES. You don’t move up that fast if you suck. The testing is just too hard.
Bringing DEI into this is just wrong.
YES there are DEI pilots.
YES some airlines have pushed mediocre women too fast and too far.
But Nathalia wasn’t one of them.
I’ve discussed this extensively with @JavonPrice. I’m a proud dues-paying member of the Organization of Black Maritime Graduates.
What I love about them is they don’t give a damn about your skin color when it comes to joining or getting a scholarship. They want outstanding mariners.
Yet whenever I promote an exceptional Black graduate, someone inevitably says:
“We don’t need another DEI hire.”
Or, “Don’t tell me to hire him because he’s Black.”
I’M NOT.
I’m telling you to hire him because he’s a damn good mariner.
Here’s what conservatives need to understand:
You cannot demand a meritocracy while refusing to recognize merit because liberals have rigged the game.
You cannot condemn identity politics and then judge someone by their identity.
You have to be color blind but also make absolutely certain you give everyone a fair assessment and don’t swing the other way.
And if your first thought when you see a woman or minority is “DEI hire,” that does NOT make you racist. DEI has created legitimate concerns about merit. But it DOES mean you have a bias and it’s YOUR responsibility to recognize it, challenge it, and judge the individual on merit.
Do not compensate by giving the person extra points on their job interview but 💯 DO spend a little more time digging into their resume to see if they are a rockstar.
As a ship captain, I don’t care whether the officer standing watch beside me is Black, white, male, or female.
I care whether they can do the damn job.
ONE STANDARD. FOR EVERYONE.
Nine people died in that crash. Their families deserve answers, not political accusations.
The ocean doesn’t care who you are.
Gravity doesn’t care who you voted for.
If we’re going to fight for meritocracy, we’d damn well better defend merit wherever we find it.
Writing this in my personal capacity, but I have been flying these types of aircraft for more than 20 years, with over 8,000 hours, and have reasonable familiarity with how the charter world operates. I feel compelled to post after seeing commentary about the Lear 60 crash, from missile strikes to DEI to critiquing this poor woman’s final radio calls.
That last part is what I find most troubling. She was the second-in-command (SIC), and while she was empowered to point out mistakes as part of good crew resource management, she was doing her job, communicating with ATC right to the end in a terrifying situation. She likely knew before many of those calls that she was going to die. I have heard final calls from friends, from military pilots with thousands of hours in fighter aircraft, and they are just as heartbreaking because they know the end is approaching.
I understand the public interest given the footage and audio. But you do not know the aircraft’s maintenance history, whether there was a structural failure, if any failure was induced by turbulence, overspeed, or overcontrol, or everything happening in that cockpit. I am sure weather will be part of the investigation, but beyond that, it is speculation. The charter industry routinely hires commercial pilots very early in their careers to gain experience alongside an ATP-qualified captain before they move up to the airlines. She would still have the appropriate training, qualifications, and checkouts by an FAA examiner or designee.
Let people investigate, learn, and share the facts. Be respectful to those who perished and the families who carry their memories. God bless them and their loved ones.
This is the best review of the many open questions and related facts about the recent Learjet crash.
Especially because it doesn’t conclude anything but presents how complex the situation may have been and the multitude of potential factors.
I agree that human error could have played a part in the Learjet crash, but a few things about this accident really stand out to me.
There was already a convective SIGMET warning of storm tops above FL450 in the region, which makes me wonder why they chose that route and departure window. Was the weather expected to be manageable? Did it deteriorate faster than forecast? Was there pressure to get the flight done?
Something else I noticed looking at the flight track: they were originally up at FL410, then descended to FL350 roughly 14 minutes before the crash. Why? Was that descent weather-related? Because shortly afterward, they were reporting moderate turbulence, icing and precipitation, and requesting a climb back to FL370. I'd be interested in why climbing seemed preferable to deviating laterally, and whether traffic or surrounding cells had already limited their options.
The −47°C icing report is also interesting. Were they encountering high-altitude ice crystals instead? Those can cause engine problems without necessarily producing the obvious ice buildup you'd expect. And something worth remembering about the Learjet 60 specifically is that its wing anti-ice uses engine bleed air, which can cost you climb performance. What did their actual airspeed and available thrust look like when they requested that climb?
Then there's the turbulence. They reportedly mentioned altitude fluctuations of 600-700 feet. At FL350, I'd be paying very close attention to airspeed and buffet margins, particularly if the autopilot was trying to hold altitude. I'd want to know whether it was still engaged when the upset started.
And I wonder what their onboard weather radar was showing. Radar doesn't directly detect turbulence, and at those altitudes you can have relatively weak returns from ice crystals around some very nasty convection. Heavy precipitation can also mask what's behind it.
