For all of those that don't understand how Trump can simultaneously start wars and end them and that it's the same thing: 1. Venezuela was becoming encamped with Chinese and Russians. It was going to become vastly more difficult to root them out, and with Venezuela so close, the interference in American business was going to grow. The socialism in the Americas was going to get worse, not better. The gang violence and drugs into the US was going to get worse not better as China funded them and supplied them product for free for the sole purpose of undermining the American system (look it up, yes it was and still is happening). It had to be dealt with. It now is. Next stop, democratic elections. Along with it, will slowly but surely come the end to the Venezuelan gangs and human trafficking over our border. And the Chinese and Russians are out of Venezuela and now largely out of the entire Americas sphere of influence. 2. Cuba was being infested with Russians and Chinese just off our shores and as the Cuban government got ever more desperate. It should have been invaded and cleaned out decades ago and wasn't. It had to be dealt with to create a lasting peace in the Caribbean. And in the process the US gets access to the Vietnam of the Caribbean with lower skilled labor than Mexico which it needs for the manufacturing revolution that is building out care of Chinese demographic collapse. 3. Iran was a 50 boil on the back of the ass of the United States created by the London establishment as a proxy to drive up insurance and lending costs. The CIA was absolutely collaborative under what Kissenger created more in touch with MI6 than with the US government by his own admission. It's one of the biggest mistakes Reagan ever made not dealing with it immediately upon taking office. If you ever want the US out of the middle east, you must deal with Iran. Treaty obligations ensure we'd be back, but this time it would be with a nuclear Iran, and funded, backed and supplied by China and Russia. Right now China is weakened and gets weaker because of the lack of black market oil that was sustaining their economy. Russia is distracted and overextended in Ukraine and as a result can't help. Now was exactly the right time to deal with Iran once and for all and set the rest of the middle east on self protection by ending the proxies of Hamas, Hezbolah and Houthis once and for all. Once they're gone, you can then extract from the middle east entirely and let it devolve into the backwater it needs to be. Until then, leaving just ensures we'll be back and in far more force than before. 4. Greenland had a treaty with holes that was going to ensure that China was going to be developing minerals and extracting resources from Greenland within 10 years. The bases that they would have established to do so would have been used to spy on the US while the US was limited to a single military base and not able to install anti ICBM systems on Greenland. Trump has gotten everything he wanted and has ensured that no Chinese or Russian company can do anything on Greenland while giving the US unlimited military presence (which will be thin because of the reality of the environment) and access to all of the resources that Greenland has. This was a must, but short sighted people couldn't see that the Europeans were about to do to Greenland what they've done to their own industrial base: Sell it out to China lock, stock, and barrel. You MUST understand power vacuums. Trump does. He's setting things up so that the US can have a light touch on the world while reaping the benefits, taking over insuring and lending of international commerce as payment for the US protecting the world's oceans and making that international commerce safe. This ends London and the British Economic Empire and gets us paid for our services, while at the same time ensuring that less of those services will be required. It is the ultimate peace plan. Libertarians can't see it, not because they're too dumb, but because they refuse to think systematically about how you actually get what Libertarians want. This is the shortest path to that there is but they just want to take their toys and go home and expect that to go well. Democrats don't like this because then there is no money funnel to steal from and no kickbacks left in the corrupt economic system that all 3 of these created. ActBlue should have shown us the truth, so understand that the military industrial complex makes USAID look like penny candy in comparison. Trump is Hadrian right now. Yet you're fighting him while he's saving you. historyextra.com/membership/…

I’m not shocked.

Reminder: Islam exists to govern the phenomenally stupid. Smart Europeans cannot live in a society of stupid barbarians.

Men are being shafted constantly. This is why the rate of actual conviction for rape and false accusations of rape are roughly equal. You'd be shocked that false accusations are just as prevalent when they want to get revenge.

And correctly, you got community noted because you're embarrassingly wrong. The @AmerMedicalAssn should be forcing retraining on you, with punishment for pushing this bullshit and you should be blocked from all diabetes treatment or comment until you've been retrained and actually know what you're talking about. I've completely posterized you in this thread and you've completely exposed your vast ignorance right down to not understanding the mode of action for the disease.

Take it back. Push out the socialists/progressives/communists along I89 and i91, and then take all of Northern and Eastern Maine. When we're done there, take all of upstate NY north of I90. Open a major seaport in Eastern Greater NH and build a fuck ton of nuclear reactors.

