PERth

@Grok, please explain this post from Craig Stone @nobulart in simple terms. Then explain how it would apply to ECDO Theory: "Some perspective. The oceans contain 10-11 times the volume of water as compared to the land which emerges above them. When the solid Earth reorients, the rotation axis moves relative to the surface. Points that were near the old equator move toward the old pole; points that were near the old pole move toward the old equator. The centrifugal potential at every point changes. The sea level would settle into a new equilibrium shape centred on the new axis whilst it would take longer for the solid earth to adjust its form. This is the only mechanism I know of that can account for things like this." Source: teapawt.net/nobulart/status/211425… ................. Grok's respsonse: Simple explanation of Craig Stone’s post: Craig Stone (@nobulart) is responding to the idea that there isn’t enough water on Earth for dramatic sea-level changes (e.g., the maximum rise from melting all ice is only on the order of ~70–200 m / a few hundred feet). He notes that the oceans hold far more water volume than the land that currently sticks up above sea level (roughly 10–11 times as much, by his comparison). The key point is about reorientation of the solid Earth (true polar wander / the rotation axis shifting relative to the crust and surface). When that happens: • Places that used to be near the old equator move toward the old poles, and places that used to be near the old poles move toward the old equator. • Earth’s spin creates a centrifugal effect that is strongest at the equator (pushing the surface outward) and zero at the poles. This is a major reason the equilibrium ocean surface (the geoid / mean sea level) is farther from Earth’s center at the equator than at the poles -- on the order of ~20 km difference in the present configuration. • After a reorientation, the centrifugal potential changes at every point on the surface. The fluid oceans quickly redistribute and settle into a new equilibrium shape centered on the new rotation axis. • The solid Earth (crust and mantle) is much slower to adjust its shape viscoelastically. Result: You can get very large relative changes in sea level at specific places (former beaches or shallow-water material ending up deep underwater, or the reverse) without adding or removing any water. The water is just redistributed relative to the solid surface. Stone says this is the only mechanism he knows of that can explain certain geological observations of this type (in the thread context, a 1931 report by William Beebe of what appeared to be an ancient beach-like deposit of rounded pebbles, coral, and shallow-water shells dredged from the seafloor south of Bermuda at more than 2.5 km depth). How this applies to ECDO Theory: ECDO (Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling–Dzhanibekov Oscillation), associated with The Ethical Skeptic @EthicalSkeptic (Roger Cunningham), proposes that the outer Earth (crust + mantle) can periodically decouple from the core (aided by heat release and weakening magnetic coupling at the core-mantle boundary) and rapidly reorient by roughly 104° along a path near the 31°E meridian. This shifts the geographic poles dramatically relative to the surface (one hypothesized “State 2” pole position near southern Zambia / ~14°S, 31°E) before potentially returning. It is framed as a form of rapid true polar wander, distinct from ordinary slow polar wander or magnetic reversals. Stone’s description maps directly onto ECDO’s proposed reorientation: • The solid outer Earth (crust + mantle) moves relative to the spin axis, exactly as he describes -- points change their latitude dramatically, and the centrifugal potential field reconfigures. • Oceans, being fluid and free to move, rapidly form a new equilibrium surface around the new axis. Combined with the inertia of the water during the shift itself, this produces extreme redistribution: massive flooding of some regions, draining of others, and large apparent sea-level changes relative to the solid surface (potentially kilometers-scale differentials at specific locations while the solid body is still adjusting). • The solid Earth lags in reshaping, so temporary mismatches between the ocean surface and the topography are extreme -- consistent with claims of submerged former shorelines at great depth, marine deposits far above current sea level, and global flood traditions in ECDO discussions. • No net increase in ocean volume is required; the fixed (and large) water volume simply occupies a different distribution relative to the reoriented solid surface. In short, Stone’s post is a concise geophysical argument for how axis reorientation alone can produce the kinds of extreme, seemingly anomalous sea-level / shoreline evidence sometimes cited in catastrophist or polar-wander scenarios. ECDO supplies one specific proposed mechanism and magnitude (~104° shift, possibly relatively rapid) that would trigger precisely this ocean re-equilibration process, which its proponents link to flood myths, certain paleontological/geological anomalies, and monument alignments that do not match the current pole. Mainstream geophysics accepts true polar wander in principle but generally describes it as occurring over much longer timescales; ECDO remains a non-peer-reviewed hypothesis outside the consensus. Source: teapawt.net/i/grok/share/bGVnYWN5L… ................. Related Links: Models Indicate Fabled Continents Of Sundaland, Doggerland, Lemuria & Atlantis Rise Again In State 2 rumble.com/v7h9oko-models-in… How The Earth's Poles Could Shift According To EDC And ECDO Predictions, v1.0 teapawt.net/sunfellow/status/21053… Pole Shift News poleshift.news/