Scott Pfister (@goneflyin) profile picture

A pragmatic technologist, experienced in finance, travel, retail, whatever. Primary focus on distributed systems, especially microservices, and Erlang/Elixir.

Chicago, Illinois
Joined May 2008
Photo by Scott Pfister (@goneflyin)Photo by Scott Pfister (@goneflyin)Photo by Scott Pfister (@goneflyin)Photo by Scott Pfister (@goneflyin)Photo by Scott Pfister (@goneflyin)Photo by Scott Pfister (@goneflyin)Photo by Scott Pfister (@goneflyin)Photo by Scott Pfister (@goneflyin)Photo by Scott Pfister (@goneflyin)
Scott Pfister retweeted
Guys, we need to have an honest conversation about DEI. And some fellow conservatives aren’t going to like this. My son attends @ERAU_Daytona, arguably the top flight school in the world. He earned a 4.0 GPA last semester and just scored a 97 on his commercial pilot exam. He’s 6’3”, confident, and has sailed with me through ocean storms so violent I probably should have been arrested for bringing him aboard. We’ve hiked deep into the wilderness for days with nothing but backpacks. I don’t say this to brag. I say it because the kid is a rock star. He’s exactly the kind of young man you’d want to see at the end of the jetway. Now let’s talk about the tragic Learjet crash that killed nine people. The captain was Jeff Gregory, 55, a white man with decades of experience and the gray hair and seasoned appearance that inspire confidence. His copilot was Nathalia Gadelha Filgueiras, a 20-year-old woman. And immediately people started screaming DEI. That makes my blood boil. I’m DEAD set against DEI quotas. I believe cockpit seats should be earned through competence, judgment, and merit. Not race or gender. But if you look at a female pilot and automatically assume she’s a DEI hire, YOU ARE DOING EXACTLY WHAT YOU CLAIM TO OPPOSE. Consider this: My son is 20. She was 20. My son has hundreds of flight hours. She reportedly had over 1,300. My son is working on his commercial certificate. She earned hers as a teenager. My son flies single-engine piston aircraft. She was flying a JET the military uses. Put it in baseball terms: My son is the college phenom with every Major League scout in the stands, watching his every move and predicting a brilliant future. But she? At the same age, she was already batting cleanup for the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders, the New York Yankees’ Triple-A team. A the same age, she was operating at an entirely different level of professional aviation. Was she a great pilot? YES. You don’t move up that fast if you suck. The testing is just too hard. Bringing DEI into this is just wrong. YES there are DEI pilots. YES some airlines have pushed mediocre women too fast and too far. But Nathalia wasn’t one of them. I’ve discussed this extensively with @JavonPrice. I’m a proud dues-paying member of the Organization of Black Maritime Graduates. What I love about them is they don’t give a damn about your skin color when it comes to joining or getting a scholarship. They want outstanding mariners. Yet whenever I promote an exceptional Black graduate, someone inevitably says: “We don’t need another DEI hire.” Or, “Don’t tell me to hire him because he’s Black.” I’M NOT. I’m telling you to hire him because he’s a damn good mariner. Here’s what conservatives need to understand: You cannot demand a meritocracy while refusing to recognize merit because liberals have rigged the game. You cannot condemn identity politics and then judge someone by their identity. You have to be color blind but also make absolutely certain you give everyone a fair assessment and don’t swing the other way. And if your first thought when you see a woman or minority is “DEI hire,” that does NOT make you racist. DEI has created legitimate concerns about merit. But it DOES mean you have a bias and it’s YOUR responsibility to recognize it, challenge it, and judge the individual on merit. Do not compensate by giving the person extra points on their job interview but 💯 DO spend a little more time digging into their resume to see if they are a rockstar. As a ship captain, I don’t care whether the officer standing watch beside me is Black, white, male, or female. I care whether they can do the damn job. ONE STANDARD. FOR EVERYONE. Nine people died in that crash. Their families deserve answers, not political accusations. The ocean doesn’t care who you are. Gravity doesn’t care who you voted for. If we’re going to fight for meritocracy, we’d damn well better defend merit wherever we find it.
