
Aspiring Reformed Episcopalian. Book Review Editor @northamanglican. Book: https://teapawt.net/t.co/EPWcNXl7ba
Joined February 2017
- Tweets8.5K
- Following68
- Followers746
- Likes28.5K
Pinned Tweet
Replying to @jamesdkclark
"But I beseech You of Your kindness to have mercy on me—not the lesser mercy which You show temporarily for physical distress, but Your greater mercy which You show for the distress of the soul. Have mercy on me, and forgive me my sin. Amen."
James Clark retweeted
“If thou, LORD, shouldest mark iniquities, O Lord, who shall stand? But there is forgiveness with thee, That thou mayest be feared.”
Psalm 130:3-4
"It is no exaggeration to say Morgan has written the most important book on natural law in decades. He shows, through exhaustively careful analysis, why those who have sought to make natural law into a tool of political utility were bound to fail."
northamanglican.com/the-end-…
James Clark retweeted
Look, this is classic “interview Trump.”
He’s often conciliatory. He’s repeatedly talked about an immigration deal and it’s NEVER happened.
Don’t freak out on a personal level. Just take it as an opportunity to loudly oppose amnesty, as every patriot should!
Trump said he likes legal immigration, then cut it the sharpest levels since 1924. He said he wants student visas — they halved. He said take a softer touch on deportations: ICE arrests surged to the highest levels ever.
Look at the actions next to the words, then react.
Trump has endorsed an immigration deal with Democrats every year since 2017, and he has shot the bills down every time.
Trump has offered a pass to illegals who work or have ties here, then does the opposite. So far this is only words, his actions keep blocking amnesty.
Trump endorses an amnesty deal with Democrats, saying immigration maximalists are on the “pretty far right” and suggesting that illegals who have been in the US for 10-15 years should have an opportunity to stay.
Follow: @AFpost
We're supposed to believe this after Trump just promoted Stephen Miller to Chief of Staff? Anyone who uncritically posts this account or @unusual_whales needs to log off permanently.
1
63
James Clark retweeted
We will win this. I mean, look, last night sucked. Even I succumbed to dooming for a brief moment. But I have eternal life through my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, so what’s the worst that could happen, really?
James Clark retweeted
"I would uphold, then, the Articles in their plain, literal sense; but I would uphold them as part and parcel of the Prayer-book. Taken in connexion with the Prayer-book they admirably serve the purpose of exhibiting the doctrinal aspect of God’s truth..." northamanglican.com/church-d…
James Clark retweeted
The sheer lack of taste in regards to fiction amongst large swaths of the Right at large sickens me.
You can't mock leftists for their slop when you're just as pleased by a different color of slop
Replying to @JadeAtrophis
But becoming a snooty suit is boring and drab and quite uninteresting on face value so of course nobody here ia going to even consider the notion because they'd rather AI a blonde woman regurgitating their meme of choice back to them
I voted straight-R with the intention of keeping the infinity-immigration Democrats out of power.
Many actions are indeed intrinsically immoral (i.e., deontologically impermissible), but casting a vote for any given candidate is not one of them. Rather, the intention and circumstances behind a person's vote determine its moral status.
1
16
404
James Clark retweeted
"The Articles should no longer be hidden or explained away as historical but not foundational..they are part of the foundation of authentic Anglicanism and therefore should be studied and utilized as fundamental principles of our faith.."
—Andrew Brashier
northamanglican.com/articula…
Many actions are indeed intrinsically immoral (i.e., deontologically impermissible), but casting a vote for any given candidate is not one of them. Rather, the intention and circumstances behind a person's vote determine its moral status.
Additionally, even if some evil consequence of a given vote can be foreseen, it does not follow that said consequence is intended. This is known as the principle of double effect: "The difference between intended effects and foreseen side effects is relevant for judging actions."
1
2
29





















