🤑 https://teapawt.net/t.co/E76I62t6wu 🌐 https://teapawt.net/t.co/7eQ8GpK2Gk ✨ https://teapawt.net/t.co/Pq8uCGs1VX ⚡ https://teapawt.net/t.co/LKDgjv3slz ⚙️ Building…
🇪🇺
Joined November 2014
- Tweets835
- Following779
- Followers251
- Likes584
What’s the point of announcing this if the fix is not yet released?
Security release pre-alert:
We will release new versions of Node.js 22, 24, and 26 release lines on or shortly, after 2026-11-11 in order to address security vulnerabilities.
The highest severity issue fixed in this release is HIGH.
nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerabi…
Yet another “book me a flight” demo
Agents should feel like a magical layer that makes things happen without constant human steering. They should understand the intent and work inependently.
Having multiple Claude accounts is inconvenient because when you switch you lose your chats.
Not anymore
I found an open-source tool that lets you move your chats along with your current account.
github.com/vitaliyhayda/clau…
DevDay
They’re cutting included usage in the $200 by 50%
Not a good start
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo
✨ You can now use Opus/Fable from the Codex App.
👉 Video one-shotted by Opus 5.5 in Codex.
🚀 I made it open source, link below.
I used to like @thsottiaux transparency when there were issues with codex.
This time he seems to be unusually quiet, we would appreciate some feedback from the team
When you run out of usage on Codex, you can sign in with a different account and your chats will still be there, so it is easy to continue working.
With claude, each accounts gets its own chats, so it is not so convenient to own multiple accounts.
With all the usage drama we're seeing in Codex, I think it would be a big win for Anthropic to let users share chats across different accounts
@trq212