Writing this in my personal capacity, but I have been flying these types of aircraft for more than 20 years, with over 8,000 hours, and have reasonable familiarity with how the charter world operates. I feel compelled to post after seeing commentary about the Lear 60 crash, from missile strikes to DEI to critiquing this poor woman’s final radio calls. That last part is what I find most troubling. She was the second-in-command (SIC), and while she was empowered to point out mistakes as part of good crew resource management, she was doing her job, communicating with ATC right to the end in a terrifying situation. She likely knew before many of those calls that she was going to die. I have heard final calls from friends, from military pilots with thousands of hours in fighter aircraft, and they are just as heartbreaking because they know the end is approaching. I understand the public interest given the footage and audio. But you do not know the aircraft’s maintenance history, whether there was a structural failure, if any failure was induced by turbulence, overspeed, or overcontrol, or everything happening in that cockpit. I am sure weather will be part of the investigation, but beyond that, it is speculation. The charter industry routinely hires commercial pilots very early in their careers to gain experience alongside an ATP-qualified captain before they move up to the airlines. She would still have the appropriate training, qualifications, and checkouts by an FAA examiner or designee. Let people investigate, learn, and share the facts. Be respectful to those who perished and the families who carry their memories. God bless them and their loved ones.
591
553
67
6,164
540,495
Scott Pfister retweeted
Socialism ALWAYS fails. So today’s socialists argue, “That wasn’t real socialism!” They say that about the Soviet Union. Give me a break. Here I debunk myths about socialism vs. capitalism:
79
691
30
2,411
39,504
Scott Pfister retweeted
Replying to @khuxsal
Not at all. 4 years is very short. Social media glorifies shipping speed but real, durable ideas all take a decade or more. Very few quick wins that aren't just flash in the pan. Dig in deep and expect the good ideas to be full time work for a long, long time.
9
57
11
852
45,368
SAY SOMETHING!!!! Iranian filmmaker Jafar Panahi just got sentenced to OVER 5 YEARS IN PRISON. His crime in the past? Speaking out against the Terror Regime of IRAN They’re seizing his assets, freezing his bank accounts & banning him from social media. #FREEIRAN
17
51
1
253
11,348
Scott Pfister retweeted
Heads up, @OpenAI and @AnthropicAI. Rumor reaches my ears that you're doing a stupid thing, and should stop before you damage yourselves. I hear you've now nerfed your models so that when people try to use them to clean the spamware and spyware out of their televisions, you block that. If you really want Chinese open-weight models and open-source projects like OpenWaldo to eat your lunch, crippling your models so that people paying expensive subscriptions can't use them for completely legitimate purposes is a great way to accomplish this. If, on the other hand, you'd rather have a volume business, maybe stupid arbitrary restrictions that look like they have the sole purpose of protecting corporate sleazeballs aren't such a good idea. A word to the wise should be sufficient.
169
692
59
7,590
240,415
Scott Pfister retweeted
Grok @bot is awesome. I like this feature.
