Troubleshooter for large enterprises. Semi retired. Love the U.S.A. Interested in serious causes. Don't suffer fools well.
Joined November 2024
- Tweets786
- Following15
- Followers20
- Likes8.6K
One could hardly argue the New Zealand government are hiding their WEF subservience.
The elephant in the room. Despite parliament and media's best efforts, the whole world is aware New Zealand is completely WEF owned. Filibuster and braggadocio aside, everything WEF has instructed successive New Zealand governments to do, they have obliged.
1
6
113
It appears you were absolutely correct in your assessment and prediction @PlatonianFire . The New Zealand WEF government have admitted their guilt.
teapawt.net/nzdsos/status/19554603…
Continuing with the COVID Inquiry on these terms must be unbearable for those affected. It is an insult to all New Zealanders witnessing the commissions attempts at justifying the evil perpetrated. "...lessons have been learned..." and "...mistakes were made..." are vomit.
1
11
135
It is disgraceful from the Inquiry. We need to know why criminals who knowingly and wilfully ignored the hippocratic oath and obligations to the people of New Zealand are being asked to try and justify their belligerent malevolence. Nobody wants to hear from these criminals.
Who is inviting the governments vaccine purveyors to testify at the Inquiry? It is this sort of bias, unwarranted, unnecessary, and selective testimony that supports the "theatre" and futility of the Inquiry.
1
9
66
Many, including former judges, have complained of no judicial oversight in New Zealand. So, yes, by example judges have repeatedly demonstrated their ability to ignore the law with impunity. It is impossible for Barry Young to receive a fair trial.
New Zealand justice system is unique in the western world in that judges often prefer hearsay over physical evidence. Nothing establishes that fact better than @PlatonianFire 's X Articles "The Injustice of Justice in New Zealand" It leaves Barry in an unenviable position.
8
66
Did you read Ari Stotle's plan on Telegram? It may still be there. He outlined the process suffice to say, those wanting to stay in power will initiate the bloodshed, even if the people are within their rights to remove their government.
There doesn't have to be blood to overthrow a government. It is actually quite simple. Just make sure you have a succession plan before you do it.
10
47
It is incredible their complete and utter contempt for the laws they are charged with upholding. They have any and all respect for themselves. Disgracefully wanton belligerent behaviour.
Yes, it does come back to the judges and court staff refusing their duty of office under the Senior Courts Act 2016, the Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005, the High Court Rules 2016, the Victims’ Rights Act 2002, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, and the Crimes Act 1961.
9
51
Nice to know New Zealander's can rely on the honesty and integrity of their judiciary [sic]. ffs ...when did New Zealand become a third world world country...actually worse that that?
X Article "The Injustice of Justice in New Zealand. Part 4" has Justice Christine Montague refusing government supplied evidence MSD, IRD, and MOH. Preventing the respondent from speaking, not allowing his children's testimony, admitting false testimony, and manufacturing evidence. This is all on the hearing recording.
3
26
Isn't the question: How can the Australian government consistently, persistently, and belligerently ignore the will of the people without consequences? Far from alleviating public anger, It confirms Government guilt and complicity.
Destroying the evidence?
I feel very sorry for anyone who had this shot. 💉💀
A ‘globally significant’ bank of biosamples from a study into the immune effects of Covid vaccines is set to be destroyed, two years after the award-winning research project was defunded by the Queensland Government.
Intended “to better understand the short, medium and long-term impacts of COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines in Queensland,” the QoVAX Safety and Efficacy Statewide Study boasted 10,000 adult participants across 86% of postcodes, both vaccinated and unvaccinated, generating over 100,000 biospecimens and 11 million data points.
canberradaily.com.au/queensl…
1
5
32
It is bizarre, beyond Orwellian, that the New Zealand Government would go to these lengths. The evidence must be damning to say the least.
$Millions of dollars spent breaking their own laws to prevent one mans recorded evidence being heard. Makes a mockery of New Zealand's Justice system. And confirms their guilt.
8
33
This is what happens with years of judicial misconduct covered up, hidden from public scrutiny. It will only get worse. In this case alone, the number of crimes by the court registrars and judges makes it clear why the legal firms feel free to exploit the corruption.
If you have read any of the X Articles in the series "The Injustice of Justice in New Zealand" by @PlatonianFire the judges are maintaining they are entitled to break New Zealand laws and their rules of conduct. Sickening.
8
41
There wouldn't be many New Zealander's that don;t recognise New Zealand's WEF status. Look at every bill passed in the last 7 years. New Zealand is the only country in the world that has implemented every single one of WEF's policy directives.
It is WEF policy. You have strong leadership, Luxon does exactly as he is told. Some take longer than others to recognise the reality of New Zealand's WEF flagship status.
3
28
The X Articles in the series "The Injustice of Justice in New Zealand" Minister for Courts denies her portfolio responsibilities. The Minister of Justice asserts he is not responsible for matters of justice. Hence, judges break the law because there are no consequences.
I challenge you to find a single government department or commission that will uphold its duty of office and oath to the people of New Zealand. Judicial Conduct Commissioner, Attorney General, Minister of Justice, Minister for Courts all refuse their defined roles in legislature.
4
22
Couldn't agree more.
They are relying on ignorance and apathy. Especially with what we have known for some time about what was called "polio." Herbicide, insecticide, chemical poisoning is just that, poisoning. The WHO's desperation for relevance does not justify their actions, as well they know.
3
20
You will find that as the WEF lose ground on the moral and ethical front worldwide, their expectations from the New Zealand WEF government will increase. This being an example of that.
@mrs_wiggley there wouldn't be too many New Zealander's that don't know they are not Ukrainian soldiers. Conscious New Zealander's that is. Unless Seymour, Luxon, and Peters are claiming everything they have been saying about Ukraine for the last 5 years is a lie.
9
26
Great idea. Rather deal directly with a WEF Commissioner as at least you know what you're getting. No need for 123 paid sycophant messengers. Billions in savings.
That is a very, very good point. New Zealand does not need traditional structures of governance as they are taking instruction directly from the WEF. Think of the savings in MP's salaries, the waste in the theatre of parliament. New Zealanders would be instantly $B better off.
2
23
Correct. Reading the X Articles by @PlatonianFire "The Injustice of Justice in New Zealand." No consequences for judicial corruption even with confessions written in the hand of the offending judges. Judicial Commissioner, High Court and Court of Appeal complicit.
I believe corruption in NZ is so rife it would surprise even the most suspicious of us.
And I also think if it were to ever surface, very little would be done about it.
3
21
David Graeber's book "Bullshit jobs" recognises what the DOGE recognises, and more recently New Zealand's David Seymour. These positions are merely theatre, perception. Dead weight. They add to the tax payer burden and need to be culled.
It is pretty much accepted in New Zealand that the Judicial Commissioner merely clips the ticket. From the "Injustice of Justice in New Zealand" X Articles, he has the judges confessions before him and, in failing his duty of office, refuses to act.
4
54