Economist, Historian, Cornell University, RE Projects, Stock & Options Trader, Former Pro-Skier, Surfer, Pragmatic optimist, Balanced visionary.

Mountains, So-Cal Beaches
Joined July 2013
J Eric Webb retweeted
Replying to @BillHerringIII
1
2
12
789
Out of your $29 increase in your costs, Biden is responsible for $21, higher oil prices the rest, if we can eliminate the Islamic Regime and Iranians take back their country Oil will be $60 a barrel and costs come down... Democrats will increase your costs more if elected.
9
J Eric Webb retweeted
Obama stood on a stage Saturday and said he kept Iran from getting a nuke without firing a single shot. I read his deal. Here's what he left out: - Iran got tens of billions of dollars in cash - Every limit had an expiration date - Iran kept its most advanced centrifuges - And ballistic missiles, you know the missiles that can carry nukes, weren't even part of it. He didn’t stop the threat. He simply kicked the can down the road and handed it to the next guy, while funding terrorism. This coming from a gal who wants the Iran war to end. Watch the full breakdown on GET MACED.
1,028
4,112
142
11,091
107,690
Obamacare didn’t care. You had to be jabbed or lose your job. IRA - increased, didn’t reduce inflation. If you’re still voting democrat you need to stop
🚨 TICKING TIME BOMB: Laura Ingraham just reminded America why Trump happened. If Obama was the success media and Hollywood sold, why did voters elect Donald Trump after his second term? Chief among the disasters: Obamacare. Passed with zero Republican support. Sold as keep your doctor, keep your plan. What it really did was expand unlimited access while the subsidies were built to sunset. Cute trick. A ticking time bomb for everyone else. Then Obama shows up glib again: “What is radical about wanting everybody to have healthcare?” Laura’s point: he already claimed he saved it. The tape doesn’t lie. The bill did. Obamacare was never about care. It was about control. America rejected that record once. Don’t let them sell the same lie again.
1
20
“President Trump is working harder than any president in American history to elect America First candidates across the country. He is on the trail because Republican candidates need the turnout boost only he can deliver, and he is supplying it at a pace and intensity the White House has never seen before.” nypost.com/2026/10/26/opinio…
593
593
36
4,962
71,901
J Eric Webb retweeted
Barack Obama is in Michigan. Kamala Harris is in New Hampshire. If Democrats are really running away with this election, what are their top surrogates doing in states they’re already supposed to win? youtube.com/watch?v=wtqPPyy6…
253
313
13
3,117
208,821
It’s frightening when Communists, Frauds and Satan himself celebrate Brazil’s ‘election’
135
2,075
38
7,290
34,448
They’ll never get it
8
33
2
90
1,476
J Eric Webb retweeted
מחר אני מצביע לבנימין נתניהו.
570
1,762
77
10,442
71,687
J Eric Webb retweeted
PREDICTION MARKETS GAIN SUPPORT AS FAKE ELECTION POLLS RAISE CONCERNS Harry Crane, a Rutgers statistics professor, and Koleman Strumpf, a Wake Forest economics professor, argue in The Wall Street Journal that election polls deserve greater regulatory scrutiny than prediction markets. They cite Median Strategies and Wedgewood Polls, which reportedly published fabricated election data affecting campaign narratives and decisions.
32
26
2
2,231
154,599
A very evil and dangerous man.
119
956
22
6,736
38,198
J Eric Webb retweeted
Seditionist Slotkin rallies “democrats” in a failed attempt at a color revolution.
142
957
62
2,365
17,403
J Eric Webb retweeted
Holy shit...this clip is unreal. Nithya Raman has absolutely NO clue about how housing works in LA. Oppenheim explains to her that landlords are losing money over the last decade and she's got ZERO idea what he's saying. This lady was chair of the Homelessness and Housing Committee for years and she's genuinely hearing this for the first time in her life. Unreal that this low IQ buffoon is about to be the Mayor. WTF are we doing.
1,102
8,066
195
41,209
874,629
J Eric Webb retweeted
Replying to @the_jefferymead
Robert B. Reich has been a Communist MENACE ever since he was Clinton's Labor Secretary.