218
65
10
774
15,457
Scott Pfister retweeted
Replying to @abimaelmartell
• comments go stale very quickly and confuse agents and people • they are often used by agents to explain workarounds that would've been better off actually fixing the code instead • they are not enforceable and waste your agents' tokens my point is that moving prose (comments, rules, agent.md, skills) into deterministic lint rules, better API design/types, is far more effective, enforceable, and token efficient. comments are simply a crutch that agents will happily misuse
43
18
12
618
27,116
Scott Pfister retweeted
My post about France went viral. Thousands of likes. Many Americans told me: "Democrats aren't socialists. America will never be France." I want to answer that seriously, step by step. Start with a simple observation. Look at what has gotten cheaper in America over the last 25 years: TVs, phones, software, clothes, toys. Now look at what has exploded: college tuition, healthcare, childcare, housing. What separates the two lists? The first lives in competitive markets. The second is exactly where government is most involved: subsidies, mandates, licensing, zoning, regulation. College. Washington lends students almost unlimited money. Universities know the money will always come, so they raise tuition and hire more administrators. The student pays the bill for twenty years. More government money, higher prices. Housing. Why can't a nurse buy a home in the city where she works? Not because of capitalism. Because of zoning laws, permits, environmental reviews, years of procedure to build a single building. The most expensive places to live in America are the places where it's hardest to build. When building is nearly illegal, prices explode. Healthcare. The patient almost never sees the price. A third party pays, regulations limit who can compete, and costs climb year after year with no one able to say no. So here is the trap. The problems you suffer from are not the failure of free markets. They are the places where the market has already been replaced by the state. And the solution you're being offered is more of the same. That's the Trojan horse. It always works the same way. A real problem. A generous-sounding promise. A program that makes things worse. Then the failure of that program becomes the argument for the next one. People who lived under communism in Poland learned to recognize the lie and the mask the lie wears. The lie never presents itself as a lie. It presents itself as compassion. In France we are at the end of that road. Debt we can never repay. Young people who can't afford a home. Our best people leaving. And every few years our cities burn. Nobody voted for this. They voted for one more generous promise, fifty years in a row. If you're a Republican, share this with the Democrat in your life. Not to win an argument. To start a conversation. If you're a Democrat, I'm not asking you to switch teams. I'm asking you to look at the pattern. Wherever the state took over, life became unaffordable. Don't fix the failures of government with more government. Stay American. Ask for less state, not more.
I’m French. I want to talk to Americans who are about to vote Democrat. Not to insult you. To warn you. I come from your future. In France we did everything your progressive politicians promise. Free healthcare, free college, generous welfare, strong unions, heavy regulation, high taxes on the rich, a state that takes care of everything. Public spending close to 57% of GDP, one of the highest on the planet. On paper, it’s the dream. Here’s what it looks like from the inside. France hasn’t passed a balanced budget since 1974. Our debt is above 3,300 billion euros. Interest on that debt is becoming one of the biggest items in the national budget. Our hospitals are collapsing despite record funding. Our schools rank lower every year. Young people with degrees can’t afford an apartment in the city they were born in. Our best engineers leave for London, Zurich and San Francisco. And the rich you wanted to tax? They left too, and took the jobs with them. The promise was protection. The result is stagnation. The worst part is that nobody in France voted for decline. Every single step sounded generous, compassionate, reasonable. One more program. One more regulation. One more tax to fund it. Each step alone makes sense. Fifty years of them, and you wake up in a country that can no longer build a nuclear plant on time or keep its streets safe. I love America because it’s the one place on earth where people still believe they can build something from nothing. I came to Silicon Valley as a self-taught kid and it changed my life. That spirit is the most precious thing your country has. Before you vote, ask yourself one question: is the program you’re voting for making America more like America, or more like France? Trust me. You don’t want to be France.
894
8,815
679
29,627
1,116,422
Scott Pfister retweeted