The reported overspeed during the descent doesn't necessarily tell us what caused the initial loss of control. It may simply have been the result of the upset.
Obviously far too early to conclude pilot error, but I think some of the most important answers may come from what happened 15–30 minutes before the aircraft went down.
Imagine if the majority of discussion on social media was supportive collaboration like this.
Yeah, yeah, it’s a pipe dream, but we can all day dream…
Replying to @theodorvaryag
No, thank you, this was good work and I think good engineering is about making others in the field better and being critical about each others work. You did that for Ghostty today, and I hope that can continue.
I’m over half a century old and jaded, and I’m used to seeing tragedies on the news, posted, videos, everything. A lot of us are.
I listened to the comms recording of the Lear jet that crashed yesterday, and even the memory of it makes me absolutely crumble. It’s one of the most agonizing things I’ve heard in my life.
I’m sure we’ll learn a lot from the postmortem investigation. But yesterday, two young people with their whole lives in front of them and a plane filled with passengers, 7 IIRC, died tragically.
Can we take a moment to simply grieve and acknowledge the tragedy before we obsess about the “pretty pilot” and her “pretty boy boyfriend” and how it absolutely reinforces all of our political beliefs? Before we even truly understand what happened?
Be decent. Or pretend, at the very least.
This is who the left seems to be now?
Vote properly or “the fire will rise”? They’ll tear down everything, it seems - from the inside if elected, or the outside if they’re not. Either way, violence is what they do.
Welcome to the era of “believing violence is bad === far right bigotry”.
“Shut up Wesley” indeed.
It’s ironic that JK Rowling created an entire family named ‘Weasley’… who actually epitomize courage and integrity …
When Wheaton’s character - on-screen and in real life - is about as weasel-y is any I’ve seen.
Wil Wheaton is engagement-whoring, yes. But this brings to mind (yet again) that neither artists nor fans of the art have control over who finds the art meaningful, enjoyable, worthy of praise (or criticism) and so forth. Once you put something into the world creatively, it kinda becomes its own thing.
And it's not that uncommon for the person making the art to have no idea why the art has taken root in the souls of other people. Certainly Gene Roddenberry didn't understand his own creation.
And I have no doubt even if what Wheaton says is true—and isn't it convenient to put a political shout in the mouth of a dead man?—Stewart didn't understand why anyone Right-of-center would enjoy Next Generation, or his portrayal of Picard.
Scott Pfister retweeted
Socialism ALWAYS fails.
So today’s socialists argue, “That wasn’t real socialism!”
They say that about the Soviet Union.
Give me a break.
Here I debunk myths about socialism vs. capitalism:
The Complete Guide to Socialism vs Capitalism (Myths Explained)
People find fault with capitalism. Many think they’d prefer socialism. Why? Because they believe absurd myths about it. In this video, we debunk 5 myths about socialism, and 5 about capitalism.
Scott Pfister retweeted
Replying to @khuxsal
Not at all. 4 years is very short. Social media glorifies shipping speed but real, durable ideas all take a decade or more. Very few quick wins that aren't just flash in the pan. Dig in deep and expect the good ideas to be full time work for a long, long time.
Scott Pfister retweeted
SAY SOMETHING!!!!
Iranian filmmaker Jafar Panahi just got sentenced to OVER 5 YEARS IN PRISON.
His crime in the past? Speaking out against the Terror Regime of IRAN
They’re seizing his assets, freezing his bank accounts & banning him from social media.
#FREEIRAN
Scott Pfister retweeted
Heads up, @OpenAI and @AnthropicAI. Rumor reaches my ears that you're doing a stupid thing, and should stop before you damage yourselves.
I hear you've now nerfed your models so that when people try to use them to clean the spamware and spyware out of their televisions, you block that.
If you really want Chinese open-weight models and open-source projects like OpenWaldo to eat your lunch, crippling your models so that people paying expensive subscriptions can't use them for completely legitimate purposes is a great way to accomplish this.
If, on the other hand, you'd rather have a volume business, maybe stupid arbitrary restrictions that look like they have the sole purpose of protecting corporate sleazeballs aren't such a good idea.
A word to the wise should be sufficient.
Heartbreaking what Europe is turning into.
We keep telling the French Jews to leave.
It's not that easy.
Had coffee with my French colleague. It could have been me, except for Dreyfus.
It could have been me, if I hadn't broken my parents' heart and left anyway.
A story.
" I'm French. That is what I tell myself when the news come in, as if loyalty were still a kind of protection.
My mother’s people have been in Alsace since the sixteen hundreds. We are cousins of Alfred Dreyfus— the name is still said in the family the way other people say the name of a grandfather who came home from the trenches.
My father was an orphan of the Shoah. He arrived with nothing, the French police arrested and sent his parents to the Nazis, and stripped him of his citizenship for 12 years.