2
6
211
2,441
If anyone believes this nonsense, here are the facts he is counting on you not knowing. The deal did not end Iran's nuclear program. It rented a pause. Iran kept its centrifuges, kept Fordow buried in a mountain, kept enriching to 3.67%, and the key restrictions came with expiration dates. The sunset clauses began lifting in 2025. Obama's own answer at the time was that breakout time "would have shrunk almost down to zero" as the deal expired. His deal scheduled the problem for his successors. The regime lied its way into the deal. The JCPOA was premised on Iran coming clean about past weapons work. In 2018 Israel pulled Iran's own nuclear archive out of a Tehran warehouse: tens of thousands of documents on the Amad Project, a crash program to build nuclear weapons, preserved and hidden while Iran certified it had no such program. The IAEA later found uranium traces at undeclared sites Iran never explained. The deal paid for terror. Sanctions relief unfroze roughly $100 billion and the US delivered $1.7 billion in cash. That money flowed to the IRGC, Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis. Diplomacy with a regime at war with you is financing, not peace. And the result? By 2025 Iran was enriching to 60%, a short technical step from weapons grade, with enough material for multiple bombs and the IAEA declaring it in violation of its obligations. That is what required military force this year. Iran marched to the threshold under the deal's cover and after it. "I didn't have to fire a missile" is true. He handed the regime money, legitimacy, and a timetable, and left the missiles to be fired a decade later by someone else. Appeasing a dictatorship doesn't buy peace. It buys the dictatorship time.
OBAMA: Iran didn't have nuclear weapons because I had put a deal in place and I didn't have to fire a missile to do it. I just had to engage in diplomacy.
359
2,556
262
6,325
236,262
Good data showing that NVIDIA AI infrastructure is a durable, investable asset that retains value. New applications and workloads keep landing on our fungible platform, increasing demand because of its productivity. Chart by @a16z
GPUs are aging like fine wine, with rental rates up across the board since January 1st Approximate change YTD: - H200: +160% - B200: +120% - RTX PRO 6000: +65% - H100: +35% Even the 6-year-old A100 rents for more than it did at the start of the year Charts of the Week: a16z.news/p/charts-of-the-we…
77
216
31
1,653
484,278
J Eric Webb retweeted
James Talarico is a radical extremist. I crunched the numbers on his voting record. I show it. Whenever there was a disagreement between Republicans and Democrats in the Texas House during Talarico's time as a Texas Representative from 2019 to 2025, Talarico sided with Democrats 96.8% of the time. He sided with Republicans less often than 194 of 210 House members. Only 15 of 82 Democrats were more extreme. This puts his voting record in the top 7% most extreme left-wing among Texas House Representatives. In 2026, being an extreme Democrat is really cuckoo. For comparison, in 2021, the unhinged Jasmine Crockett was in the Texas House with Talarico. During that year, Crockett voted with Republicans 2.34% of the time. Talarico voted with them 2.38% of the time. Talarico's numbers were virtually the same as Jasmine Crockett's. Talarico has claimed that "God is non-binary" and that his goal is to "dismantle" "capitalism, white supremacy, and climate change". Now we can say with confidence that his voting record tells the same story as his words did -- until he recently suddenly changed his tune. Talarico's "views" started miraculously "changing" in the past few months. They became, as he says, "moderate", when he started campaigning against Ken Paxton for the U.S. Senate seat. What a coincidence. Talarico is lying. Talarico is a loony hiding his real views. He knows that voters would never elect him if he told them truth. So he doesn't.
208
1,018
64
3,868
554,872
J Eric Webb retweeted
Correct. Using Starlink, a civilian commercial service, for offensive drone strikes to kill people has never been allowed, nor should it be. Starshield, a different system, is controlled by the US government. What they decide to do is up to them. Ukraine military violated Starlink terms of service and used it for offensive drone strikes to kill people. That loophole was closed last week. Starlink remains critical to the defense of Ukraine, as it is the only system that cannot be jammed or blown up, at least for now. Were Starlink to be turned off, the Ukrainian front line would collapse immediately. This is NOT a threat, it is simply a statement of fact. Starlink was also crucial to preventing Russia from overrunning Ukraine in the early days of the war, as all other means of communication were destroyed or jammed by Russia. SpaceX has done more to defend Ukraine than any private company on Earth BY FAR. That said, I have nothing but UTTER CONTEMPT for the virtue-signaling evil warmongers who push for endless slaughter and offer no realistic solution to the conflict. May you burn in hell. End of story.
STARLINK WORKS THE SAME WAY ITS ALWAYS WORKED. ITS NOT A WEAPONS SYSTEM, NO MATTER HOW MUCH UKRAINE WANTS IT TO BE.
11,237
32,757
3,486
192,877
11,517,268