We're going to look back on this time with shock that we let 18 yr old humans do this. Self driving adopted en masse will bring traffic deaths to effectively zero.
Investigation continues into that deadly drive on the Arborway in Jamaica Plain yesterday that was caught on dash cam video obtained by 7News…18 year old driver who caused the crash remains hospitalized…the other driver a 48 yr old man was pronounced dead at the scene #7News
I don’t understand why apps are on such a hurry to ruin game scores. Just deleted the google app from my phone because it wouldn’t stop. Just because you know I like a team doesn’t mean I want the game ruined. App deleted forever.
Corey Koberg retweeted
There’s a painfully short list of people that write regularly about the nuclear industry and have industry experience. I’m tracking low single digits, and Nick is one of them.
He was running whatisnuclear when noooooobody cared. That made him one of the only people that was ready-to-receive when this latest renaissance kicked off, with a website packed full of data and stories for everyone to educate themselves on.
He also reviewed the first article i wrote for The Nuclear Review, my write up on nuclear reactors for investors! We’re all lucky to have a nuclear historian and cheerleader like Nick, and you should be doomscrolling his site instead of social 🤘
Instant follow
Starting today, I'm going to give the world a first hand view of what it is like to own, operate and grow a small manufacturing business.
Beginning with this picture.
This is a picture of my not-so-glamorous shop in northern Illinois. It's also the reality of thousands of other small machine shops across the country.
Mostly older machines (newest 2019), less organized and dirtier than I aim for.
I've worked here since I was 13, ran it since I was 24 and owned it since I was 26. I’m 32 now.
I’ve been considered an old soul and have always kept it real, but what I am about to do scares me.
See, my Opa started this company in 1977 and he always wanted to break $1M in revenue. To celebrate him and the 50th anniversary of Center Tool Company I’m going to do it.
I will double our revenue AND do it publicly. We are on target for $500k in ’26 (pretty much been 500-800k since 1977, very unspectacular)
In ’27 we will break a MIL.
In the grand scheme of things that's pretty small, but it could be entertaining to ride along on the journey.
I’m going to show basically every aspect of what I know and how I do things. I will post about stuff and include actual screen shots, pictures, statements, and documents. Maybe some videos of day in the life or the joys of defense contracting...
I’ll break down the inner workings of not just turning raw metal into finished tooling or parts, but also working with customers, banks, lawyers, the government, family/business and family-business dynamics, personal/business finances, and raising a young family through this.
What do you want to know and/or what I am doing wrong? Comment or DM
America sits at the precipice of reindustrialization. We have a monumental opportunity in front of us. It’s time to burn the ships and go all in.
Bringing manufacturing back to our country could return a healthy middle class and economic boom across small town America - where I live.
Stories like these are why Tesla is going to sell a bajillion home healthcare robots.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Corey Koberg retweeted
Here’s a quietly wonderful thing I noticed:
If you talk to someone who was in choir or band at a majority Black HS, you’ll eventually discuss those annoying fundraisers for uniforms, instruments, etc. & a SURPRISING number will casually say:
“Oh, Dolly Parton paid for ours”
Corey Koberg retweeted
Texas is already more than 50% renewable energy, and there's a decent chance that by next year Wind overtakes Natural Gas as the single biggest source.
None of this is because Texas Republicans care about climate change. It's because their regulations let wind/solar build fast.
Corey Koberg retweeted
Six weeks before a TWA 727 flew into a Virginia mountain and killed all 92 people on board, a United crew made the exact same mistake on the exact same approach and missed the ridge by a few hundred feet. United wrote it up internally. Nobody outside United ever saw the memo.
The crash was December 1, 1974. The controller said "cleared for the approach." The TWA crew took that as permission to descend to 1,800 feet. The controller assumed they knew to stay high until the published approach began. Pilots and controllers across the country were using the same words to mean different things, and the plane hit Mount Weather at 1,670 feet.
When the NTSB found the United near miss sitting in a company file, the question wrote itself. Why did the second crew have to die to learn what the first crew already knew?
Incentives. A pilot who admitted a mistake to the FAA was handing the regulator evidence against his own license. So nobody admitted anything. Every airline kept its own quiet incident folder, and none of them talked to each other.
The fix, launched in April 1976, is the strangest institution in American transportation. The FAA handed the confession box to NASA, a completely different agency, because pilots would never trust the cop. File a report within 10 days of screwing up and the FAA cannot use it against you. No fine, no suspension. NASA strips your name before anyone at the FAA reads a word.
Fifty years in, the system has taken more than 2 million reports and never leaked a single identity. Close to 100,000 arrive every year. Wrong altitudes, missed clearances, two planes nearly sharing a runway, fatigue nobody wants on their record. NASA reads all of it, spots the patterns, and pushes alerts back out to every carrier before the pattern kills anyone.
That is the machine behind the chart. 6,581 deaths per billion passengers in 1970. 42 in 2023. At the 1970 rate, 2023's passengers would have produced around 29,000 funerals. The actual number was under 200.
Every industry says it wants people to report their mistakes. Aviation is the one that made confessing cheaper than hiding.
AI relies on absorbing public discourse but what happens when that stops because of AI?
The Great Inversion: AI Is Quietly Draining the Public Internet of Thought
Something profound is happening to the Internet, and almost no one is naming it clearly.
I have been cataloging it of the last 4 years.
For decades, the web’s most valuable resource wasn’t bandwidth or servers. It was the messy, public give-and-take of human questions and answers.
