Pinned Tweet
100% consensus - it’s a new regime. Rates will never go back down, inflation will stay above 4%.
I give that 30% likelihood.
The other 70% is not back to where the US was, but “worse”. We’re on the European path, that followed the Japan path.
Neg rates by 2028 very possible.
Interesting
Woody Harrelson has done an ad for Exxon.
New Exxon El Nino Commercial
Written by Adam McKay @mr.ghostpanther
Voiced by Woody Harrelson @woodyharrelson
Produced by Yellow Dot Studios
Edited by Max Koepke of @lostplanetpost
Stock Footage licensing by Stalkr
Music licensing APM
This is starting to feel a little like the Watergate investigation by the press. Where you had one lead group in the Washington Post and then multiple other papers of record coming up with additional information.
Jerry Jordan retweeted
Replying to @gandalf_thegreg
For the first time in his life, Pat mcafee is the smartest person in the room
Jerry Jordan retweeted
Holy shit.
Dutch intelligence has uncovered Jared Kushner’s role as a Mossad agent.
I’ve said this on this site now for five or six years. Japan is a leader in the clubhouse, with Europe, 7 to 10 years behind them, and the US 7 to 10 years behind Europe.
The demographic drop off, and the very slow to zero real GDP growth is coming for the US
Vincent Deluard (@VincentDeluard) on why Europe looks like Japan in 2011-12:
“Europe today is where Japan was in 2011-12, just uglier. Japan, because of its unique demography, is usually 10, 15 years ahead of the rest of the world.”
“The only way I can get growth back up is by trashing my currency so much that eventually my exports and my tourism really pick up. That’s how I get out of the debt trap.”
“That led to 13 years of a falling yen. Really massive. At one point after the earthquake, there was an 80-handle on the yen against the dollar. This summer it was 165.”
He’s right. That doesn’t mean the spending makes sense. Go back and look at what all the commodity companies were doing from 2007 to 2011. The exact same thing. Because they knew that the commodity cycle was gonna last 40 years so they spent incredibly aggressively. Turned out it was only a 10 year cycle and they were at the end of it.
The hyperscalers are the biggest cash-generating businesses the world has ever seen. And they’re recycling all of that cash flow into the biggest capex build in history.
It’s a self-reinforcing loop. They use the technology they’re building themselves, productivity rises, cash flows rise, capex accelerates. People worry about the borrowing, but these companies carry roughly 3.5% of their market cap in debt. They’re barely in debt at all.
This is already the second largest capex event in history. The only bigger one was the railroads... and that cycle ran for 35 years.
If intelligence keeps rising, capex keeps rising with it. There is no end to the need for data centers, compute and energy.
Jerry Jordan retweeted
Replying to @sidprabhu @donnelly_brent
I would argue this has been predominantly correct for most of technology for the last 10 or 15 years. Google search really was a massive change. The iPhone, and its early iterations with the App Store, absolutely. But each iteration in the last 10 years has had only modest improvements. Let’s be honest, social media could disappear tomorrow and the world doesn’t change. And maybe it gets better. Throwing in online shopping, which is nice but it’s not like we didn’t have shopping before let alone mail order catalogs.
So in the end, where do we stand with technology over the last decade, trillions and trillions of market cap created, but trillions and trillions of extracted value from the public, and honestly I’m not sure really any better off as a society.
Looks like the systematic group tends to revert back to the discretionary group when the spread is this wide for this long. Like we saw in 2015 and 2022.
📌 Equity
Systematic strategies are still overweight, with positioning at the 79th percentile. Discretionary investors are much more cautious, underweight at the 18th percentile, with plenty of room to add risk
👉 isabelnet.com/?s=equity
@DeutscheBank $spx #spx #stocks #equity
Jerry Jordan retweeted
Goldman updated their SPX CTA estimates Monday and per @dailychartbook's nightly email now see as their base case approximately $11.5B in selling just this week ($23.3B globally with selling "across all regions").
Here's the full breakdown:
Over the next 1 week…
Flat tape: Sellers -$11.6B out of the SPX
Up tape (+2 s/d): Sellers -$5.9B out of the SPX
Down tape (-2.5 s/d): Sellers -$26.4B out of the SPX
Over the next 1 month…
Flat tape: Sellers -$11.9B out of the SPX
Up tape: Buyers $11.2B into the SPX
Down tape: Sellers -$64.4B out of the SPX
BofA saw significant selling from the systematic community last week and sees CTAs now into a sell cycle.
"CTA equity positioning continues to narrow following another difficult week for technology shares. Price trends are projected to weaken across most equity markets next week. Higher realized volatility could also reduce position sizes where CTAs remain long. S&P 500 futures are now the only equity market in this report with consensus long positioning across model speeds and risk tolerances, but that exposure is increasingly at risk, with the first sell trigger only 0.5% below current levels."
As they noted, the sell trigger for the S&P 500 now sits just around −0.5% away (from ~−1.1% last week), and it’s now the only equity market in BofA’s report where CTAs are still long across all model speeds.
The Nasdaq-100’s sell trigger is even closer at ~−0.2% (from ~−0.9%). For the Russell 2000 they see the next sell trigger at ~−3.0% (from essentially at its trigger last week) along with a buy trigger at +2.4%.
Globally they see selling in all scenarios for the upcoming week:
−$79B of selling in a “down” market (defined as the 2.5th percentile price path or ~−2.9%, different than Goldman who uses −4.5%; from −$81B last week), with CTAs selling ~$50B, vol control ~$20B and risk parity ~$9B
−$48B of selling in a flat market (from −$10B last week) as selling from CTAs (~$38B) and vol control (~$17B) more than offsets ~$7B of buying from risk parity
−$1B of selling in an “up” market (defined as the 97.5th percentile price path or ~+3.5%, similar to Goldman; from −$3B last week) as ~$21B of vol-control selling offsets buying from CTAs (~$14B) and risk parity (~$6B).
An excellent piece about Founders, and what constitutes vision versus lying:
mail.blockworks.com/p/invest…
@bgilliam1982
Jerry Jordan retweeted
The next decade's winner is unlikely to be the last decade's winner.
Each of the last several decades had a clear winner, an asset that rose so far and so persistently that it came to seem like the obvious place for money.
Each went on to disappoint in the decade that followed.
The pattern is consistent across very different assets:
* Gold rose more than thirteen-fold in the inflationary 1970s, then lost ground through the 1980s as inflation fell.
* Japanese stocks rose nearly six-fold in the 1980s, then lost half their value in the 1990s, beginning a slump that lasted decades.
* The Nasdaq rose roughly nine-fold in the 1990s, then fell 44 percent in the 2000s.
* Emerging market stocks nearly tripled in the 2000s, then barely moved in the 2010s.
In each case, the decade’s winner ended it with the widest following, the most confident forecasts, and the highest prices relative to its fundamentals.
This 👇👇👇
I’ve said the same thing for three years. See: Microsoft laying off 27% of their workforce. And you think Allstate isn’t going to hollow out their mid tier white collar workers?? Liberty Mutual??
Jerry Jordan retweeted
Elon Musk has spent more money on American elections in the last two years than George Soros has in his entire life.
Jerry Jordan retweeted
You either want @jaredkushner arrested for treason.
Or you support a foreign spy actively compromising the White House and selling that access to foreign nations and doing lord knows what else.
There’s no more in between on that one.
Jerry Jordan retweeted
Replying to @NatalieKorach