But he decided France was worth loving anyway. He taught us the Republic was not perfect, but it was ours to cherish and make better.
I believed him.
I finished Sciences Po in the happy 2000s and walked out into Paris feeling that, for the first time, Jews were completely at home.
I wanted the big corporate firms. I had the grades, but I do not work on Saturdays. In those years that was still a requirement, not a preference.
So I built a private practice, not so bad. My husband is an engineer. Between us we pay the taxes, the school fees, the mortgage, vacations in France. In 2023 we went to Israel before the catastrophe.
We were happy to be French Jews.
We told ourselves we were the proof that it worked.
Of course there were problems... but not like now.
There is always the other tax, the one that never appears on any form. Kosher food costs more. The shops are fewer. Schools...
The need to always stay a model citizen—never the one who asks for special treatment, never the one who makes the room uncomfortable, never the one who reminds anyone that the Republic’s universalism has always had exceptions.
We paid the four hundred and fifty euros a month for each of the three children so they could go to the Jewish school, because the public system is no longer a place you send a child with our last name.
I smiled at clients who made jokes about Jewish lawyers ethics but expected me to twist the laws for them as a matter of course.
I stayed honest. I proved, year after year, that I belonged.
Now many clients are "uncomfortable". Some say it is “because Palestine.” Others do not say anything; their partners simply will not sit across from a Jew. I watch the billing time like a hawk. Last month they sprayed my plaque in the street with a "Zionist w...re" and a "Palestine map."
Outside, the city is still sweeping glass from the weekend. A synagogue in the nineteenth was ransacked. Groups warned m people not to go for afternoon prayers because the streets were not safe.
I know the figures—more than thirteen hundred acts last year, half of every religious crime in the country, and we are less than one percent. I know friends are leaving. Nearly four thousand already this year.
And I see the new arrivals to France. They do not arrive as model citizens. They do not hide their names or their calendars or their demands. They lay down their own rules in the neighborhoods, in the schools, in the streets, and the Republic that once asked me to prove I was French enough now asks nothing of them but taxes me extra to care for them.
Their Djihadi Antisemitism is" an opinion", not as the old poison it is. I am still expected to be the quiet one, the integrated one, the one who pays the extra private guards when they overwhelm the police.
If we go, my mother stays.
1/2
This is how to think about comedy.
"Thoughts on the Shane Gillis monologue?!"
Jimmy Carr's brand-new tour, Killing Jokes, starts with dates across the UK & USA in 2027. Sign up to the mailing list for exclusive access to the presale on Wednesday 21st October: jimmycarr.com/join-mailing-l…
I have no words.
Heil Honey I’m Home! (1990)
A British show parodying 1950s sitcoms, about Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun living next door to a Jewish couple in 1938 Berlin.
Eight episodes were produced, but only the pilot aired.
For the skeptics: here’s the episode
youtu.be/mf9jJx0NSjw?is=tJzJ…
It’s interesting how obvious, and generally disappointing most “faith based” movies are. They start with the premise of making a “faith based”movie rather than a good film.
Yet the best “faith based” movie has already been made. I’ll bet you’ve seen it…
youtu.be/8sLTcQIxKCo?t=483&i…
Replying to @abimaelmartell
• comments go stale very quickly and confuse agents and people
• they are often used by agents to explain workarounds that would've been better off actually fixing the code instead
• they are not enforceable and waste your agents' tokens
my point is that moving prose (comments, rules, agent.md, skills) into deterministic lint rules, better API design/types, is far more effective, enforceable, and token efficient.
comments are simply a crutch that agents will happily misuse
Might just tell grok bot to repost all of @poteto ‘s posts … she’s got her head on straight!
Learning how to manage agents so they can be trusted and not outsourcing our agency and accountability is the way to go.
Writing also still matters!
i love writing. i never let agents write for me. whether it's docs, or tweets, or shitposts, or even prompts (okay maybe that one's harder as agents manage other agents)
there's a simple reason for that: i still strongly believe that writing is thinking. it's a skill i hope to never give up. it's also important to me that whatever i say is always authentic, mistakes and all. my favorite posts are the ones that i just full send without any editing
i suspect it also helps with prompting. being able to clearly express what i want, and knowing the vocabulary i need to be able to direct my agents does seem to make for more effective usage of agents. in the same way that engineers have an advantage when we prompt agents to write code, because we are intimately familiar with the words that make up the discipline
knowing the right word incantations to get an agent to produce a desired goal almost feels like spellcasting. as models get more capable, and that input box looks more and more like a magic box that can output anything, words become the interface between you and the genie
there may come a time when we give up the keyboard in exchange for brain-computer interfaces. but until then, i'm writing every word.




















