夯 (@hanghang2016) header
夯 (@hanghang2016) profile picture

币圈胡撸娃

币圈
Joined October 2011
Photo by 夯 (@hanghang2016)Photo by 夯 (@hanghang2016)Photo by 夯 (@hanghang2016)Photo by 夯 (@hanghang2016)Photo by 夯 (@hanghang2016)Photo by 夯 (@hanghang2016)Photo by 夯 (@hanghang2016)Photo by 夯 (@hanghang2016)Photo by 夯 (@hanghang2016)Photo by 夯 (@hanghang2016)
《对 Movement 的七大质问:在事实面前,请项目方正面回应社区关切》 在社区持续不断的质疑与声讨下,Movement 项目方至今未能拿出任何实质性行动,仅以“尽快”“希望尽快”等模糊话术敷衍社区。然而,事实胜于一切承诺,在更大的愤怒爆发之前,我们希望以理性、客观的态度表达社区的关切,同时强烈敦促项目方公开、透明、如实地回应以下六个核心问题: _____________________________________ 一、为何承诺的空投大幅缩水? 根据项目方的公开信息,原承诺初始释放 10% 的空投,但最终实际领取比例不到 1%。链上数据显示,超过 90% 以上的合格钱包未能领取到任何空投。 • 这一结果是否意味着你们的承诺从一开始就是谎言? • 你们是否存在蓄意夸大空投规模,误导用户参与的行为? • 这种严重违背承诺的做法,项目方如何向社区解释? movement 实际领取仅0.6%验证地址:dune.com/zzzzt/move-airdrop-… 二、为何空投领取时间远低于行业平均水平? 初次开放时间12月9日19.35,正常领取从20.30开始,12月10日早上8点后突然需要增加gas费才能领取。 12月10,早上10点关闭领取!,12月10下午17点从ETH主网领取,仅能领取10%比例!迫使用户只能等待主网。 在仅能领取10%的情况下,项目方的老鼠仓地址还以几万几万的疯狂领取:👉 证据链接 Movement 设定的空投领取窗口仅10小时,相比行业常见的数天至数周的领取时间,远远低于正常水平。 • 这一时间窗口的制定依据是什么?是否充分考虑了全球用户的时区差异和网络拥堵等不可控因素? • 是否存在故意缩短领取时间,从而减少实际发放的空投份额,以便将代币留给内部人员或进行其他不正当操作? _____________________________________ 三、为何项目方屡次延迟上线,且随意更改规则? 根据官方公告记录: • 1月15日 宣布即将上线,但未兑现,币价下跌 14% 以上。 • 2月9日重新宣称正在准备发射,并承诺二月完成,但再次跳票,币价再跌 3%。 • 3月10日宣称“最多两周”上线,并发布新路线图,币价下跌 37%。 • 3月底 再次宣布延期,理由为“完成二期活动后”。 如此反复延迟、随意更改规则的行为,导致市场信心不断下滑。 • 这是项目方蓄意欺骗的手法,还是意味着你们技术实力根本无法支持项目落地? • 如果不是欺诈行为,那么项目方是否愿意公布详细的进度报告,以证明延期的合理性? _____________________________________ 四、为何项目团队通过 OTC 大量抛售代币? 在空投未正式领取前已将代币转至OTC做市商,相关地址: 0xaAB6ca7781Dba195AcD5e997c38b2294f5B8803a 0x12800aa2e1d276760DE3C29736184B9729B1327A 0xC07d39dCc914DB4AD2731FD11d09D41DB380230e 0xb6709bbad79135F0D8A5EA6C9AaAd7170Eae2bF8 链上数据显示,自 2023 年底以来,累计超过 1 亿美元的代币通过 17 个关联钱包进行 OTC 交易,其中相当一部分发生在空投领取比例不到 1% 的情况下。 • 这些代币的来源是什么?是否是项目方私自出售,而非市场正常流通? • 项目方是否可以公开所有团队地址,以确保不存在任何内幕交易或恶意抛售行为? _____________________________________ 五、为何大量新钱包异常领取空投? 项目方老鼠仓呈现多种形式(一对一、一对多),均为2024/12/09左右的新钱包,其中主要交易对手为币安、bybit,流程大致为交易所进资金,转移后卖出 部分新钱包特征地址: 0x27f00209aa51074E7089Cd9fE5EF62cd69e6A2Fb 0xfAf5E08208B27aF6643CdBe711780EB3af657D67 0x64c326De2A520C42cB99f2C41891C343be324AC1 0x2850D1b686561b7f4d3efEB05Db44910aA2Ce965 0x62e30ff4feb3728260e1f9f9ddf070b83a2b8944 0xb45bf2a2092bc9f4942148a4fa1222ffa345e342 一对多转账钱包地址: 0x0d62c805bccd072baa018ff8a3b658eda84d82db 0xB656b0a6276432B34e2858F5Eb8b6224d6149EF9 0xD7f4a22Da47218F68Eb012833fa20bFfC762265e 在空投领取期间,链上数据显示: • 超过 400 个新钱包 领取了远超正常范围的空投; • 这些钱包大多来自相同 IP 集群,且在领取后三分钟内迅速抛售; • 部分新钱包领取空投时,未支付任何 Gas 费,疑似存在特殊通道。 这一系列异常数据是否表明,项目方内部存在利益输送和“老鼠仓”? • 这些钱包的归属是否与项目团队有关? • 项目方是否愿意提供链上数据,证明分发过程公平透明? _____________________________________ 六、为何跨链桥频繁出现技术故障,导致用户资产被强制锁定? Movement 的跨链桥自 2024 年 12 月以来,多次出现严重技术故障: • 提款功能被禁用,导致用户资金单向进入,无法提取; • 目前累计超过 4000 万美元 的资金被锁定,用户无从取回; • 97% 的跨链交易为单向转入,项目方至今未提供任何解决方案。 这是技术问题,还是项目方有意为之? • 如果是技术问题,是否可以公布详细的修复进度和时间表? • 如果不是技术问题,项目方是否承认变相挪用用户资产,并是否涉嫌非法占有? _____________________________________ 七、为何面对社区质疑,项目方始终不敢正面回应? 在上述所有问题发生期间,项目方的态度始终是沉默、回避、拖延。 • 运营团队不仅未曾公开回应,甚至多次对社区禁言; • 社区提出的合理质疑,项目方不是敷衍就是回避,从未提供任何实质性解答。 这种回避责任、拒绝沟通的行为,是否证明了项目方本身缺乏诚信、试图掩盖问题? • 项目方是否愿意召开X Space/AMA或发布正式公告,逐一回应社区的合理质疑? • 如果项目方继续沉默,是否意味着默认上述问题的真实性? 我们需要的是真相,而不是拖延!! Movement 社区的所有质疑,都是基于链上数据和官方公告的客观事实,而不是无端猜测。面对这些问题,社区需要的是清晰、透明的解释,而不是“希望”“尽快”等毫无实际意义的托词。 我们在此郑重要求项目方正面回应社区的六大核心问题,拿出实际行动,而非继续敷衍、回避! 如果你们仍然选择沉默,那么社区将用自己的方式,让整个行业看到 Movement 项目的真相!
