mensallobos

Excess mortality estimates from 2020 to 2023, using the Australian Bureau of Statistics Official Serfling model, reveal that 8,744 more Australians died in 2023 than would be expected from pre-pandemic mortality levels. No equivalent estimates using that methodology have been published for 2024 or 2025, and on 3 July 2026 the ABS introduced a further change, adopting a Generalised Additive Model (GAM) incorporating mortality data from COVID-affected years into its expected deaths baseline. I asked the ABS why. To hear more from me and stay up to date, signup to my email newsletter here: alexantic.com.au/join

Dr. Caroline Wheeler has been made a scapegoat by her own profession. I do wonder how some of her colleagues sleep at night before waking up and looking in the mirror without a flicker of disgust at what they see reflected back. @nzdsos A travesty. archive.ph/20260218052536/ht…

New Zealand has a problem in that it is not that people do not believe there is judicial corruption, it is that they do not want to acknowledge it. A prime example being Paul Goldsmith sacking and stacking the Criminal Cases Review Commission with "government friendly" lawyers.

🚨 HIDDEN DNA CONTAMINATION IN THE PFIZER COVID-19 VACCINE A Massive, Ignored Oncogenic Threat A presentation by @Kevin_McKernan, a genomics expert with deep roots in the Human Genome Project This presentation was recently given to Commissioners of Phase 2 of New Zealand’s Royal Commission of Inquiry into COVID-19 Lessons Learned. “If you look through the vaccine history and the literature, you'll know that the SV40 virus contaminated the polio vaccines, and there's a large debate in the literature that's been going on for decades as to its implication in cancer. When you give SV40 viruses to cell lines and to tissues you will get cancers, there's no question about that.....in the laboratory, this virus is one of the most potent oncogenic viruses we know of. We don't have the whole virus in these vaccines, we have some of the more carcinogenic components of that virus in the vaccines however, and I'm going to touch on some of the papers that point that out. These sequences are very functional and they have consequences when they are left behind inside of a vaccine.” “The DNA sequence that's in there is known as the SV40 promoter in the enhancer region, that's one of the regions, there's also an SV40 origin of replication that we'll touch on, and there's an SV40 polyA signal. Those are the three main pieces of DNA that are in there. The SV40 enhancers are used in gene therapy plasmids, these are nuclear targeting sequences, so these transcription factors bind to that sequence and drag it, and everything connected to it, into the nucleus of the cell. So when you hear a lot of the responses to this work, they’ll say, ‘Oh, it doesn’t matter, it’s never going to get to the nucleus.’ There are two things wrong with that statement: firstly, there’s a nuclear targeting sequence that guarantees it will get to the nucleus, secondly, these lipid nanoparticles go to cells that are dividing, and when cells divide, there is no nuclear envelope protecting the DNA. They have to go through cell division, and that dissolves during that process. So when they’re talking about this not getting to the nucleus, these people are doing a smoke screen on you. They’re not being honest about the fact that cells divide, and when cells divide, there is no protection of this DNA. That’s something to watch out for when you see people saying it doesn’t get to the nucleus, that's a sign they are trying to lie to you.” “The other literature out there shows that this SV40 promoter and enhancer binds to the p53 gene. The p53 gene is the guardian of your genome, it's a tumour suppressor gene. You don’t want anything binding to that gene, otherwise you may see an impact in cancer. This is very important given the literature we have now on the spike protein itself also inhibiting the expression of the p53 gene. Now we've got two reasons to be concerned about p53: the DNA in there interferes with it to some degree, and we know the spike protein plays a role in that pathway as well, so there's an oncogenic concern here. There is also listed literature now demonstrating that this particular sequence is known as a ‘hyper mutability element,’ it will induce mutations in DNA near it, potentially leading to tumourigenic activity. So when they say there is no function to this DNA, you can point to these three papers and say, no, there’s published function of this DNA that needs to be explained. This is not something you can dismiss by saying, well, they forgot to tell us about it. No, it’s very relevant, and there’s a reason they forgot to tell you about it: they didn’t want you to know this was in there. And you'll see that this lines up with some of their future business interests.” “The kicker here is that we’re now finding these sequences not just in the vaccine, but we're finding them in people. We don’t know if it’s integrated, but it’s there. These are studies that weren’t looking for it, and the methods they used arguably suppressed the signal significantly. There's at least five peer reviewed studies that have come out looking at RNA sequencing in vaccinated and unvaccinated people. If you dig through that data on NCBI, you can take all those reads, map them against the plasmids from the vaccine manufacturers, and you can find that DNA in these patients. There's a study from Ryan et al. that looked at 75 people in Australia, and there's a great study from Chakraborty that went though that data and demonstrated that both the Ryan paper and the Odak paper have Moderna and Pfizer vaccine sequences in the patients’ blood. So this means that the blood supply is contaminated. That’s a very serious issue if the blood banks aren’t looking for it and are re-injecting this into other people. This would normally have caused an enormous halt in any other scenario, once you find components of the vaccine that were never declared and have links to oncogenic sequences, and they are now floating around the blood supply, and no one’s doing anything about it. That should be a concern to everybody in the transfusion field.” Please retweet. @SimeonBrownMP @TanyaUnkovichMP @ChrisPenknz

Nothing will change until people stop voting and start disobeying.