You're mistaking (and so did the researchers) what the data actually show: Both want that. But for women long term relationships absent physical violence is low risk, high reward and even imperative for their lives historically until the last 60ish years. Their entire instinct and genetic makeup rewards it because it was for their very survival. Women today are ignoring that instinct and harming themselves in the process. Women withhold and trade sex in exchange for that relationship both initially and then to keep it over time. Children make this even more vital because of the risk to a woman while she is pregnant and caring for a infant and then until about 9-10 years of age her child requires the protection of the male. (you can see this in the data on fatherless households. It's horrific, not so motherless) For men, relationships are expensive. The overhead of caring for, protecting and providing for a woman is high. It always has been. Thus men gate-keep the relationship because of the overhead. It must be worth it and the right one for the reward to be worth the effort. More so with children. That's the genetic imperative to want said relationship but guarding it because it's expensive for the man unlike the woman. And then you have modern society which punishes men if the relationship goes bad with divorce rape and massively biased family courts which ensures that men are even more careful because it can literally end their lives (through suicide after being crushed by the courts into poverty) and bankrupt them. Meanwhile, the imperative for men to reproduce because men are expendable and women aren't because men can impregnate 9 women a day while a woman can't get pregnant more than once every ~10 months is what previously drove them into settling in relationships that they wouldn't otherwise agree to. But because sex is free and abundant for the top 30% of men, and non-existent for the bottom 70% of men now, that metric has changed. For the top men, they don't need a relationship to have sex (and tell their brains they're fulfilling the drive to reproduce) thus giving up a relationship when they can have an endless stable of women makes little sense given the expense and risk. And for the bottom 70% of men, there is no sex, and there are no women on offer at all until they're washed up and the top 30% are done and have discarded them and the women are forced to settle. But even then, these men know that, and they know that these women would trade up again given the opportunity, which ensures that these men are even more careful and suspect of the discards at age 30+ than they would be otherwise, because the cost to them is even higher than historical numbers would suggest. Worse still for the man, accepting the children of other men that had success with a woman infers more overhead without any genetic advantage because you're literally raising the child of another man's genetics putting in the effort he hasn't to care for his genes not yours. Feminists that live in cities and use capitalism and government to abstract their need for protection and care from men will of course get outraged by this as will the suck up men dining on the sloppy second left overs, but it is none-the-less true. This is why men control relationships: Their lives depend upon it. This is why women desire relationships: Their lives depend upon it.

🎯. Because once you do, all illegals are net losses by HUGE margins.

Yup.

Sexism is killing men.

The problem isn't that it makes them upset. It's that the only logical conclusion that comes from the data is that eugenics programs have worked. Even if they were unintentional: 1. Europe killed 1% of its violent, lazy and fraudulent people for 400 years. Because of the IQ/violence relationship they also raised IQ. Before that they banned cousin marriage. This was accidental eugenics that drove major improvements in IQ. A demographic map of the US shows this explicitly and the rest of the variation in the US is because of where people immigrated from in Europe/Britain (Saxons are the outlier intelligence across the Europeans both from Britain and from the continent). Scots were dumber and lazier in Appalachia, and North West Britons were the dumbest and laziest in the Antebellum south. Everyone else didn't go through the eugenics program. 2. East Asians valued and rewarded intelligence while killing their fraudsters and violent people and marginalizing all other negative traits to a high trust society for 1000 years. The extent for which a culture in east asia did so and which metric was most focused upon determines these traits almost perfectly with Japan and Korea being most like Europeans because they removed the fraudsters aggressively whereas China did not. 3. India's entire caste system is effectively an IQ sorting machine. The average IQ is 86, but they have so segmented based on IQ that the top tiers are as if not slightly more intelligent than Europeans with the bottom tiers phenomenally stupid to the point where basic sanitation is beyond them while they never sorted for fraud at all, so the entire culture top to bottom has it baked in and rewarded. 4. Islam rewarded violence and is a religion design to control stupid people. It breeds more stupid people and has the feature baked in of incest which furthers the function of the religion. And now with AI we're facing the vast majority of humans having no purpose at all with current IQs. Only the 125+ group have anything that they can contribute beyond AI which means that 95% of the population is basically going to be a welfare project and the less people have to work the more violent and destructive they get. Which is why people are really freaking out about the IQ conversation because it's genetic, we can do something about it, we need to do something about it, and the history of what humans do to do something about it is fucking horrific so the consequences of the entire conversation could look like 7 billion people eradicated in some form or another if another Hitler or similar comes along. So the real question is, how do we improve the human condition through improving IQ without it turning into a horror movie of immoral evil?

The evolution of a feminist online in a debate in a single thread. 1. My personal experience disproves your group statistics! 2. Nope, your personal experience is nicely encapsulated in the group statistics. 3. But that's not what I want so I'll come back with my lived experience bull shit. 4. That also doesn't matter but you do the feminist thing. 5. But but! 6. Seriously, here's reality, quit while you're behind and learn how to actually understand what you're talking about and statistics. 7. You're just wrong and I hate you you meany poopie head! One last bullshitism inesues. *blocked because truth fucking broke their brain* To be clear, male feminist suck ups looking for sloppy seconds sex after the men they actually want discard them, also do the same.

500 genes and counting on type 2 diabetes alone of which over 95% of Americans have at least one. Because no one understands that this is exactly what you'll get if you go looking for genetics when it's about behavior and just eating too much sugar. The worst type of correlation doesn't equal causation at scale in population medicine. It's the equivalent of trying to argue that IQ isn't genetic or the earth is the center of the universe.