Replying to @Alexphysics13
I mean now that they have a chance at reuse and have revenue generating flights they want as many nines as reasonably possible.
They can improve performance Falcon 9 style while ramping cadence.
Replying to @Alexphysics13
Reliably can have a lot of different meanings and contexts
Replying to @varifrank
I mean, I get it. With their homegrown cruise missiles and drones, and Starlink unrestricted in Russia? They could pilot drones through the halls of the Duma.
But the US won't let them do that any more than we will enforce a no-fly zone.
Replying to @pronounced_kyle
How about a battleship? We could remove the turrets and replace them with one giant gun of some sort...
Replying to @TMFAssociates @GareyJones
Yes? There's an obvious difference with regard to arms control
Replying to @AFResearchLab @SpaceX
Questions: could you fit a Marine with some oxygen in there? How many? Could they survive reentry and landing with a nice pillow perhaps?
Just curious.
Replying to @jessesingal
Russia could deny nearly all of LEO if they wanted, it's not that hard. It's just indiscriminate and would piss off literally every other country on Earth.
Replying to @kabrutusdeid
How bad could it be?
*checks location*
Oh. Hmm. That's a tough one, man, not gonna lie.
Replying to @Bakoba225
Should they cut all Starlink accounts in Ukraine?
Sounds good to me.
Replying to @MKjrstad @Pablo_1791
Man fuck Ukraine. I say shut it off entirely and let them use Oneweb.
Enjoy your $9000 terminals that weigh 50 lbs.
Replying to @AngelicaOung
It's been almost 5 years now. Hard to tell what's changed at a glance over the last 3 years.
Pouring money and lives into a woodchipper indefinitely is a hard sell to third parties, at least.
Replying to @AndrewHard96304
Tbf lunar mass drivers probably need to be regulated like strategic weapons.
Replying to @shashj
The funniest part is that it was the crackdown and whitelisting to prevent Russian Starlink use that made the bootleg Ukrainian use obvious.
Replying to @PolymarketIntel
What is the US getting out of this aside from a lot of irritation and additional financial and military commitments?
Replying to @Blaze_R935
It would also cost like half the federal budget. The fifth amendment exists
Replying to @DastDn
Deal with who? For what? Commercial aviation service? Which also does not allow military use and costs a couple grand a month?
Funniest part: a) private pilots has been grumbling about this for months and b) eliminating Russian use of Starlink is partly why this happened.
Replying to @mrfundman
No. I’m impatient. I’ll take the slightly elevated risk.