But wouldn't most be suspicious at least of "we can't produce a COVID isolate because it is too small to see" or even better in 5 years, 194 WHO member states, UNC Chapel Hill, EcoHealth Alliance, NIAID, NIH, US DoD have been unable to produce COVID in vivo? Reality.......please.

"Once they have control of your transactions... they can dictate what food you can and cannot buy." Ex-investment banker Catherine Austin Fitts: Control of the food supply is one of the driving forces behind the push to roll out CBDCs. "They're pushing to control the food supply... The idea is we get rid of farmers, we kill any naturally-grown food, and we engineer food in manufacturing plants and laboratories." "Once they have control of your transactions... they can dictate what food you can and cannot buy. So if they don't want you buying pizza, you can't buy pizza. If they want you to buy pizza made with insect-based flour, that's what you're gonna get." "If they succeed in [putting farmers and fishermen out of business], you and I will be eating lab-grown meat. That's their plan."

The X Artice "The Injustice of Justice in New Zealand" has the disgraced Litigation Assistant assuring the appellant he cannot win his case because she has been close friends with the presiding judge, Christine Montague for over 20 years. So yes, I take your point.

We need to understand that borrowing from the same WEF organisations that we owe, directly and indirectly, almost all of our debt to, breeds and encourages this behaviour. WEF members cannot be members of parliament, it is quite simple. It is a conflict of interest.

💥PRESIDENT TRUMP withdraws the United States from the World Health Organization 👍 @winstonpeters @dbseymour

Do some people really think that she's some sort of saviour?

GO AWAY you silly old woman ! Enough of your insane and uber-controlling ideas ! Just retire already! Off to a nice quiet retirement village and leave the world alone. What a bloated ego this creature has!! No one with a scrap of intellect or independence of spirit , likes her or trusts her. I can't even be bothered remembering her name here.

94 member states. How did countries vote for the approval of the Pandemic Treaty? - 124 Member States voted for the approval (including NZ) - no objections - 11 abstained from voting (Bulgaria, Egypt, Iran, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, the Netherlands, Paraguay, Poland, ussia, and Slovakia). The voting rights of Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Comoros, Dominica, Lebanon, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Venezuela, and Yemen are suspended due to non-payment of arrears. The WHA decided that if Cameroon, Grenada, Myanmar, Panama, and Saint Lucia were still in arrears at the date of the opening, their voting rights should be suspended. The Secretariat reported that Comoros, Bolivia, and Iran had cleared their arrears, removing the risk of suspension of their voting privileges. Algeria received sufficient funds to avoid being listed as at risk of having its voting rights suspended at the next World Health Assembly. @nzdsos @HopeRising19 @MRobertsQLD @P_McCulloughMD @DrDMartinWorld @lawrie_dr @jamesroguski @ConceptualJames

Early on I asked my police shadow a straight up question in his capacity as Officer of the Law: "...can I ask you a straight question...and your hypothetical response as a policeman? Say, for example, an employee (say a person who was extremely law-abiding and had NEVER been arrested before) was seeing a lot of seriously bad things happening in a job he was doing that could/should warrant police attention - for example, the employer was causing a LOT of people to die by inadvertently giving them a product that was dangerous and provably so. Would that person be able to go to the police to voice these concerns? Or would it be for the employee to go only to the employer even though they believed the employer to be 'not interested' in these concerns. I am unaware of the rules in that scenario. Please let me know what is the best course of action in this hypothetical instance. As an officer of the law, you should be able to tell me.." His response: "I’m sorry, but I won’t be commenting on the hypothetical that you have posed." I asked again: "As an officer of the Law in an official capacity, surely you have to reply to that scenario? As a citizen asking advice from a police officer, what would your recommended course of action be?" He did not reply to this. Under the Protected Disclosures Whistle Blowers Act 2022 the @nzpolice are actually an appropriate authority to make these disclosures to. As an appropriate Authority the police should at the very least: 1) Acknowledge the question and direct you to the Police’s protected disclosure process (e.g., their website or a specific contact). 2) Provide basic information about my right to make a disclosure to the Police, as outlined in s 12. 3) Refer you to another authority (e.g., the Ombudsman, who oversees protected disclosures) if unsure how to respond. Instead, his refusal to comment offered no guidance, which could be seen as a missed opportunity to fulfill the Police’s obligations under s 16 to inform potential whistleblowers about their rights. @nzpolice maybe you need to remember this for next time before you send 8 armed cops to smash into someones home? I didn't do anything wrong. The @nzpolice have failed to act appropriately. @NZPoliceMedia @NZPoliceAssn