Professor @Penn @perryworldhouse. Former DASD for Force Development and Emerging Capabilities. Defense, #AI, and innovation. Always Boston. Views my own.

Philadelphia, PA
Joined November 2008
Super cool survey on AI use in the public sector!
We know far more about governing AI than about governing with it. InnovateUS' first Observatory of Public Sector AI report asks 106,000+ public servants in all 50 states + DC how they use AI and what stops them. Here’s what we found ↓
1
4
719
🔥🔥🔥 indeed!
With the Celtics season starting (at 3pm on a Tuesday?), I will register my hot take for the year: Payton Pritchard makes the All-Star Team while Jaylen Brown does not.
2
2
708
FWIW, not sure those things are mutually exclusive. Doesn't all the "normal tech" view require is thinking that past general purpose tech helps us understand likely AI impacts?
It’s weird that the CEO of Hugging Face continues to be an “AI is normal technology” guy despite being the victim of an autonomous cyberattack by a swarm of rogue agents, arguably the least normal thing AI has done so far.
1
524
Michael C. Horowitz retweeted
Belatedly sharing @mchorowitz’s important piece. “Iran has shown that weaker states are no longer priced out of the military power game, and the United States has discovered that stronger states are not guaranteed the upper hand in major battles.” foreignaffairs.com/iran/how-…
2
4
904
Michael C. Horowitz retweeted
“The U.S.-Israeli war on Iran shows that the age of precise mass is here,” writes @mchorowitz. “Tehran has demonstrated how less powerful countries can stymie more powerful ones in the modern battlefield.” foreignaffairs.com/iran/how-…
1
4
12
6,567
Michael C. Horowitz retweeted
Ever wondered what the difference b/w killer robots, autonomous weapons systems, lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS), and AI-enabled weapons? In our latest visual explainer for @CFR_org @mchorowitz and I created a taxonomy to break it down. cfr.org/articles/the-autonom…
3
14
1
37
2,780
There are real frontier AI safety issues - but those are different than issues surrounding autonomous weapon systems and we'll make better policy choices if we understand that!
The debate over autonomous weapons and the debate over frontier AI safety are about different problems, argue experts @mchorowitz and @Lauren_A_Kahn. To regulate them, policymakers need a framework to address it, they write. “Everyone wants autonomy to be a clear binary, yes or no. . . . In reality, autonomy is a spectrum defined by the technology being used and the human choices that are made to employ a weapon system. The question isn't, ‘Is it autonomous?' but rather, ‘How autonomous is it?'” “What few people understand is how much autonomy is already in modern military systems—and has been for decades,” they write. Read their analysis: cfr.org/articles/the-autonom…
3
27
1,328
Michael C. Horowitz retweeted
Really important contribution to the national security and LAWS dialogue here by @mchorowitz and @Lauren_A_Kahn! Strongly recommend!
1
2
6
549
Essential - most current or planned autonomous weapon systems have nothing to do with frontier AI!
Replying to @Lauren_A_Kahn
Critical to remember at this point that autonomy ≠ AI. Autonomous weapon systems are a subset of all weapon systems, and weapon systems using AI are a subset of those. An autonomous weapon may or may not use AI. AI is just one approach to how autonomy functions.
1
14
1,142
Michael C. Horowitz retweeted
@mchorowitz and I have found it most helpful to think of every weapon as fitting into one of 5 possible types. There are 3 basic types: unguided, semi-autonomous, and autonomous. Semi-autonomous and autonomous weapon systems can then ea be either supervised or unsupervised
1
7
9
432
Check out this incredible thread from @Lauren_A_Kahn explaining everything you need to know on AI and weapons, based on our @CFR_org piece! ⬇️⬇️⬇️
3
18
1,787
Michael C. Horowitz retweeted
The debate over autonomous weapons and the debate over frontier AI safety are about different problems, argue experts @mchorowitz and @Lauren_A_Kahn. To regulate them, policymakers need a framework to address it, they write. “Everyone wants autonomy to be a clear binary, yes or no. . . . In reality, autonomy is a spectrum defined by the technology being used and the human choices that are made to employ a weapon system. The question isn’t, ‘Is it autonomous?’ but rather, ‘How autonomous is it?’” “What few people understand is how much autonomy is already in modern military systems—and has been for decades,” they write. Read their analysis: cfr.org/articles/the-autonom…
5
20
1
39
4,626
Low cost precise mass is shaping wars around the world - time for the US to adapt!
The war in Iran has shown that the age of “precise mass—or high-volume, low-cost, precision-guided weapons—is well underway,” writes @mchorowitz. foreignaffairs.com/iran/how-…
1
1
13
1,105
Michael C. Horowitz retweeted
When it comes to offensive capacities, “the military gap between rich states and poor ones” has closed, writes @mchorowitz. How can the United States maintain its edge in this new era of warfare? foreignaffairs.com/iran/how-…
2
1
3
4,767
Michael C. Horowitz retweeted
1/ Article now officially out in @ISQ_Jrnl! Every day, we hear about how disruptive technologies are "breaking" international security. AI. Quantum. Biotech. Hypersonics. If alarm bells are sounding, isn't it time to regulate? Yet policymakers almost always wait. 🧵
2
12
1
26
1,542
Michael C. Horowitz retweeted
Fantastic time for Foreign Affairs to re-up this excellent @mchorowitz piece. You don’t need to match forces if you can enforce de facto air or sea blockades, or take energy or information infrastructure offline with cheap, precise mass.
A new era of warfare has begun—one in which “weaker states are no longer priced out of the military power game” and “stronger states are not guaranteed the upper hand in major battles,” writes @mchorowitz. foreignaffairs.com/iran/how-…
1
3
325