⚠️ Warning: Reading this woman’s story could break your heart. Her husband took the children outside. Her brother came with a knife. And her family reportedly defended her killers. This is not a horror movie. This happened in Iran. Her name was Maryam Yarmohammadi. She was only 28 years old. A mother of two children . On October 5, in Qeshm, southern Iran, her husband took their two children out of the house, reportedly to make way for her murder. Then her own brother entered. I cannot believe that I Am even writing this .😔 Her brother came with a knife and stabbed his sister in the neck, breasts, and genitals. He literally, stood over her body, butchered his sister and waited as long as he was certain she was dead, then he took her to the hospital. But the most horrifying part of this story came afterward. Some of Maryam’s own relatives gathered outside the hospital. Not to demand justice for her. Not to mourn her murder. They protested the arrest of her brother and husband. They said death was the least punishment she deserved. They called it HONOR. What kind of honor requires a brother to butcher his sister? What kind of honor turns a husband into an alleged accomplice in the murder of his children’s mother? And what kind of society allows a woman’s life to be treated as family property? Let me tell you why honor killings happen in Iran; Under the laws of the Islamic Republic, misogyny is not just a mindset. It is taught, institutionalized, and protected by law. From childhood, boys are taught that a woman’s body, her hair, her sexuality, and her choices are matters of male honor. In schools, universities, state media, and religious institutions, the message is repeated: A woman belongs to a man. First her father. Then her brother. Then her husband. At the end the strangers in the street called “morality police “. And when a woman dares to disobey, these men think they have the right to punish her. In Iran, a woman get arrested, beaten, and flogged for showing her hair in public. But a man who beheaded his 17-year-old wife and paraded her head through the streets received just over eight years in prison. Eight years. For cutting off a woman’s head. And you wonder why women are being murdered in the name of honor again and again! A woman’s hair is treated as a greater threat than a man holding his sister’s or his wife’s dead body. Now, do you understand why we try to educate some men in 21st century and shout laud that, we are not your honor. We are not your property. We are not your family reputation. Our bodies do not belong to our fathers, brothers, or husbands. Stop killing women in the name of honor. Stop controlling women in the name of religion. Leave women alone. I cannot stop thinking about Maryam’s two children.💔
174
2,270
135
6,632
132,307
Scott Pfister retweeted
Super excited to be interviewing @poteto, live, in ~48 hours on YouTube. We'll be nerding out about skills, high-velocity software factories, and learning SOTA techniques for shipping with agents. This Friday - 9AM PT. Don't miss it! youtube.com/live/MN9dGgmLyso
128
143
50
3,513
251,285
I think what infuriated me most about 2024's interpretation of SHOGUN is that it proved people still know how to make very good television. Most of the studios just choose not to.
110
162
9
3,765
45,324
Scott Pfister retweeted
Replying to @BarackObama
FYI - here's what venture Capitalist/innovator Marc Andreeson was told when discussing AI startups with Obama/Biden admin insiders:
3
42
7
111
5,530
Scott Pfister retweeted
This is a bombshell video. The anti-AI psyop is very well funded and very real. Since Sabine's video, other tech youtubers have come forward with similar stories. X also banned a 100,000 strong anti-AI bot network with accounts that were liking and boosting anti-AI sentiment. AI is a winner take all game of thrones amongst nations. You can bet 100% there is a lot of propaganda out there.
146
228
23
2,880
127,658
Scott Pfister retweeted
WOW 🎸🫶
6-year-old Shane took on "Money For Nothing" by Dire Straits at his school talent show. That's the way you do it!!! 🎸
99
829
35
10,495
524,513
The ability to wrangle these immensely powerful, yet dangerously capricious, agents into a productive harness that produces high quality systems — is the software engineering challenge of this decade.
103
185
26
1,987
65,894
Scott Pfister retweeted
Share this with someone that needs it! I believe in you!
534
5,537
342
26,238
523,483
Scott Pfister retweeted
PICARD: Data, shields up DATA: Brilliant! Shields can reduce damage we sustain. Not immunity. Not hubris. Just prudence. It's not precaution—it's strategy. [camera shakes] WORF: HULL BREACHES ON NINE DECKS DATA: Here's what happened: you told me to raise shields, and I didn't
294
4,734
179
49,439
1,406,974
Replying to @karrisaarinen
Mostly down the tubes. We’ve roped a wild stallion that has the potential to become a great racehorse; but we haven’t broken it yet. So it leaps around chaotically throwing its riders on the ground and breaking its corral walls. There are quite a few of us, trying to figure out how to channel that wild stallion’s energy and directed it towards the race. Stay tuned.
11
8
1
178
7,482
Scott Pfister retweeted
Uncle Bob gets it
I am absolutely more productive using agents. I don't know the factor but it's large. However much of that productivity is spent tuning the agents and hardening the product. I'm guessing 30%-40%. Some might consider that a waste; but I don't. The software I'm creating nowadays is vastly more robust than I'd ever been able to create manually. I don't mean that the code is better. I mean the surrounding tests are vastly better. I have a higher degree of confidence than I ever had manually -- even when I used very disciplined TDD and Acceptance testing. And then there's the ability to quickly reorganize the modules and the architecture while keeping those robust tests running. That is a tremendous boon.
12
26
679
164,057
Who did this? - 😭 😭 😭
🤖 Made with AI
329
1,500
160
10,523
249,479