Stefan Lujarczyk retweeted
Such a joke
The “woman only” island resort that the media was so excited over..was built entirely by men. Then they were told to leave. And then the place went bust because there were no men there to fix anything. Toilets, electrical breakers, generators, food processors, washing machines, etc, all broke down eventually. And the place turned into a stinking hell hole. I wonder if the “no men” feminists learned anything from this? Of course not, they are just as dumb now as they were then
Stefan Lujarczyk retweeted
Feministki dopiero co otrząsnęły się ze związku Filipa Chajzera z 20 lat młodszą Blanką, a już mamy kolejną parę z niemal 20-letnią różnicą wieku.
Tyle że tym razem to kobieta jest starsza.
To najwyraźniej dużo zmienia.
Nagle w komentarzach czytamy, że nikomu nic do tego kto ma ile lat, że miłość nie zna wieku i w ogóle klasa.
Wiek partnera jest dla feministek problemem tylko wtedy, gdy starszy jest mężczyzna.
Stefan Lujarczyk retweeted
skoro bycie kobieta to stekanie z bolu przy porodzie to czemu zrobilas aborcje?
Stefan Lujarczyk retweeted
Brawo, politycy koalicji. Mówicie o mowie nienawiści? To najpierw zacznijcie od siebie.
@Kpelczynska ogłasza odejście z rządu. I rusza festiwal osobistych przytyków, kpin oraz publicznego zadowolenia.
Koalicyjna lekcja szacunku wygląda tak:
🔴 @jflibicki : „Baba z wozu, koniom lżej”. Do tego „po prostu toksyczna” i „nie umie z nikim współpracować”.
🔴 @BaszkaOli : „Jest atencjuszką”.
🔴 @MiroslawSuchon : „główny stołkowy tego rządu”. Dorzuca też słowa „odchodząc w niesławie”.
🔴 @GiertychRoman : sięga po żart o dżungli amazońskiej, sugerując, że w przypadku minister powodem do radości jest dopiero jej odejście.
🔴 @poselTTrela : ceni ją za to, „że wreszcie odeszła”. I dziękuje.
🔴 @WZembaczynski : „Ozięble żegnam panią minister”.
🔴 @pomaska : „Ja nie do końca rozumiem tę decyzję, ale płakać nie będę”.
🔴 @Arlukowicz : „Premier dobrze czuł, że te Indie to będzie udana wizyta”. Tak żartuje z odejścia koalicjantki podczas zagranicznej wizyty premiera.
🔴 @RKropiwnicki : „Pani Pełczyńska-Nałęcz podjęła doskonałą decyzję. To doprawdy miłe z jej strony”.
🔴 @szejnfeld : „Dobra decyzja. Dziękujemy”.
🔴 @Popielarz_Mar : „Nigdy nie myślałem, że to napiszę, ale po prostu dziękuję”.
🔴 @hennigkloska : „wyrachowanie, populizm”. Zarzuca jej, że chce „udawać opozycję”.
🔴 @KotulaKat : „prowadziła własną grę, grała do własnej bramki”.
Od obraźliwych etykiet po demonstracyjne podziękowania za odejście. Tak pokazujecie kulturę polityczną, której wymagacie od innych?
Nauczyciele codziennie tłumaczą uczniom, że wyśmiewanie, poniżanie i przyklejanie ludziom etykiet krzywdzi. Potem młodzi otwierają internet i widzą zachowanie osób tworzących prawo.
Krytykujcie decyzje. Rozliczajcie pracę. Przedstawiajcie argumenty. Odpowiadajcie też za własne słowa.
Godność człowieka nie wygasa wraz z odejściem z rządu. Szacunek obowiązuje także wobec osoby, która przestała być politycznie wygodna.
Kiedy następnym razem będziecie pouczać społeczeństwo o hejcie, zacznijcie od własnych wpisów i własnego środowiska.
Bo hipokryzję też widać.
Stefan Lujarczyk retweeted
Translation: "I need constant drama to create/sustain the illusion that I'm special."
