
Bede vs Gregory of Tours. Medieval Movies & links to history podcasts. Antiques friendly Moving permanently to @morangles.bsky.social
Humberside
Joined January 2009
- Tweets164K
- Following301
- Followers1.4K
- Likes174K
T S P retweeted
In 1851 a fourteen year old girl named Olive Oatman watched most of her family killed on a trail in Arizona and was taken.
Five years later she walked into an Army fort with a blue tattoo across her chin.
She spent the next forty seven years being asked about it, and the version everybody read was written by somebody else.
The Oatmans were Mormons who had joined a splinter sect called the Brewsterites, following a man who said the promised land lay at the junction of the Gila and the Colorado. The party fell apart in New Mexico, and Olive's father took his own family on alone.
On March 18, 1851, on the Gila River trail, a group of men approached the wagon and asked for food and tobacco. Royce Oatman gave them almost nothing. They attacked.
Her parents and four of her siblings were killed. Her older brother Lorenzo was beaten, thrown down an embankment and left for dead. He survived. Olive, fourteen, and her sister Mary Ann, seven, were taken.
Olive later identified the attackers as Apache. Historians now believe they were almost certainly Tolkepaya, a Western Yavapai group.
The girls spent about a year with them, and that year was slavery. They hauled water and firewood, foraged, and were treated as property.
Then they were traded to the Mohave for two horses, some vegetables, blankets and beads. The trade happened because the daughter of a Mohave leader, a young woman named Topeka, kept pressing for it.
And here is where the story everyone has heard falls apart.
The Mohave did not hold them as slaves. They took them in. Topeka's mother, Aespaneo, looked after both girls and arranged for them to be given plots of land to farm. Olive was given a Mohave clan name, Oach, along with a personal name.
The clan name is the detail that matters. That is not something given to a captive. That is what you give to family.
The Mohave tattooed both girls on the chin and the arms.
Olive would later say it was a slave mark. It was not. Mohave women wore that tattoo. It was given to their own people so their ancestors would recognize them after death, and the pattern on her face is a Mohave pattern.
They were marking her as one of theirs.
Around 1855 a drought came and the food ran out. Mary Ann starved to death, and so did a great many Mohave. Olive nearly died with them. The reason she did not is that Aespaneo made gruel and kept feeding it to her.
In 1856 word got to Fort Yuma that a white woman was living with the Mohave, and the Army sent for her. The Mohave did not want to give her up. It took trade goods and a threat of reprisal to settle it. Topeka walked with her the twenty day journey to the fort.
She was nineteen. Within days she learned that Lorenzo was alive. He had spent five years looking for her.
And then the rest of it happened to her.
A minister named Royal B. Stratton wrote a book about her life, in her voice, published in 1857. It sold around thirty thousand copies and made her famous across the country. It described the people who had raised her for four years as savages, which is what the market wanted.
Stratton took the proceeds and used part of them to send Olive and Lorenzo to university. Then he put her on the road, lecturing, with the tattoo on display, telling the story the way his book told it.
But it kept leaking out around the edges. She spoke of the Mohave by name and with obvious warmth. She grieved for them. When the Mohave leader Irataba came to New York in 1864, Olive Oatman went to see him.
There is no evidence she ever married a Mohave man or had Mohave children, despite a century of rumor. What the record actually shows is a woman who had two families and lost both of them.
In 1865 she married a cattleman and banker named John Brant Fairchild, whom she met after one of her lectures. They moved to Sherman, Texas and adopted a daughter. She stopped lecturing. Stratton was not invited to the wedding and she never spoke to him again.
Fairchild went looking for copies of Stratton's book and burned them.
She had headaches and long stretches of depression for the rest of her life. She died of a heart attack in Sherman on March 20, 1903, at sixty five.
She lived forty seven years after she walked into Fort Yuma, in a country that could not stop staring at her face.
And the only full account of her life was written by a man who needed her to hate the people who kept her alive.
T S P retweeted
Replying to @angelalevin1
@angelalevin1 “Are you trying to blame this on me?”
That’s what you said to Louis Theroux after admitting a nurse at Stoke Mandeville Hospital told you Jimmy Savile was interfering with paralysed little girls in their beds.
You did nothing. You cited the libel laws, his powerful connections, and the millions he raised for hospitals.
Those connections included the Royal Family, the same royals you’ve spent years defending and writing about.
Jimmy Savile used that access and status to abuse hundreds of people (official reports later recorded 214 offences, dozens of rapes, victims as young as 8).
Now you go on TV to moralise about Meghan and her family.
The reality check is simple, you had information about one of Britain’s worst child sex offenders and stayed quiet.
Meghan was advised by police and her lawyers not to speak publicly about the disturbing allegations against her father while they were under investigation. She went no contact to protect her children, then faced years of attacks for “abandoning” him. Now people are criticising her for not publicly repeating those previously unsubstantiated claims, even though the police already knew and it was their job to handle them.