I was a Top Writer on Quora for nearly a decade as well as a massive pre-crazy Wikipedia contributor — I lived in the space of that give and take.
Someone would hit a wall, open a forum, type out the problem, and a conversation would form. Ideas were stress-tested in the open. Nuance appeared. Dead ends were marked. Better questions got refined in real time. That entire process — the friction, the disagreement, the collective thinking — was left behind as searchable, linkable, durable public knowledge.
That flow has reversed.
The same questions, the same moments of curiosity or confusion, are now more routed into private AI interfaces. A person opens a chat window, types the prompt, receives the output, and the entire exchange vanishes into a closed ecosystem.
The assumption we must make (because it is true) is that the AI company stores both the prompt and the response. The thinking that once would have become part of the shared human record is instead locked inside a corporate training silo.
This is not a minor shift in user behavior. It is an inversion of the Internet’s original knowledge architecture.
Public discourse is being systematically stripped of its higher-signal material. As the internet’s data gets more and more noisy in a very really way it is growing quiet.
The questions that used to generate the richest threads the ones that forced people to clarify assumptions, admit uncertainty, or synthesize across domains are the ones most efficiently answered by AI. What remains on the open web is increasingly the residual: lower-effort posts, performative arguments, recycled takes, and the questions that still feel too social or too ambiguous for a model.
AI then trains on that thinning residue, while the better thinking is captured privately and never returns to the commons.
The result is a strange feedback loop. The public Internet becomes less thoughtful precisely because the thoughtful interactions have been privatized. And the models, trained more and more on what is left behind, risk becoming increasingly fluent in the lesser exchanges that now dominate the surface.
This is not the usual complaint about “AI is making people dumber” or “forums are dying.” Those are symptoms. The deeper phenomenon is structural: the migration of human cognitive surplus from a public knowledge commons into private, non-reciprocal data reservoirs.
The Internet is no longer primarily a place where thinking is externalized and shared. It is becoming a place where thinking is extracted and contained.
The novelty of this observation is that it reframes the problem away from content moderation, engagement algorithms, or even AI capability. The core issue is architectural. We have inverted the direction of knowledge flow. What once leaked outward into a shared substrate now drains inward into silos that do not, by default, give back.
The long-term consequences are massive under-discussed as not noticed.
How does a civilization maintain a high-quality public epistemic environment when its best questions are no longer asked in public? What happens to the training data of future models when the richest human reasoning is locked behind commercial walls? And what cultural muscles atrophy when the habit of thinking out loud, in front of others, becomes rarer?
This is the silent inversion of the Internet. The data once destined for the commons is now shunted into AI. The thoughtful exchanges are disappearing from the surface, and the models are learning from what remains.
That is the novel dynamic. Everything else is downstream of it.
Corey Koberg retweeted
People are not ready for the fact that we are on the cusp of legitimately being able to communicate complex topics with animals
i think AI is about to uncover an entire hidden world of animal communication
and what it's already found is insane...
> AI found evidence that elephants call each other by name. when researchers played one its name-like call, it approached the speaker faster and called back more, revealing a form of personal naming once thought almost uniquely human
> AI analyzed 53,993 marmoset calls and found tiny monkeys may use names too. entire families use similar labels for the same monkey, suggesting they learn names and dialects from each other
> AI learned to tell what Egyptian fruit bats were arguing about: food, mating, sleeping spots or personal space. it could even partly identify who was shouting at whom inside a colony of thousands
> AI discovered a “phonetic alphabet” in sperm whale clicks, with rhythm, tempo and tiny timing changes combining into at least 143 recurring patterns. their communication system is nearly 10x more expressive than scientists previously believed, and we still don't know what most of it means
> an AI trained on 1.5 million zebra finch calls held real-time vocal exchanges with living birds, generating calls as they spoke and getting them to respond with the same timing and flexibility they use with other birds
> Google trained an AI on decades of dolphin recordings to predict what sound comes next, then paired it with an underwater device that gives objects their own synthetic whistles. the goal is for a wild dolphin to copy a whistle to ask a human for a specific object, creating a tiny shared vocabulary between species
> AI combined microphones worn by wild crows with nest cameras and uncovered quiet calls that may announce when a crow is arriving at the nest and help entire families coordinate caring for their chicks
> a robot bee performed the waggle dance real bees use to share the direction and distance of food, and the bees changed their flight paths based on its instructions. researchers effectively sent a destination into a hive in bee language
Corey Koberg retweeted
In 2021, The Simpsons' most reclusive writer from its golden era did an interview and in the middle of it, he gave one of the best writing tips I've ever heard. Like it's legitimately something I still think about and utilize all these years later.
This section in the wonderful Mike Sacks interview with John Swartzwelder is the most revelatory thing I've ever read about the writing process. newyorker.com/culture/the-ne…
A key stat that every environmentalist who is serious about solving climate change should know:
The US Navy has put into operation over 400 nuclear reactors without a single failure that resulted in any radioactive release.
That is equivalent to the entire total number of civilian reactors deployed worldwide, but the Navy’s reactors are literally deployed in BOATS IN THE WATER, that continually move, rock, get shot at, etc.
There are non-trivial engineering challenges, but the core reality is that safe, clean, abundant nuclear is a matter of political will, intelligence, and organizational culture.



