272
153
74
626
384,543
纵观 @_kaitoai pre-tge项目 @_kaitoai :把用户当成刷分机器,整天洗版污染推特环境,结果推荐的全是些不靠谱的垃圾项目,割完一茬换个模型接着来。 @megaeth :TPS吹到10万,结果连NFT Mint都搞不定。号称秒杀一切L2,实际连基本共识机制都还在PPT里。 @0G_labs :披着“去中心化计算”的外衣,干的还是老掉牙的“卖节点圈钱”套路。 @StoryProtocol :故事倒是讲得不错,融了上亿美元,空投抠得像要饭的,PUA用户白嫖贡献,事后卸磨杀驴,查女巫严得像东厂,还妄想靠塞钱给KOL堵住大家的嘴。 @use_corn :web3里的玉米地,它真的想让我们去当农民。 @EclipseFND :Solana和evm的完美结合,号称革命性L2,结果把用户当免费劳动力,骗大家“养牛”刷交互,最后牛没了、草吃光了,空投还不知道在哪片天上飞。 @infinex_app:无限可能,除了落地的可能。 @initia :连主网都没影子,却已经开始谈生态繁荣。 @monad_xyz :白皮书里干翻以太坊,现实中开个测试网墨迹得要命。 @tradeparadigm:去中心化交易所,去得连用户都找不到,深度超级感人,抗单影响睡眠。 @QuaiNetwork:PUA周期比牛市还长,空投少得像施舍,价值低得连Gas费都不够,割韭菜还要让韭感恩戴德。 yap你大爷,哼~
161
32
12
159
56,985
Quai is the stingiest project in the history of the crypto space. With a circulating supply of 540 million tokens, 90% of the circulating tokens are controlled by the team and institutions, while the community holds only 10%. All accounts participating in the Galaxy mission must pay a $5 KYC fee to receive rewards. The entire community is very disappointed with the Quai team. 90% of testnet participants might receive rewards lower than the $5 KYC fee. The community has been building alongside the Quai team for 1-3 years, participating in dozens of AMA meetings. The Quai team has let the community down, but they will never admit it. When questioned, the Quai team responds by saying that "those who question the project are deliberately trying to smear Quai." The two co-founders of Quai are extremely stingy and arrogant! @0xalank @basedPavel @QuaiNetwork
1
208
Quai is the stingiest project in the history of the crypto space. With a circulating supply of 540 million tokens, 90% of the circulating tokens are controlled by the team and institutions, while the community holds only 10%. All accounts participating in the Galaxy mission must pay a $5 KYC fee to receive rewards. The entire community is very disappointed with the Quai team. 90% of testnet participants might receive rewards lower than the $5 KYC fee. The community has been building alongside the Quai team for 1-3 years, participating in dozens of AMA meetings. The Quai team has let the community down, but they will never admit it. When questioned, the Quai team responds by saying that "those who question the project are deliberately trying to smear Quai." @0xalank @basedPavel @QuaiNetwork
1
156
At the end of October, CoinW Exchange announced that AVAIL tokens would soon be tradable. However, 45 days have passed, and AVAIL is still not listed on CoinW. A project that raised $75 million still can't get listed on a small exchange. Currently, AVAIL is also not listed on major exchanges like Binance, Upbit, OKX, or Coinbase. AVAIL is the only project in the past two years that raised more than $50 million but failed to get listed on major exchanges. The team seems unable to solve liquidity issues. Is the AVAIL team being too stingy, unwilling to spend money to get listed on big exchanges? A daily trading volume of only a few million dollars is truly shameful for a project that raised $75 million. @dragonflyvc @cyberfund @foundersfund @HashKey_Capital @ForesightVen @mirana @NomadCapital_io @SevenXVentures @alliancedao @Superscrypt @LongHashVC @FigmentCapital @chapterone @KR1plc @RW3Ventures @Elixir_Capital @localglobevc @balajis @maqstik @sunnya97 @Mudit__Gupta @ashwinrz @AvailProject @prabalbanerjee @anuragarjun
654
恭喜@movementlabsxyz 恭喜空投达人们直接达成除了@binance以外的大满贯成就。 直接上线@upbitglobal直接韩元交易对开启。 币安在这样下去,真的要出事了 真的要的有点多 在给其它交易所送钱,送用户
恭喜 @movementlabsxyz 。 恭喜 @crypto_laodong 。 恭喜空投达人们直接达成除了 @binance 以外的大满贯成就。 直接上线 @upbitglobal 直接韩元交易对开启。
18
9
18
27,711
I'm dumping all my $avail due to the price action. This coin is like experiencing a bear market, sorry @AvailProject i'll never buying invest in any indian project anymore #altcoins