No one is asking Beatrice and Eugenie to address what they must have known about their father’s ties to Epstein: that he lied in the Newsnight interview about cutting all contact with Epstein after 2010, that he hosted Epstein at Beatrice’s 18th birthday in 2006 (two months after a US arrest warrant for sexual assault of a minor), or that their mother took both of them to lunch with him days after his 2009 release for soliciting a minor. And neither Beatrice nor Eugenie has cut their father off.
Funny how the double standard works.
#BeatriceandEugenie #EugenieandBeatrice #Eugenie #Beatrice #MeghanMarkle #MeghanSussex #DuchessofSussex
Replying to @brettachapman
@brettachapman When a Native tribe Yurok recovered some lands stolen by Uncle Sam.
🇺🇸🚨 APRÈS PLUS D’UN SIÈCLE, CETTE TRIBU RÉCUPÈRE 190 KM² DE SES TERRES ANCESTRALES !
En Californie, la tribu amérindienne Yurok a récupéré près de 47 100 acres, soit environ 190 km², le long de la rivière Klamath.
Achevé en juin 2025 après 23 ans d’efforts, ce transfert historique permet à la tribu de protéger ses forêts, ses cours d’eau et des habitats essentiels aux saumons.
(Associated Press)
T S P retweeted
After seeing comparisons between Barack Obama and Donald Trump giving speeches over the weekend, here's another comparison about how they each talk.
#Obama #Trump #presidential
Replying to @Tush27J
A per #JoshJohnson it never goes well when you debate the age of consent for a minor. Making adifferent between a child and a minor??? a child, any child be it a newborn or a 17yo, IS a minor.
Replying to @Tush27J
Is her ladyship aware this is being an accomplice into engaging actively into paedophilia and that in general it gets you a front seat at Old Bailey?
T S P retweeted
She didn't monetize her sacrifice—she answered the call.
The Senate hearing room went cold when the insult landed.
Tammy Duckworth sat across from J.D. Vance, waiting for him to answer her question. She'd come prepared with policy, with specifics, with the kind of detailed inquiry that veterans' issues demand. But instead of engaging, Vance chose a different route. He compared her to Forrest Gump.
Let that sink in for a moment. A sitting senator, facing a decorated combat veteran who'd left parts of herself on an Iraqi battlefield, thought a fictional character was the appropriate reference.
Duckworth's response was surgical. She didn't raise her voice. She didn't need to. When you've piloted a Black Hawk helicopter through hostile fire, when you've felt the explosion that tears through metal and bone, when you've woken up in a hospital missing both legs and part of an arm, petty insults from small men barely register.
November 12, 2004. That's the day her helicopter was hit by an RPG over Iraq. She was co-piloting, focused on her mission, when the world turned to fire and shrapnel. The rocket-propelled grenade destroyed her aircraft and nearly destroyed her. Most people would have let that be the end of their service story.
Duckworth spent a year in recovery at Walter Reed. She learned to walk again on prosthetic legs. Then she went back to work.
No book tour about resilience. No cable news circuit trading on sacrifice. She didn't monetize her Purple Heart or turn her injuries into a personal brand. She served in the Illinois National Guard, then ran for office to continue serving in a different capacity.
Retired Lieutenant Colonel. Combat veteran. Purple Heart recipient. The first disabled woman elected to Congress, then to the Senate. The first senator to give birth while in office, bringing her newborn onto the Senate floor because the rules hadn't contemplated a working mother who'd also taken shrapnel for her country.
When Vance tried his cheap shot, she treated it exactly like what it was: noise from someone who'd never answered a question he found uncomfortable. She'd faced real danger. She knew the difference between actual courage and performance art patriotism.
That's who Tammy Duckworth is. Remember it.
Replying to @sunnyfla2 @ScotchMist31
Mom home-made apple pie
Grandma peach pie
Sky high meringue lemon pie
plus coconut, cherry, blueberry, pecans. Rhubarb!!!
Pies. Pies. All sorts of pies.
And this is before we debate of whipped creamamd vanilla ice creal scoop. A la mode.
T S P retweeted
I bought this photograph online of a little girl from 1972 who was a member of my tribe (Ponca). She is named on the caption, and it may have probably been a media photo for a newspaper, but unfortunately, she died last year, so I am hoping to give it to one of her children
When @Telegraph & Simon Heffer say this book is pathetic, you know it has no redeeming quality whatsoever. Remember this man and this newspaper have always rooted for Tories. But LoopyLiz has proven too much loopy for them. @ScotchMist31
“Liz Truss’s new book is the most deranged thing I’ve ever read”
I will always remember how Nigel Farage effused on the day of Truss’s infamous budget… that it was the best budget he’d seen since the 1986.
The book is tempting. But I have things to do.
telegraph.co.uk/books/non-fi…


