Stefan Lujarczyk retweeted
Jane Doe: I had sex with several men at once!
Feminists: You go girl!
Jane Doe: But I'm ashamed...
Feminists: You were raped!!
Stefan Lujarczyk retweeted
This is why online mob mentality is dangerous.
I hope these two boys sue the absolute fuck out of many influencers and news outlets.
According to both their & Jane's statements, they had precisely ZERO involvement in the sexual acts. All they did was briefly come in the room to check what was happening, saw that Jane was conversational and lucid and that it simply appeared to be consenting adults having a threesome, and they left.
That's it. Yet, their faces are being plastered all over the Internet and they're being labelled "RAPISTS".
This is insane.
Stefan Lujarczyk retweeted
Cornell Case - Jane Doe Texted Her Roommate During the “Seven Hours”
During Cornell's Title IX investigation, one of Jane Doe's roommates told investigators that she texted Doe before going to sleep on Oct. 20.
3:05 a.m. - Doe’s roommate texts:
“Are you coming home tonight?”
~3:09 a.m. - Doe responds that she doesn't know.
This exchange interests me because of where it appears to fall in the alleged sequence of events.
1:42 a.m. - Newell sends the Snapchat message to Chi Phi members saying there is “free pussy” upstairs.
~2:00 a.m. - Lopes says he left around this time. Doe’s account reportedly places his departure before the additional men entered the room.
After ~2:00 a.m. - Additional fraternity members begin entering the room.
The civil complaint alleges Doe became uncomfortable, retreated under the covers, and that her phone was across the room. It specifically connects this to her feeling as though there was “no way for her to escape this room full of predatory, fraternity men.”
After ~2:30 a.m. - Sarabia (Male 7) says he entered the room around this time. The civil complaint places his arrival shortly after the other fraternity members.
At some point, another fraternity member enters and breaks up the gathering. There is no time listed for when that happened.
Then, at approximately 3:00 a.m., Doe apparently has access to her phone and responds to her roommate within four minutes.
What I'm curious about is how this 3:00 a.m. exchange was treated during the different investigations.
Was it included in the six-page sworn statement provided to the DA's office? Did the DA know about it when explaining why his office believed the available evidence didn't support prosecution?
And how did Cornell's Title IX investigators evaluate it? They had the roommate's account and apparently did not ultimately find the accused students responsible for rape. Was this exchange considered evidence that Doe was voluntarily remaining at Chi Phi at that point, or was there other evidence establishing that the larger group had already left before she regained access to her phone?
The timestamp alone doesn't answer those questions. But I'd like to know whether investigators asked them.
Stefan Lujarczyk retweeted
Seven names. One signed statement.
Almost nobody read it.
Rape is a crime, and any man who commits rape should be charged and punished, but that doesn’t turn an accusation into a verdict.
Her November 2024 statement is public. She signed it, corrected it by hand, and the DA declined to charge because, on her own account, the sex and the drugs were voluntary, and when she said stop, it stopped.
Innocent until proven guilty is not a favor to men. It is the standard that makes a guilty verdict mean something, which is the only reason a real victim gets believed. Regret is not rape, and a false accusation does not protect women. It teaches everyone to doubt the next one who is telling the truth.
Read the statement, then talk.
tompkinscountyny.gov/files/a…
Stefan Lujarczyk retweeted
College hookup culture is messy. False accusations can make it catastrophic. Due process exists for a reason.
Stefan Lujarczyk retweeted
Jane Doe was so traumatized from getting a train pulled on her that she found the strength 3 days later to tell the Cornell frat boy who allegedly raped her, “i luv u king.”
Stefan Lujarczyk retweeted
“After drunken orgy sex, females have regrets. And they translate their regret into rape, but that doesn’t make it so.”
- @HMDatMI on the Cornell 7 💪💪💪
Stefan Lujarczyk retweeted
The eternally-validated Camille Paglia on the Cornell case.
"The sexual revolution must be undone because middle-class women can't handle it. They cannot take responsibility for their own actions."