3
1
2
497
The token structure of Avail is highly opaque. Currently, the tokens held by the team or VCs have not been unlocked. Can they participate in staking? The Avail team and VCs probably won't answer me. Out of the 1.3 billion staked tokens, only a small portion consists of circulating tokens participating in staking; the majority of staked tokens are actually unlocked tokens. Is the complex token structure designed to confuse token holders? Circulating 1.866B (18.31%)+Staking 1.312B (12.87%)+Others 7.01B (68.80%)=10.188B A month ago, the exchange CoinW announced that it would list Avail, but a month has passed, and Avail is still not listed on the exchange. Currently, Avail is struggling to get listed even on smaller exchanges. Meanwhile, the Avail team continues to make grand claims and talk about ongoing development, but the token's liquidity is getting worse. It's baffling that a team capable of securing $75 million in funding cannot resolve the liquidity issues of their token. Teams that manage to raise $50 million typically address liquidity on the very first day of token listing. Four months have passed, and the Avail team has yet to resolve these liquidity problems. Are your team members selling tokens every day? Why is the liquidity of a $70 million project so poor? @prabalbanerjee @anuragarjun @AvailProject @naruto11eth @Avail_intern @san1ty_piyush @0xabhk @annu_shekhawat @kyleArojas @neilvidyarthi @swetha @ri5hitripathi @ScottMilat @qedk_ @robin_rrtx @vibhu_rajeev @alisonclaire @sasaprsic @jschxyz @cechjakub @kailas_kroos @thedelroybosco @Sky_lunat1c @migroslinx @thunder @hosseeb @jml_campbell @_vshapovalov @jonbit3 @cryptoricky_ALT @sezaitsev @Lomashuk @chainyoda
426
A month ago, the exchange CoinW announced that it would list Avail, but a month has passed, and Avail is still not listed on the exchange. Currently, Avail is struggling to get listed even on smaller exchanges. Meanwhile, the Avail team continues to make grand claims and talk about ongoing development, but the token's liquidity is getting worse. It's baffling that a team capable of securing $75 million in funding cannot resolve the liquidity issues of their token. Teams that manage to raise $50 million typically address liquidity on the very first day of token listing. Four months have passed, and the Avail team has yet to resolve these liquidity problems. @AvailProject @anuragarjun @prabalbanerjee
133
Someone said: "We’re partnering with more crypto projects than all our competitors combined for a reason." You're exaggerating and making empty claims again. I know Avail has a few high-profile collaborations with well-funded projects (Lens, Sophon, Symbiotic and other partners), but in terms of numbers, it falls short compared to Celestia and Eigen. Most of Avail's partnerships are just logo + logo collaborations. At least for now, the number of deep partnerships and token market cap are lagging behind these two competitors. Yesterday's 24-hour trading volume Celestia: $1.54 billion Eigen: $221 million Avail: $7.15 million One is 200 times Avail's volume, and the other is 30 times. Please stop making exaggerated claims. You're currently behind others, so learn to be humble. No offense intended, I hope our conversation focuses as much as possible on data-driven discussions. @naruto11eth @robin_rrtx @0xabhk @annu_shekhawat @kyleArojas @neilvidyarthi @swetha @ri5hitripathi @ScottMilat @qedk_ @robin_rrtx @vibhu_rajeev @alisonclaire @sasaprsic @jschxyz @cechjakub @kailas_kroos @thedelroybosco @Sky_lunat1c @migroslinx @thunder @0xErod @0xTAY_
This quoted post is unavailable.
5
406
Avail Volume (24h) : $1.97M Avail Market cap : $230.26M October 7, 2024 Circulating supply:17.95B October 16, 2024 Circulating supply:1.812B October 25, 2024 Circulating supply:1.824B In 18 days, the number of tokens increased by 29 million. October 7, 2024 Avail price $0.1347 Staking 757.964M October 25, 2024 Avail price $0.1262 Staking 981.004MM In 18 days, the number of Staking tokens increased by 224 million. The number of staked tokens has increased by 224 million, but the token price has actually dropped. I can confirm that most of the staked tokens belong to the Avail team. Why not help Avail token holder extensions for liquidity first? When to solve the problem of Avail insufficient liquidity? @prabalbanerjee @anuragarjun @AvailProject @naruto11eth @Avail_intern @san1ty_piyush @0xabhk @annu_shekhawat @kyleArojas @neilvidyarthi @swetha @ri5hitripathi @ScottMilat @qedk_ @robin_rrtx @vibhu_rajeev @alisonclaire @sasaprsic @jschxyz @cechjakub @kailas_kroos @thedelroybosco @Sky_lunat1c @migroslinx @thunder @hosseeb @jml_campbell @_vshapovalov @jonbit3 @cryptoricky_ALT @sezaitsev @Lomashuk @chainyoda
1
3
446
Avail Volume (24h) : $3.04M Avail Market cap : $245.39M October 7, 2024 Circulating supply:17.95B October 16, 2024 Circulating supply:1.812B In 9 days, the number of tokens increased by 17 million. Avail Volume/Market cap (24h) only 1.24%---$3.04M Other projects Volume/Market cap (24h) more than 10% ZK Volume/Market cap (24h) 12.85%---61.37M Tia Volume/Market cap (24h) 13.95%---$176.67M Eigen Volume/Market cap (24h) 25.37%---$156.09M Why not help Avail token holder extensions for liquidity first? When to solve the problem of Avail insufficient liquidity? @prabalbanerjee @anuragarjun @AvailProject @naruto11eth @Avail_intern @san1ty_piyush @0xabhk @annu_shekhawat @kyleArojas @neilvidyarthi @swetha @ri5hitripathi @ScottMilat @qedk_ @robin_rrtx @vibhu_rajeev @alisonclaire @sasaprsic @jschxyz @cechjakub @kailas_kroos @thedelroybosco @Sky_lunat1c @migroslinx @thunder
1
351
Avail Volume (24h) : $3.71M Avail Market cap : $243.86M October 7, 2024 Circulating supply : 17.95B October 15, 2024 Circulating supply : 1.807B In 8 days, the number of tokens increased by 10 million. Why not help Avail token holder extensions for liquidity first? When to solve the problem of Avail insufficient liquidity? @anuragarjun @prabalbanerjee
1
164
Avail raised $75 million, but Avail's daily trading volume is less than $3 million. The daily trading volume of Avail will decrease to $2 million after one month. The Avail token is only listed on a few centralized exchanges. I hope the Avail team can resolve the liquidity issues. When will Avail be listed on Binance, Upbit, Coinbase, Okx? @prabalbanerjee @anuragarjun @AvailProject @naruto11eth @Avail_intern @san1ty_piyush @0xabhk @annu_shekhawat @kyleArojas @neilvidyarthi @swetha @ri5hitripathi @ScottMilat @qedk_ @robin_rrtx @vibhu_rajeev @alisonclaire @jschxyz @cechjakub @kailas_kroos @thedelroybosco @Sky_lunat1c @migroslinx @thunder
1
1
324
Avail raised $75 million, but Avail's daily trading volume is less than $5 million. The daily trading volume of Avail will decrease to $3 million after one month. The Avail project team says they don't care about the token price, but they do care whether you've staked their tokens. The Avail token is only listed on a few centralized exchanges. I hope the Avail team can resolve the liquidity issues. Please face reality. Stop talking about unrealistic visions and focus on resolving the liquidity issues. When will Avail be listed on Binance, Upbit, Coinbase, Okx? @prabalbanerjee @anuragarjun @AvailProject @naruto11eth @Avail_intern @san1ty_piyush @0xabhk @annu_shekhawat @kyleArojas @neilvidyarthi @swetha @ri5hitripathi @ScottMilat @qedk_ @robin_rrtx @vibhu_rajeev @alisonclaire @sasaprsic @jschxyz @cechjakub @kailas_kroos @thedelroybosco @Sky_lunat1c @migroslinx @thunder
378
$AVAIL now at $1.4B FDV after going down to $830M on Monday's crash. ​ It's up >67% since bottom, and I'm still holding my bags. 💎 🙌 ​ Why? ​ I believe that $AVAIL is significantly undervalued in the mid-long term. ​ Let me explain why! 📈👇 ​ @AvailProject recently launched Avail DA mainnet. ​ That's basically @CelestiaOrg but with full nodes ensuring block validity through ZK proofs rather than a fraud proving mechanism (and built on Substrate rather than Cosmos SDK). ​ That reduces latency, and as some might argue, increases security. ​ Like Celestia, Avail DA is powered by light nodes that perform data availability sampling. ​ A powerful feature of this novel design is that @AvailProject can scale the block size that can be securely sampled by the light nodes with an increasing number of light nodes in the system. ​ As long as there is at least one honest full node, the light nodes can operate under almost the same security guarantees. ​ It also means that the network scales linearly with participation in terms of max data throughput. ​ Since light node operation comes with very low hardware requirements and is generally possible from any device, the barriers of entry are very low, which also promotes network decentralization. ​ Why does all of this matter? ​ Avail DA, just like @CelestiaOrg, has one core focus, and that is providing abundant and cheap block space to rollups to publish their data to. ​ Doing so at scale and while maintaining decentralization & security, is a problem these modular DA layers solve. ​ But enough about DA. ​ @AvailProject has a much broader vision. 🔮 👇 ​ With the proof aggregation layer Nexus and the shared security (a.k.a. restaking) layer Fusion, @AvailProject is building a cohesive infrastructure base for a cohesive and unified ecosystem of app- and vertical specific blockchains. ​ Beyond scalable DA, @AvailProject is setting out to "unify Web3", solving interoperability and cross-rollup composability, while maintaining decentralization and security. Don't get me wrong though. I'm not saying Avail is better than Celestia and I'm also not saying that it's very surprising that $AVAIL stands where it currently does compared to Celestia (especially considering market conditions). ​ Celestia and its ecosystem are much more developed already. It also enjoys the first-mover advantage and definitely has more mindshare than @AvailProject currently does. ​ But I'm bullish @CelestiaOrg and I also think that $TIA has brighter times ahead with the ecosystem maturing and $TIA use cases across Celestia-based execution layers emerging (hope the nov 2nd unlock doesn't mess it up tho). ​ The "stake for airdrop" narrative from earlier this year could still be powerful, especially once the airdrops actually come in, which I expect to happen in the coming months. ​ However, I can see a similar narrative emerge for $AVAIL too. ​ As more of the infra pieces to complete the vision of a unified Web3 are released too, I think the $AVAIL valuation is set for an upward correction in the next few months (given markets don't die first). ​ If there are airdrops along the way, even better. 🪂 ​ With the recent market crash, launch timing for $AVAIL was unfortunate in retrospective. ​ But as outlined initially, I believe that this could be an opportunity. $TIA has seen $20B FDV before. Will it go back there? ​ I don't know. ​ But I'm pretty sure that $TIA at 5x the valuation of $AVAIL is probably a ratio that is too high in the long-term and with a very bullish case for both of them this cycle imo, it's worth doing your research. ​ Also interesting: ​ Look at the supply charts for $AVAIL and $TIA. ​ They look very similar. ​ ☞ $AVAIL: ☞ $TIA: However, the timeline is different. ​ @CelestiaOrg has huge unlocks (>85% of supply cliff unlock) comping up and from Nov 2nd, there will be millions in daily vested investor tokens. ​ More on this here: teapawt.net/zerokn0wledge_/status/… ​ $AVAIL on the other hand still has a year without unlocks on investor or core team side ahead. ​ That means less sell pressure and ample time to build out an ecosystem during the bull. ​ As we approach the major $TIA unlocks, I could see a rotation from $TIA to the currently undervalued $AVAIL. ​ In any case, $AVAIL is definitely one of my main bets this cycle. My post-airdrop $AVAIL strategy: teapawt.net/zerokn0wledge_/status/… ​ ⚠️ NFA tho sers, DYOR! ​ What's your take anon? 👀 ​ Do you hold $AVAIL?
✨ 🪂 My Post-Airdrop Strategy for AVAIL 🪂 ✨ ✦ Bridge $AVAIL to Ethereum ✦ Stake $AVAIL on @deq_fi ✦ Receive $stAVAIL on Ethereum ✦ Hold $stAVAIL in EVM wallet to deploy in DeFi (soon) This strategy allows me to: ✦ Retain exposure to $AVAIL upside ✦ Reap in staking rewards ✦ Earn @deq_fi points ✦ Be eligible for @AvailProject ecosystem airdrops ✦ Stay liquid Also staking part of my bag natively btw. Want to get started too? 👀 Use my referral code below! ⤵️
13
22
2
113
11,989